Whole Identity-Who is Whole Dude at Whole Foods?

Michigan Medicine AHEAD Study uses unscientific demographic information to ascertain the Identity of Whole Dude for participation in Medical Research Project

Michigan Medicine should have known better and must use valid, verified principles to identify every Human Being as a Specific Individual with Individuality without depending upon unverified claims about Race and Ethnicity.
Michigan Medicine AHEAD Study has no Research Protocol to verify the Identity and Individuality of the Complex, Multicellular, Human Organism

Man describes his identity in terms of his personal name, age, gender, race, ethnicity, place of origin, language, religion, political, occupational, or social affiliation. In reality, the man is an association of trillions of individual cells. Michigan Medicine should have known better and must use valid, verified principles to identify every Human Being as a Specific Individual with Individuality without depending upon unverified claims about Race and Ethnicity.

Michigan Medicine AHEAD Study has no Research Protocol to verify the Identity and Individuality of the Complex, Multicellular, Human Organism

The AHEAD Study is researching the safety and effectiveness of an investigational medication in people who might be at increased risk for developing memory loss associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. The study is looking for participants age 55-80 years old, who have generally normal memory function in daily life, and who are not being treated for memory problems. For individuals age 55-64 years old, an additional risk factor is required, such as a parent or sibling with Alzheimer’s Disease or previous biomarker testing showing increased risk for developing Alzheimer’s Disease. This study sees participants in Ann Arbor. Contact Lauren Mackenzie at spearsl@med.umich.edu or 734-232-2415, Clinical Research Coordinator, Neurology Clinical Trials Organization (NeCTO), NCAC.

On Tuesday, December 05, 2023, at the Michigan Clinical Research Unit (MCRU) at the Cardiovascular Center (CVC), Whole Dude was interviewed for participating in the AHEAD Study. Whole Dude was asked to provide their demographic information to register their personal identity for participation in the Medical Research Project. Further, Whole Dude was asked to provide information about their Race which is entirely determined by the Place of their Birth, and the Country of their Birth. Whole Dude was asked to verify their Ethnicity using the one and only Criteria which relates to the Ethnicity of Hispanic people.

Whole Dude remains totally dismayed to learn that the Research Project has not established its own Protocol to describe the Identity and Individuality of the Specific Human Individual who may be included as a Research Subject in Clinical Medical Research. Michigan Medicine should have known better and must use valid, verified principles to identify every Human Being as a Specific Individual with Individuality without depending upon unverified claims about Race and Ethnicity.

Michigan Medicine AHEAD Study has no Research Protocol to verify the Identity and Individuality of the Complex, Multicellular, Human Organism
Michigan Medicine should have known better and must use valid, verified principles to identify every Human Being as a Specific Individual with Individuality without depending upon unverified claims about Race and Ethnicity.

Man is constituted as a Biotic Community of socially interacting cells and microbes

Whole Dude at Whole Foods examines the complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism
Whole Dude at Whole Foods examines the complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism
Whole Dude at Whole Foods examines the complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism. The Law of Individuality leaves the Individual with no choice other than that of expressing variability while being a member of a Social Group which may have a fixed Identity.
Whole Dude at Whole Foods examines the complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism

The Cellular and the Molecular Basis of Identity and Individuality

Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.
Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.
Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.

In 1965, while Whole Dude was a student of Human Anatomy at Kurnool Medical College, they had the opportunity to know Dr. J. C. B. Grant (1886-1973), the author of Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy. The 5th Edition of his Atlas was published in 1962 and was available in India in their Medical College Library.

John Charles Boileau Grant (1886–1973)

Dr. J C B Grant. Whole Dude coined the phrase Whole Individualism to discover Man by a study of the building blocks, the structural units and organization of the human body. To defend human existence, Whole Individualism lays the emphasis on knowing the person who is at risk apart from knowing the agent posing the risk.

Born in Loanhead (south of Edinburgh) in 1886, Grant studied medicine at the University of Edinburgh Medical School and graduated with an M.B., Ch.B. degree in 1908. While at Edinburgh, he worked under the renowned anatomist Daniel John Cunningham. Grant became a decorated serviceman of the Royal Army Medical Corps during the First World War before moving to Canada.

He established himself as an ‘anatomist extraordinary’ at the University of Toronto, publishing three textbooks that form the basis of Grant’s Anatomy. The textbooks are still used in anatomy classes today, and made unforgettable memories for those who found themselves in his classes nearly a century ago. One of Grant’s many accomplishments was establishing a division of histology within the department.

Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.

As a medical student, Whole Dude used Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy, the seminal work of Scottish-born Dr. John Charles Boileau Grant, who was the chair of Anatomy at the University of Toronto in 1930 and retired in 1965.

Students continue to use Grant’s textbooks today, and for the more artistic anatomist there’s even a Grant’s Anatomy Coloring Book, published in 2018.

Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.

At the University of Toronto, Dr.McMurrich, Chair of Anatomy was succeeded as chairman in 1930 by Dr. John Charles Boileau Grant. Dr. Grant wrote three text books, of which “An Atlas of Anatomy” (published in 1943) rapidly gained international prominence and is still, one of the most widely used anatomical atlases in the world. It is now known as “Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy” and is in its tenth edition. The atlas was based on a series of elegant dissections done either by Grant or by others under his supervision. Many of these dissections are currently housed in Grant’s Museum at the University of Toronto. 

The concept of Whole Dude relates to knowing the man, the building blocks and the structural units and organization of the human body. To defend human existence, Whole Dude lays the emphasis on knowing the person who is at risk apart from knowing the agent posing the risk.

The Identity of Multicellular Human Organism:

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide Whole Dude the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems

Daniel John Cunningham was born on 15 April 1850 in Scotland. After his initial schooling at his home town, Crieff, he took up the study of medicine at the University of Edinburgh and passed with honours. He is best known for the excellent series of dissection manuals, namely Cunningham’s Dissection Manuals. Cunningham’s Manual of Practical Anatomy has provided me the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide Whole Dude the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide Whole Dude the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide Whole Dude the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems

Whole Dude learned the truths about the living human body and about Life while dissecting dead human bodies in a systematic manner. The Manual of Practical Anatomy which guides students through this entire process was published in England. The author Dr. Daniel John Cunningham prepared the Manual while dissecting cadavers of British or Irish citizens. He never encountered cadavers of Indian citizens. At Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India, where Whole Dude was a student, the Department of Anatomy obtains dead bodies from  Government General Hospital Kurnool and most of the deceased are the poor and often illiterate people of that region. None of the deceased had the chance to know this man called Cunningham and Cunningham had no knowledge about the existence of these people who arrive on our dissection tables. But, as the dissection of the human body proceeds, inch, by inch, we recognize the anatomical parts as described by Cunningham. The manual also lists some anatomical variations and we very often exchange information between various dissection tables and recognize the variations mentioned. The dissections also involve slicing the organs and studying them, both macroscopically, and microscopically. We did not miss any part of the human body.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide Whole Dude the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems

So what is the Identity of this Human Person who experiences his life using Sensory Experiences such as Taste? How does the living Human organism maintains its Identity and Individuality? Apart from the Cultural Traditions of India, several Schools of Religious Thought claim that the Human Individuality and true or real Identity is represented by Human Soul. Does man have a soul? Where does this soul exist in the human body? What is the location if the soul is present in the living person? How does the human organism acquires Knowledge about its own structures and the functions they perform?To know the burdens of Life, Whole Dude asks his readers to know the reality of man and the nature of his existence.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. THE KNOWER AND THE KNOWING-SELF: IN THIS IMAGE OF HUMAN BRAIN, THE GREEN PORTION OF BRAIN STEM IS CALLED RETICULAR FORMATION. WHOLE DUDE DESCRIBES IT AS THE KNOWING-SELF AND IT IS THE “KNOWER” OF THE HUMAN BODY WHICH CONSTANTLY CHANGES ITS MORPHOLOGICAL APPEARANCE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF TIME CALLED THE AGING PROCESS.

Human Identity vs Human Individuality:

Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.

Human Identity may involve a variety of factors such as facial appearance, age, gender, race, ethnicity, language, religion, culture, nationality, sexual orientation, social and occupational status. Whereas human individuality has to be evaluated by using the markers that the human body uses to recognize its own Self and defends its own existence from threats posed by Non-Self.

Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.
Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.
Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. In the final analysis, the human organism is a biotic community of trillions of individual, independent cells.
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality: THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX (MHC) IS THE HUMAN LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN (HLA) GENE CLUSTER ON CHROMOSOME 6. HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES CANNOT BE TRANSPLANTED OR GRAFTED INTO THE BODIES OF UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS. HUMAN IDENTITY MUST BE DISCOVERED AT MOLECULAR LEVEL TO ESTABLISH THE AFFINITY BETWEEN TWO HUMAN INDIVIDUALS.
Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.

THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX (MHC) IS THE HUMAN LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN (HLA) GENE CLUSTER ON CHROMOSOME 6. HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES CANNOT BE TRANSPLANTED OR GRAFTED INTO THE BODIES OF UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS. HUMAN IDENTITY MUST BE DISCOVERED AT MOLECULAR LEVEL TO ESTABLISH THE AFFINITY BETWEEN TWO HUMAN INDIVIDUALS.

Human Individuality and the Genome

Individuality and the Genome. A COLONY OF GENETICALLY IDENTICAL E. COLI IS ACTUALLY A MOB OF ‘INDIVIDUALS’.

Understanding Individuality: 

Individuality and the Genome. Even among simple forms of life, like the common bacterium E. coli, genetics only partly determines what any one organism is like. E. coli expresses its individuality in many ways. All the bacilli above are genetically identical, but the shades show differences in the production of proteins that digest lactose.Credit…Dr. Michael Elowitz

Dr. Michael Elowitz, Physicist at California Institute of Technology has conducted experiments on colonies of genetically identical (Clones) E. coli bacteria under identical experimental conditions and has discovered that the clones behave in different ways which could be viewed as an expression of ‘individuality’.

