Category Archives: RED CHINA -The Expansionist

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM :

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - RED CHINA - ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM : AT SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE WE ARE TRAINED TO RECOGNIZE RED CHINA AS AN ADVERSARY, AN OPPONENT, AN ENEMY WITH WHOM WE ARE ENGAGED IN A PROLONGED CONFLICT .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM : AT SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE WE ARE TRAINED TO RECOGNIZE RED CHINA AS AN ADVERSARY, AN OPPONENT, AN ENEMY WITH WHOM WE ARE ENGAGED IN A PROLONGED CONFLICT .

Bill Powell published a story in Newsweek magazine predicting a prolonged geopolitical struggle between the United States and Red China and named it Cold War-2. In his analysis, Red China is a tough adversary because of its economic power. He makes no mention about adversarial relationship between Tibet and Red China since 1950s. At Special Frontier Force, an alliance between the US, India, and Tibet, we have always recognized Red China as an adversary, an enemy, an opponent, and a party with which we are engaged in a prolonged conflict with a potential to secure our mission fighting a battle that aims to evict the occupier of Tibet. Special Frontier Force is a product of Cold War-1 and we are not waiting for the dawn of a “New Cold War” or “Cold War-2.”

Economics is the Science that deals with the production, distribution, and consumption of wealth. Red China’s economy is managed by a system of government that is involved in all the aspects of production, distribution, and consumption of its national wealth. A capitalist is a person who has capital, owner of wealth used in business. Capitalism is the economic system in which all or most of the means of production and distribution are privately owned and operated for profit. Communism is an economic theory or system in which a one-party political structure has the ownership of all property and manages the production and distribution of economic goods. In a Communist State, the economy is just another tool in the hands of one-party that governs the Land. Unlike capitalists in the West, Red China’s concern for earning profits is translated into implementing its Policy of Expansionism of which Economic Expansionism is one dimension.

Red China while expanding private ownership of property, its one-party government remains as the ultimate manager who makes decisions about production, distribution, and consumption of wealth. Red China brings raw materials and finds new markets for its manufactured products. Red China is able to get raw materials and flood the world markets with Made in China products with great ease without the need to conquer other countries fighting costly battles. American and other capitalists who directly or indirectly invest in Red China have no control over the one-party government that manages all the parts of its economic system. American and other foreign investors are primarily concerned about the profits they earn by giving Red China the power of production and distribution of goods. The one-party government of Red China is empowered by this capital inflow and by its ability to acquire raw materials from other nations without waging wars or by simply occupying territory of its weaker neighbors like Tibet.

Red China has steadily expanded its Economic Power which it uses to exert its political influence over weaker nations and even over developed nations in the West. Nixon-Kissinger US administration in 1972 formulated trade and commerce relations with Red China not knowing the nature of its one-party government. Red China is earning profits from its worldwide trade and those profits directly benefit to accomplish its goal of Expansionism to become a true Imperial Power.

In the years ahead, the United States and others will be left with no political alternatives to face the challenges posed by Expansionist Red China. The capitalists who invest in Red China have the only option of Economic Disinvestment.

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162, USA
SPECIALFRONTIERFORCE.ESTABLISHMENT22

A NEW COLD WAR, YES. BUT IT’S WITH CHINA, NOT RUSSIA

Newsweek

Bill Powell

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - RED CHINA - ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM : PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA CAME INTO ITS EXISTENCE ON OCTOBER 01, 1949 . AFTER ITS MILITARY INVASION AND OCCUPATION OF TIBET IN 1950, A GEOPOLITICAL STRUGGLE TOOK BIRTH TO EVICT THE OCCUPIER OF TIBET .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM : PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA CAME INTO ITS EXISTENCE ON OCTOBER 01, 1949 . AFTER ITS MILITARY INVASION AND OCCUPATION OF TIBET IN 1950, A GEOPOLITICAL STRUGGLE TOOK BIRTH TO EVICT THE OCCUPIER OF TIBET .

© Saul Loeb/Reuters Secretary of State John Kerry and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi shake hands prior to meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, May 16, 2015. The Soviet system failed because it didn’t work; China will be a tougher adversary.

Something that as recently as a decade ago was almost never discussed in polite company—the prospect for a prolonged geopolitical struggle between the United States and China (Cold War 2.0)—is now Topic A in the foreign policy salons of both Washington and Beijing. In the United States, the centrist Council on Foreign Relations issued a lengthy report calling for the U.S. to “revise” its “grand strategy” toward China. In Beijing, Liu Mingfu, a colonel in the People’s Liberation Army and one of its most influential strategists, wrote in his recent book, The China Dream, “In the 21st century China and the United States will square off and fight to become the champion among nations.’’

The current tension in the South China Sea, where Beijing is building artificial islands in the Spratlys, a contested chain claimed by six countries, certainly sounds like a Cold War in the making. The U.S. Defense Department let it be known in mid-May that it was considering sending surveillance aircraft and warships to within 12 nautical miles of the chain, as a signal to Beijing to back off. The Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry immediately condemned Washington for even thinking about it.

Meanwhile, nine Chinese and Russian warships came together for joint exercises in the Mediterranean Sea—the most recent evidence of the warmer ties between the two historical antagonists. A month earlier, Vietnam, deeply distrustful of Beijing, hosted a dozen U.S. defense contractors for meetings in Hanoi. They came just eight days before celebrations marking the 40th anniversary of Vietnam’s defeat of the United States.

War games, prospective weapons sales, a war of words over contested real estate in some far-flung part of the world. That’s all pretty much standard Cold War fare, familiar to anyone in Moscow or Washington who fought the last one. But a Washington vs. Beijing Cold War 2.0—should it prove to be unavoidable—would be very different from its predecessor.
The fundamental, obvious difference is that Beijing would bring far more economic power to the contest than the Soviet Union ever did. Indeed, for Soviet citizens, the enduring image from the last days of Communism is empty shelves at the food store. And pretty much everywhere the Soviets exerted their influence—from Eastern Europe to Africa to Latin America—economic calamity ensued. The command and control, state-dominated form of economic management didn’t work, and that—more than how many nuclear weapons Moscow possessed—was what mattered in the end.

Contrast that with China. Already the second-largest economy in the world, it may well surpass the United States as the biggest in a decade or so. While the state controls the commanding heights of the economy—banking, telecommunications, energy—it tries to do so in a market-friendly way, and it allows unfettered private enterprise in a range of industries (including, critically, high technology) that have helped drive China’s extraordinary three-decade-long ascent from poverty. Alibaba is but one recent example of a private Chinese company with an increasingly global footprint. Remember all those great Soviet companies with initial public offerings of billions of dollars on the NASDAQ or the New York Stock Exchange? Right. You don’t. Because there weren’t any.

China is in the business of deploying its economic power abroad in a big way. It invests heavily in infrastructure projects in Africa. It uses its massive foreign exchange reserves to buy up resources—oil, gas and minerals—throughout Africa and Latin America. This is often—inaccurately—described as “soft” power. Economic power is not the same as soft power. Soft power has to do with lots of things—the form of government, the transparency of government, the accountability of elites to the broad citizenry, what a country stands for and stands against. The projection of economic power means the ability to put money in local pockets. Beijing is doing that aggressively, and, given its enormous accumulation of foreign exchange reserves, it is in a position to continue to do so for quite some time, even as its frantic economic growth now slows.

The United States, in the view of many analysts, is in a different and arguably more difficult place. Its hard power—its military assets—still dwarfs China’s, even though Beijing has rapidly increased its defense spending in recent years. But the prospect of a Cold War between the two countries was—and to a certain extent still is—dismissed by many China hands in the U.S. because, as former National Security Council staffer Aaron Friedberg wrote last year in his book A Contest for Supremacy, “the enormous advantages the United States now enjoys are the product of its long-standing lead in the development and deployment of new technologies, and the unmatched ability of its huge and dynamic economy to carry the costs of military primacy.”

Is the United States still more technologically advanced than China? Absolutely. Is it still more innovative. Yes. But those leads are narrowing, and the U.S. plainly faces a host of domestic economic issues—from debt to demographics to an economy seemingly stuck at stall speed—that are daunting. As Friedberg wrote, “Whether [the United States] will continue to enjoy [its
economic advantages] in a long-term strategic rivalry with China is by no means obvious.”

The other critical difference between Cold War 1.0 and the Cold War 2.0 that now looms is the simple fact that China is the most important market in the world for the Fortune 500. By contrast, the Soviet Union, for 99.5 percent of America’s biggest companies, simply didn’t exist. Beijing can use access to its market as leverage in geopolitical disputes, and in so doing will be playing to a core establishment constituency in the United States: big business. As long as China avoids an economic crisis that upends the current economic reality, that reality is going to be difficult for Washington to finesse as geopolitical competition intensifies.

There is, of course, tremendous irony in that. For decades, U.S. policy was to help China succeed economically. We had convinced ourselves that through trade and prosperity, political change would come in Beijing (just as it had in South Korea and Taiwan, former authoritarian economic success stories turned vibrant democracies). That notion is now long gone. The
Chinese Communist Party, and its one-party rule, doesn’t appear to be going anywhere. It’s also playing a long game; its military is just a regional player now, but by 2049, when the party expects to celebrate its 100th anniversary in power, it may well be able to project force globally. That, anyway, is the intention of the more hawkish elements of the party and its military.

Washington had earnestly hoped that the days of a global struggle against a powerful adversary were gone, the stuff of history books. That it’s now waking up and acknowledging a different reality is step one in what Liu Mingfu calls the central “fight” for the 21st century.

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - RED CHINA - ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM : RED CHINA HAS DRAINED THE ECONOMIC POWER OF AMERICAN AND FOREIGN CAPITALIST WHO INVEST IN RED CHINA . THEY HAVE NO POLITICAL OPTIONS . THE ONLY CHOICE IS THAT OF ECONOMIC DISINVESTMENT .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – ECONOMIC EXPANSIONISM : RED CHINA HAS DRAINED THE ECONOMIC POWER OF AMERICAN AND FOREIGN CAPITALIST WHO INVEST IN RED CHINA . THEY HAVE NO POLITICAL OPTIONS . THE ONLY CHOICE IS THAT OF ECONOMIC DISINVESTMENT .

Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism

The Evil Red Empire – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism

Mao Zedong proclaims the founding of the People's Republic of China in Beijing on Oct. 1, 1949. HE WAS ENRAGED BY MOSCOW'S DECISION TO SUSPEND ASSISTANCE TO RED CHINA'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM ON JUNE 20, 1959. FROM THAT TIME RED CHINA PURSUED A VERY AMBITIOUS NUCLEAR POLICY TO COMPETE AGAINST UNITED STATES AND SOVIET UNION .
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: MAO ZEDONG PROCLAIMS THE BIRTH OF PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA ON OCTOBER 01,1949.  HE WAS ENRAGED BY MOSCOW’S DECISION TO SUSPEND ASSISTANCE TO RED CHINA’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM ON JUNE 20, 1959. FROM THAT TIME RED CHINA PURSUED A VERY AMBITIOUS NUCLEAR POLICY TO COMPETE AGAINST UNITED STATES AND SOVIET UNION .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : RED CHINA CONDUCTED ITS FIRST NUCLEAR TEST ON OCTOBER 16, 1964 AT LOP NOR, INSIDE OCCUPIED TIBET . FROM THAT TIME SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE STARTED MONITORING RED CHINA'S NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES INSIDE TIBET .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: RED CHINA CONDUCTED ITS FIRST NUCLEAR TEST ON OCTOBER 16, 1964 AT LOP NOR, INSIDE OCCUPIED TIBET . FROM THAT TIME SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE STARTED MONITORING RED CHINA’S NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES INSIDE TIBET .

