RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – OCCUPIER OF TIBET: ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS SUGGEST THAT PEOPLE OF ANCIENT TIBET HAD FACED THREATS OF FOREIGN CONQUESTS.
Red China took possession of Tibet or seized Tibet using her superior military power. Red China told a lie when she claimed about peaceful liberation of Tibet by People’s Liberation Army. Red China is an occupying force that faces eviction from Tibet when Peace, Freedom, and Justice will prevail again. It is interesting to note that people of ancient Tibet had faced similar threats from external aggressors.
Archaeologist explores the first civilization of ancient Tibet
Mon, Aug 10, 2015
Vestiges of a once flourishing prehistoric civilization dot the landscape of Upper Tibet.
For more than two decades, University of Virginia Tibet Center archaeologist and historian John Vincent Bellezza has been exploring highland central Asia, going places where few archaeologists and explorers have ventured. Since 1992, he has investigated and documented scores of monumental sites, rock art, castles, temples, residential structures, and other features on the desolate reaches of the TIBETAN PLATEAU, building a knowledge base on a vast archaic civilization and ancient religion that flourished long before Buddhism emerged and dominated this otherwise comparatively sparsely populated high altitude region.
“Commonly, when people think of Tibet, Buddhism comes to mind,” writes Bellezza in his newest book, THE DAWN OF TIBET. By this he also implies the better-known and popular images of the imposing, sky-high, mountaintop monumental wonders of Buddhist centers such as Lhasa. But, he continues, “before Buddhism was introduced, a different type of civilization reigned in Tibet, one with monuments, art, and ideas alien to those of more recent times……….Demarcated through an enormous network of citadels and burial centers spanning one thousand miles from east to west, it would endure for some fifteen hundred years.”*
Bellezza is describing an archaic civilization known as ZHANG ZHUNG, which flourished from about 500 BC to 625 AD and encompassed most of the western and northwestern regions of the Tibetan Plateau. Mastering an ancient technology base not normally attributed to people of this region in the popular perception, the people of Iron Age Zhang Zhung, according to Bellezza, built citadels, elite stone-corbelled residential structures, temples, necropolises featuring stone pillars, sported metal armaments and a strong equestrian culture, established links with other cultures across Eurasia, and exhibited a relatively uniform and standardized cultural tradition rich in ritualistic religious practice, where kings and priests dominated the highest rungs of power. These are all characteristics of stratified, centralized and developed societies most often associated with the more southerly, lower-altitude great Old World Bronze and Iron Age civilizations that ringed the Mediterranean as well as the advanced civilizations of Mesoamerica and South America. The supporting findings on the landscape, when considered across two decades of investigation, have been nothing less than prolific.
The Tibetan Plateau features ancient stone structures, many of which date back to the First Millennium B.C. McKay Savage, Wikimedia Commons
But this archaeological evidence, according to Bellezza, also opened a window on a civilization that heavily fortified itself from threats both within and without. The struggle for resources in a land where climate gradually changed over preceding millennia from one that was relatively warmer and moist to one that was cold and dry may have played a significant role in this. Competing external and internal forces may have played another. “Most archaic era residential facilities in Upper Tibet were built on unassailable high ground, on inaccessible islands, or in hidden spots, “ writes Bellezza. “This insularity indicates that defense was a preoccupation of the population. Eternal Bon historical sources speak of the martial character of Zhang Zhung society and its political nexus of kings and priests.” Even the priests were depicted in the literature as possessing arms. On the other hand, notes Bellezza, “these literary accounts also hold that the ancient priesthood was very adept in the practice of astrology, divination, magic, and medicine.”*
With much still awaiting discovery and study, Bellezza continues to explore and analyze the massive trove of data he has already compiled on this ancient people. In time, he and other researchers hope, by merging references in the literary sources with the accumulating new archaeological evidence, a sharper focus on an otherwise obscure and ill-understood civilization will emerge.
Readers can learn more about Zhang Zhung in Belezza’s book, THE DAWN OF TIBET, and in an upcoming article about Zhang Zhung authored by Bellezza in the Fall issue of Popular Archaeology Magazine.
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA West Philippine Sea Aggression – Fiery Cross Reef
Red China’s passionate desire to exercise power and influence over her weaker regional neighbors has undermined the prospects for Peace, Security, and Stability in Southeast Asia since 1950s.
SE Asia warns of ‘increased tensions’ over S. China Sea
By Nicolas Revise August 6, 2015 1:40 PM
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – IMPERIALIST: A satellite image of China’s military airstrip at Fiery Cross Reef.
Land reclamation in the South China Sea has “increased tensions” in the region, Southeast Asian foreign ministers said Thursday at the close of talks dominated by Beijing’s island-building.
The declaration, contained in a final communique, followed a warning by US Secretary of State John Kerry that Washington would not tolerate any restrictions on freedom of navigation in the strategically important waters.
The Southeast Asian ministers’ joint final statement noted “the serious concerns expressed by some ministers on the land reclamations in the South China Sea”. It said the land works “have eroded trust and confidence, increased tensions and may undermine peace, security and stability in the South China Sea,” without specifically singling out Beijing.
The communique was hashed out after two days of wrangling over how hard to pressure China on its controversial drive to expand tiny reefs and build military posts in the disputed waters.
The issue took centre stage at the series of diplomatic meetings this week in Kuala Lumpur, hosted by the 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
US Secretary of State John Kerry (L) and China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi talk before a bilateral meeting at the Putra World Trade Center August 5, 2015 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. REUTERS/Brendan Smialowski/Pool
US Secretary of State John Kerry attends an Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
They also included envoys from two dozen other nations such as China and the United States. Beijing claims control over nearly the entire South China Sea, a key shipping route thought to hold rich oil and gas reserves. Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei — all ASEAN members — also have various claims, as does Taiwan, many of which overlap.
Even before the land reclamations, China had sparked rising unease over the years with actions interpreted as seeking to shore up its disputed claims, in violation of a pledge not to upset the status quo.
A day after voicing concern to his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi over the potential “militarization” of the South China Sea, Kerry said freedom of navigation must be maintained.
Red Dragon – Red China – Imperialist: West Philippine Sea Aggression. Johnson South Reef
Alleged reclamation by China on what is internationally recognised as the Johnson South Reef in the West Philippine Sea or South China Sea.