Whole Dude at Whole Foods has Cellular and Molecular Basis for his Identity and Individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged. Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.

E. coli bacteria in billions populate our intestines. Typical E. coli bacillus has about 4,000 genes. Human cells have about 20,000 genes. The bacteria have fingerprints of their own and even when they share the exact same genome, they could still be identified as ‘individuals’.

Individuality and the Genome. Dr. Michael Elowitz and Dr. Long Cai are developing a platform through which cells can self-record their lineage and molecular event histories directly into their own DNA as they create new tissues, particularly in the brain. This research will help to address how individual cells in a developing embryo diversify into many distinct cell types, each playing its unique role in the organism.

The key to understanding E. coli’s fingerprints is to recognize that the bacteria are not simple machines. Unlike wires and transistors, E. coli’s molecules are floppy, twitchy and unpredictable. In an electronic device, like a computer or a radio, electrons stream in a steady flow through the machine’s circuits, but the molecules in E. coli jostle and wander. When E. coli begins using a gene to make a protein, it does not produce a smoothly increasing supply. It spurts out the proteins in fits and starts. One clone may produce half a dozen copies of a protein in an hour, while a clone right next to it produces none.

Michael Elowitz, a physicist at Caltech, put these bursts on display in an elegant experiment. He and his colleagues incited E. coli to produce its proteins for feeding on lactose. Dr. Elowitz and his colleagues added extra genes to the bacteria so that when they made lactose-digesting proteins, they also released light.

The bacteria, Dr. Elowitz found, did not produce a uniform glow. They flickered, sometimes brightly, sometimes dimly. And when Dr. Elowitz took a snapshot of the colony, it was not a uniform sea of light. Some microbes were dark at that moment while others shone at full strength.

At the very least, E. coli’s individuality should be a warning to those who would put human nature down to any sort of simple genetic determinism. Living things are more than just programs run by genetic software. Even in minuscule microbes, the same genes and the same genetic network can lead to different fates.

The bacteria have fingerprints of their own and even when they share the same genome, they could still be identified as individuals.

Individuality and the Genome. Man is constituted as a Biotic Community of socially interacting cells and microbes

Humans differ from one another in too many different ways and it is hard to count. The current human population of over six billion could be identified as the same number of individuals. Each human being has an unique genome of his own. There are millions of typographical differences between one genome and another human genome. Even identical twins are not truly identical at all as identical genes in our cells can behave differently. 

Living entities are not like simple machines. When we use a gene to make a protein, the gene may not produce a smoothly increasing supply of that protein. The gene tends to work in fits and starts and spurts out the protein. Identical genes can behave differently as the gene makes protein or remains silent depending upon the ‘Methyl’ groups that cap the DNA strands and function as ‘transducers’. These ‘Methyl’ groups sometimes fall off of DNA or become attached to new spots. Hence genetically identical individuals can have different physical identities in the natural world. The protein molecules that make up living entities, turn them into individuals. 

The Irrelevance of Evolution: 

CHARLES DARWIN’S ORIGIN OF SPECIES (1859) PROPOSES A MECHANISTIC, NON-PURPOSIVE ACCOUNT OF EVOLUTION AS THE PRODUCT OF NATURAL SELECTION OF RANDOMLY PRODUCED GENETIC MUTATIONS.

In the natural world, all living entities exist as individuals and express their individuality. The Theory of Evolution proposes that a species can descend or arrive to become a new species by changing its genome in a gradual and incremental manner using a mechanism that is described as Natural Selection. As per Darwinism, the mechanism of natural selection operates via a process of random and unguided mutations in the genetic code that changes the genome and eventually produces the ‘biodiversity’ that we witness in the natural world.

Individuality and the Genome. The phenomenon of Diversity must be studied beyond the realm of genes, genetic codes, and genomes. Cytoplasm and its organs must be studied to understand the physiological basis of Diversity

This Theory of Evolution has no relevance to the ultimate identity of each individual member of a given species. This identity is dictated by interplay between the various components of each individual cell and its interactions with other cells. With the same genomes or different genomes, the living entities can only exist as individuals and they have no other choice. The evolutionary connections are not relevant to this identity. To understand the phenomenon of biodiversity, we will be forced to look at each individual member of each given species. 

The Law of Individuality: 

Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality formulates the phenomenon of Human Individuality.

Whole Dude states that the Law of Individuality governs all the living entities and is manifested in various biological phenomena. The genes and the genetic code function in accordance with the Law of Individuality. Hence, Whole Dude describes Individuality as a Trade Mark. It is the characteristic of a biological entity. Genes and the genetic codes are the tools that an organism uses to express its Individuality. Each organism assembles its own kind of protein molecules to define its identity and to defend its existence in the natural world. 

Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality formulates the phenomenon of Changing Human Identity and the Unchanging Human Individuality.

Whole Dude is the Given Name of a known, verified, specific Whole Person

What is Identity and What is Individuality?

Human Identity and Individuality: A brief glance at the face is enough for most people to identify one another. Face recognition is a basic feature of human identity and recognition.

A brief glance at the face is enough for most people to identify one another. However, man does not exist with the same identity during the course of his life. The word identity describes the condition or fact of being a specific person. Identification is the process by which a person can be identified in an accurate and consistent manner.

The morphological or the external appearance of a person is subject to constant changes and it differs in a significant manner during the various stages of life such as infancy, boyhood, adulthood, and old age.

The morphological or the external appearance of a person is subject to constant changes and it differs in a significant manner during the various stages of life such as infancy, boyhood, adulthood, and old age. The term individuality describes the sum of the characteristics or qualities that set one person apart from others. The condition of being individual, or different from others establishes the indivisibility of man. Man is unique, original, one kind of person who has not existed before and would not also exist in future even when he shares the same identical genome. Two identical twins could be correctly identified as two different individuals. I propose the Law of Individuality and Creation which claims that man exists as Individual and has no choice in this conditioned nature of subjective physical existence in the world. Man can only exist as Individual with Individuality.

Human Identity and Individuality: If Identity described by the Phenotype establishes one face of the Coin, the Individuality describes the second face of the same coin and is established by the Genotype. While being the same, the Genotype presents the Individual with varying features of identification.

The Identification Technology:

Human Identity and Individuality: Using Fingerprints is the oldest method of Identification. The Fingerprint is electronically read by a sensor plate.

Biometrics is that branch of Biology which deals with its data statistically and by mathematical analysis. Using Fingerprints is the oldest method of Identification using biometric information. People have tiny ridges of skin on their fingers. These ridges form through a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The genetic makeup, the position of the fetus in the womb, and the composition and density of surrounding amniotic fluid play a role in how every individual ridge on the skin surface of finger will form. Fingerprints are a unique marker for a person, even an identical twin. Fingerprint analysis can define the differences between two fingerprint impressions.

Human Identity and Individuality: Fingerprints are a unique marker for a person and Fingerprint analysis can define the differences between Fingerprints.

The Fingerprint is electronically read. The corrugated ridges of the skin are non-continuous and form a pattern that has distinguishing features or minutiae. Two varieties of Fingerprint scanning technology are currently used; the optical Fingerprint scanners and the Capacitance Fingerprint scanner that uses a computerized analysis.

Iris Recognition Technology:

Human Identity and Individuality: The Iris is the most unique feature visible on the human body.Iris Scan Recorder uses pattern recognition techniques based on images of the Iris.

 Iris Scanners use pattern recognition techniques based on images of the irides (Irises) of an individual’s eyes.

Human Identity and Individuality: How does the multicellular human organism recognizes its own Identity?

No two irides being the same, even in identical twins, individuals could be identified with accuracy and consistency.

DNA Analysis:

Human Identity and Individuality: A small sample of DNA is amplified by using Polymerase Chain Reaction or PCR. The Short Tandem Repeat Analysis examines how often base pairs repeat in specific locations on a DNA strand.

A small sample of DNA is amplified by using Polymerase Chain Reaction or PCR. In a method described as Short Tandem Repeat Analysis, it is examined to find how often base pairs repeat in specific locations or loci on a given DNA strand. These can be dinucleotide, trinucleotide, tetranucleotide, or pentanucleotide repeats; that is repetition of 2, 3, 4, or 5 base pairs. Very often, the investigator looks for tetranucleotide or pentanucleotide repeats in the DNA sample. The likelihood that any two individuals (except identical twins) will have the same 13-loci DNA profile can be as high as 1 in 1 billion or greater.

Biometric Facial Recognition Technology:

Human Identity and Individuality: Every face has numerous distinguishable landmarks, the different peaks and valleys that make up facial features.

 Every face has numerous distinguishable landmarks, the different peaks and valleys that make up facial features. These landmarks are known as nodal points. Each human face has approximately 80 nodal points.

Human Identity and Individuality: How does the multicellular human organism recognizes its own identity?

Distance between the eyes, width of the nose, depth of the eye sockets, the shape of the cheekbones, the length of the jawline and other features are used as nodal points. These nodal points are measured creating a numerical code called a face print, representing the face in the database and comparison is made between images of face. 2D or 3D image of a person’s face uses distinct features of the face where rigid tissue and bone is most apparent, such as the curves of the eye socket, nose, and chin to identify the subject.

Human Identity and Individuality. In a multicellular human organism, who recognizes the Identity of the human person?

Unique templates are created from measurements between key points on the face and these measurements provide identification of the individual.

Skin Biometrics – Skin Surface Texture Analysis:

Human Identity and Individuality: The uniqueness of Skin Texture offers an opportunity to identify differences between identical twins.
Human Identity and Individuality: Surface Texture Analysis creates a Skin Print by using local information about skin texture at various points on the surface.