The US Department of Defense in its annual report of 2015 informed the US Congress on Red China’s nuclear capabilities apart from its advances in conducting conventional warfare. Special Frontier Force has been assisting US in monitoring Red China’s nuclear activities after it conducted its first Nuclear Test on October 16, 1964 at Lop Nor, inside Occupied Tibet. It is the only site Red China uses for its nuclear tests. It is important to remember that US President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev agreed for the first Limited or Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty during 1963. Since that time United States is making a steady progress on Nuclear Disarmament issue with full cooperation from the Soviet Union and later Russia.

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM - NUCLEAR STRATEGY .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM – NUCLEAR STRATEGY. RED CHINA DEVELOPED AND DEPLOYED A VARIETY OF BALLISTIC MISSILES THAT CAN EASILY TARGET MOST PLACES IN THE UNITED STATES.

I ask my readers to recognize the role played by Soviet Premier Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev(April 17, 1894 to September 11, 1971) in curbing Red China’s nuclear ambitions. Khrushchev was the USSR Communist Party Secretary from 1956 and its Premier from 1958 to 1964. In 1956, in the 20th Communist Party Congress, he gave his famous six-hour “Secret Speech” denouncing “The Crimes of the Stalin Era.” After the US, Britain, France, and Soviet Union Geneva Summit Conference in July 1955, he formulated a policy of “Peaceful Coexistence” with the West. He traveled to the US in 1959 and 1960. He stopped assisting Red China’s Nuclear Program on 20 June 1959. His insistence on “Peaceful Coexistence” with the West contributed to a rupture with Red China’s Mao Tse-Tung or Mao Zedong. Khrushchev eased relations with the West but antagonized Red China. Nixon-Kissinger took advantage of this Sino-Soviet Split to formulate US-China Relations without any concern for Red China’s Nuclear ambitions. United States and Soviet Union held Strategic Arms Limitation Talks from 1969 to 1972 (SALT I), Strategic Arms Limitation Talks from 1972 to 1979 (SALT II), Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) from 1982, signed several treaties in 1972, 1987, 1991, 1993 and more recently in April 2010.

While US and Russia continue to make progress in reducing strategic offensive arms, Red China rapidly pursued a Nuclear Expansionism Policy to strengthen its nuclear offensive capabilities and to establish itself as a global superpower that can seriously challenge the US supremacy in both conventional and nuclear warfare. Nixon-Kissinger initiative to befriend Red China during 1970-72 has totally compromised the US Nuclear Strategy, a costly mistake that the US would regret forever. United States has underestimated the nature of Red China’s Imperialism.

Pentagon report: Chinese ballistic missiles can target nearly the entirety of the US

By Jeremy Bender

China now has dozens of nuclear-capable missiles that could target almost the entirety of the US, according to the Department of Defense’s 2015 report on the Chinese military.

The annual report to Congress focuses on China’s military modernization, possible invasion plans for the self-governing and US-allied island of Taiwan, advances in space technology, and Beijing’s rapidly advancing missile capabilities.

China’s conventional capabilities are improving. But Beijing also now has what could be considered the ultimate military asset for a rising superpower: the ability to deliver nuclear warheads nearly anywhere on earth (outside of South America, at least).

The following map from the report highlights the maximum missile ranges of China’s medium and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). The longest-ranging of the missiles, the CSS-4, can target almost the entirety of the US (except for Florida).

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM - NUCLEAR STRATEGY .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM – NUCLEAR STRATEGY. RED CHINA DEVELOPED AND DEPLOYED A VARIETY OF BALLISTIC MISSILES THAT CAN EASILY TARGET MOST PLACES IN THE UNITED STATES.

(Screenshot/Department of Defense)

The CSS-4 has the largest range of any Chinese ICBM. The missile is nuclear-capable, according to the DoD report, and is housed in silos across the Chinese countryside. Beijing is estimated to have between 50 and 60 silo-based ICBMs.

The DF-31A has the second-longest range of any Chinese missile. It is capable of hitting the majority of the US’ Pacific coast in addition to portions of the mid-West. Unlike the CSS-4, the DF-31A is a road-mobile missile. This means Beijing can move the ICBM to various points throughout the country to better target various locations and avoid possible incoming strikes.

The DF-31, the CSS-3, and the CSS-5 are all also road-mobile and nuclear-capable. But unlike the CSS-4 or the DF-31A, these missiles are intended for regional deterrence against neighboring powers like Russia and India.

Unlike the other land-based missiles on the chart, the JL-2 is a sea-based nuclear-capable ballistic missile. According to the DoD, the JL-2 will be carried by China’s future JIN-class ballistic missile submarine as a nuclear deterrent. So far China has commissioned four JIN-class submarines with a fifth one under construction. The Pentagon report expects the JIN to begin patrols in 2015.

the evil red empire nuclear submarine 2009 plan type094 02
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE –  JL-2  IS  A  SEA-BASED  NUCLEAR-CAPABLE  BALLISTIC MISSILE CARRIED BY RED CHINA’S JIN-CLASS  BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINE.

(Navy Office of Legislative Affairs) A Chinese JIN-class submarine

The improvement in China’s nuclear deterrent has been spurred by developments in countries that China might consider to be its strategic competitors.

China modernized its missile forces because of “continued advances in the US and, to a lesser extent, Russian strategic ISR [Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance], precision strike, and missile defense capabilities,” the report notes.

Likewise, India’s own nuclear force has put pressure on China to continuously update and better its own capabilities.

Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism since 1964 while the US and the Soviets/Russia were engaged in Arms Control Negotiations:  

I included photo images of historical progress being made by US and Soviet Union to reduce nuclear tensions by limiting offensive nuclear weapons and limiting antiballistic missiles.

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM - DURING COLD WAR ERA, BOTH THE US AND SOVIET UNION TRIED TO REDUCE TNSIONS . JULY 1955 GENEVA CONFERENCE . LEFT TO RIGHT: SOVIET PREMIER NIKOLAI BULGANIN, US PRESUDENT DWIGHT EISENHOWER, FRENCH PRIME MINISTER EDGAR FAURE, AND BRITISH PRIME MINISTER SIR ANTHONY EDEN .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM – DURING COLD WAR ERA, BOTH THE US AND SOVIET UNION TRIED TO REDUCE TENSIONS. JULY 1955 GENEVA CONFERENCE. LEFT TO RIGHT: SOVIET PREMIER NIKOLAI BULGANIN, US PRESIDENT DWIGHT EISENHOWER, FRENCH PRIME MINISTER EDGAR FAURE, AND BRITISH PRIME MINISTER SIR ANTHONY EDEN.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : SOVIET PREMIER KHRUSHCHEV VISITED THE US IN SEPTEMBER 1959.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: SOVIET PREMIER KHRUSHCHEV VISITED THE US IN SEPTEMBER 1959.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : MAO ZEDONG OF RED CHINA CRITICIZED PREMIER KHRUSHCHEV AS A "PSALM-SINGING BUFFOON" WHO UNDERESTIMATED THE NATURE OF WESTERN IMPERIALISM .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: MAO ZEDONG OF RED CHINA CRITICIZED PREMIER KHRUSHCHEV AS A “PSALM-SINGING BUFFOON” WHO UNDERESTIMATED THE NATURE OF WESTERN IMPERIALISM.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : RED CHINA'S MAO ZEDONG CRITICIZED KHRUSHCHEV'S POLICY OF PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE . KHRUSHCHEV VISITED THE US IN 1959 .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: RED CHINA’S MAO ZEDONG CRITICIZED KHRUSHCHEV’S POLICY OF PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE. KHRUSHCHEV VISITED THE US IN 1959.
03 June 1961 President Kennedy meets with Chairman Khrushchev at the U. S. Embassy residence, Vienna. U. S. Dept. of State photograph in the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library, Boston.
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: 03 June 1961 President Kennedy meets with Chairman Khrushchev at the U. S. Embassy residence, Vienna. U.S. Dept. of State photograph in the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library, Boston.
the evil red empire the expansionist . RED CHINA'S NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE –  RED CHINA’S NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM WAS  INITIALLY SUPPORTED BY THE SOVIET UNION UNTIL 1959. SINO-SOVIET RELATIONS BECAME SOUR AFTER JUNE 1959 WHEN SOVIETS SUSPENDED NUCLEAR ASSISTANCE.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : ON AUGUST 05, 1963, IN MOSCOW, THE US AND SOVIET UNION SIGNED THE LIMITED NUCLEAR TEST BAN TREATY .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: ON AUGUST 05, 1963, IN MOSCOW, THE US AND SOVIET UNION SIGNED THE LIMITED NUCLEAR TEST BAN TREATY.
MOSCOW, SOVIET UNION AUGUST 05, 1963 . THE CELEBRATION FOLLOWING THE SIGNING OF LIMITED OR PARTIAL NUCLEAR TEST BAN TREATY .
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: MOSCOW, SOVIET UNION AUGUST 05, 1963. THE CELEBRATION FOLLOWING THE SIGNING OF LIMITED OR PARTIAL NUCLEAR TEST BAN TREATY.
WASHINGTON D. C. US PRESIDENT JOHN F KENNEDY SIGNS THE LIMITED OR PARTIAL NUCLEAR TEST BAN TREATY IN OCTOBER , 1963 AFTER THE US SENATE RATIFIED THE TREAT BEGINNING A NEW ERA IN NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT IN WHICH RED CHINA REFUSES TO PARTICIPATE .
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: WASHINGTON D. C. US PRESIDENT JOHN F KENNEDY SIGNS THE LIMITED OR PARTIAL NUCLEAR TEST BAN TREATY IN OCTOBER, 1963 AFTER THE US SENATE RATIFIED THE TREAT BEGINNING A NEW ERA IN NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT IN WHICH RED CHINA REFUSES TO PARTICIPATE.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : JULY 01, 1968. AT LANCASTER HOUSE, LONDON, BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY SIGNS THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY WITH SOVIET(LEFT), AND THE US(RIGHT) AMBASSADORS .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: JULY 01, 1968. AT LANCASTER HOUSE, LONDON, BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY SIGNS THE NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY WITH SOVIET (LEFT), AND THE US (RIGHT) AMBASSADORS .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : US SECRETARY OF STATE DEAN RUSK AND US PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON AT THE SIGNING OF NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY ON JULY 01, 1968 .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: US SECRETARY OF STATE DEAN RUSK AND US PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON AT THE SIGNING OF NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY ON JULY 01, 1968 .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : US PRESIDENT BEFRIENDED MAO ZEDONG BEFORE MAKING THIS HISTORIC TRIP TO MOSCOW ON MAY 24, 1972 WHEN HE SIGNED STRATEGIC ARMS LIMITATION - SALT I TREATY WITH SOVIET PREMIER ALEXI KOSYGIN .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: US PRESIDENT BEFRIENDED MAO ZEDONG BEFORE MAKING THIS HISTORIC TRIP TO MOSCOW ON MAY 24,1972 WHEN HE SIGNED STRATEGIC ARMS LIMITATION – SALT I TREATY WITH SOVIET PREMIER ALEXI KOSYGIN .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : RED CHINA EXPANDED HER NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES WHILE THE US AND THE SOVIETS CONSTANTLY ENGAGED IN STRATEGIC ARMS LIMITATION TALKS . US PRESIDENT HENRY FORD AND SOVIET PREMIER LEONID BREZHNEV SIGNING TREATY ON NOVEMBER 24, 1974 .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: RED CHINA EXPANDED HER NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES WHILE THE US AND THE SOVIETS CONSTANTLY ENGAGED IN STRATEGIC ARMS LIMITATION TALKS. US PRESIDENT HENRY FORD AND SOVIET PREMIER LEONID BREZHNEV SIGNING TREATY ON NOVEMBER 24, 1974 .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : STRATEGIC ARMS LIMITATION TALKS - SALT II ON JUNE 16, 1979. US PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER AND SOVIET PREMIER LEONID BREZHNEV .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: STRATEGIC ARMS LIMITATION TALKS – SALT II ON JUNE 16, 1979. US PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER AND SOVIET PREMIER LEONID BREZHNEV .
18 Jun 1979, Vienna, Austria Soviet President Leonid Brezhnev and US President Jimmy Carter meet in Vienna to negotiate the strategic arms limitation treaty (SALT II), June 18, 1979. Image by © CORBIS
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: 18 Jun 1979, Vienna, Austria Soviet President Leonid Brezhnev and US President Jimmy Carter meet in Vienna to negotiate the strategic arms limitation treaty (SALT II), June 18, 1979. Image by © CORBIS
the evil red empire reagan gorbachev 1987
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: US  PRESIDENT Ronald Reagan and Soviet President Gorbachev 1987. INTERMEDIATE-RANGE NUCLEAR FORCES (INF) TREATY SIGNED ON DECEMBER 10, 1987. STRATEGIC ARMS REDUCTION TALKS (START).
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM : SOVIET PRESIDENT MIKHAIL GORBACHEV WITH US PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH SIGNING TREATY ON DECEMBER 06, 1990.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – NUCLEAR EXPANSIONISM: SOVIET PRESIDENT MIKHAIL GORBACHEV WITH US PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH SIGNING TREATY ON DECEMBER 06, 1990. A FIFTY PERCENT REDUCTION IN STRATEGIC NUCLEAR FORCES ON EACH SIDE
the evil red empire george bush boris yeltsin 01 03 1993
The Evil Red Empire – Nuclear Expansionism: US PRESIDENT GEORGE H W Bush with  Russian President Boris Yeltsin January 03, 1993
the evil red empire bush putin - SORT.
THE  EVIL  RED  EMPIRE –  NUCLEAR  EXPANSIONISM: RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN WITH US PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH.  STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS REDUCTION TREATY (SORT) MAY 24, 2002 IN MOSCOW .
the evil red empire obama medvedev prague treaty 04 08 2010
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: US president Obama and Russian foreign secretary Medvedev Prague Treaty , APRIL  08, 2010. “NEW START.”
the evil red empire nuclear expansionism
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: Tibet – Location of Nuclear Arsenals
the evil red empire 10 01 2009
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: The Evil Red Empire 10 01 2009
china cv 16 liaoning aircraft carrier pla navy j 15 flying shark takeoff
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: China cv 16 Liaoning aircraft carrier PLA  Navy j 15 flying shark takeoff
the evil red empire long range ballistic missile
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: China’s long range ballistic missile
the evil red empire china missile capabilities
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: China’s missile capabilities
specialfrontierforce china hypersonic glide vehicle
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: China’s hypersonic glide vehicle
An artist's illustration of DARPA's Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2 (HTV 2) travelling at 13,000 mph, or Mach 20, during its Aug. 11, 2011 test flight.
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: An artist’s illustration of DARPA’s Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2 (HTV 2) traveling at 13,000 mph, or Mach 20, during its Aug. 11, 2011 test flight.
specialfrontierforce china military threat wind tunnel
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism: Wind Tunnel to test missiles
the evil red empire china anti ship missile sizzler
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism. China’s anti-ship missile sizzler
the evil red empire first nuclear submarine
Whole Evil – Red China’s Nuclear Expansionism. China’s first nuclear submarine