– Behind-the-scenes wrangling –
“Let me be clear: The United States will not accept restrictions on freedom of navigation and overflight, or other lawful uses of the sea,” he told reporters.
Diplomatic sources told AFP the Philippines and Vietnam — which have been in the most direct confrontation with China — had called for strong language. But they said there had been pushback from Beijing’s traditional allies among the association. Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar traditionally side with China within ASEAN.
The tug-of-war raised the spectre of a bitter 2012 ASEAN meeting hosted by Cambodia, when the bloc was unable for the first time in its four-decade history to issue a joint statement. Cambodia was accused of precipitating the debacle by refusing to allow criticism of China over territorial issues.
A Malaysian foreign ministry source told AFP there were some “ASEAN members who said that we don’t want a repeat of 2012”.
The United States and Southeast Asian nations have called for a halt to further island-expansion and construction by China. Wang, however, said Wednesday that land reclamation had “already stopped” — a claim some diplomats said was met with scepticism at the gathering.
Kerry told reporters after the close of the talks: “The Chinese have indicated that they have stopped. I hope it is true. I don’t know yet.” ASEAN has expressed increasing impatience with China’s actions over the years.
Analysts, however, say Beijing maintains immense diplomatic and economic leverage in the region and that a concerted and sustained effort by ASEAN to resist China’s assertions was unlikely. Singapore International News South China Sea
US Secretary of State John Kerry (L) and China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi talk before a bilateral meeting at the Putra World Trade Center August 5, 2015 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. REUTERS/Brendan Smialowski/Pool
Red China’s acts of aggression alarm her neighbors and nations of Southeast Asia are trying their best to convince Red China about the nature of her acts. It is not easy to persuade a tyrant for a tyrant will always find a pretext to justify own actions and find fault with others if they complain about it. Red China is a danger to peace and tranquility in Southeast Asia and she must be quarantined until such time she recovers from her disease called ‘AGGRESSION’.
US, China bicker over territorial claims in South China Sea
By MATTHEW LEE and EILEEN NG
China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi, right, listens while U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry talks before a bilateral meeting at the Putra World Trade Center in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Wednesday, Aug. 5, 2015. (Brendan Smialowski/Pool Photo via AP)
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — The United States and China clashed Wednesday over who is to blame for rising tensions over territorial disputes in the South China Sea with Washington demanding a halt to “problematic actions” in the area and Beijing telling foreign parties to keep out.
In blunt but diplomatic terms, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi suggested that efforts to ease tensions over competing claims remained a contentious work in progress despite hopes for movement on ways to resolve them here at a Southeast Asian regional security forum. Kerry urged China to end provocative land reclamation projects in the South China Sea that have ratcheted up tensions with its smaller neighbors in some of the world’s busiest commercial sea lanes. Wang, meanwhile, sent a strong message that those without claims, such as the United States, should allow China and the other claimants to deal with them on their own. Kerry told foreign ministers of members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations that the U.S. shares their desire “to ensure the security of critical sea lanes and fishing grounds, and we want to see that disputes in the area are managed peacefully and on the basis of international law.” A senior U.S. official said Kerry made the case for easing tensions in a closed-door meeting with Wang. In his meeting with Wang, Kerry reiterated U.S. concerns about the rising tensions and “China’s large-scale reclamation, construction, and militarization of features,” according to the senior U.S. official. The official said Kerry had “encouraged” China, and the other claimants, “to halt problematic actions in order to create space for diplomacy.” The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about the private meeting. Chinese land reclamation in contested waters has irked Southeast Asian nations who, like the U.S., want China to stop. Washington is calling for a halt to aggressive actions by China and other claimants to allow a diplomatic solution to the rift. The U.S. is not a party to the conflict but says a peaceful resolution of the problem and freedom of navigation are in the U.S. national interest. China rejects any U.S. involvement and insists it has the right to continue the reclamation projects. Beijing was opposed to the issue being raised at the security forum in the first place. Kerry told the ASEAN ministers that his meeting with Wang had been “good” and that he hoped “we will find a way to move forward effectively, together, all of us” over the course of the two-day forum. But Wang gave no indication he had been swayed by Kerry, telling reporters later that foreign parties should support Beijing and ASEAN’s plan to accelerate negotiations on a code of conduct governing behavior in the disputed waters. “We want to send a clear message to the international community that China and ASEAN have the capability and wisdom to resolve this specific issue between us,” he told a news conference. “We shouldn’t allow the South China Sea region to be destabilized.” He said that China is committed to a peaceful solution through “rules and mechanisms already in place.” He also pledged that China will uphold freedom of navigation and overflight at sea. “There has not, and will not be any problem in this regard,” he said. However, ASEAN members have complained that although China has pledged to start substantive negotiations with them on a code of conduct governing behavior in the resource-rich and busy waterways, there is a gap between its pledge and the situation on the ground. China, Taiwan and several ASEAN members — the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam and Brunei — have wrangled over ownership and control of the South China Sea in a conflict that has flared on and off for decades. Tensions rose last year when China began building artificial islands in the Spratly Islands, which the U.S. and Beijing’s rival claimant countries fear could impede freedom of navigation and overflights in a major transit area for the world’s oil and merchandise. The disputes have led to deadly confrontations between China and Vietnam, and Washington and governments in the region are concerned that greater military deployments increase the risk of miscalculations and accidental clashes that could spiral out of control. U.S. officials say China has reclaimed more than 3,000 acres (1,200 hectares) in the last 18 months alone. That figure dwarfs the 100 acres (40 hectares) that Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines and Taiwan have reclaimed in disputed areas over the last 45 years. Wang bristled when asked about calls for China to halt its island-building activities. “China has stopped, China has stopped. You want to see who is building? Take a plane and go see who is still building,” he said. John Kerry South China Sea China
Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – SOUTH CHINA SEA AGGRESSION
Red China is guilty of aggression for she makes unprovoked attacks on other nations. Red China is in the habit of being destructively hostile to her weak neighbors. Red China used her armed forces violating her international obligations in ruthless pursuit of her desire to dominate other nations to further her own ends. Firstly, I am asking news media to use correct linguistic terms to describe Red China’s war like acts.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi listens while U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry talks before a bilateral meeting at the Putra World Trade Center on Wednesday in Kuala Lumpur. | REUTERS
Kerry raises South China Sea concerns with China’s Wang
AFP-JIJI, Reuters
Aug 5, 2015
Online: Aug 05, 2015
Print: Aug 06, 2015
Last Modified: Aug 05, 2015
KUALA LUMPUR – U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry voiced concern to China on Wednesday over its land reclamation in the South China Sea and the “militarization” of its disputed waters. Kerry made the remarks to Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Kuala Lumpur on the sidelines of meetings involving the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, where maritime tensions have taken center stage.