The Surface Texture Analysis algorithm operates on the top percentage of results as determined by the Local feature analysis. This method creates a Skin Print and performs either a 1:1 or 1:N match for verification or identification. It can identify the differences between identical twins.

 Identity, Individuality, and Consciousness:

Human Identity, Individuality, and Consciousness

Man describes his identity in terms of his personal name, age, gender, race, ethnicity, place of origin, language, religion, political, occupational, or social affiliation. In reality, the man is an association of trillions of individual cells.

Human Identity and Individuality. How does the multicellular human organism recognizes its own Identity?

The human organism is a conscious being and the function called consciousness achieves functional unity of all these individual cells and works for the benefit of the individual who always maintains his individuality.

Human Identity and Individuality. Cognitive Biology must address the issue of cognition of human Identity. In the multicellular human organism, who recognizes the Identity of the Human Individual?

This is possible because individual cells have the ability to recognize the presence of other living cells in their environment and display functional subordination to serve the purpose of the whole organism.

Human Identity, Individuality, and Consciousness – Existence precedes Essence.

Human Identity and Individuality is defined by the Doctrine of Molecular Individualism

Whole Dude coined the phrase Whole Individualism to discover Man by a study of the building blocks, the structural units and organization of the human body. To defend human existence, Whole Individualism lays the emphasis on knowing the person who is at risk apart from knowing the agent posing the risk.

Whole Dude coined the phrase Whole Individualism to discover Man by a study of the building blocks, the structural units and organization of the human body. To defend human existence, Whole Individualism lays the emphasis on knowing the person who is at risk apart from knowing the agent posing the risk.

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Whole Individualism and Molecular Individualism

TAT ASMI PRABHU - FIFTH MAHAVAKYA - MOLECULAR INDIVIDUALISM. MAN'S EXISTENCE IS DEFENDED BY MOLECULES CALLED ANTIBODIES WHICH CAN RECOGNIZE OR SEPARATE SELF AND NON-SELF PROTEIN MOLECULES.
THE WHOLE DUDE DOCTRINE OF MOLECULAR INDIVIDUALISM. MAN’S EXISTENCE IS DEFENDED BY MOLECULES CALLED ANTIBODIES WHICH CAN RECOGNIZE OR SEPARATE SELF AND NON-SELF PROTEIN MOLECULES.

The man exists in the physical world for his existence is essentially supported by Unity or ‘Eikyata’ with ‘Prabhu’, or LORD God Creator. It is of great importance to note that man’s existence involves use of a creative mechanism that deploys unique molecules that establish man’s physical identity on a molecular basis. Man’s existence is ‘Conditioned’ for he has no choice other than that of existing as an Individual with Individuality. This Individualistic Nature of Existence is defended by Immune System that deploys unique molecules called Antibodies. Man’s existence is defended by a creative mechanism that involves deployment of Antibody molecules that distinguish or separate Self and Non-Self.

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION: MAN IS ABLE TO EXIST IN NATURE FOR HE IS ABLE TO DEFEND HIS EXISTENCE BY DEPLOYING MOLECULES THAT CAN MAKE THE RECOGNITION AND DISTINCTION BETWEEN SELF AND NON-SELF.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE-THE ART OF KNOWING: AT A FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL, LIFE AND LIVING IS ABOUT KNOWING MATTER AS SELF OR NON-SELF. THIS IDENTIFICATION OF MATTER INVOLVES THE ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE MOLECULES OF MATTER . TO LEARN THE ART OF KNOWING, MAN HAS TO KNOW ABOUT THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR EXISTENCE.

Modern Science has provided tools to visually examine large molecules and experimentally verify individualistic variations in their behavior. For this reason, we have to know each man as a Specific Individual with Individuality.

TAT ASMI PRABHU - FIFTH MAHAVAKYA - MOLECULAR INDIVIDUALISM. DR STEVEN CHU, US SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEMONSTRATED INDIVIDUALISTIC BEHAVIOR OF LARGE MOLECULES SUCH AS DNA.
THE WHOLE DUDE DOCTRINE OF MOLECULAR INDIVIDUALISM. DR STEVEN CHU, U.S. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DEMONSTRATED INDIVIDUALISTIC BEHAVIOR OF LARGE MOLECULES SUCH AS DNA.
The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Man exists as an Individual with Individuality. This Individualistic Nature of Existence is defended by Immune System that deploys unique molecules called Antibodies.
The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Man exists for he is united with Prabhu or LORD God Creator. Man’s existence is defended by a creative mechanism that involves deployment of Antibody molecules that distinguish or separate Self and Non-Self.

Knowing man’s identity and individuality demands understanding of molecules that defend human existence. For example, each antibody molecule bears two identical binding sites consisting of six b-loops.

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism: At room temperature atoms and molecules in the air move about at breakneck speed. In order for them to be studied, they need to be slowed down or chilled. During the 1980s Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, and William Phillips developed different methods for this. When atoms come in contact with light particles with fixed energies, photons, their movement is affected as if they had been bumped. With the aid of laser light from different directions and adjustment of the photon’s energy for Doppler effects, the atoms can be cooled to extremely low temperatures and captured in a trap.

Nobel Laureate, Dr. Steven Chu (United States Secretary of Energy), former Professor of Physics and Applied Physics, Stanford University has described that molecules can exhibit a surprising degree of individuality. In experiments that examine the physical behavior of single molecules, Stanford researchers have discovered that identical polymers; long, flexible, spaghetti-like molecules that are found in everything from plastics to living cells;  UNFOLD in a variety of ways even when exposed to the same experimental conditions. Dr. Chu had stated : “We discovered it because we have developed the ability to visualize and manipulate single molecules.” He had further observed that, “Only by looking at individual animals you can get a true sense of  diversity of species.” Dr. Chu researched Biological Physics and Polymer Physics. Dr. Chu’s research in Polymer Physics made use of individual molecules of DNA to study Polymer Dynamics.

We define our identity in the natural world and defend our existence by deploying unique protein molecules. Our genetic code determines the protein molecules that we use. The genetic code is made up of  DNA strands that express Molecular Individualism. It arises from exceedingly small differences in the initial configuration of the polymer.

We define our identity in the natural world and defend our existence by deploying unique protein molecules. Our genetic code determines the protein molecules that we use. The genetic code is made up of  DNA strands that express Molecular Individualism. It arises from exceedingly small differences in the initial configuration of the polymer.

Nobel Prize for Medicine Goes to Cancer Therapy

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. The Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’. 2018 Nobel Prize for Medicine. My Thoughts on the Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence.

American James Allison and Japan’s Tasuku Honjo have won the 2018 Nobel Prize in Medicine for a pioneering approach to cancer treatment.

The Nobel committee said the pair’s research — which harnesses the body’s immune system to attack cancer cells — amounted to a “landmark in our fight against cancer.” The approach, known as immune checkpoint theory, had “revolutionized cancer treatment and has fundamentally changed the way we view how cancer can be managed,” the committee said.

Clipped from: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-45704322

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: 2018 Nobel Prize for Medicine. My Thoughts on the Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence.

Image copyright SPL

Two scientists who discovered how to fight cancer using the body’s immune system have won the 2018 Nobel Prize for physiology or medicine.

The work, by Professor James P Allison from the US and Professor Tasuku Honjo from Japan, has led to treatments for advanced, deadly skin cancer.

Immune checkpoint therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, said the prize-giving Swedish Academy.

Experts say it has proved to be “strikingly effective”.

Prof Allison, of the University of Texas, and Prof Honjo, of Kyoto University, will share the Nobel prize sum of nine million Swedish kronor – about $1.01 million or 870,000 euros.

Accepting the prize, Tasuku Honjo told reporters: “I want to continue my research … so that this immune therapy will save more cancer patients than ever.”

Prof Allison said: “It’s a great, emotional privilege to meet cancer patients who’ve been successfully treated with immune checkpoint blockade. They are living proof of the power of basic science, of following our urge to learn and to understand how things work.”

Treating the untreatable

Our immune system protects us from disease, but it has built-in safeguards to stop it from attacking our own tissue.


The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: 2018 Nobel Prize for Medicine. My Thoughts on the Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence.

Image copyright. Kyoto University. Image caption. Professor Tasuku Honjo and his team at Kyoto University

Some cancers can take advantage of those “brakes” and dodge the attack too.

Allison and Honjo, now both in their 70s, discovered a way to unleash our immune cells to attack tumors by turning off proteins that put the brakes on.

And that led to the development of new drugs which now offer hope to patients with advanced and previously untreatable cancer.

Immune checkpoint therapy is being used by the NHS to treat people with the most serious form of skin cancer, melanoma.

It doesn’t work for everyone, but for some patients it appears to have worked incredibly well, getting rid of the tumor entirely, even after it had started to spread around the body.

Such remarkable results had never been seen before for patients like these.


The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: 2018 Nobel Prize for Medicine. My Thoughts on the Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence.

Image copyright. Getty Images. Image caption. Professor James P Allison

Doctors have also been using the treatment to help some people with advanced lung cancer.

Prof Charles Swanton, from Cancer Research UK, congratulated the prize winners, saying: “Thanks to this groundbreaking work, our own immune system’s innate power against cancer has been realized and harnessed into treatments that continue to save the lives of patients. For cancers such as advanced melanoma, lung, and kidney, these immune-boosting drugs have transformed the outlook for many patients who had run out of options.

“The booming field of immunotherapy that these discoveries have precipitated is still relatively in its infancy, so it’s exciting to consider how this research will progress in the future and what new opportunities will arise.”

My thoughts on the Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence


The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: 2018 Nobel Prize for Medicine. My Thoughts on the Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence.

The Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence. Man’s Unity with Lord God Creator can be learned from the study of Immunology. Each Antibody molecule bears two identical binding sites consisting of six b-Loops.