Whole Tyrant – Red China – Imperialist

The Evil Red Empire – Red China – Imperialist

Mao Zedong proclaims the founding of the People's Republic of China in Beijing on Oct. 1, 1949.
The Evil Red Empire – Red China – Imperialist. Mao Zedong proclaims the founding of the People’s Republic of China in Peking on Oct. 1, 1949.

The term ‘Imperialism’ refers to  extension of rule or influence by one government or nation over another. From the dawn of the written history, local rulers extended their realms by conquering other states. Industrial Revolution introduced a form of Imperialism in which Imperial State pursued the policy and practice of forming and maintaining an Empire in seeking to control raw materials and world markets by the conquest of other countries. The British Empire represented Imperialist Power called Great Britain. Marxists argued that Imperialism was the ultimate state of Capitalism. It gave an impression that Communism is fundamentally opposed to the practice of forming and maintain an Empire to control raw materials and global markets. The Evil Red Empire proclaimed by Mao Zedong or Mao Tse-Tung slowly transformed itself into an Imperial State. Now, Red China exploits raw materials and vast quantities of natural resources from nations across the globe and it supplies manufactured products to the rest of the world including all nations in the West which take pride in their belief called Capitalism.

the evil red empire secretary of state john kerry
US Secretary of State John Kerry visited Beijing on Saturday, May 16, 2015 with the hope of resolving the problems posed by Red China’s Empire building.

US Secretary of State John Kerry visited Beijing on Saturday, May 16, 2015 with the hope of resolving the problems posed by Red China’s Empire building. He is soundly rebuffed while Red China’s President Xi Jinping announced that the US-China relations are stable. The economic and political influence of Red China give it the status of Imperialist State. Red China acts and behaves in a most assertive manner that signifies her full confidence of her military power to defend its Empire built since 1949 without fighting bloody battles that were common in the past.

Despite tension, Xi says U.S.-China relations are stable

By David Brunnstrom

the evil red empire kerry xi jinping
The Evil Red Empire – Red China – Imperialist © REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.

China’s relations with the United States remain stable, Chinese President Xi Jinping said on Sunday, as he sought to defuse tension over a territorial dispute in the South China Sea that has pitted Washington against Beijing.

“I look forward to continuing to develop this relationship with President Obama and to bring China-U.S. relations to a new height along a track of a new model of major country relationship,” Xi told U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry at the end of Kerry’s two-day trip to China.

Kerry’s trip has been dominated by deepening security concerns about Beijing’s maritime ambitions in the South China Sea. China’s rapid reclamation effort around seven reefs in the Spratly archipelago of the South China Sea has alarmed claimants such as the Philippines and Vietnam.

Kerry’s trip is intended to prepare for the annual U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue next month in Washington and Xi’s expected visit to Washington in September, a trip that Xi said he looked forward to.

Xi has repeatedly told Obama of his desire for a “new model of major country relationship,” in which China would be viewed as an equal global player.

the evil red empire kerry xi jinping the great hall of the people
US Secretary of State John Kerry visited Beijing on Saturday, May 16, 2015 with the hope of resolving the problems posed by Red China’s Empire building.

© REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.

But the model also outlines a respect for “each other’s sovereign and territorial integrity as well as political system and development path”.

“In my view the China-U.S. relationship has remained stable,” Xi told Kerry at Beijing’s Great Hall of the People at a session open to reporters.
China claims about 90 percent of the 3.5 million sq km (1.35 million sq mile) sea. The Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia, Brunei and Vietnam also claim large parts of it.

Recent satellite images have shown that since about March 2014, China has conducted reclamation work at seven sites in the Spratlys and is constructing a military-sized air strip on Fiery Cross Reef and possibly a second on another reef.

The Philippines, a U.S. treaty ally, has called for urgent action.
Kerry said the United States had stated its concerns about the pace and scope of China’s land reclamation in the South China Sea.

On Saturday, China’s top diplomat, Yang Jiechi, urged Kerry to “properly control our differences and sensitive issues” as well as “view our strategic intentions objectively and rationally”, according to a report by state-run China News Service.

“I hope the United States can do more for peace and stability in the region,” Yang, who holds the title of State Councillor, was quoted as telling Kerry, referring to the South China Sea.
China has expressed its concern about a possible U.S. plan to send military aircraft and ships to assert freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.
China rejects U.S. involvement in the dispute and has blamed the United States for stoking tension by encouraging countries to engage in “dangerous behavior”.

(Additional reporting and writing by Sui-Lee Wee; Editing by Robert Birsel)

The Evil Red Empire – Red China – Imperialist

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – TERRITORIAL EXPANSIONISM

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – TERRITORIAL EXPANSIONISM:

Mao Zedong proclaims the founding of the People's Republic of China in Beijing on Oct. 1, 1949.
Mao Zedong proclaims the founding of the People’s Republic of China in Beijing on Oct. 1, 1949.

The Evil Red Empire called Red China or People’s Republic of China(Mandarin. Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo) was proclaimed at Peking( now Beijing) by Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong or Mao Tse-Tung on October 01, 1949. He formulated a vision of Empire building using a Policy of Expansionism during the late 1940s. Red China expanded its territory after the Communist victory in all of China. Apart from keeping territories gained by China in its historical past, Red China during 1950 attacked Tibet which had declared its independence after the downfall of Manchu China( the Ch’ing or Manchu dynasty) that ruled China from 1644 to 1912. The following Provinces and Autonomous Regions of Red China bear mute testimony to the great problem of its Territorial Expansionism:

the evil red empire the dragon covets the arctic2
the evil red empire the dragon covets the arctic2

1. Tibet, Xizang Autonomous Region.
2. Sichuan Province(Szechwan, annexed Tibetan territory).
3. Qinghai Province(Tsinghai annexed Tibetan territory).
4. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region( Sinkiang Uigur)
5. Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region(Nei Monggol).
6. Liaoning Province, Jilin Province(Kirin), and Heilongjiang Province(Heilungkiang) which together represent Manchuria.

the evil red empire map of tibet1
the evil red empire map of tibet1

The problem of Red China’s Expansionism in South China Sea must be studied in conjunction with the above problems of annexed territory. The United States will not succeed in its efforts to address the problem of Red China’s land reclamation activities in South China Sea without resolving The Great Problem of Tibet.