The official said Kerry told Wang that while Washington did not take a position on sovereignty claims in the strategic waterway, it wanted to see them resolved peacefully and in accordance with international law.
“He encouraged China, along with the other claimants, to halt problematic actions in order to create space for diplomacy,” the official said. In brief remarks to reporters after his talks with Kerry, Wang said China would pursue “peaceful discussions” to resolve the South China Sea dispute. He did not elaborate.
Recent satellite images show China has almost finished building a 3,000-metre airstrip on one of its seven new islands in the Spratlys. The airstrip will be long enough to accommodate most Chinese military aircraft, security experts have said, giving Beijing greater reach into the heart of maritime Southeast Asia.
China claims most of the South China Sea, through which $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei have overlapping claims.
China had said it did not want the South China Sea dispute raised at this week’s ASEAN meetings, but some ministers, including from host Malaysia, rebuffed that call, saying the issue was too important to ignore.
In a statement, Japan’s Senior Vice Foreign Minister Minoru Kiuchi “voiced deep concern over unilateral actions that change the status quo and heighten tensions in the South China Sea, including large-scale land reclamation, the construction of outposts and their use for military purposes.”
Despite strong public comments by several Southeast Asian ministers about the need to reduce tensions, the grouping had yet to issue a customary communique following annual talks between its foreign ministers on Tuesday.
“On the South China Sea, I think we are probably nearing a formulation,” said Jakkrit Srivali, director-general of the ASEAN department at Thailand’s Foreign Affairs Ministry. Other issues had also held up the statement, he said without elaborating. A communique was expected at the end of joint meetings between ASEAN, the United States, China, Japan and other countries on Thursday, senior officials said.
China and Southeast Asian nations had agreed to set up a foreign ministers’ hotline to tackle emergencies in the waterway, a senior ASEAN official said on Friday. This was expected to be contained in the communique.
Wang was due to hold talks with ASEAN foreign ministers later on Wednesday. On Monday, he described calls for a freeze in activity in the South China Sea as “unrealistic.”
Kerry told his ASEAN counterparts in a separate meeting that Washington wanted to see stability in the South China Sea. “We want to ensure the security of critical sea lanes and fishing grounds and to see that disputes in the area are managed peacefully and on the basis of international law,” Kerry said.
China has shown no sign of halting its construction on artificial islands in disputed areas. It has accused the United States of militarizing the South China Sea by staging patrols and joint military drills.
The senior State Department official said Kerry and Wang also discussed Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the United States in September, as well as U.S. concerns over cybersecurity and human rights in China.
“They agreed there are many shared challenges that both countries should work closer together to address, such as climate change and development, and that more dialogue and cooperation between the United States and China remains vital,” the official said.
Revelation So, is the whole world just going to continue sitting on their thumbs while China continues to advance is what is clearly not quote “militarization”, but indeed militarization? What will it take to get the United States, the U.N- SOMEONE- to strike in glaring detail the Chinese government is ignoring officially set maritime borders and take actual action against this? Do we honestly have to wait until China takes over a nation or two in order to wake people up? This is not a time to shy due to the possibility of war. We might have one in the future if this keeps up.
koedo I couldn’t agree more. What’s truly frightening is the mismatch between Kerry and Wang Yi. Remember, Kerry and Obama, think they just accomplished a historic agreement with Iran. As far as negotiating with China goes, history is, indeed, repeating itself and Kerry is playing the lead role of Neville Chamberlain. China does not fear the current US administration in the least bit. Why should they? Kerry and Obama’s complete incompetence in the arena of foreign policy, is going to, literally, get people killed.
Revelation Bother the US Administration the Chinese government fears no one, and why? Because the world has stupidly fed the beast until it’s become the monster it is today. The majority of world economies depend on China, and they can’t simply sever relations; China knows this, which is why they dare to cause trouble. No kidding how incompetent Obama is; then again, the States has not had a competent president in ages, let alone one who isn’t a bloody coward.
THE PROBLEM OF RED CHINA’S AGGRESSION IN WEST PHILIPPINE SEA
RED CHINA’S AGGRESSION IN WEST PHILIPPINE SEA DEMANDS FULL UNDERSTANDING OF HER EXPANSIONIST POLICY.
I am pleased to note that United States is giving support to Philippines to confront the problem of Red China’s aggression in West Philippine Sea. Resolution of this problem demands a proper understanding of Red China’s Expansionist Policy and containing and resisting all manifestations of Red China’s Expansionism. Tibet is Red China’s first victim and Southeast Asia’s nations have to seek justice for Tibetans if they want to protect their own national interests from Red China’s Imperialism.
US, PHILIPPINES URGE END TO ISLAND-BUILDING IN S. CHINA SEA
FILE – Foreign Minister of the Philippines Albert del Rosario (L) and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry shake hands before a meeting.
SIMONE ORENDAIN
August 04, 2015 8:17 AM
MANILA—
The Philippines says it will back calls by the United States for a series of measures aimed at reducing tensions in the South China Sea during a regional security forum in Kuala Lumpur Wednesday. Washington wants countries to stop building artificial islands and carrying out military activities.
The Philippines is expected to raise the issue of China’s activities in the South China Sea during meetings of the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) this week. Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario released a statement Tuesday saying that his country would also endorse a U.S. call for stopping all work on disputed outcroppings and any military activities.
“As a means of de-escalating tensions in the region, the Philippines fully supports and will pro-actively promote the call of the United States on the ‘three halts’ — a halt in reclamation, halt in construction and a halt in aggressive actions that could further heighten tensions,” Del Rosario said.
However, he said the Philippines back those measures only if other claimants, including China, do the same. And he said this does not mean that China’s island construction on at least seven outcroppings is legitimate.