My ‘Theory of Man’ describes the Man as a Created Being. Man’s physical existence in the natural world in good health or ill-health always demands Man’s Unity (Sanskrit. Asmi) with Lord God Creator (Sanskrit. Brahman) for Man is constituted as a Spiritual Being. Man, the Rational Being is inclined to investigate the basis for the reality of his own existence. The reasoning for my statements is derived from the study of Immunology.

The Defense of Human Existence

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: The Study of Immune System helps in understanding the Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence.

THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE. NATURE OF HUMAN IDENTITY AND INDIVIDUALITY IS REVEALED BY HUMAN DEFENSE MECHANISMS.

An individual exists in the natural world by his biological abilities to defend his continued existence as an independent entity. This essay explores the physiological aspects of human existence and the defensive mechanisms that sustain this existence and the molecules which define and shape our Individualism. The term immunity describes the natural defensive mechanisms that give an individual the ability to recognize foreign proteins and foreign substances and neutralize or degrade them with or without injury to the individual’s own tissues. Immunology is the branch of science concerned with the body’s response to foreign agents and substances.

The Functions of the Immune System

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: The Functions of the Immune System relate to the role played by unique protein molecules in the Defense of Human Existence.

THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE. ORGANS, CELLS, AND PROTEIN MOLECULES OF IMMUNE SYSTEM REPRESENT A CREATIVE MECHANISM TO OPPOSE, NEUTRALIZE, AND DESTROY FOREIGN INVADERS.

The immune system responds to invasion by the foreign organisms and their toxic products. This immune response is also described as active immunity. In the natural world, an infant is defended by molecules transferred passively across the placenta from the mother’s circulation during the fetal stage of development. The infant after birth may also receive passively protein molecules from mother when breastfed. This passive immunity defends the baby for several months and the baby further survives by developing its own immune system. Another major function of the immune system is the removal of damaged or dying cells. The immune system is also able to recognize and eliminate abnormal or mutant cells that frequently arise within the body. Using a system that is described as immune surveillance, the body recognizes and disposes of such abnormal cells which could result in the incidence of certain types of cancer. The immune system plays a vital role in protecting the body from bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites and helps to prevent certain types of cancer.

The immune system is very important and it is also very sensitive. The system’s very ability to recognize foreign substances may often result in undesirable reactions. Millions of people suffer on account of hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to fairly harmless substances present in the environment. Many individuals suffer on account of their sensitivity to proteins found in the foods such as milk, eggs, fish, wheat (gluten), and nuts that we consume. Sometimes, the immune system is misdirected and initiates an immune response against the body’s own cells or tissues producing a condition known as an autoimmune disease. While an immune system could cause some problems, we take full advantage of the system to defend ourselves from serious infectious diseases such as smallpox,polio,rabies, diphtheria, whooping-cough, measles, rubella, mumps, tetanus, typhoid, cholera, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, influenza and others by using vaccines and inoculations. Millions of lives are protected by routine use of vaccines and inoculations which help the body to become resistant to these infectious agents. We also use foreign proteins to protect the lives of people in times of a severe life-threatening crisis. We use blood, plasma, and sera (containing immunoglobulins secreted by animals) with utmost care to tide over an emergency. I used foreign immunoglobulins to treat snakebite victims and tetanus cases. The foreign proteins elicit a minor immune response and the situation is carefully monitored.

By being careless and reckless, and by polluting our food, water, air, and soil with dangerous chemicals, we damage our very sensitive immune system and this is contributing to a higher incidence of immune-related health problems in the population.

Types of Immune Response

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: Man’s Intelligence, mental work, and mental memory are not the “First Line of Defense.”

The Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence: The Fundamental Basis of Human Existence is not that of Man’s Intelligence, Mental Memory and Mental Functions.

The immune system defends human existence with a variety of cells and by the protein molecules known as immunoglobulins or antibodies produced by the immune function capable cells. The ability to recognize foreignness, specificity of the response, and the memory of the prior immune response are the key characteristics of immune defense. The immune system must be able to recognize the foreign agents and foreign materials in order to locate and destroy them. Specificity means that immunity to one foreign substance or organism does not provide resistance to another type of organism. Memory is the ability of the individual to develop an accelerated, enhanced, and long-lasting immunity after the initial attack by an infectious disease. The memory function described in Immunology should not be confused with the mental faculty called Memory. The body defends itself through two types of mechanisms which work together to protect our existence. 1. Humoral Immunity:- this involves the production of protein molecules described as immunoglobulins or antibodies.2. Cell-mediated Immunity:- It does not involve secretion of antibodies but requires direct physical contact with the foreign substance or agent. It also involves the use of other protein molecules which assist in the defense mechanisms.

Humoral Immunity

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: The recognition of Self and Non-Self at the molecular level is the fundamental basis for human existence.

THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR DEFENSE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE: HUMORAL IMMUNITY INVOLVES DEPLOYMENT OF UNIQUE PROTEIN MOLECULES TO COUNTERACT WITH FOREIGN PROTEIN MOLECULES.

The cells known as Lymphocytes or B cells are produced in the bone marrow and circulate in our blood and are distributed to the various lymphoid tissues in the body, such as the lymph nodes, spleen, tonsils, and Peyer’s Patches (Lymphoid Follicles) that line the small intestine. When stimulated by an infectious organism, production of lymphocytes increases and the lymphocytes are carried to the site of infection. Depending upon the site of infection, the lymph nodes of that region often swell up and are found packed with lymphocytes. The B cells produce chemical substances known as antibodies. These are protein molecules which are specifically generated against specific organisms. The foreign substance is described as antigen. The antibodies that are generated recognize their antigens with high affinity and extreme selectivity. The interaction of an antigen with its specific antibody involves only small areas on the antigen’s surface; these areas are known as antigenic determinants. Protein molecules are very potent antigens as they have several antigenic determinants. Many carbohydrates are also antigenic because they have antigenic determinants. The antibodies circulate in the blood. The simplest, most prevalent means by which the immune system defends the body against bacteria and viruses is by a combination of a specific antibody with the antigenic determinants on the surface of the invading organism. This interaction between antibodies and antigens produces an aggregate of cells called as an agglutination. The body has wandering scavenger cells known as Macrophages. The clumps of agglutinated cells are engulfed and digested by the macrophages. Antibodies also bind to toxic molecules given off by invading microorganisms and this reaction produces large, insoluble aggregates known as precipitates. These precipitates are also removed by macrophages. The virus after entering the body survives by its ability to invade or enter cells. Antibodies prevent the ability of the virus to infect cells by covering up and blocking the attachment sites of the virus.

Cell-Mediated Immunity

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: Immunity and Immune Response involves the deployment of unique protein molecules.

THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE: INTERACTION OF CELLS AND UNIQUE PROTEIN MOLECULES OF IMMUNE SYSTEM DEFINES MAN’S IDENTITY ON MOLECULAR BASIS.

There is another distinct type of Lymphocytes known as T lymphocytes or T cells. T cells originate in the THYMUS and become localized in lymphoid organs. The immunity associated with T cells does not involve secretion of antibodies but through their direct contact with their targets or by the effects of secreted molecules known as lymphokines which help other cells to make the direct contact. There are four kinds of T cells. 1. The cytotoxic T cells
or Natural Killer cells or NK cells defend the body by destroying infected, foreign or cancerous cells. The other three kinds of T cells regulate immune responses by secreting messenger proteins known as lymphokines. 2. Helper T cells enable the other T cells and most B cells to perform their functions. The Helper T cells are destroyed by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) patients resulting in a depressed immune response that allows infection by a variety of microorganisms and the growth of some types of cancerous tumors. AIDS patients are very vulnerable to fatal infections. 3. Suppressor T cells dampen the immune response of the B and T cells. 4. The fourth kind of T cell is involved in certain kinds of hypersensitivity reactions. In a normal healthy individual, there is a balanced ratio of these four kinds of T cells to provide an efficient immune system for defense against all foreign substances. Macrophages and White blood cells known as neutrophils have the ability to engulf and digest particulate matter by the process of phagocytosis. They eliminate many foreign organisms and particulate materials that enter the body. The ability of NK cells to kill or destroy some cancerous or tumor cells is enhanced by two lymphokines known as gamma interferon and interleukin-1. Another lymphokine known as interleukin-2 activates the Lymphokine Activated Killer Cells or LAK cells which also have the ability to kill a variety of human tumor cells. Activated T cells also secrete a lymphokine known as Transfer Factor which is able to cause normal lymphocytes to release lymphokines or otherwise become activated and thus to destroy other cells. Transfer Factor stimulates the lymphocytes to develop normal immunity.

The Cytotoxic T cells destroy other cells by interacting with antigens present on the surfaces of the cell. They are involved in the attacks on tissues and organs grafted or introduced into the body, viral antigens found on infected cells and on chemicals that have entered the body and found attached to cells. T cells are involved in skin reactions resulting from contact with molecules found in poisonous plants like Poison Ivy, Poison Sumac, and Poison Oak.

Organ Transplantation and Cell-Mediated Immunity

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: Identity and Individuality are determined by unique protein molecules of the human body.

THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR THE DEFENSE OF HUMAN EXISTENCE: ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION AND IMMUNOLOGY. MOLECULES OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN (HLA) SYSTEM

T cells are involved in the rejection of transplanted tissues and organs. The chances of successful organ transplantation are improved by carefully matching the tissue or Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigens known as the HLA system of the donor with those of the recipient. The protein molecules of the HLA Complex establish the identity of our body, its tissues, and various organs. They work to preserve the identity of the individual and to exclude the introduction or grafting of foreign material into the body. Even after careful matching, and selection of suitable donors, transplanted tissues or organs are usually maintained by using drugs that cause immunosuppression by which the normal immune response of the recipient against the donated organ is prevented.