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162, USA
SPECIALFRONTIERFORCE.ESTABLISHMENT22

US, China remain at odds over South China Sea activity

Associated Press

By MATTHEW LEE, AP Diplomatic Writer

© Provided by Associated Press S. Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a joint press conference following meetings with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, China, Saturday, May 16, 2015. Kerry is in China to press Beijing to halt increasingly assertive actions it is taking in the South China Sea that have alarmed the United States and China’s smaller neighbors. (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

BEIJING — The United States and China held firm Saturday to deep disagreements over increasingly assertive Chinese activity in disputed areas of the South China Sea, as Beijing politely but pointedly rejected U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s push for it to reduce tensions.

After meeting in the Chinese capital, both Kerry and China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi stressed the importance of dialogue to resolve the competing claims, but neither showed any sign of bending in their positions over Chinese land reclamation projects that have alarmed the United States and China’s smaller neighbors. The U.S. and most members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations want a halt to the projects, which they suspect are aimed at building islands and other land features over which China can claim sovereignty.

“We are concerned about the pace and scope of China’s land reclamation in the South China Sea,” Kerry said, urging China to speed up talks with ASEAN on binding guidelines on how maritime activity in disputed areas should be handled. “And, I urged China, through Foreign Minister Wang, to take actions that will join with everybody in helping to reduce tensions and increase the prospect of diplomatic solutions.”

“I think we agree that the region needs smart diplomacy in order to conclude the ASEAN-China code of conduct and not outposts and military strips,” Kerry told reporters at a joint news conference with Wang.

But Wang signaled that while China was prepared to talk, it would not back down on the construction which he said “is something that falls fully within the scope of China’s sovereignty.”
“The determination of the Chinese side to safeguard our own sovereignty and territorial integrity is as firm as a rock, and it is unshakable,” he said. “It has always been our view that we need to find appropriate solutions to the issues we have through communications and negotiations that we have among the parties directly concerned with peaceful and diplomatic means on the basis of respecting historical facts and international norms. This position will remain unchanged in the future.”

Wang added that the differences between China and the U.S. could be managed “as long as we can avoid misunderstanding and, even more importantly, avoid miscalculation.”
The Chinese claims and land reclamation projects have rattled the region where South China Sea islands and reefs are contested by China and five other Asian governments and activities have led to clashes, accompanied by nationalistic protests and occasional serious diplomatic implications.

The U.S. says it takes no position on the sovereignty claims but insists they must be negotiated. Washington also says ensuring maritime safety and access to some of the world’s busiest commercial shipping routes is a U.S. national security priority.

China has bristled at what it sees as U.S. interference in the region and wants to negotiate with the ASEAN countries individually, something those much smaller nations fear will not be fair.
In one disputed area, the Spratly Islands, U.S. officials say China has reclaimed about 2,000 acres of dry land since 2014 that could be used as airstrips or for military purposes. The U.S. argues that man-made constructions cannot be used to claim sovereignty.

Obama administration officials have declined to comment on reports that it may deploy military assets, or that it is considering a demonstration of freedom of navigation within 12 nautical miles of the islands’ notional territorial zone. But they have said many of the features claimed by China in the disputed Spratlys are submerged and do not carry territorial rights, and said that China cannot “manufacture sovereignty.”

Despite the clear disagreements over the South China Sea, Kerry and Wang said they were on track to make progress in other areas, notably on climate change, the fight against violent extremism and preparations for the next round of the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue in June and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to Washington in September. They expressed pleasure with their cooperation in the ongoing Iran nuclear talks, their solidarity in trying to denuclearize North Korea and combat diseases such as the deadly Ebola virus.
Kerry will wrap up the China portion of his Asia trip in meetings with Xi, Chinese State Councilor Yang Jiechi and the country’s top military officer.

On Sunday, Kerry heads to Seoul where he will be meeting senior South Korean officials and deliver a speech on cyber security and related issues.
Kerry will return to Washington after delivering a speech on a proposed Trans-Pacific trade agreement in Seattle on Tuesday.

1 of 5 © Provided by Associated Press

S. Secretary of State John Kerry, left, talks with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi after their joint press conference at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing Saturday, May 16, 2015. Kerry is in China to press Beijing to halt increasingly assertive actions it is taking in the South China Sea that have alarmed the United States and China’s smaller neighbors. (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

2 of 5 © Provided by Associated Press

S. Secretary of State John Kerry speaks during a joint press conference following meetings with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, China, Saturday, May 16, 2015. Kerry is in China to press Beijing to halt increasingly assertive actions it is taking in the South China Sea that have alarmed the United States and China’s smaller neighbors. (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

3 of 5 © Provided by Associated Press

S. Secretary of State John Kerry at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, China, Saturday, May 16, 2015. Kerry is in China to press Beijing to halt increasingly assertive actions it is taking in the South China Sea that have alarmed the United States and China’s smaller neighbors. (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

4 of 5 © Provided by Associated Press

S. Secretary of State John Kerry, left, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi hold a joint press conference following meetings at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing Saturday, May 16, 2015. Kerry is in China to press Beijing to halt increasingly assertive actions it is taking in the South China Sea that have alarmed the United States and China’s smaller neighbors. (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

5 of 5 © Provided by Associated Press

S. Secretary of State John Kerry, left, and Chinese Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission General Fan Changlong, right, shake hands prior to a meeting at the Ministry of
National Defense in Beijing Saturday, May 16, 2015. Kerry is in China to press Beijing to halt increasingly assertive actions it is taking in the South China Sea that have alarmed the United States and China’s smaller neighbors. (Saul Loeb/Pool Photo via AP)

5 of 5

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – AIRSPACE EXPANSIONISM

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – AIRSPACE EXPANSIONISM:

Mao Zedong proclaims the founding of the People's Republic of China in Beijing on Oct. 1, 1949.
Mao Zedong proclaims the founding of the People’s Republic of China in Beijing on Oct. 1, 1949.

The term “The Evil Red Empire” describes the national entity founded by Communist leader Mao Zedong on October 01, 1949. To build an Empire, Mao Zedong formulated a Policy of Expansionism in late 1940s.

the evil red empire airspace expansionism
the evil red empire airspace expansionism

Airspace is the space extending up above an area of the earth’s surface; specifically, airspace refers to the space above a nation over which it can claim jurisdiction. Red China’s maritime expansionism in South China Sea poses a security threat as it involves the rights to use the airspace by other countries. With its land reclamation activities, Red China has expanded its claims to Land, Sea, and Airspace and is further willing to control that airspace by establishing its own Air Defence Identification Zone.

the evil red empire airspace nine dash expansionism
the evil red empire airspace nine dash expansionism

United States Navy and Air Force have no option other than that of challenging Red China’s illegal claim to sovereignty using land reclamation and building activity without any approval from its neighbors who have legitimate claims in that region.

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162, USA
SPECIALFRONTIERFORCE.ESTABLISHMENT22

U.S., CHINA SET FOR HIGH-STAKES RIVALRY IN SKIES ABOVE SOUTH CHINA SEA

the evil red empire airspace south china sea expansionism
the evil red empire airspace south china sea expansionism

 

Reuters

By Greg Torode

An aerial photo taken though a glass window of a Philippine military plane shows the alleged on-going land reclamation by China on mischief reef in the Spratly Islands .

An aerial photo taken though a glass window of a Philippine military plane shows the alleged on-going …

By Greg Torode

HONG KONG (Reuters) – When the U.S. navy sent a littoral combat ship on its first patrol of the disputed Spratly islands in the South China Sea during the past week, it was watching the skies as well.

The USS Fort Worth, one of the most modern ships in the U.S. navy, dispatched a reconnaissance drone and a Seahawk helicopter to patrol the airspace, according to a little-noticed statement on the navy’s website.

While the navy didn’t mention China’s rapid land reclamation in the Spratlys, the ship’s actions were a demonstration of U.S. capabilities in the event Beijing declares an Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the area – a move experts and some U.S. military officials see as increasingly likely.

“It’s not inevitable but if we are betting paychecks I’ll bet that they will eventually declare one, I just don’t know when,” said a senior U.S. commander familiar with the situation in Asia.
ADIZs are not governed by formal treaties or laws but are used by some nations to extend control beyond national borders, requiring civilian and military aircraft to identify themselves or face possible military interception.

China sparked condemnation from the United States and Japan when it imposed an ADIZ in the East China Sea, above uninhabited islands disputed with Tokyo, in late 2013.

Chinese military facilities now under construction on Fiery Cross Reef in the Spratlys, including a 3,000-metre (10,000-foot) runway and airborne early warning radars, could be operational by the year-end, said the U.S. commander, who declined to be identified.

Recent satellite images also show reclamation work on Subi Reef creating landmasses that, if joined together, could make space for a similar sized airstrip.
Growing concern in Washington that China might impose air and sea restrictions in the Spratlys once it completes work on its seven artificial islands is likely to be on the agenda when U.S.

Secretary of State John Kerry meets Chinese leaders in Beijing this weekend for previously scheduled talks.

TOUGH TO ENFORCE

Asia’s rising power claims sovereignty over most of the South China Sea, through which $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei also have overlapping claims.

China has said it had every right to set up an ADIZ but that current conditions in the South China Sea did not warrant one.

Enforcing such an ADIZ would be difficult even with two airstrips capable of handling fighter planes in the Spratlys, as well as an expanded airstrip on Woody island in the disputed Paracel island chain further north because of the distances involved, regional military officials and experts said.

The Spratlys for example lie more than 1,100 km (680 miles) from the Chinese mainland, putting China’s well-equipped airbases along its coastline well out of reach.
“Even with the new reclamations, it is going to be a stretch for China to routinely enforce such a zone that far south,” said Richard Bitzinger, a regional security analyst at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

The Japanese and U.S. military ignore the ADIZ above the East China Sea, as does Japan’s two major carriers, ANA Holdings <9202.T> and Japan Airlines <9201.T>.

A study produced by the independent U.S. Congressional Research Service earlier this year noted that while China’s air force actively monitors that zone with ground radar from its coastline, it had generally shown restraint in enforcement.
China’s planes were unlikely to maintain a constant presence over the East China Sea, the study noted, citing a U.S. air force assessment.

RISK OF ESCALATION

The South China Sea might prove more problematic for China given the complexity of the dispute and the possibility of challenges from the U.S. navy and air force.

Indeed, on Tuesday, a U.S. official said the Pentagon was considering sending military aircraft and ships to assert freedom of navigation around the Chinese-made islands.
China’s Foreign Ministry responded by saying Beijing was “extremely concerned” and demanded clarification.

On Friday it accused the Philippines of working together with the United States to “exaggerate the China threat” over the Spratlys.
China had recently warned Philippine air force and navy planes at least six times to leave the Spratlys, the Philippine military commander responsible for the region said last week. The planes refused.

Zhang Baohui, a mainland security expert at Hong Kong’s Lingnan University, said he was worried about the risk of confrontation from any U.S. show of force.
“It’s reckless,” he said, referring to Washington’s latest plans.

“It has a built-in dynamic for unintended escalation,” he added. “Are they willing to take the consequences of this escalation?”
At sea, tensions are already apparent.