In recent months the U.S. has been raising concerns over China’s project to convert reefs and shoals in the Spratlys into manmade islands. “This has been the American position for what, almost two years now, saying that everyone should stop developing their particular areas that they hold,” explained Carl Baker, programs director at the Pacific Forum of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. “But everybody knows that this is really directed at China.”
China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi arrives at a meeting during the 48th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) foreign ministers meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Aug. 4, 2015.
CHINA’S STANCE
China insists that ASEAN forums are not the place to raise these territorial disputes.
Beijing claimed nearly the entire South China Sea, while the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan also have overlapping claims. The Philippines has filed a case with the Permanent Court of Arbitration to question what it calls China’s “excessive claims” in the sea. China rejected the case and is not participating.
Baker does not foresee any change in the U.S. position and nor does he see a shift in China’s stance, especially since it already built the islands. He predicts that the standoff will “inhibit security cooperation” in Southeast Asia.
On Monday in Singapore, China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, downplayed the concerns over Beijing’s island building, which has rapidly built airstrips and buildings on top of what were until recently mostly submerged rocks and reefs.
“At the moment the general situation in the South China Sea is stable, and China is steadfastly committed to working with the parties to maintain the situation which has not come easily. And we will never allow any country to destabilize the South China Sea,” said Wang.
Wang made a pitch for peacefully resolving the disputes through “consultations and negotiations” among what he called “five commitment points” of China regarding the contested sea.
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – AGGRESSION IN WEST PHILIPPINE SEA. AGGRESSOR MUST BE QUARANTINED.
At Special Frontier Force, the fact of Red China’s aggression in Tibet is recognized since 1950. Now, Red China’s aggression in West Philippine Sea is attracting media attention unlike Red China’s prolonged military occupation of Tibet. Aggressor nation must be quarantined by placing diplomatic and economic sanctions. Aggression has to be treated like a disease and aggressor has to be isolated from rest of the global community for aggression poses dangers to peaceful existence of all people.
Protesters condemn China’s aggression in West Philippine Sea
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – AGGRESSION IN WEST PHILIPPINE SEA : PROTEST ON JULY 25, 2015. RAFAEL ALUNAN WITH MARTIN DINO BELLE ENRIQUEZ AND DANTE JIMENEZ.
By LEO REYES Jul 25, 2015
The West Philippine Sea Coalition has condemned China’s aggression in the West Philippine Sea in a protest rally held along Roxas Boulevard (fronting the West Philippine Sea) in Manila Saturday morning.
Belle Enriquez of West Philippine Sea Coalition FB
The coalition members include the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC), RAM, Anti-Drugs Advocate, Guardians, Motorcycle Philippines Federation, United Defense Manufacturing Corp., ProGun, SMX Phils and Predator Riders, among others. The event was the 3rd Annual Day of Protest against China’s bullying in the West Philippine Sea. Simultaneous protests have also been held in London, United States and other cities across the globe.
Anti-China Rally, Manila July 25, 2015 FB
Among others, the West Philippine Sea Coalition cited China’s territorial aggression when it reclaimed (and continues reclaim) reefs, shoals, islets, and other submerged rocks and corals for their exclusive use despite diplomatic intervention by the US, Japan and other ASEAN-member countries. On the environmental front, the coalition scored China for the massive destruction of the coral reefs in the disputed territories as a result of its ongoing reclamation and construction activities. The coalition also cited China’s invasion of the Scarborough Shoal, a rich fishing ground located within the 200-mile economic zone of the Philippines. China’s continued presence in what the Philippines claims as part of its territory had prevented hundreds of Filipino fishermen from traversing the rich fishing ground resulting in their family’s economic displacement. The coalition lambasted China for being a top source of illegal drugs that continues to be smuggled into the Philippines by Chinese drug lords. In their short talk during the rally, Top VACC officials Dante Jimenez and Martin Dino together with Anti-Drugs Advocate Jonathan Morales criticized China for having destroyed lives of hundreds of thousands of drug addiction victims in the country.
Former DILG Sec. Rafael Alunan with Nick Sotelo FB
Alunan and leaders of the coalition called on the public to support the case pending before the UN Arbitral Tribunal by educating the people on the merits of the case. At the same time, they also urged the public to call on the nation’s leaders to fast track the development of a credible external defense capability. Rep. Roilo Golez, who is supporting the coalition has called on the public to boycott made in China products especially garments and buy products that are made in the Philippines.
In London, Gene Alcantara, a longtime immigration adviser and social activist together with concerned Filipinos in UK joined the global protest with their placards denouncing the Chinese aggression at the Chinese Embassy despite heavy rain. Similar protest was also held in Ireland by the Filipino communities there
Gene Alcantara with friends at the Chinese Embassy in London Gene Alcantara FB
Filipino communities across the US have also participated in the Anti-China protest like the one shown here from the Filipino group in Guam and the Marianas.
Anti-China protest in Guam, July 25, 2015 Gene Alcantara-FB-Pacific News Center
The leaders of the West Philippine Sea Coalition have vowed to continue heightened protests against China’s aggression in the disputed territories through legal and peaceful means. As part of its campaign to educate the public on the country’s territorial claim, West Philippine Sea Coalition’s Belle Enriquez told Digital Journal that another forum will be held in late August to allow the public to view an ancient map showing the extent of the Philippine coastline.
Red Dragon – Red China aggressor nation – United Nations must act to stop China’s Aggression in Southeast Asia.
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – AGGRESSION IN WEST PHILIPPINE SEA. AGGRESSOR MUST BE QUARANTINED.
Red Dragon – Red China aggressor nation – United Nations must act to stop China’s Aggression in Southeast Asia.
RED DRAGON – RED CHINA – AGGRESSION IN WEST PHILIPPINE SEA : PROTEST ON JULY 25, 2015. RAFAEL ALUNAN WITH MARTIN DINO BELLE ENRIQUEZ AND DANTE JIMENEZ.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA: Red China Arrogant Nation, Evil Power.
While Red China enjoys very impressive trade and commerce relations with a large number of nations of this world, it is not hard to reflect upon her sudden downfall. The word ‘Babylon’ symbolizes ‘evil’ and a seat of evil power. Man recognizes actions that unjustly harmful to others as ‘evil’ for those actions have consequences. The most important consequence of ‘evil’ action is that of a calamity, catastrophe, or disaster that will rapidly ruin the power wielded by ‘evildoer’. A man who chooses to act in evil manner causes his own downfall for there is no escape from consequences of evil acts. Red China cannot pay a ransom to ward off disaster that is sure to strike her. Using words of Prophet Isaiah, I would like to tell Red China, “There is not one that can save you.”