Biological Existence

A normal, healthy immune system is vital to defend our biological existence. Immunodeficiency diseases, depressed or compromised immune system conditions such as associated with corticosteroid therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or exposure to certain types of toxic chemicals, and autoimmune diseases impose a heavy burden and threaten our existence. Medical interventions and treatment may help us but the quality of life is invariably compromised. A functioning immune system is important to defend our existence.

Molecular Individualism

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’: Immunology helps in understanding the Molecular Basis for Man’s Identity and Individuality.

The Molecular Basis for the Defense of Human Existence: Man exists as Individual with Individuality as his existence involves defensive mechanisms operated by independent, individual cells, and protein molecules which exhibit Cellular Autonomy. The cell is the lowest common denominator of all life. While the cell is functionally independent or autonomous or self-governing, it displays the abilities characterized by Mutal Assistance, Cooperation, Tolerance, and Functional Subservience to provide some benefit to the Individual who lives in the physical world.

2018 Nobel Prize for Medicine will help us to develop a ‘Theory of Man’ by the study of unique protein molecules that play an important role in the defense of human survival. The Physical Being called Man needs the support of Spirit, Soul, or a Divine Agency to bring Unity between the cells, tissues, organs, and organ systems providing the structural and functional basis for Man’s existence.

The Whole Dude Doctrine of Molecular Individualism. Study of Antibody Molecules will help in understanding the concept of ‘Molecular Individualism’. The Doctrine of Individualism. The Man has no choice other than that of existing as an Individual with Individuality. His genome is unique and one of its own kind.
Michigan Medicine should have known better and must use valid, verified principles to identify every Human Being as a Specific Individual with Individuality without depending upon unverified claims about Race and Ethnicity.

Whole Relationship – Mental Health is about Social Relationships

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships

May is Mental Health Month, a time to shine a light on the importance of mental health to personal wellbeing and overcome reluctance to seeking help. Mental health is key to positive relationships and feelings of satisfaction and fulfillment in life. Mental health is also closely linked with physical health. Just as with physical health, mental health problems can be successfully treated. Mental Health America, the sponsor of Mental Health Month in the U.S., offers information and tools on its website: https://www.mhanational.org/mental-health-month

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships

Mental health is defined as the capacity in an individual to form harmonious relations with others and to participate in or contribute constructively to changes in the social environment.

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships: Human existence raises some fundamental questions about individual’s identity, the purpose in life and the nature of human relationships. Does the image I see in the mirror describe my true identity? Unless I define my identity, how it would be possible to describe my relationship with others. The fundamental rule for formulating harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships relate to understanding my own identity and recognizing my relationship with my own self. If I know, who I am, I could live in a relationship with myself.

Human existence raises some fundamental questions about individual’s identity, the purpose in life and the nature of human relationships. Does the image I see in the mirror describe my true identity ? Unless I define my identity, how it would be possible to describe my relationship with others? The fundamental rule for formulating harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships relate to understanding my own identity and recognizing my relationship with my own self. If I know, who I am, I could live in a relationship with myself.

The complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism

The complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism. THE NEWBORN BABY ALWAYS ARRIVES INTO THE WORLD WITH AN ORIGINAL, UNIQUE, DISTINCT, AND ONE OF ITS OWN KIND OF GENOME THAT HAS NEVER EXISTED IN THE PAST AND WILL NEVER EXIST AGAIN IN THE FUTURE

If man is viewed as a multicellular human organism, we may have to ask ourselves the following question. Who or what is the subject who lives because of the functions of the trillions of cells?

Man is unique, original, one kind of person who has not existed before and would not also exist in future even when he shares the same identical genome. Two identical twins could be correctly identified as two different individuals. I propose the Law of Individuality and Creation to claim that man exists as Individual and has no choice in this conditioned nature of subjective physical existence in the world. Man can only exist as Individual with Individuality.

Human Anatomy Formulates Human Identity

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships

I learned the truths about the living human body and about Life while dissecting the dead human bodies in a systematic manner. 

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships

So what is the Identity of this Human person or Human subject? How does the living Human organism maintain its Identity and Individuality? Apart from the Cultural Traditions of India, several Schools of religious thought claim that the Human Individual and its Identity is represented by Human Soul. Where does this soul exist in the human body? What is the location if the soul is present in the living person? Does man have a soul? How does the human organism acquires Knowledge about its own structures and the functions they perform?

How does the multicellular human organism recognizes its own Identity and Individuality?

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships

A brief glance at the face is enough for most people to identify one another. However, man does not exist with the same identity during the course of his life. The word identity describes the condition or fact of being a specific person. Identification is the process by which a person can be identified in an accurate and consistent manner

Human Anatomy Formulates Human Identity. A brief glance at the face is enough for most people to identify one another. Face recognition is a basic feature of human identity and recognition.

The morphological or the external appearance of a person is subject to constant changes and it differs in a significant manner during the various stages of life such as infancy, boyhood, adulthood, and old age. The term individuality describes the sum of the characteristics or qualities that set one person apart from others. The condition of being individual, or different from others establishes the indivisibility of man.

Human Anatomy Formulates Human Identity. If Identity described by the Phenotype that establishes one face of the Coin, the Individuality describes the second face of the same coin and is established by the Genotype. While being the same, the Genotype presents the Individual with varying features of identification.

Identity, Individuality, and Consciousness:

Human Anatomy Formulates Human Identity. Identity and Individuality. How does the multicellular human organism recognizes its own Identity?

Man describes his identity in terms of his personal name, age, gender, race, ethnicity, place of origin, language, religion, political, occupational, or social affiliation. In reality, the man is an association of trillions of individual cells.

Human Anatomy Formulates Human Identity. Identity and Individuality. Cognitive Biology must address the issue of cognition of human Identity. In the multicellular human organism, who recognizes the Identity of the Human Individual?

The human organism is a conscious being and the function called consciousness achieves functional unity of all these individual cells and works for the benefit of the individual who always maintains his individuality. This is possible because individual cells have the ability to recognize the presence of other living cells in their environment and display functional subordination to serve the purpose of the whole organism.

Human Anatomy Formulates Human Identity. Identity, Individuality, and Consciousness – Existence precedes Essence

Understanding Individuality:

Dr. Michael Elowitz and Dr. Long Cai are developing a platform through which cells can self-record their lineage and molecular event histories directly into their own DNA as they create new tissues, particularly in the brain. This research will help to address how individual cells in a developing embryo diversify into many distinct cell types, each playing its unique role in the organism.

Dr. Michael Elowitz, Physicist at California Institute of Technology has conducted experiments on colonies of genetically identical (clones) E. coli bacteria under identical conditions and discovered that they behave in different ways.

The complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism. The Law of Individuality. Genetically identical bacteria is actually a mob of Individuals.

A colony of genetically identical E. coli bacteria is actually a mob of individuals. Even among simple forms of life, like the common bacterium E. coli, genetics only partly determines what any one organism is like. E. coli expresses its individuality in many ways. All the bacilli above are genetically identical, but the shades show differences in the production of proteins that digest lactose.

The key to understanding E. coli’s fingerprints is to recognize that the bacteria are not simple machines. Unlike wires and transistors, E. coli’s molecules are floppy, twitchy and unpredictable. In an electronic device, like a computer or a radio, electrons stream in a steady flow through the machine’s circuits, but the molecules in E. coli jostle and wander. When E. coli begins using a gene to make a protein, it does not produce a smoothly increasing supply. It spurts out the proteins in fits and starts. One clone may produce half a dozen copies of a protein in an hour, while a clone right next to it produces none.

The bacteria, Dr. Elowitz found, did not produce a uniform glow. They flickered, sometimes brightly, sometimes dimly. And when Dr. Elowitz took a snapshot of the colony, it was not a uniform sea of light. Some microbes were dark at that moment while others shone at full strength.

At the very least, E. coli’s individuality should be a warning to those who would put human nature down to any sort of simple genetic determinism. Living things are more than just programs run by genetic software. Even in minuscule microbes, the same genes and the same genetic network can lead to different fates.

The bacteria have fingerprints of their own and even when they share the same genome, they could still be identified as individuals.

The Law of Individuality:

The complex issues of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism.

I propose the Law of Individuality which governs all the living entities. Either with the same and identical genome or with different genomes, all living organisms have no choice other than that of living as ‘Individuals’.

Individuality and the Genome. The phenomenon of Diversity must be studied beyond the realm of genes, genetic codes, and genomes. Cytoplasm and its organs must be studied to understand the physiological basis of Diversity

The genes and the genetic codes function in accordance with the Law of Individuality. While the genetic structural organization is the same, there is functional variability due to factors over which the organism has no control. I describe Individuality as a Trade Mark. It is the characteristic of a biological entity. Genes and the genetic codes are the tools that an organism uses to express its Individuality. Each organism assembles its own kind of protein molecules to define its identity and to defend its existence in the natural world

Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality formulates the phenomenon of Human Individuality.

The concept of Biological Individual and Individuality has to be always defined in the context of the Individual’s relationship with its own Body, Social Group, Society, Time, and the Environment in which the Individual finds the reality of its own Existence. In the natural world, all living entities exist as individuals and express their individuality.

The complex issue of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism. The Law of Individuality leaves the Individual with no choice other than that of expressing variability while being a member of a Social Group which may have a fixed Identity.

Man is constituted as a Biotic Community of socially interacting cells and microbes

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships. Man is constituted as a Biotic Community of Socially interacting Cells and Microbes.
The complex issue of identity and individuality in the multicellular human organism

Biology must use the concept of Soul/Spirit to identify each man as a Specific Individual with Individuality. Human Identity and Individuality always involves the biological community, the time, the place, and the environment which are constantly interacting to provide the basis for the human existence.

My relationship with myself. Who am I?