The naval statement about the USS Fort Worth, which can also hunt submarines and support amphibious landings, noted the ship “encountered multiple People’s Liberation Army-Navy warships” during its patrol. It did not go into detail.
“Our interactions with Chinese ships continue to be professional and (the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea) helps clarify intentions and prevent miscommunication,” Commander

Matt Kawas, the Fort Worth’s commanding officer, said in the statement.
(Additional reporting by Tim Kelly and Nobuhiro Kobu in YOKOHAMA, Japan; Editing by Dean Yates)

  • South China Sea
  • East China Sea
  • China

Obama Salutes Marines in Nepalese Crash

(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2015. Click For Restrictions – http://about.reuters.com/fulllegal.asp

Yahoo – ABC News Network

the evil red empire airspace south china sea
the evil red empire airspace south china sea

the evil red empire airspace south china sea expansionism
the evil red empire airspace south china sea expansionism

the evil red empire airspace maritime expansionism
the evil red empire airspace maritime expansionism

the evil red empire airspace expansionism air defence zones
the evil red empire airspace expansionism air defence zones

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – MILITARY EXPANSIONISM

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – MILITARY EXPANSIONISM:

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - MILITARY EXPANSIONISM : THE RED DRAGON'S EXPANSIONISM USING ITS SUPERIOR MILITARY POWER OVER ITS WEAKER NEIGHBORS .
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – MILITARY EXPANSIONISM : THE RED DRAGON’S EXPANSIONISM USING ITS SUPERIOR MILITARY POWER OVER ITS WEAKER NEIGHBORS .

Red China’s land reclamation activities in South China Sea are mere symptoms of a serious disease called Military Expansionism. Red China is projecting its military power by acting against the interests of its neighbors for she thinks there is no one besides her. In Red China’s estimate, all other nations will submit to her superior military power or at a minimum avoid a direct military conflict to change her behavior. The word ‘APOCALYPSE’ means unveiling or revelation, it refers to a revelation depicting symbolically the ultimate destruction of Evil and triumph of Good. The word ‘DOOM’ refers to what is laid down, decree, judgment, a sentence of condemnation, destiny, tragic fate, ruin, to ordain as a penalty. Doomsayer is a person disposed to predicting catastrophe or disaster. As Doomsayer of Doom Dooma, I am predicting the downfall of The Evil Red Empire without the need for fighting against its military power.

“Therefore in one day her plagues will overtake her
death, mourning and famine.
She will be consumed by fire,
for mighty is the Lord God who judges her.” (REVELATION 18:4)

I am not surprised to read REUTERS news story published by David Brunnstrom that the US Secretary of State John Kerry would take tough approach in China over South China Sea during his visit to Beijing on Saturday, May 16, 2015.

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162, USA
SPECIALFRONTIERFORCE.ESTABLISHMENT22

U.S. Kerry to take tough approach in China over South China Sea

Reuters

By David Brunnstrom 16 hours ago

Chinese President Xi Jinping speaks with U.S. State Secretary John Kerry, through a translator, during a lunch banquet in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing .

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) speaks with U.S. State Secretary John Kerry (R), through a translator, …

By David Brunnstrom

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry will leave China “in absolutely no doubt” about Washington’s commitment to ensuring freedom of navigation and flight in the South China Sea when he visits Beijing this weekend, a senior State Department official said on Wednesday.

Setting the scene for what could be contentious encounters with Chinese leaders, including President Xi Jinping, the official said Kerry would warn that China’s land reclamation work in contested waters could have negative consequences for regional stability – and for relations with the United States.

On Tuesday, a U.S. official said the Pentagon was considering sending military aircraft and ships to assert freedom of navigation around rapidly growing Chinese-made artificial islands in the disputed South China Sea.

China’s Foreign Ministry responded by saying that Beijing was “extremely concerned” and demanded clarification.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense David Shear told a Senate hearing the United States had right of passage in areas claimed by China. “We are actively assessing the military implications of land reclamation and are committed to taking effective and appropriate action,” he said, but gave no details.

Cui Tiankai, China’s ambassador to the United States, responded by warning Washington not to interfere in the South China Sea dispute and rebuked it for “double standards” in its criticism of Beijing, state news agency Xinhua said on Thursday.

“Just who is creating tensions in the South China Sea?” Cui was quoted as saying. “In the past few years, the United States has intervened in such a high-profile way. Is that to stabilize the situation or to further mess it up? The facts are out there.”

Cui, in an interview with Chinese media in the United States on Wednesday, noted that some countries had already begun reclaiming land on reefs that Beijing says belong to China, but the United States had not singled them out.

On the Pentagon’s plan to send military aircraft and ships to the South China Sea, Cui “stressed that many things in the world cannot rely on a show of force to solve them and that the knee-jerk ‘Cold War’ mentality to use force is outdated”.

The senior State Department official said “the question about what the U.S Navy does or doesn’t do is one that the Chinese are free to pose” to Kerry in Beijing, where he is due on Saturday for meetings with civilian and military leaders.

Kerry’s trip is intended to prepare for the annual U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue next month in Washington and Xi’s expected visit to Washington in September. But growing strategic rivalry rather than cooperation look set to dominate.

China’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said that freedom of navigation did not mean that foreign military ships and aircraft can enter another country’s territorial waters or airspace at will.

“YOU CAN’T BUILD SOVEREIGNTY”

The State Department official dismissed the idea that constructing islands out of half-submerged reefs gave China any right to territorial claims.
“Ultimately no matter how much sand China piles on top of a submerged reef or shoal … it is not enhancing its territorial claim. You can’t build sovereignty,” he said.

He said Kerry would “reinforce … the very negative consequences to China’s image and China’s relationship with its neighbors on regional stability and potentially on the U.S.- China relationship from their large-scale reclamation efforts and the behavior generally in the South China Sea.”

Beijing claims sovereignty over most of the South China Sea, through which $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei have overlapping claims.

Last month, the U.S. military commander for Asia, Admiral Samuel Locklear, said China could eventually deploy radar and missile systems on the islands it is building in the Spratly archipelago that could be used to enforce an exclusion zone should it move to declare one.

The U.S. official who spoke on Tuesday said U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter had requested options that include sending aircraft and ships within 12 nautical miles (22 km) of the reefs China has been building up.

U.S. President Barack Obama announced a strategic shift toward Asia in 2011 in response to growing Chinese power and influence, but critics have questioned his commitment to this “rebalance” given U.S. security distractions elsewhere in the world and stretched resources.

News of the possibly tougher U.S. stance came as the key economic pillar of the rebalance suffered a blow at the hands of Obama’s Democrats in the U.S. Senate, who blocked debate on a bill that would have smoothed the path for a 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal.

Failure to clinch an agreement could damage Washington’s leadership image in Asia, where China has been forging ahead with a new Beijing-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) seen as a challenge to U.S. global financial leadership.

(Additional reporting by Phil Stewart and David Alexander, and Ben Blanchard and Sui-Lee Wee in Beijing; Editing by Emily Stephenson, W Simon, Christian Plumb, Chris Reese and Alex Richardson)

  • South China Sea
  • China
  • John Kerry
  • Beijing

What to read next

  • US anxious over China's 'great wall of sand'US anxious over China’s ‘great wall of sand’AFPRail Assoc. Says Safety Measures Being Adopted

(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2015. Click For Restrictions – http://about.reuters.com/fulllegal.asp

Yahoo – ABC News Network

Whole Evil – The Evil Red Empire – The Expansionist

The Evil Red Empire – The Red Dragon – The Expansionist

Whole Evil: The Evil Red Empire – The Red Dragon – The Expansionist

Red China’s Policy of Expansionism is formulated by Mao Zedong or Mao Tse-Tung the founder of China’s Communist Party. Tibet is her first victim. Red China’s claim for the entire South China Sea began with maps it published in 1947 in which she used “NINE- SEGMENTS” to demarcate its maritime boundaries. For Red China is unwilling to withdraw its fraudulent claims, Southeast Asia nations like Philippines, and Vietnam have to consider a military option to defend their territorial rights.

Red China’s claim for the entire South China Sea began with maps it published in 1947 in which she used “NINE- SEGMENTS” to demarcate its maritime boundaries.

China pursuing huge South China Sea land reclamation: US – Yahoo News

The Evil Red Empire – Red China – Expansionism: Manila, Philippines Protest- April 23, 2015
Filipino fisherman Efren Montehermosa, 20, speaks about how his fishing boat was hit by Chinese Coastguard water cannon while he was fishing in Scarborough Shoal, on April 13, 2015, during an interview with Reuters at his home in coastal town of Infanta, Pangasinan in northern Philippines April 22, 2015. China on Wednesday defended the actions of its vessels in the disputed South China Sea after the Philippines accused China’s coast guard of using water cannon on Philippine fishing boats and urged Manila to increase its “education” of its fishermen. Filipino fishermen said that China’s coast guard boarded their fishing boats and threw away fish catch and fishing gear last week after spraying them with water in a disputed shoal in the South China Sea. REUTERS/Erik De Castro
The Evil Red Empire – Red China – Expansionism poses military threat to regional nations. April 19, 2015. Philippines – US Exercise Balikatan
U.S. troops take their positions during a combined assault exercise at a beach facing one of the contested islands off the South China Sea known as Scarborough Shoal in the West Philippine Sea Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at the Naval Education and Training Command at San Antonio township, Zambales province, northwest of Manila, Philippines. More than ten thousand troops from both the US and Philippine militaries are taking part in the annual military drill that focuses on regional security, terrorism, disaster preparedness and inter operability of both countries. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)
U.S. troops set up their mortars during a combined assault exercise with Philippine counterpart facing one of the contested islands in the South China Sea known as the Scarborough Shoal in the West Philippine Sea Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at the Naval Education and Training Command at San Antonio township, Zambales province, northwest of Manila, Philippines. More than ten thousand troops from both the U.S. and Philippine militaries are taking part in the annual military drill that focuses on regional security, terrorism, disaster preparedness and inter operability of both countries. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – EXPANSIONIST – FIERY CROSS REEF – Images taken on January 22, 2006 and April 02, 2015.
Philippine Marines watch U.S. Navy amphibious assault vehicles storm the beach during a combined assault exercise facing one of the contested islands in the South China Sea known as the Scarborough Shoal in the West Philippine Sea Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at the Naval Education and Training Command at San Antonio township, Zambales province, northwest of Manila, Philippines. More than ten thousand troops from both the U.S. and Philippine militaries are taking part in the annual military drill that focuses on regional security, terrorism, disaster preparedness and inter operability of both countries. (AP Photo/Bullit 
Former police officer and mayor Abner Afuang, sets on fire to the first of two Chinese flag in protest against recent reclamation activities by China in the contested group of islands known as the Spratlys in the South China Sea Thursday, April 23, 2015 in Manila, Philippines. The reclamation works by China drew protests both from the Government and civil society groups which they claim are well within the Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)
Philippine Marines cheer as a U.S. Navy AAV (Amphibious Assault Vehicle) storms the beach during a combined assault exercise facing one of the contested islands in the South China Sea known as the Scarborough Shoal in the West Philippine Sea Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at the Naval Education and Training Command at San Antonio township, Zambales province, northwest of Manila, Philippines. More than ten thousand troops from both the U.S. and Philippine militaries are taking part in the annual military drill that focuses on regional security, terrorism, disaster preparedness and inter operability of both countries. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – DICTATORIAL REGIME. RED CHINA CREATED TERRITORIAL DISPUTES WITH ALL OF HER REGIONAL NEIGHBORS FOR SHE IS EVIL POWER.