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA: The Fall of Babylon – Evil Empire – Prophet Isaiah
Isaiah 47 NIV – The Fall of Babylon – “Go down, sit – Bible Gateway ISAIAH 47 NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION(NIV)
THE FALL OF BABYLON
47 “Go down, sit in the dust,
Virgin Daughter Babylon; sit on the ground without a throne, queen city of the Babylonians.[a] No more will you be called tender or delicate. 2 Take millstones and grind flour; take off your veil. Lift up your skirts, bare your legs, and wade through the streams. 3 Your nakedness will be exposed and your shame uncovered. I will take vengeance; I will spare no one.”
4 Our Redeemer—the Lord Almighty is his name—
is the Holy One of Israel.
5 “Sit in silence, go into darkness,
queen city of the Babylonians; no more will you be called queen of kingdoms. 6 I was angry with my people and desecrated my inheritance; I gave them into your hand, and you showed them no mercy. Even on the aged you laid a very heavy yoke. 7 You said, ‘I am forever— the eternal queen!’ But you did not consider these things or reflect on what might happen.
8 “Now then, listen, you lover of pleasure,
lounging in your security and saying to yourself, ‘I am, and there is none besides me. I will never be a widow or suffer the loss of children.’ 9 Both of these will overtake you in a moment, on a single day: loss of children and widowhood. They will come upon you in full measure, in spite of your many sorceries and all your potent spells. 10 You have trusted in your wickedness and have said, ‘No one sees me.’ Your wisdom and knowledge mislead you when you say to yourself, ‘I am, and there is none besides me.’ 11 Disaster will come upon you, and you will not know how to conjure it away. A calamity will fall upon you that you cannot ward off with a ransom; a catastrophe you cannot foresee will suddenly come upon you.
12 “Keep on, then, with your magic spells
and with your many sorceries, which you have labored at since childhood. Perhaps you will succeed, perhaps you will cause terror. 13 All the counsel you have received has only worn you out! Let your astrologers come forward, those stargazers who make predictions month by month, let them save you from what is coming upon you. 14 Surely they are like stubble; the fire will burn them up. They cannot even save themselves from the power of the flame. These are not coals for warmth; this is not a fire to sit by. 15 That is all they are to you— these you have dealt with and labored with since childhood. All of them go on in their error; there is not one that can save you.
Footnotes:
Isaiah 47:1 Or Chaldeans; also in verse 5
Cross references:
Isaiah 47:1 : S Job 2:13; S Isa 29:4 Isaiah 47:1 : S Isa 21:9; S 23:12 Isaiah 47:1 : Ps 137:8; Jer 50:42; 51:33; Zec 2:7 Isaiah 47:1 : Dt 28:56 Isaiah 47:2 : Ex 11:5; Mt 24:41 Isaiah 47:2 : S Jdg 16:21 Isaiah 47:2 : S Ge 24:65 Isaiah 47:2 : S Isa 32:11 Isaiah 47:3 : S Ge 2:25; Eze 16:37; Na 3:5 Isaiah 47:3 : S Isa 20:4 Isaiah 47:3 : S Isa 1:24; S 34:8 Isaiah 47:3 : Isa 13:18-19 Isaiah 47:4 : S Job 19:25 Isaiah 47:4 : S Isa 13:4 Isaiah 47:4 : Isa 48:2; Jer 50:34; Am 4:13 Isaiah 47:4 : S Isa 1:4; 48:17 Isaiah 47:5 : S Job 2:13 Isaiah 47:5 : Isa 9:2; 13:10 Isaiah 47:5 : S Isa 21:9 Isaiah 47:5 : ver 7; La 1:1; Rev 18:7 Isaiah 47:5 : S Isa 13:19; Rev 17:18 Isaiah 47:6 : S 2Ch 28:9 Isaiah 47:6 : S Dt 13:15; S Isa 42:24; Jer 2:7; 50:11 Isaiah 47:6 : Isa 10:13 Isaiah 47:6 : S Isa 14:6 Isaiah 47:7 : S Isa 10:13; Da 4:30 Isaiah 47:7 : S ver 5; Rev 18:7 Isaiah 47:7 : S Isa 42:23, 25 Isaiah 47:7 : S Dt 32:29 Isaiah 47:8 : S Isa 32:9 Isaiah 47:8 : S Isa 45:6 Isaiah 47:8 : Isa 49:21; 54:4; La 1:1; Rev 18:7 Isaiah 47:9 : S Ps 55:15; 73:19; 1Th 5:3; Rev 18:8-10 Isaiah 47:9 : S Isa 13:18 Isaiah 47:9 : Isa 4:1; Jer 15:8; 18:21 Isaiah 47:9 : ver 12; Na 3:4; Mal 3:5 Isaiah 47:9 : Dt 18:10-11; Rev 9:21; 18:23 Isaiah 47:10 : S Job 15:31; Ps 52:7; 62:10 Isaiah 47:10 : S 2Ki 21:16; S Isa 29:15 Isaiah 47:10 : S Isa 5:21 Isaiah 47:10 : Isa 44:20 Isaiah 47:11 : S Isa 10:3; S 14:15; S 21:9; S 31:2; Lk 17:27 Isaiah 47:11 : S Ps 55:15; S Isa 17:14; 1Th 5:3 Isaiah 47:12 : S ver 9; S Ex 7:11 Isaiah 47:13 : Isa 57:10; Jer 51:58; Hab 2:13 Isaiah 47:13 : S Isa 19:3; S 44:25 Isaiah 47:13 : ver 15; S Isa 5:29; 43:13; 46:7 Isaiah 47:14 : S Isa 5:24 Isaiah 47:14 : S Isa 30:30 Isaiah 47:14 : Isa 10:17; Jer 51:30, 32, 58 Isaiah 47:15 : Rev 18:11 Isaiah 47:15 : S ver 13; S Isa 44:17
Doomsayer of Doom Dooma predicts the fall of Evil Red Empire.The Evil Red Empire – Beijing is Doomed -Red China Arrogant Nation, Full of Self-Pride. EvilDoer.Doomsayer of Doom Dooma says Bejing is Doomed.Doomsayer of Doom Dooma shares Prophecy – Beijing is Doomed by asteroid impact.Doomsayer of Doom Dooma shares Prophecy – Catostrophe to strike Evil Red Empire.Asteroid Day – Doomsday Prophecy – The Fall of Evil Red Empire
Doomsayer of Doom Dooma says Bejing is Doomed.