What is my relationship with myself ?
I have forgotten all other relationships.
How many mirrors that I have looked into, yet
I have forgotten my face. 

The above lines are an attempt by me to translate into English the ‘ghazal’ titled “Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai” by Mumtaz Rashid. The ‘ghazal’ is included in the music audio cassette (11/98), “Rubayee” (Volume 1). The singer is India’s famous ghazal singer Pankaj Udhas. The cassette was released by Music India, Polygram India Ltd. The cassette includes “Rubayees” of Hakim Omar Khayyam translated into Indian language Urdu by Janab Zameer Kazmi and Janab Irteza Nishat

Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai Lyric

Beemar Ko Bekaar Na Kardo Ya Rab
Iss Jeene Ko Dushwar Na Kardun Ya Rab
Iss Khaab Se Har Shaam Ko Pee Leta Hoon
Main Khud Se Bhi Inkaar Na Kar Dun Ya Rab

Peene De Mujhe Bhar De Mera Paimaana
Duniya To Hain Ek Uljha Huaa Afsaana
Jab Tak Mujhe Maalum Na Ye Ho Jaaye
Main Aaya Kahan Se Hun Kahan Hain Jaana
Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai
Har Ek Rishta Bhool Gaya
Itne Aaine Dekhe Hain Ki
Apna Chehra Bhool Gaya
Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai

Ab To Yeh Bhi Yaad Nahi Hai
Farq Tha Kitna Dono Main
Ab To Yeh Bhi Yaad Nahi Hai
Farq Tha Kitna Dono Main
Us Ki Baatein Yaad Raheen Aur
Us Ki Baatein Yaad Raheen Aur
Us Ka Lehja Bhool Gaya
Itne Aaine Dekhe Hain Ki
Apna Chehra Bhool Gaya
Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai

Pyasi Dharti Ke Hothon Per
Mera Naam Nahi To Kya
Pyasi Dharti Ke Hothon Per
Mera Naam Nahi To Kya
Main Woh Baadal Ka Tukda Hoon
Main Woh Baadal Ka Tukda Hoon
Jis Ko Dariya Bhool Gaya
Itne Aaine Dekhe Hain Ki
Apna Chehra Bhool Gaya
Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai

Duniya Wale Kuch Bhi Kahein
Rashid Apni Majboori Hain
Duniya Wale Kuch Bhi Kahein
Rashid Apni Majboori Hain
Uski Gali Jab Yaad Aayi Hain
Uski Gali Jab Yaad Aayi Hain
Ghar Ka Rasta Bhool Gaya
Itne Aaine Dekhe Hain Ki
Apna Chehra Bhool Gaya
Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai
Har Ek Rishta Bhool Gaya
Mujh Se Mera Kya Rishta Hai
Har Ek Rishta Bhool Gaya.

Who am I? From where I have arrived? Where am I going?  

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships

Human existence raises some fundamental questions about individual’s identity, the purpose in life and the nature of human relationships. Does the image I see in the mirror describe my true identity ? Unless I define my identity, how it would be possible to describe my relationship with others. The fundamental rule for formulating harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships relate to understanding my own identity and recognizing my relationship with my own self. If I know, who I am, I could live in a relationship with myself.

Mental Health – The rules for developing harmonious, positive interpersonal relationships

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian

University of Michigan and Michigan Medicine must learn that there is no human race called Indian

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: Michigan Medicine and University of Michigan reveal their ignorance of the term called Race. There is no Race of People called Indian. However, several Indians, Iranians and Germans celebrate their Aryan Race heritage. I ask Michigan Medicine and University of Michigan to share its educational experience and publish its Theory of Man

Excerpt: The Michigan Medicine AHEAD study is examining the efficacy of a medication aimed at preventing Alzheimer’s Disease in individuals at increased risk of developing the disease. The study has, however, faced criticism regarding its focus on years of schooling and its lack of a research protocol to verify the identity and individuality of the human organism. Critics assert that biological processes like the flow of biological information and protein synthesis are not influenced by education level and that individuality should not be tied to factors such as race and ethnicity. The conceptualization of “life as knowledge in action” and that it is an interplay of cellular function and knowledge must be explored.

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: Michigan Medicine asks, “What is your Race?” I ask Michigan Medicine and University of Michigan to share its educational experience and publish its Theory of Man. I categorically claim that there is no human race called Indian.

The AHEAD Study is researching the safety and effectiveness of an investigational medication in people who might be at increased risk for developing memory loss associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. The study is looking for participants age 55-80 years old, who have generally normal memory function in daily life, and who are not being treated for memory problems. For individuals age 55-64 years old, an additional risk factor is required, such as a parent or sibling with Alzheimer’s Disease or previous biomarker testing showing increased risk for developing Alzheimer’s Disease. This study sees participants in Ann Arbor. Contact Lauren Mackenzie at spearsl@med.umich.edu or 734-232-2415.

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: Michigan Medicine asks, “What is your Race?” There is no human race called Indian. I ask Michigan Medicine and University of Michigan to share its educational experience and publish its Theory of Man.

On Tuesday, December 05, 2023, at the Michigan Clinical Research Unit (MCRU) at the Cardiovascular Center (CVC), I was interviewed for participating in the AHEAD Study and I completed the Stage 1A of the Screening process. I am asked to provide information about the most important occupation of my life, my sexual orientation, my race and ethnicity in the context of my place of birth and the country of origin, the total number of years I spent in the School to register my personal identity for participation in the Medical Research Project.

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: Michigan Medicine asks, “What is your Race?” There is no human race called Indian. I ask Michigan Medicine and University of Michigan to share its educational experience and publish its Theory of Man.

The AHEAD Study Research Protocol has not identified the basis for discovering the identity of a multicellular human organism. I can answer the questions I am asked. Do I have the ability to communicate my answers to the cells of my own body and reflect that identity in the living functions they perform to keep me alive?

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: University of Michigan and Michigan Medicine must learn that there is no human race called Indian

There is no racial or ethnic identity described as American or European. For the same reason, there is no racial or ethnic identity that can be construed as Asian/Indian. India has over a billion human population. No person uses the terms Asian/Indian and Non-Hispanic if they are asked to describe their identity. However, many Indians respectfully acknowledge their racial heritage using the term Aryan. This identity is equally shared by Persians and Germans to varying extents

The differences between race and ethnicity – and why they’re so hard to define

Harmeet Kaur

By Harmeet Kaur, CNN

Updated 8:07 AM EDT, Tue May 30, 2023

CNN — 

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: The differences between race and ethnicity – and why they’re so hard to define

If you’ve ever filled out a Census form, a college application or a patient questionnaire at the doctor’s office, you’ve probably been asked to identify your race and ethnicity.

Governments, workplaces and educational institutions often collect data on these categories to determine things like which programs require funding, what disparities exist between different groups and when civil rights violations are occurring.

But you might have also felt that checking a box on a form requires you to define yourself in ways that don’t necessarily align with your own identity.

If it seems like the distinctions between race and ethnicity are confusing, unsatisfying or unclear, you’re onto something. These categories are messy and lack concrete definitions. Their meanings have evolved over time and can shift depending on the context.

“It’s not like there is some truthful race and truthful ethnicity out there, and that we bestow it on the population,” said Tomás Jiménez, a sociology professor at Stanford University who studies race and ethnicity. “It comes from an observation of how people use these ways of categorizing themselves and each other.”

Put another way, race and ethnicity are social and political constructs. Still, they carry enormous consequences in the US, Jiménez and other scholars say. Here’s how to make sense of them. 

Race and ethnicity, defined (sort of)

In US parlance, race refers to a group of people who share physical traits – such as skin color, hair texture or eye shape – based on some common ancestry. That common ancestry is broadly related to geography, said Grace Kao, a professor of sociology at Yale University. (For example, White people can generally trace their roots back to Europe, while Black people can generally trace their roots to Africa.)

The US Office of Management and Budget, which determines the racial categories used by the Census Bureau and other federal agencies, currently outlines five racial groups: American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White.

Ethnicity, meanwhile, refers to a group of people who share a common history and culture. It sometimes (but not always) correlates to national origin – for example, a person might be categorized as racially Asian and ethnically Chinese. But this understanding of ethnicity would not apply in other parts of the world. In China, for example, a person’s ethnicity would be described using more specific terms. There are 56 officially recognized ethnic groups in the country, including the Han people, the Mongols and the Uyghurs.

Census forms and other questionnaires rely on self-identification to determine a person’s race and ethnicity. But people make assumptions and assessments about others’ racial and ethnic identities all the time, and individuals don’t have control over how they’re perceived. Nancy López, a professor of sociology at the University of New Mexico, refers to this phenomenon as “street race” – the race that people see you as when you’re out in public. 

“When you show up to look for an apartment, people are not asking you ‘What’s your ancestry?’” López said. “They just take a look at you and decide, ‘We want people who look like you living next to us or we don’t.’”

One way to understand street race is through the way Blackness is characterized in the US. Someone can have a Black parent and a White parent, but if they have a certain skin tone and hair texture, they will likely be perceived as solely Black (a legacy of the one-drop rulethat classified anyone with known African ancestry as Black).

Kao pointed to her own identity as an Asian American woman as another example. People might assume upon looking at her that she doesn’t speak English or that she’s an immigrant. But she said her husband, who is White and from Canada, doesn’t face those kinds of assumptions.

“That speaks to how important race is,” she said. “It’s not something we can just pretend doesn’t exist, because it affects everything in terms of our daily lives.”

Examples of how race and ethnicity overlap

Despite their importance in our society, the categories of race and ethnicity are far from fixed.

Merriam-Webster’s dictionary entry shows that race has previously been understood as “a group of people sharing a common cultural, geographical, linguistic, or religious origin or background,” “the descendants of a common ancestor” and “a group of people sharing some habit or characteristic (such as profession or belief).” During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, for example, groups such as the Irish, Italians and Jews were referred to in the US as separate races. Today, members of those groups would largely be classified as White in the US. 