Whole Evil – Red China – Evil One – Evildoer

The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - RED CHINA.
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire.

I  have a great pleasure in sharing the blog post titled “China’s Opening to Russia” by Dina Badie published by Huffington Post on April 27, 2015. It clearly exposes Dr. Henry Alfred Kissinger, PhD as Whole Villain for he formulated the US-China relations without any concern for values that define United States of America. Red China’s opening to Russia will compel the United States to define its national values while it defends its security interests in present day world.I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China as The Evil Red Empire.

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - RED CHINA : US PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN ADDRESSED NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ON MARCH 08, 1983. HE COINED THE PHRASE "EVIL EMPIRE" TO DESCRIBE SOVIET UNION AND HE FRAMED THE US - SOVIET CONFRONTATION AS "GOOD VS EVIL."
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: US President Ronald Reagan addressed National Association of Evangelicals on March 08, 1983. He coined the phrase “Evil Empire” to describe the Soviet Union. He framed the US-Soviet confrontation as “Good vs Evil.”

What is Evil?

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - RED CHINA : THE WOMAN RIDING THE SCARLET BEAST IS THE PERSONIFICATION OF THE EVIL RED EMPIRE - RED CHINA .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China as The Evil Red Empire: The Woman riding the Scarlet Beast is the personification of the Evil Red Empire – Red China.🇨🇳

The term Evil describes conduct regarded as morally bad, morally wrong, wicked, depraved, causing pain, or trouble, harmful, injurious, offensive, disgusting, threatening, and bringing misfortune and misery to those affected by it. Red China is Evildoer for it does evil actions habitually. Red China is Evil-Minded for its disposition is malicious. Red China is the Evil One, a term used for The Devil or Satan. 

Dina Badie Headshot
Dina Badie, Assistant Professor of Politics and International Studies at Centre College in Danville, KY

CHINA’S OPENING TO RUSSIA

Posted: 04/27/2015 3:12 pm EDT Updated: 04/27/2015 3:59 pm EDT

China’s Opening to Russia. The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .

When Henry Kissinger returned from a secret meeting in China in 1971, he laid the groundwork for a historic diplomatic opening after more than 20 years of rejecting the Communist Party government. Within a year, Richard Nixon visited Mao Zedong in Beijing, the Shanghai Communiqué was signed, and the process of normalizing Sino-America relations began. Since then, most scholars and analysts have considered Nixon’s opening to China to be a resounding foreign policy success. In the midst of the Cold War, it successfully exploited existing divisions within the communist bloc and improved the U.S. strategic position vis-à-vis the USSR. Rather than three powerful states existing in isolation of one another, it was now 2 against 1: the U.S. and China vs. the USSR.

At the time, however, Nixon’s policy did not come without criticism. Mao Zedong’s brand of communism along with his brutal implementation of a “cultural revolution,” made him an improbable target for U.S. policymakers looking for diplomatic partners. Given the importance of the “democracy and capitalism” narrative of the Cold War, trading the recognition of the old Kuomintang government in Taiwan for the Communist Party state in the mainland was a contentious move. Yet, Nixon and Kissinger looked beyond ideology to open dialogue for strategic purposes.

Today, the U.S. is on the other end of an opening.

American and European statesmen are currently boycotting, sanctioning, condemning, and isolating Russia as punishment for its Ukraine policy. In the way that the U.S. picked off China after recognizing the Sino-Soviet split, China is now picking off Russia given the American-Russian split. The Ukraine crisis indirectly created an opportunity for China to expand a “strategic partnership” with Russia as the only major power not taking part in the sanctions regime. This is not to say that Russia and China had no diplomatic relations prior to the Ukraine crisis; rather, that Western policy toward Russia is creating an opening that China can easily exploit. As far as Russia policy goes, the further the West goes, the closer China comes.

While it is easy to criticize China’s noninterference policy and neutrality on Ukraine, it is not significantly different from Nixon and Kissinger’s decision to look beyond ideology in the 1970s. Pursuing a tangible national interest over ideological considerations, China has been able to deepen economic ties with Russia to ease the impact of Western sanctions. To address its growing energy needs, China is working on a second pipeline project with Russia to import much-needed natural resources. And next month, Xi Jinping will be the guest of honor at Russia’s WWII commemorative parade, which American and European leaders plan to boycott.

China’s strategic opening should come as no surprise to the U.S. There remain significant differences between Russia and China but the more Washington pushes and pivots, the closer Moscow and Beijing will become. Rather than continually isolating Russia over its actions in Ukraine and denouncing China for remaining neutral, the U.S. would be best served to once again cast off ideologically motivated policy in favor of real politik. ​

Special Frontier Force vs The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China.
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China.
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China.
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .
Special Frontier Force VS The Evil Red Empire - Red China .
The Evil Red Empire – Evil One – Evildoer: I am inspired by US President Ronald Reagan to describe Red China 🇨🇳 as The Evil Red Empire. Kissinger was sworn in as US Secretary of State in September 1973. He was the Adviser, National Security Affairs when he abused his position to Open the Door to Communist China in 1971 .

 

Whole Evil – The Evil Red Empire

Whole Evil – The Evil Red Empire

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: DRAGON SYMBOLIZED IMPERIAL CHINA'S POWER. THE RED DRAGON OF BIBLE SYMBOLIZES SIN, DISOBEDIENCE, RECKLESSNESS, FORCEFULNESS, REBELLIOUSNESS OF SATAN, THE DEVIL.
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: DRAGON SYMBOLIZED IMPERIAL CHINA’S POWER. THE RED DRAGON OF BIBLE SYMBOLIZES SIN, DISOBEDIENCE, RECKLESSNESS, FORCEFULNESS, REBELLIOUSNESS OF SATAN, THE DEVIL.
SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE : WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF TIBET??? FOR HOW LONG TIBETANS HAVE TO LIVE UNDER THE TYRANNY OF OCCUPATION??? WHEN WILL COMMUNIST CHINA LOSE ITS MILITARY GRIP OVER LHASA???
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF TIBET? FOR HOW LONG TIBETANS HAVE TO LIVE UNDER THE TYRANNY OF OCCUPATION? WHEN WILL COMMUNIST CHINA LOSE ITS MILITARY GRIP OVER LHASA?

On Wednesday, April 15, 2015, People’s Republic of China released a white paper to describe Tibet’s Progress and Development. The Tibet it describes is known as TAR or Tibetan Autonomous Region that Red China created in 1965. As such this white paper does not describe the national entity called Tibet. The white paper traces the history of origin of Tibetan Resistance Movement that eventually resulted in  creation of a military organization called Special Frontier Force. This Organization aims to evict the occupier of Tibet. China’s white paper describes China’s position on the demand for full autonomy. China claims that it is rejecting the demand for full autonomy as it may lead to Tibet’s full independence.

WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF TIBET? FOR HOW LONG TIBETANS HAVE TO LIVE UNDER THE TYRANNY OF OCCUPATION? WHEN WILL COMMUNIST CHINA LOSE ITS MILITARY GRIP OVER LHASA?

In human history, empires have risen, and empires have fallen. The Evil Empire of Red China will not be an exception and I predict Beijing is Doomed and its fate or destiny was written long ago and sealed in a scripture called ‘Revelation’ which describes The Day of Reckoning.

WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF TIBET? FOR HOW LONG TIBETANS HAVE TO LIVE UNDER THE TYRANNY OF OCCUPATION? WHEN WILL COMMUNIST CHINA LOSE ITS MILITARY GRIP OVER LHASA?
SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE : FOR SIXTYFIVE YEARS, TIBETANS HAVE LIVED UNDER MILITARY OCCUPATION . WHAT IS TIBET'S FUTURE???? HOW TO EVICT THE EVIL RED EMPIRE FROM TIBET????
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: FOR SIXTY FIVE YEARS, TIBETANS HAVE LIVED UNDER MILITARY OCCUPATION. WHAT IS TIBET’S FUTURE? HOW TO EVICT THE EVIL RED EMPIRE FROM TIBET?

In my view, the Occupier of Tibet faces inevitable destruction by an apocalyptic event without the need to fight him in a direct battle. The prophetic vision of this enemy’s defeat is  in The Old Testament Book of Isaiah, The Book of Psalms-Psalm 137, and The New Testament Book of Revelation.

WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: IN MY PROPHETIC VISION, I PREDICT THAT THE EVIL RED EMPIRE WILL BE DESTROYED BY AN APOCALYPTIC EVENT FORETOLD IN THE BOOKS OF BIBLE.

They predict a sudden destruction of Evil not through warfare but by a cosmic event which involves the Evil Empire getting hit by an asteroid thrown down to cause its utter ruin.

The Evil Red Empire:

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE : MAO ZEDONG OR MAO TSE-TUNG PROCLAIMS THE FOUNDING OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA IN PEKING (BEIJING) ON OCTOBER 01, 1949. THIS NATION IS FOUNDED ON THE IDEOLOGY OF COMMUNISM FOLLOWING "RED REVOLUTION." THIS RED CHINA IS AN EVIL EMPIRE FROM ITS BIRTH .
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: MAO ZEDONG OR MAO TSE-TUNG PROCLAIMS THE FOUNDING OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA IN PEKING (BEIJING) ON OCTOBER 01, 1949. THIS NATION IS FOUNDED ON THE IDEOLOGY OF COMMUNISM FOLLOWING “RED REVOLUTION.” THIS RED CHINA IS AN EVIL EMPIRE FROM ITS BIRTH .

I am using the name Evil Red Empire to specifically describe a political entity called The People’s Republic of China proclaimed by Mao tse-Tung or Mao Zedong on October 01, 1949.

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE : RED CHINA FOUNDED BY MAO TSE-TUNG IS MORE EVIL THAN HITLER'S NAZI GERMANY. AFTER THE FALL OF SOVIET UNION, RED CHINA HAS BECOME THE MOST EVIL EMPIRE OF THE PRESENT DAY WORLD .
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: RED CHINA FOUNDED BY MAO TSE-TUNG IS MORE EVIL THAN HITLER’S NAZI GERMANY. AFTER THE FALL OF SOVIET UNION, RED CHINA HAS BECOME THE MOST EVIL EMPIRE OF THE PRESENT DAY WORLD.

In the past, US President Ronald Reagan used the phrase ‘Evil Empire’ to describe Soviet Union. Now, that designation gets full applied to The People’s Republic of China.

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE : APRIL 26, 1984 . US PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN WITH EVIL CHINA'S PRESIDENT LI XIANNIAN IN PEKING . RED CHINA IS MORE EVIL AS COMPARED TO RED SOVIET UNION IN 1984.
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: APRIL 26, 1984. US PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN WITH EVIL CHINA’S PRESIDENT LI XIANNIAN IN PEKING. RED CHINA IS MORE EVIL AS COMPARED TO RED SOVIET UNION IN 1984.