Doomsayer of Doom Dooma shares Prophecy – Beijing is Doomed by asteroid impact.
Doomsayer of Doom Dooma shares Prophecy – Catostrophe to strike Evil Red Empire.
Asteroid Day – Doomsday Prophecy – The Fall of Evil Red Empire
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – BEIJING IS DOOMED – NO ONE CAN SAVE RED CHINA: Red China Arrogant Nation, Evil Power.
The Evil Red Empire – Beijing is Doomed -Red China Arrogant Nation, Full of Self-Pride. EvilDoer.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – DOOMSDAY PROPHECY
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – DOOMSDAY PROPHECY FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT BOOK “REVELATION” CHAPTER 18.
The New Testament Book “REVELATION” shared a prophecy predicting sudden, unexpected, fall of an evil empire using coded name “BABYLON.” Planet Earth has already witnessed several impacts by heavenly bodies called asteroids, or meteorites with known or unknown consequences to life on Earth. The most significant asteroid impact event may have happened 65 million years ago which wiped out a huge variety of animals collectively known as ‘Dinosaurs’ and surprisingly, life thrived on Earth with emergence of new species that populate Earth in present times. Without any human initiative, without any human intervention, Earth may be hit by a very large stone that would result in the downfall of an evil empire while sparing rest of the humanity. I am asking my readers to contemplate on Doomsday Prophecy found in ‘Revelation’ Chapter 18 and compare its scenario with some of Earth’s recorded asteroid/meteorite impact events:
Doomsayer of Doom Dooma: Qaraqul crater, Black Lake, Pamir mountains, Tajikistan.
1. Qaraqul crater, Palmir mountains, located between Tajikistan and Afghanistan. The impact happened 10 million years ago, created Black Lake which is 45 kilometers wide.
Doomsayer of Doomdooma: Manicouagan crater, Quebec, Canada.
2. Manicouagan crater, Quebec, Canada. 212 million years old impact. Created one of the biggest impact craters which is about 100 kilometers wide.
Doomsayer of Doom Dooma: Clear Water Crater Lakes, Hudson Bay, Quebec, Canada.
3. Clear Water Crater Lakes, Quebec, Canada. Impact 290 million years ago. Created Western Lake, 32 kilometers wide; and Eastern Lake, 22 kilometers wide.
doomsayer of doom dooma: Wolfe Creek meteorite crater, Australia.
4. Wolfe Creek crater, Central Australia. 300,000 years old. Crater is 875 miles wide.
doomsayer of doom dooma: Aorounga crater Chad, Africa.
5. Aorounga crater, Chad, Africa. 200 million years old. Crater is 17 kilometers wide.
asteroid day mexico major extinction event 1600km central america
6. Chicxulub crater, Yucatan Peninsula, Gulf of Mexico. A very significant, dangerous asteroid impact event that may have caused extinction of entire Dinosaur species 65 million years ago. Asteroid could be 10 and 20 kilometers in diameter and caused 70 kilometers wide crater.
Doomsayer of doom dooma: meteor crater near Flagstaff, Arizona
7. Arizona’s Menlo Park crater near Flagstaff, Arizona. Impact event 49,000 years old. Crater is 1186 meters in diameter.
As Doomsayer of Doom Dooma, I am predicting an impact event that would cause demise of Evil Power ruling Beijing. However, the actual impact may affect Shanghai, Red China’s largest City without causing loss of human lives as people get a warning and given chance to run away from impending danger.
THE EVIL RED EMPIRE – RED CHINA – DOOMSDAY PROPHECY.
REVELATION 18 NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION(NIV)
LAMENT OVER FALLEN BABYLON 18 After this I saw another angel coming down from heaven. He had great authority, and the earth was illuminated by his splendor.
2 With a mighty voice he shouted:
“‘Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great!’[a] She has become a dwelling for demons and a haunt for every impure spirit, a haunt for every unclean bird, a haunt for every unclean and detestable animal. 3 For all the nations have drunk the maddening wine of her adulteries. The kings of the earth committed adultery with her, and the merchants of the earth grew rich from her excessive luxuries.”
WARNING TO ESCAPE BABYLON’S JUDGMENT
4 Then I heard another voice from heaven say:
“‘Come out of her, my people,’[b] so that you will not share in her sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues; 5 for her sins are piled up to heaven, and God has remembered her crimes. 6 Give back to her as she has given; pay her back double for what she has done. Pour her a double portion from her own cup. 7 Give her as much torment and grief as the glory and luxury she gave herself. In her heart she boasts, ‘I sit enthroned as queen. I am not a widow;[c] I will never mourn.’ 8 Therefore in one day her plagues will overtake her: death, mourning and famine. She will be consumed by fire, for mighty is the Lord God who judges her.
THREEFOLD WOE OVER BABYLON’S FALL
9 “When the kings of the earth who committed adultery with her and shared her luxury see the smoke of her burning, they will weep and mourn over her. 10 Terrified at her torment, they will stand far off and cry:
“‘Woe! Woe to you, great city, you mighty city of Babylon! In one hour your doom has come!’
11 “The merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over her because no one buys their cargoes anymore—
12 cargoes of gold, silver, precious stones and pearls; fine linen, purple, silk and scarlet cloth; every sort of citron wood, and articles of every kind made of ivory, costly wood, bronze, iron and marble;
13 cargoes of cinnamon and spice, of incense, myrrh and frankincense, of wine and olive oil, of fine flour and wheat; cattle and sheep; horses and carriages; and human beings sold as slaves.
14 “They will say, ‘The fruit you longed for is gone from you. All your
luxury and splendor have vanished, never to be recovered.’
15 The merchants who sold these things and gained their wealth from her will stand far off, terrified at her torment. They will weep and mourn
16 and cry out:
“‘Woe! Woe to you, great city, dressed in fine linen, purple and scarlet, and glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls! 17 In one hour such great wealth has been brought to ruin!’ “Every sea captain, and all who travel by ship, the sailors, and all who earn their living from the sea, will stand far off. 18 When they see the smoke of her burning, they will exclaim, ‘Was there ever a city like this great city?’