The US Census is another useful case study in the malleability of race. 

Beginning in 1870, the government added Chinese under a category labeled “color” to describe all East Asians. The “color” category was later renamed as “race,” and Japanese was added in 1890. Later iterations of the form used the term Hindu to describe South Asians (despite the fact that most South Asian migrants at the time were Sikh and Muslim), according to the Pew Research Center. 

Mexican was included as a racial category on the 1930 census. But Mexican American groups at the time didn’t want Mexicans to be counted as a separate race, fearing that would affect how certain populations are counted. might be targeted by the government. It would be 40 years before the government tried to count the Latino population again, this time asking about origin separately from race. Though the wording of the question has since evolved, the census continues to categorize Hispanic and Latino as an ethnic identity rather than a racial one.

The five racial categories that are listed on the census today – American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native  or Other Pacific Islander, and White – have been in place since 1997. But there has long been debate about whether those are sufficient, and the Biden administration is currently proposing changes to the 2030 census that would affect how certain populations are counted.    

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: The differences between race and ethnicity – and why they’re so hard to define

The proposal would combine the race and ethnicity questions into one. That means instead of being asked about Hispanic or Latino origin separately from race, respondents would see a box for “Hispanic or Latino” alongside such categories as “Black,” “White” and “American Indian or Alaska Native.” Respondents would be able to select multiple categories from the list. Several Latino civil rights organizationssupport the change – many Latinos currently check the “some other race” box, and there have been concerns about whether the population is being adequately counted.

Others, including Afro-Latino scholars such as López, argue that combining race and ethnicity into one category on the census would lump together a highly diverse population and make it more difficult to understand racial inequities in housing, employment and other arenas. There are White, Black and Indigenous Latinos, López said. She instead proposes that the Census add a category such as “brown” to capture the specific experiences that Latinos of mixed ancestry experience.

Under the proposed changes to the 2030 Census, “Middle Eastern or North African” would also be added as a category – the government currently classifies those of Middle Eastern or North African (MENA) descent as White, although many Arab Americans have said that does not reflect their reality.

Kao said such debates over how groups are categorized illustrate just how complicated these categories are.

“Everything is messy,” she added. “If we were talking five years from now or 10 years from now, it could be totally different.”

Why race and ethnicity are important

Jiménez thinks about the categories of race and ethnicity as “claims that we make about who’s in and who’s out.”

In the case of race, Jiménez says, society has ascribed meaning to certain physical features and created a hierarchy around them that informs who is treated with respect and dignity and who has access to wealth, education and other resources. But race isn’t an innate biological classification – anthropologists and geneticists who have studied these questions have found that there is no set of physical or behavioral traits that corresponds to all of the people in a given race. Our understanding of race is instead a product of colonization, the transatlantic slave trade and migration patterns, scholars say.

“Our modern conception of race is one that is European, and it immediately puts Europeans or Whites at the top of the hierarchy,” Kao said. “You can argue that if you have racial groups, you don’t need to have a hierarchy. We can say the world is divided into these populations and not assume that one is superior to the other. But that’s not the way our racial categories have formed.”

Ethnicity can be similarly squishy, Jiménez said. There are certain markers that we typically use to determine whether someone is part of an ethnic group, like where their family is from, what foods they eat or what language they speak. Still, a person with Puerto Rican parents who doesn’t speak Spanish might be seen by others in the community as “not Latino enough” just as a person with one Iranian parent might be seen as “not Persian enough.” 

To complicate matters, ethnicity is sometimes conflated with political states that may not have existed in their current form a few hundred years ago. For example, Jiménez points out, Italian is widely considered an ethnicity in the US today. But some earlier Italian immigrants might not have described themselves as Italian given regional differences within the population, he added.

“The fact that the boundaries move around… (and) the fact that those change over time all speak to the fact that we’re making this up collectively,” Jiménez said.

Given that these categories are social constructions, it might be tempting to suggest that we do away with them all together. On an individual level, these classifications can feel limiting, Kao said – no one wants to feel constrained by stereotypes or perceptions that others have of them because of their racial or ethnic identity. But at the same time, race – and ethnicity to a degree – has very real implications in our society, and understanding it is imperative to discern where disparities are occurring and how they might be addressed.

That, Jiménez said, is the paradox of these socially constructed categories.

“It is something that frustrates us,” he said. “It’s also in some ways a requirement if we are to get to a place where these categories matter less and less – in ways that affect us negatively.”

Whole Aryan – There is no Human Race called Indian: University of Michigan and Michigan Medicine must learn that there is no human race called Indian

Whole Dude – Whole Consent

University of Michigan and Michigan Medicine must avoid the social and political constructs of Race and Ethnicity. How does the multicellular human organism verifies its own Identity?

Excerpt: As a research participant, I am investigating the problem of Selection Bias in the Selection Process used by the Research Investigator at University of Michigan. The Selection Bias is inherent in the Selection process for it is gathering information from its human subjects outsides the boundaries of the declared purpose of the Study.

Informed Consent For the Michigan Medicine AHEAD 3-45 Study Screening Procedures

University of Michigan and Michigan Medicine must reject the concept of Race and Ethnicity to describe Asian/Indian Identity

On Tuesday, December 05, 2023, I signed the Informed Consent Form for the AHEAD 3-45 Study Screening Procedures. Reference: UM eResearch ID: HUM00178622; NIA & Eisai Inc. / Protocol Number BAN2401-G000-303

I was informed about an Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was instructed to contact the Study Subject Adviser, Advarra IRB to report my concerns or complaints regarding this research study. I contacted Advarra IRB on December 28 to share my concerns about my exclusion from the study due to the problem of Selection Bias. The following is a copy of that communication sent to the Study Subject Adviser:

Dear Study Subject Adviser,

REFERENCE NUMBER: Pro00041484

As a research participant, I am investigating the problem of Selection Bias in the Selection Process used by the Research Investigator at University of Michigan.

I am informed that I am excluded from further participation in this Study and I want to verify the results of the blood and urine samples I provided on December 05, 2023 to ascertain the fact of my exclusion from the Study is consistent with the Research Protocol for which I have given my written consent.

In any case, I shall hold University of Michigan to its primary responsibility to share the lab test results for it has issued me a Medical Registration Number and informed me about this Hospital Appointment and provided me the assurance that the lab results will be shared with the patient.

Whole Dude – Whole Bias

University of Michigan and Michigan Medicine must reject the concept of Race and Ethnicity to describe Asian/Indian Identity

Selection bias refers to systematic differences between baseline characteristics of the groups that are compared. The unique strength of randomization is that, if successfully accomplished, it prevents selection bias in allocating interventions to participants.  Its success in this respect depends on fulfilling several interrelated processes.  A rule for allocating interventions to participants must be specified, based on some chance (random) process. We call this sequence generation. Furthermore, steps must be taken to secure strict implementation of that schedule of random assignments by preventing foreknowledge of the forthcoming allocations. This process if often termed allocation concealment, although could more accurately be described as allocation sequence concealment. Thus, one suitable method for assigning interventions would be to use a simple random (and therefore unpredictable) sequence, and to conceal the upcoming allocations from those involved in enrolment into the trial.

University of Michigan and Michigan Medicine must learn that there is no human race called Indian

Excerpt: The Michigan Medicine AHEAD study is examining the efficacy of a medication aimed at preventing Alzheimer’s Disease in individuals at increased risk of developing the disease. The study has, however, faced criticism regarding its focus on years of schooling and its lack of a research protocol to verify the identity and individuality of the human organism. Critics assert that biological processes like the flow of biological information and protein synthesis are not influenced by education level and that individuality should not be tied to factors such as race and ethnicity. The conceptualization of “life as knowledge in action” and that it is an interplay of cellular function and knowledge must be explored.

The following is a copy of the automated response sent by Advarra Adviser (IRB)

From: Advarra Adviser

Thank you for your email.  Advarra offices will be closing at 3pm Friday, December 22nd and will be closed through Monday January 1, 2023 for our Holiday Break.  Emails sent during this time will be addressed the following business day, Tuesday, January 2nd.

Please note – questions regarding:

*Compensation

*Scheduling

*Test Results

*Study equipment

*Consent form questions

*Enrolling or withdrawing from a studyShould be discussed directly with the research staff.  The research staff contact information can be found on the first page of the consent form.

My reply to the automated response sent by Advarra Adviser (IRB):

Thanks for your email. My concern is about the research protocol for which the research scientist obtained my written consent. I am not asking you about the Consent Form Questions. I am asking you to verify the legitimacy of the Research Project to ask the Questions on the Consent Form. Firstly, the AHEAD Study did not disclose that the Study is constructed on the basis of creating a profile information of each research subject. Secondly, the Questions asked have no scientific validity; the information provided has no relevance to the study of this investigational drug. It seems that there is some other agenda is at work to use this research to gather information about research subjects without any concern for the randomization of the selection of research subjects. The Selection Bias is inherent in the Selection process for it is gathering information of its human subjects outsides the boundaries of the declared purpose of the Study.

The AHEAD Study is researching the safety and effectiveness of an investigational medication in people who might be at increased risk for developing memory loss associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. The study is looking for participants age 55-80 years old, who have generally normal memory function in daily life, and who are not being treated for memory problems. For individuals age 55-64 years old, an additional risk factor is required, such as a parent or sibling with Alzheimer’s Disease or previous biomarker testing showing increased risk for developing Alzheimer’s Disease. This study sees participants in Ann Arbor. Contact Lauren Mackenzie at spearsl@med.umich.edu or 734-232-2415.