To the Jews of Biblical times, Babylonia became a byword for evil, for she was the nation that had destroyed Jerusalem and its Temple to God. The New Testament Book of Revelation refers to Babylonia and many experts recognize the symbolism of “Babylon The Great.” It is more likely Revelation used the word Babylon as a coded name and it simply intended to predict the downfall of Roman Empire.

Now, world is not facing any danger from former Evil Empires like Babylonia, Rome, or Soviet Union. Those empires got  wiped out and do not exist any more. For all practical purposes, after the fall of Nazi Germany, the breakup of Soviet Union, the only Evil Empire that exists is that of Red China. Historically, China’s rulers include The Shang dynasty, Chou dynasty, Chin dynasty, Han dynasty, T’ang dynasty, Sung dynasty, Yuan dynasty, Ming dynasty, and Ch’ing or Manchu dynasty, the last one ruled from 1644 to 1912. Red China formulated by Communist Party Chairman Mao tse-Tung is ideologically driven and he and his party is responsible for pain and suffering imposed on millions of people.

The Red Dragon:

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE : RED DRAGON IS A MYTHICAL OR LEGENDARY ANIMAL OF FRIGHTENING PROPORTIONS . IT IS ANOTHER NAME FOR SATAN, THE DEVIL, WHO IS OFTEN DEPICTED AS A SERPENT , BEAST , JACKAL, MALE GOAT, SEA MONSTER, AND OTHERS SYMBOLIZING EVIL POWER WHICH IS PHYSICAL FORCE APPLIED IN RECKLESS MANNER TO EVENTUALLY CAUSE PAIN AND SUFFERING .
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: RED DRAGON IS A MYTHICAL OR LEGENDARY ANIMAL OF FRIGHTENING PROPORTIONS . IT IS ANOTHER NAME FOR SATAN, THE DEVIL, WHO IS OFTEN DEPICTED AS A SERPENT, BEAST, JACKAL, MALE GOAT, SEA MONSTER, AND OTHERS SYMBOLIZING EVIL POWER WHICH IS PHYSICAL FORCE APPLIED IN RECKLESS MANNER TO EVENTUALLY CAUSE PAIN AND SUFFERING.

Dragon is a mythical or legendary animal which combines several features of snake and lizard. It symbolizes force and power that evokes a sense of great fear. In China, and Japan, the dragon may have some benevolent attributes.

In China, from ancient times, dragon was the emblem of the Imperial family, and until the founding of the Republic (1911), the dragon adorned the Chinese flag. In Christian tradition, the dragon symbolizes an evil power and it is thought to be a physical manifestation of Satan or The Devil. Satan symbolizes Sin, Disobedience of God, rebelliousness, recklessness, wickedness and supernatural power which brings people to utter ruination or eternal damnation in Hell.

The Hebrew words “TANNIM” and “TANNIN” appear thirteen and fourteen times respectively in The Old Testament Books. They are translated as Dragon, Jackal, sea-monster, Serpent, Whale, Wolf, and The Beast. These are large creatures with a frightening aspect.

WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: RED DRAGON IS A MYTHICAL OR LEGENDARY ANIMAL OF FRIGHTENING PROPORTIONS. IT IS ANOTHER NAME FOR SATAN, THE DEVIL, WHO IS OFTEN DEPICTED AS A SERPENT, BEAST, JACKAL, MALE GOAT, SEA MONSTER, AND OTHERS SYMBOLIZING EVIL POWER WHICH IS PHYSICAL FORCE APPLIED IN RECKLESS MANNER TO EVENTUALLY CAUSE PAIN AND SUFFERING .

In The New Testament Book of Revelation, Satan is referred to as a dragon in Chapter 12, verse 3: “Then another sign appeared in Heaven; an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads.”

The Evil Red Empire – The Beast of Revelation: RED DRAGON IS A MYTHICAL OR LEGENDARY ANIMAL OF FRIGHTENING PROPORTIONS . IT IS ANOTHER NAME FOR SATAN, THE DEVIL, WHO IS OFTEN DEPICTED AS A SERPENT , BEAST , JACKAL, MALE GOAT, SEA MONSTER, AND OTHERS SYMBOLIZING EVIL POWER WHICH IS PHYSICAL FORCE APPLIED IN RECKLESS MANNER TO EVENTUALLY CAUSE PAIN AND SUFFERING.
SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE VS THE EVIL RED EMPIRE : THE WOMAN ON THE SCARLET BEAST . "THE WOMAN YOU SAW IS THE GREAT CITY THAT RULES OVER THE KINGS OF THE EARTH . " IT IS NOT BABYLON . IT IS NOT ROME . IT IS NOT BERLIN . IT IS NOT MOSCOW . INDEED IT IS BEIJING .
WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: THE WOMAN ON THE SCARLET BEAST. “THE WOMAN YOU SAW IS THE GREAT CITY THAT RULES OVER THE KINGS OF THE EARTH.” IT IS NOT BABYLON. IT IS NOT ROME. IT IS NOT BERLIN. IT IS NOT MOSCOW. INDEED IT IS BEIJING.

The relationship between the Evil Empire called Babylon and The Devil is described in Revelation, Chapter 17, verse 3: “Then the angel carried me away in the spirit into a desert. There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns.” Revelation, Chapter 17, verse 18 describes the symbolism of The Woman on The Beast: “The woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.” In present times, the only great city associated with The Evil Empire is Peking or Beijing. It matches with  description of Babylon as the seat of Power and Wealth.

WHOLE EVIL – THE EVIL RED EMPIRE: RED DRAGON IS A MYTHICAL OR LEGENDARY ANIMAL OF FRIGHTENING PROPORTIONS . IT IS ANOTHER NAME FOR SATAN, THE DEVIL, WHO IS OFTEN DEPICTED AS A SERPENT , BEAST , JACKAL, MALE GOAT, SEA MONSTER, AND OTHERS SYMBOLIZING EVIL POWER WHICH IS PHYSICAL FORCE APPLIED IN RECKLESS MANNER TO EVENTUALLY CAUSE PAIN AND SUFFERING .

The Fall of Evil Empire: A Prayer in the Book of Psalms:

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA: Red China Arrogant Nation, Evil Power.

Psalm 137 was composed by captive Jews in Babylon. Verse 8 reflects their hope and expectation:
“O Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction,
happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us….”

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA: Red China Arrogant Nation, Evil Power.

People in occupied Tibet are held captive in their own Land and they are all waiting for their release, for liberation, and for salvation that will end the pain, and misery of decades of brutal oppression and tyrannical rule by Beijing. Babylon is a coded substitute for Beijing and the Fall of Babylon is  The Fall of Beijing.

The Fall of the Evil Red Empire by a Sudden Catastrophe:

God predicts that the Great Queen Babylon (Beijing) will become a harlot, and will be surprised by a sudden catastrophe. Prophet Isaiah reveals the scenario of this sudden catastrophe in Book of Isaiah, Chapter 47, verses 10, 11, 12, and 15:

God predicts that the Great Queen Babylon (Beijing) will become a harlot, and will be surprised by a sudden catastrophe. Prophet Isaiah reveals the scenario of this sudden catastrophe in Chapter 47, verses 10, 11, 12, and 15:

God predicts that the Great Queen Babylon (Beijing) will become a harlot, and will be surprised by a sudden catastrophe. Prophet Isaiah reveals the scenario of this sudden catastrophe in Book of Isaiah, Chapter 47, verses 10, 11, 12, and 15:

“You have trusted in your wickedness and have said, ‘No one sees me.’
Your wisdom and knowledge mislead you
When you say to yourself,
‘I am and there is none besides me.’

“Disaster will come upon you that you cannot ward off with a ransom;
a catastrophe you cannot foresee will suddenly come upon you.”

“Keep on, then, with your magic spells and with your many sorceries,
which you have labored at since childhood.
Perhaps you will succeed, perhaps you will cause terror.”

“That is all they can do for you –
these you have labored with and trafficked with since childhood.
Each of them goes on in his error;
There is not one that can save you.”

The Fall of Babylon (Beijing) – Prophesy in the Book Revelation:

Whole Evil – The Evil Red Empire: The Book of Revelation, Chapter 18 gives a detailed account of the Fall of Evil Empire and describes the mechanism for its destruction.

The Book of Revelation, Chapter 18 gives a detailed account of the Fall of Evil Empire and describes the mechanism for its destruction. The kings of the earth who committed adultery with her, the merchants of the earth who traded with her, every sea-captain, the sailors, and all who earn their earn their living from the sea will stand far off, terrified at her torment. They will weep and mourn and cry out:

“Woe! Woe , O great city, dressed in fine linen, purple and scarlet,
and glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls!
In one hour such great wealth has been brought to ruin!”

In one hour, the great wealth and power of Beijing will be brought to ruin as foretold in verse# 21:

“Then a mighty angel picked up a boulder the size of a large millstone and threw it into the sea, and said:
“With such violence the great city of Babylon will be thrown down, never to be found again.”

China calls on Dalai Lama to ‘put aside illusions’ about talks

Reuters

The Dalai Lama gestures during a public talk and teachings event at St. Jakobshalle, in Basel, February 2015.

BEIJING (Reuters) – China on Wednesday urged the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, to “put aside his illusions” about talks on Tibet’s future and accused him of insincerity and covertly pushing for independence, rather than autonomy.

China has ruled Tibet with an iron fist since troops “peacefully liberated” the region in 1950. The Dalai Lama fled into exile in India in 1959 after an abortive uprising against Chinese rule.

Representatives of the Nobel Peace laureate held rounds of talks with China until 2010, but formal dialogue has stalled amid leadership changes in Beijing and a crackdown in Tibet.

In a lengthy white paper released by the official Xinhua news agency, the government said that having failed to use violence to achieve their goals, the Dalai Lama and his supporters had little understanding of modern Tibet and “a sentimental attachment to the old theocratic feudal serfdom”.

“The only sensible alternative is for the Dalai Lama and his supporters to accept that Tibet has been part of China since antiquity, to abandon their goals of dividing China and seeking independence for Tibet,” it said.

“The central government hopes that the Dalai Lama will put aside his illusions in his remaining years and face up to reality,” the government said in the white paper, released in both English and Chinese.

Beijing has been disappointed that the Dalai Lama remains committed to the Middle Way – which he says merely seeks genuine autonomy for the Himalayan region – and this is something China cannot accept as its real goal is still independence, it added.

“None of the negotiations were conducted in good faith – it was always the intention of the Dalai Lama and his supporters to divide China and achieve independence for Tibet,” it added.

The Tibetan government in exile, based in India, said in an emailed statement that condemning the Middle Way showed Beijing’s failure to come up with an alternative.
“The Middle Way Policy seeks genuine autonomy within the framework of the constitution of the People’s Republic of China which is a win-win proposition for all parties and one lauded throughout the world including various governments,” it said.

The Dalai Lama denies espousing violence and says he only wants genuine autonomy for Tibet, though China has repeatedly said he is insincere.
China has recently stepped up its rhetoric against the Dalai Lama. He is being received by fewer and fewer foreign leaders in recent years, because of the anger it draws from China, the world’s second-largest economy.

China rules out more Tibetan autonomy

(Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Clarence Fernandez

THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA: Red China Arrogant Nation, Evil Power.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA: Red China Arrogant Nation, Evil Power. Red China’s Maritime Expansionism.