19 They will throw dust on their heads, and with weeping and mourning cry out:
“‘Woe! Woe to you, great city, where all who had ships on the sea became rich through her wealth! In one hour she has been brought to ruin!’
20 “Rejoice over her, you heavens! Rejoice, you people of God! Rejoice, apostles and prophets! For God has judged her with the judgment she imposed on you.”
THE FINALITY OF BABYLON’S DOOM 21 Then a mighty angel picked up a boulder the size of a large millstone and threw it into the sea, and said:
“With such violence the great city of Babylon will be thrown down, never to be found again. 22 The music of harpists and musicians, pipers and trumpeters, will never be heard in you again. No worker of any trade will ever be found in you again. The sound of a millstone will never be heard in you again. 23 The light of a lamp will never shine in you again. The voice of bridegroom and bride will never be heard in you again. Your merchants were the world’s important people. By your magic spell all the nations were led astray. 24 In her was found the blood of prophets and of God’s holy people, of all who have been slaughtered on the earth.”
Red China has polluted all aspects of Tibet, its land, rivers, mountains, and denizens. Red China is not satisfied. Red China’s passionate obsession to possess Tibet has extended to Tibet’s traditional institutions which impart national character, and national identity. Red China has openly declared her desire to control The Dalai Lama’s Reincarnation and participate in Tibetan tradition of discovering the reincarnated Dalai Lama. A big suprise may await Red China. To frustrate Red China’s evil desire, I am hoping that The Dalai Lama’s Reincarnation may assume a new dimension; the Spirit will manifest in every newborn Tibetan child all over the world to preserve Tibetan Identity and to empower Tibetan people until they win their natural rights to Freedom, Self-governance, and liberation from brutal military occupation.
Tibet: Dalai Lama Mocks Chinese Government’s Claim to Understand His Reincarnation
The Dalai Lama has made a bold statement regarding China’s attempts to control the successor to his position, saying that he thinks the title could even end when he dies. Concerns about who will be next to hold the prestigious title are justified in the context of increasing pressure from the Chinese authorities, who insist that they must be able to approve the candidate. There is concern that the position of Dalai Lama could be tarnished by a similar fate as that which befell the Panchen Lama in 1995.
Read the full article, published by CHANNEL NEWS ASIA, below:
Tibet’s spiritual leader the Dalai Lama has ridiculed China’s Communist Party for wanting to control his reincarnation, saying the government is “pretending” to know more about the system than he does, the New York Times reported on Thursday.
Tibetans fear that the Chinese government will use the issue of the Dalai Lama’s succession to split Tibetan Buddhism, with one new Dalai Lama named by exiles and one by the government after his death.
The Dalai Lama’s comments are likely to draw an angry response from China.
“The Chinese Communist Party is pretending that they know more about the reincarnation system than the Dalai Lama,” the Dalai Lama, who recently turned 80, told the New York Times in an interview.
Tibetan Buddhism holds that the soul of a senior lama is reincarnated in the body of a child on his death. China says the tradition must continue and it must approve the next Dalai Lama.
However, the Dalai Lama has said he thinks the title could end when he dies.
Chinese officials, however, have stressed that the government must approve the next Dalai Lama and the current Dalai Lama has no right to abandon reincarnation.
China, which regards the Dalai Lama as a dangerous separatist, has ruled Tibet with an iron fist since Communist troops took over the region in 1950.
The Dalai Lama fled into exile in India in 1959 after an abortive uprising against Chinese rule.
The Nobel Peace laureate said his biggest concern was that China would name the next Dalai Lama, saying “the precedent has been set”, the New York Times said.
In 1995, after the Dalai Lama named a boy in Tibet as the reincarnation of the previous Panchen Lama, the second highest figure in Tibetan Buddhism, China put the boy under house arrest and installed another in his place.
Many Tibetans spurn the Chinese-appointed Panchen Lama as a fake.
The Dalai Lama “hinted that he would hold some kind of referendum among Tibetan exiles, and consultations among Tibetans within China” about his succession, saying the issue would be formally resolved around his 90th birthday, the newspaper said.
The Dalai Lama praised Chinese President Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign, the newspaper said. He also said Xi’s mother was “very religious, a very devout Buddhist,” and noted Xi himself had spoken positively of Buddhism.
(Reporting by Sui-Lee Wee; Editing by Robert Birsel)
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971
Nixon-Kissinger administration’s historical contribution to the US, India, Tibet friendly relations deserve very special mention. President Richard M Nixon’s announcement on July 15, 1971 to visit Red China marks it as a Black Day to Freedom, Black Day to Peace, Black Day to Democracy, and Black Day to Justice for this trip included a plan to ‘stab Tibet in the back’, to harm by treachery, an act of betrayal.
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971.
History will recognize Nixon-Kissinger as Backstabber for they intended to do a great harm to their innocent ally, a partner in the fight against Communism to promote Freedom, Peace, Democracy, and Justice in the world.
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971.
To stab in the back means to harm by treachery, an act of betrayal. Apart from backstabbing Tibet, Nixon-Kissinger have to be charged for treason in Vietnam War.
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971. STAB IN THE BACK. TO HARM BY TREACHERY, AN ACT OF BETRAYAL.
Red China’s Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong or Mao Tse-Tung is guilty of crimes against humanity, and he deserves to be charged for a crime called ‘Cultural Genocide’. His ‘Cultural Revolution'(1966 – 1976) was a massive state-sponsored violence against innocent civilians and it physically destroyed people using vicious attacks, or extrajudicial killings.
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET ON JULY 15, 1971. NIXON-KISSINGER PLAYED A DIRTY, SINFUL GAME IN THE NAME OF “REALPOLITIK.”
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – JULY 15, 1971. US PRESIDENT RICHARD M NIXON ANNOUNCES HIS TRIP TO COMMUNIST CHINA. NIXON-KISSINGER DECISION TO BACK STAB TIBET TO PLAY A DIRTY SINFUL GAME IN THE NAME OF “REALPOLITIK.”
On behalf of Special Frontier Force I recognize JULY 15, 1971 as “BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM.” On July 15, 1971, US President Richard M Nixon announced his visit to Communist China. This announcement stunned Special Frontier Force for Nixon-Kissinger made decision to ‘Back Stab’ Tibet with a passionate desire to befriend Communist China which is our opponent, adversary, and enemy. I want my readers to know this day as the day on which Nixon-Kissinger had deliberately violated the trust reposed by Tibet and India in the United States, their partner in a military alliance that promotes Freedom, Democracy, and Peace in Occupied Tibet. In my opinion, July 15, 1971 is the darkest day in the history of friendly relations between United States, India, and Tibet.
THIS DAY IN HISTORY: 07/15/1971 – NIXON VISIT TO RED CHINA
In a This Day in History video, learn that on July 15, 1971, Richard Nixon stunned the nation by stating that he would visit communist China. Nixon was a product of the Cold War and spent his career bad-mouthing everything Red China did or said. But, Nixon wanted a second term and his polls were down; he hoped China would put pressure on their allies, the North Vietnamese, to end the war. Unfortunately, there was no immediate gain from the trip and the Vietnam War went on for another year and a half.
During a live television and radio broadcast, President Richard Nixon stuns the nation by announcing that he will visit communist China the following year. The statement marked a dramatic turning point in U.S.-China relations, as well as a major shift in American foreign policy.
Nixon was not always so eager to reach out to China. Since the Communists came to power in China in 1949, Nixon had been one of the most vociferous critics of American efforts to establish diplomatic relations with the Chinese. His political reputation was built on being strongly anti-communist, and he was a major figure in the post-World War II Red Scare, during which the U.S. government launched massive investigations into possible communist subversion in America.
By 1971, a number of factors pushed Nixon to reverse his stance on China. First and foremost was the Vietnam War. Two years after promising the American people “peace with honor,” Nixon was as entrenched in Vietnam as ever. His national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, saw a way out: Since China’s break with the Soviet Union in the mid-1960s, the Chinese were desperate for new allies and trade partners. Kissinger aimed to use the promise of closer relations and increased trade possibilities with China as a way to put increased pressure on North Vietnam–a Chinese ally–to reach an acceptable peace settlement. Also, more importantly in the long run, Kissinger thought the Chinese might become a powerful ally against the Soviet Union, America’s Cold War enemy. Kissinger called such foreign policy ‘realpolitik,’ or politics that favored dealing with other powerful nations in a practical manner rather than on the basis of political doctrine or ethics.
Nixon undertook his historic “journey for peace” in 1972, beginning a long and gradual process of normalizing relations between the People’s Republic of China and the United States. Though this move helped revive Nixon’s sagging popularity, and contributed to his win in the 1972 election, it did not produce the short-term results for which Kissinger had hoped. The Chinese seemed to have little influence on North Vietnam’s negotiating stance, and the Vietnam War continued to drag on until U.S. withdrawal in 1973. Further, the budding U.S.-China alliance had no measurable impact on U.S.-Soviet relations. But, Nixon’s visit did prove to be a watershed moment in American foreign policy–it paved the way for future U.S. presidents to apply the principle of realpolitik to their own international dealings.
Related Videos
American politician Richard Nixon (1913 – 1994) at the White House with his family after his resignation as President, 9th August 1974. From left, son-in-law David Eisenhower, Julie Nixon-Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Pat Nixon (1912 – 1993), Tricia Nixon and her husband Edward Cox, August 1974. (Photo by Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
NIXON ANNOUNCES HIS RESIGNATION
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
NIXON’S SECRET PLAN TO END THE VIETNAM WAR
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
INAUGURAL ADDRESS: RICHARD NIXON
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
1970s
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
RICHARD NIXON’S PARANOIA LEADS TO WATERGATE SCANDAL
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
RICHARD NIXON’S IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
NIXON’S LINCOLN DAY DINNER
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971.
THE ROAD TO WAR
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
RICHARD NIXON
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
NIXON ADDRESSES “SILENT MAJORITY”
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971.
More on This Topic
NIXON RETURNS FROM CHINA
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
NIXON DISCUSSES FORTHCOMING TRIP TO CHINA
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
CULTURAL REVOLUTION
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
PING-PONG DIPLOMACY IN CHINA
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
MAJOR MILESTONES IN U.S. – CHINA RELATIONS
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
SENATOR NIXON TAKES TOUGH STAND ON COMMUNISM DETENTE
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
DETENTE
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
KISSINGER ON IMPORTANCE OF STRONG FOREIGN POLICY
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
NIXON’S FIRST INAUGURAL ADDRESS
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
VIETNAM WAR: PRESIDENTS AND POLICY MAKERS
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
COLD WAR
1971
NIXON ANNOUNCES TRIP TO CHINA
During a live television and radio broadcast, President Richard Nixon stuns the nation by announcing that he will visit communist China the following year. The statement marked a dramatic turning point in U.S.-Chinese relations. At first glance, Nixon seemed like the last American president who would ever consider a visit..
1971
NIXON ANNOUNCES A VISIT TO CHINA
In a surprise announcement, President Richard Nixon says that he will visit Beijing, China, before May 1972. The news, issued simultaneously in Beijing and the United States, stunned the world. Nixon reported that he was visiting in order “to seek normalization of relations between the two countries and to exchange…
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMAmerican politician Richard Nixon (1913 – 1994) at the White House with his family after his resignation as President, 9th August 1974. From left, son-in-law David Eisenhower, Julie Nixon-Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Pat Nixon (1912 – 1993), Tricia Nixon and her husband Edward Cox, August 1974. (Photo by Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)BLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOMBLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971.
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971.
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971.
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM – NIXON-KISSINGER BACK STAB TIBET – JULY 15, 1971. STAB IN THE BACK. TO HARM BY TREACHERY, AN ACT OF BETRAYAL.
Black Day to Freedom – Whole Villain – Nixon – Mao cartoon
Black Day to Freedom – Whole Villain – Ping Pong Diplomacy
BLACK DAY TO FREEDOM
Black Day to Freedom – Whole Villain – TIME July 26 1971 Edition
American politician Richard Nixon (1913 – 1994) at the White House with his family after his resignation as President, 9th August 1974. From left, son-in-law David Eisenhower, Julie Nixon-Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Pat Nixon (1912 – 1993), Tricia Nixon and her husband Edward Cox, August 1974. (Photo by Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)