Whole Threat – Military Occupation of Tibet remains a threat to the World

China’s Military Threat is worsening since 1950

Special Frontier Force - China's Military Threat: On the happy occasion of the celebration of India's Republic Day on January 26, 2014, I would like to speak about the military threat posed by China's military occupation of Tibet.
China’s Military Threat is worsening since 1950: On the happy occasion of the celebration of India’s Republic Day on January 26, 2014, I speak about the military threat posed by China’s military occupation of Tibet.

India declared itself as a sovereign Republic on January 26, 1950.  As Indians celebrate Republic Day on this day, I share an article titled “AIM OF CHINA’S MILITARY REFORMS” authored by  Professor Jayadeva Ranade, a member of the National Security Advisory Board, Distinguished Fellow with the Centre for Air Power Studies, New Delhi and who had in the past served as the additional Secretary in the Cabinet Secretariat. The threat posed by China by its military invasion of Tibet since 1950 is worsening without any respite.

Special Frontier Force - China's Military Threat: The Deputy Commander-in-Chief, Myanmar Defence Service and Commander-in-Chief, Myanmar Army Vice Senior General Soe Win visited the Indian Army Eastern Command Headquarters in Fort William, Kolkata on December 10, 2013. He is seen with Eastern Army Commander Lieutenant General Dalbir Singh Suhag who served as the Inspector General Special Frontier Force from April 2009 to March 2011.
China’s Military Threat: The Deputy Commander-in-Chief, Myanmar Defence Service and Commander-in-Chief, Myanmar Army Vice Senior General Soe Win visited the Indian Army Eastern Command Headquarters in Fort William, Kolkata on December 10, 2013. He is seen with Eastern Army Commander Lieutenant General Dalbir Singh Suhag who served as the Inspector General Special Frontier Force from April 2009 to March 2011.

For the first time in the history of Special Frontier Force, its Inspector General is now appointed as the Vice Chief of Army Staff (VCOAS). Lieutenant General Dalbir Singh Suhag served as Inspector General Special Frontier Force from April 2009 to March 2011. He served as the GOC-in-C, Eastern Command from June 16, 2012 to December 31, 2013. His present appointment as the Vice Chief of Army Staff indicates that he will become the next Indian Army Chief in August 2014.

In my opinion, China’s military power, military strategy, and military tactics will not assure the inevitability of peace that is imposed by its military occupation of Tibet. Peace and War are conditions that prevail in relationship with an external reality called Natural Order. Tibetan Resistance is a symptom of the absence of Natural Order in Tibet. Resistance will prevail, and Resistance will endure if Natural Order is not restored in Tibet. Tibetans love Tibet and the Love of one’s own country is neither a moral, nor a religious virtue for it is a Natural Virtue. Speaking of War and Peace in Tibet, I ask, “Can we order Peace for the sake of War, and not War for the sake of Peace?” If Perseverance is the Secret of all Triumphs, Tibetan Resistance can hope for its Victory.

Special Frontier Force - China's Military Threat: China's Military Power, China's Military Strategy, and China's Military Tactics cannot overcome the Power of Perseverance, the Perseverance of Tibetan Resistance.
China’s Military Threat: China’s Military Power, China’s Military Strategy, and China’s Military Tactics cannot overcome the Power of Perseverance, the Perseverance of Tibetan Resistance.

Aim of China’s Military Reforms

By Jayadeva Ranade

SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE - CHINA'S MILITARY THREAT: WORLD PARLIAMENTARIANS CONVENTION ON TIBET HELD IN OTTAWA, CANADA, 2012. Carl Gershman, President of the National Endowment for Democracy, Washington, DC, Professor Jayadeva Ranade, Distinguished Fellow with the Centre for Air Power Studies, New Delhi, with Richard Gere, Chairman of the International Campaign for Tibet.
CHINA’S MILITARY THREAT: WORLD PARLIAMENTARIANS CONVENTION ON TIBET HELD IN  OTTAWA,  CANADA, 2012. Carl Gershman, President of the National Endowment for Democracy, Washington, DC, Professor Jayadeva Ranade, Distinguished Fellow with the Centre for Air Power Studies, New Delhi, with Richard Gere, Chairman of the International Campaign for Tibet.

Published: 21st January 2014 06:00 AM

The writer is a member of the National Security Advisory Board and former additional secretary in the cabinet secretariat, Indian government.

Special Frontier Force - China's Military Threat: China CV-16 Liaoning Aircraft Carrier. Navy J-15 Flying Shark takeoff. China has modernized its military cpabilities.
China’s Military Threat: China CV-16 Liaoning Aircraft Carrier. Navy J-15 Flying Shark takeoff. China has modernized its military capabilities.

Modernization of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has entered the final stage of its current phase. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s Third Plenum, which was held in November 2013 and represents a major advance in China’s reforms, provided a substantive push to the PLA’s modernization when it approved proposals for major organizational restructuring. The reforms coincide with China’s continuing assertiveness that has unsettled its neighbors.
Appointments to the Central Military Commission (CMC) effected earlier by the CCP’s 18th Congress in Beijing in November 2012 accelerated the drive to strengthen and modernize the 2.3 million-strong PLA. Within days of his appointment as the CMC chairman, Xi Jinping not only endorsed the military modernization policies of his predecessors Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, but also began bluntly advocating more rapid modernization and technological upgrade of the PLA.
The organizational reforms approved by the CCP’s Third Plenum indicate that changes are imminent in the PLA’s command structure comprising the four principal departments and seven military regions. The PLA Navy (PLAN), PLA Air Force (PLAAF) and China’s strategic missile strike force, namely the Second Artillery, have clearly been allotted an enhanced operational role and will receive priority in allocation of budgets and manpower. Personnel of the Second Artillery, PLAAF and PLAN already receive higher salaries than their counterparts in the PLA’s ground forces. Within days of the Third Plenum, CMC vice-chairman and till recently the PLAAF commander, Xu Qiliang, wrote an article in the party mouthpiece People’s Daily confirming the reforms will be implemented. He mentioned that the number of non-combatants would be drastically reduced and that the reforms would enable the PLA to win wars.
Quite separately, reports filtering out of Beijing and disclosed initially in the solitary official English-language China Daily, suggest that plans have been finalized to merge the military regions. These envisage reorganizing the seven military regions into five “combat zones” (zhan chu) within the next five years. Over the past few years China’s military literature has hinted at such impending change with occasional references to “Theatre Commands”. The reorganization is intended to concentrate firepower and troops trained for a specific type of warfare within a single theatre or zone for ease of rapid deployment. Land and sea warfare forces are to be grouped separately. This reorganization gives the PLA a definite “outward orientation” neatly meshing with its doctrine of “active defence”.

Special Frontier Force - China's Military Threat: Shenyang SAC J-16 Stealth Fighter Aircraft.
China’s Military Threat: Shenyang SAC J-16 Stealth Fighter Aircraft. Military Spending will not increase Military Power.

According to these reports, the three mainly coastal military regions of Jinan, Nanjing and Guangzhou are to be converted into three “combat zones.” Adopting a mainly maritime role, their primary objective will be to reinforce China’s efforts to establish dominance over the East China Sea and South China Sea and face up to the US-Japan alliance. By 2020, all three zones will be reinforced by three aircraft carrier combat groups. Reports suggest existing aircraft carrier Liaoning will be deployed in the East China Sea, while the other two aircraft carriers will be in the South China Sea. Interestingly on January 1, Xinhua showed pictures of Liaoning returning to its home base in Qingdao after month-long exercises in the South China Sea, but avoided mention of the run-in with the US-guided missile warship USS Cowpens.
In April 2013, Xinhua reported Rear Admiral Song Xue, deputy chief of staff of the PLA Navy, saying a second aircraft carrier was under construction. He told foreign military attaches that it would be larger and carry more fighter aircraft. On January 18, 2014, party secretary of Liaoning province Wang Min disclosed China’s second domestically produced aircraft carrier is being built at Dalian and would be ready in six years.
The four inland military regions of Shenyang, Beijing, Chengdu and Lanzhou are to similarly be merged into two large combat zones. Chengdu and Lanzhou both exercise operational jurisdiction over the India-China border. Each of the two new zones will have units of the PLA Navy, Air Force and Second Artillery integral to them. They will function under a new unified combat command. These reports also disclose that the PLA’s 300,000 non-combatant personnel will be eliminated by 2022. Though China’s ministry of defence denied the reports, it is pertinent that mention was first made in China Daily and that its contents are generally in consonance with Xu Qiliang’s assertion in People’s Daily and the reforms approved at the CCP CC’s Third Plenum.

Special Frontier Force - China's Military Threat: China has built over 39 Wind Tunnels that include Subsonic, Supersonic, Hypersonic, and others to improve its ability to design and test its military aircraft.
China’s Military Threat: China has built over 39 Wind Tunnels that include Subsonic, Supersonic, Hypersonic, and others to improve its ability to design and test its military aircraft.
Special Frontier Force - China's Military Threat: China has reportedly developed a WU-14 Hypersonic Glide Vehicle. China's Military Empire will collapse under its own weight as things in Nature change while Natural Order remains Unchanging.
China’s Military Threat: China has reportedly developed a WU-14 Hypersonic Glide Vehicle. China’s Military Empire will collapse under its own weight as things in Nature change while Natural Order remains Unchanging.

Rapid advances have also been made in the indigenous development of advanced defence technology and hardware in the past three years. Emphasis was underscored with the appointment of General Zhang Youxia, a known proponent of indigenous development of modern advanced defence technology, as director of the PLA’s General Armaments Department (GAD) in October 2012. The latest development was the announcement on January 9 that China had conducted the first flight test of a new hypersonic glide vehicle, dubbed the WU-14 by the Pentagon, thus becoming one of five nations to possess this capability. The hypersonic vehicle, capable of travelling at speeds between Mach 8 and 12, represents a major advance in China’s secretive strategic nuclear and conventional military and missile programmes. China had in May 2012 opened a new JF12 shockwave hypersonic wind tunnel—the largest of its kind—that replicates flying conditions between Mach 5 and 9.

Also this month, pictures of the new two-seater J-16 stealth fighter built by the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation were posted online. Slated to first be inducted by PLAN and later the PLAAF, the J-16 is loaded with eight tons of air-to-air and anti-ship missiles and has a combat radius of several hundred miles, enabling it to help Chinese warships battle for control of regional waters claimed by China. Some reports claim two dozen J-16 are ready for induction.
These military reforms will give the PLA an outward focus, implying that “recovery” of territories claimed by Beijing will be a central feature of China’s strategic agenda. They will reinforce diplomacy aimed at realising “China’s Dream”. Xi Jinping, meanwhile, continues to further tighten his and the CCP’s grip on the PLA. An important example is the Third Plenum approving the PLA being brought within the ambit of the party’s anti-corruption watchdog, the Central Discipline Inspection Commission.

Professor Jayadeva Ranade is a member of the National Security Advisory Board and former additional secretary in the cabinet secretariat, Indian government.

China’s Military Threat: Nuclear Submarine 2009 plan type094 02