On Tuesday, December 05, 2023, at the Michigan Clinical Research Unit (MCRU) at the Cardiovascular Center (CVC), I was interviewed for participating in the AHEAD Study and I completed the Stage 1A of the Screening process. I am asked to provide information about the most important occupation of my life, my sexual orientation, my race and ethnicity,  my place of birth and the country of origin, the total number of years I spent in the School to register my personal identity for participation in the Medical Research Project. The Research Protocol has not identified the basis for discovering the identity of a multicellular human organism. I can answer the questions I am asked. Do I have the ability to communicate my answers to the cells of my own body and reflect that identity in the living functions they perform to keep me alive?

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Plasma Biomarker Eligibility in a Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease Trial

DOI:10.1002/alz.083020

Authors: Doris P. Molina-Henry, Rema Raman, Andy Lou, Oliver Langford and others, University of Southern California

Abstract:

Background: In Alzheimer’s disease (AD) trials, differential screen failure due to cognitive and biomarker requirements may contribute to underrepresentation of racially and ethnically minoritized groups. The AHEAD 3‐45 Study (NCT04468659) is an ongoing program testing lecanemab at the stage of preclinical AD that utilizes plasma biomarker prescreening, acquired before cognitive, clinical, and medical history eligibility assessments, to enrich for participants likely to qualify based on amyloid PET eligibility criteria. Methods: We examined the frequency of plasma amyloid biomarker eligibility among racial and ethnic groups in the AHEAD Study. We assigned participants ages 55‐80 to mutually exclusive groups: Hispanic Black (HB), Hispanic White (HW), Non‐Hispanic Asian (NHA), Non‐Hispanic Black (NHB), and Non‐Hispanic White (NHW). We used univariate logistic regression models to explore group differences in screen failure rates as determined by an algorithm that includes the plasma Aβ 42/40 ratio, age, and APOE status. The algorithm indicates an adequately high probability of elevated brain amyloid (>20 centiloids). We further explored whether APOE ε4 status (carrier vs non‐carrier) contributed to group differences. Results Among 4274 participants undergoing plasma screening, 59 (1.4%) were HB, 622 (14.6%) were HW, 74 (1.73%) were NHA, 329 (7.7%) were NHB, and 3190 (74.6%) were NHW. Screen failure rates were 86% for HB, 76% for HW; 80% for NHA; 77% for NHB, and 62% for NHW. Using NHW participants as a reference group, we observed increased odds of screen failure among all other groups (HB OR = 4.0 95% CI 2.0, 9.1; HW OR = 2.0 95% CI 1.6, 2.4; NHA OR = 2.5 95% CI 1.4, 4.5; NHB OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.6, 2.7). Observed differences were consistent across APOE ε4 carriers and non‐carriers. Conclusion: Differential rates of amyloid eligibility were observed despite the lack of systematic sample bias due to clinical or cognitive requirements observed in previous studies. Potential explanations for these observations include differences in clinical trial access, incidences of elevated amyloid, needed cutoffs for biomarker assays, and confounding due to comorbidities or other unmeasured covariates. This work is supported by a public‐private partnership between Alzheimer’s Clinical Trial Consortium (U24 AG057437) and Eisai.

Disparities by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults Recruited for a Preclinical Alzheimer Disease Trial

Rema Raman, PhD1Yakeel T. Quiroz, PhD2,3Oliver Langford, MS1et al

Key Points

Question:  Are there racial/ethnic differences associated with recruitment sources and reasons for ineligibility among preclinical Alzheimer disease clinical trial participants?

Findings:  In this cross-sectional study of screening data for 5945 participants from a preclinical Alzheimer disease trial, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants were recruited from local efforts compared with White participants who were recruited from more distributed efforts. Adjusted analysis showed that underrepresented racial/ethnic communities were more likely to be ineligible after the first screening visit.

Meaning:  These findings suggest that there are racial and ethnic disparities in preclinical AD clinical trial enrollment that will require a comprehensive approach to study design and recruitment strategies to minimize disproportionate enrollment.

Abstract

Importance:  Underrepresentation of many racial/ethnic groups in Alzheimer disease (AD) clinical trials limits generalizability of results and hinders opportunities to examine potential effect modification of candidate treatments.

Whole Dude – Whole Race : Michigan Medicine and University of Michigan reveal their ignorance of the term called Race. There is no Race of People called Indian. However, several Indians, Iranians and Germans celebrate their Aryan Race heritage. I ask Michigan Medicine and University of Michigan to share its educational experience and publish its Theory of Man

What is human identity? What is human individuality?

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Human Identity undergoes changes due to the aging process but the Human Individuality persists unchanged.
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality

In 1965, while I was a student of Human Anatomy at Kurnool Medical College, I had the opportunity to know about Dr. J. C. B. Grant (1886-1973), the author of Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy. The 5th Edition of his Atlas was published in 1962 and was available in India in our Medical College Library.

Born in Loanhead (south of Edinburgh) in 1886, Grant studied medicine at the University of Edinburgh Medical School and graduated with an M.B., Ch.B. degree in 1908. While at Edinburgh, he worked under the renowned anatomist Daniel John Cunningham. Grant became a decorated serviceman of the Royal Army Medical Corps during the First World War before moving to Canada. He established himself as an ‘anatomist extraordinary’ at the University of Toronto, publishing three textbooks that form the basis of Grant’s Anatomy. The textbooks are still used in anatomy classes today, and made unforgettable memories for those who found themselves in his classes nearly a century ago. One of Grant’s many accomplishments was establishing a division of histology within the department.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality

As a medical student, I used Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy, the seminal work of Scottish-born Dr. John Charles Boileau Grant, who would become the chair of Anatomy at the University of Toronto in 1930 and retired in 1965.

Students continue to use Grant’s textbooks today, and for the more artistic anatomist there’s even a Grant’s Anatomy Coloring Book, published in 2018.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality

At the University of Toronto, Dr.McMurrich, Chair of Anatomy was succeeded as chairman in 1930 by Dr. John Charles Boileau Grant. Dr. Grant wrote three text books, of which “An Atlas of Anatomy” (published in 1943) rapidly gained international prominence and is still, one of the most widely used anatomical atlases in the world. It is now known as “Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy” and is in its tenth edition. The atlas was based on a series of elegant dissections done either by Grant or by others under his supervision. Many of these dissections are currently housed in Grant’s Museum at the University of Toronto. 

The Rudi-Grant Connection is about knowing the man, the building blocks and the structural units and organization of the human body. To defend the human existence, the Rudi-Grant Connection lays the emphasis on knowing the person who is at risk apart from knowing the agent posing the risk.

THE IDENTITY OF MULTICELLULAR HUMAN ORGANISM:

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide me the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems

Daniel John Cunningham was born on 15 April 1850 in Scotland. After his initial schooling at his home town, Crieff, he took up the study of medicine at the University of Edinburgh and passed with honours. He is best known for the excellent series of dissection manuals, namely Cunningham’s Dissection Manuals. Cunningham’s Manual of Practical Anatomy has provided me the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide me the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide me the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide me the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems

I learned the truths about the living human body and about Life while dissecting the dead human bodies in a systematic manner. The Manual of Practical Anatomy which guides us through this entire process was published in England. The author Dr. Daniel John Cunningham prepared the Manual while dissecting cadavers of British or Irish citizens. He had never encountered cadavers of Indian citizens. At Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India, where I was a student, the Department of Anatomy obtains dead bodies from  Government General Hospital Kurnool and most of the deceased are the poor, illiterate, and uneducated people of that region. None of the deceased had the chance to know this man called Cunningham and Cunningham had no knowledge about the existence of these people who arrive on our dissection tables. But, as the dissection of the human body proceeds, inch, by inch, we recognize the anatomical parts as described by Cunningham. The manual also lists some anatomical variations and we very often exchange information between various dissection tables and recognize the variations mentioned. The dissections also involve slicing the organs and studying them, both macroscopically, and microscopically. We did not miss any part of the human body.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Cunningham’s Manuals of Practical Anatomy provide me the learning tools to know and understand Man’s External and Internal Reality and its Identity as described by Cells, Tissues, Organs,and Organ Systems
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE KNOWER – THE KNOWING-SELF: IN THIS IMAGE OF HUMAN BRAIN, THE GREEN PORTION OF BRAIN STEM IS CALLED RETICULAR FORMATION. I AM PROPOSING TO CALL IT AS THE KNOWING-SELF AND IT IS THE “KNOWER” OF THE HUMAN BODY WHICH CONSTANTLY CHANGES ITS MORPHOLOGICAL APPEARANCE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF TIME CALLED THE AGING PROCESS.

So what is the Identity of this Human person or Human subject who experiences his life using the Sensory Experience such as taste? How does the living Human organism maintain its Identity and Individuality? Apart from the Cultural Traditions of India, several Schools of Religious Thought claim that the Human Individuality and true or real Identity is represented by Human Soul. Where does this soul exist in the human body? What is the location if the soul is present in the living person? Does man have a soul? How does the human organism acquires Knowledge about its own structures and the functions they perform? To know the burdens of Life, I ask my readers to know the reality of man and the nature of his existence.

Human Identity vs Human Individuality:

Human Identity may involve a variety of factors such as facial appearance, age, gender, race, ethnicity, language, religion, culture, nationality, sexual orientation, social and occupational status. Whereas human individuality has to be evaluated by using the markers that the human body uses to recognize its own Self and defends its own existence from threats posed by Non-Self.

The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. Illustration of the anatomy of a female human face
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. In the final analysis, the human organism is a biotic community of trillions of individual, independent cells.
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality. SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – HUMAN EVOLUTION: THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX (MHC) IS THE HUMAN LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN (HLA) GENE CLUSTER ON CHROMOSOME 6. HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES CANNOT BE TRANSPLANTED OR GRAFTED INTO THE BODIES OF UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS. HUMAN IDENTITY MUST BE DISCOVERED AT MOLECULAR LEVEL TO ESTABLISH THE AFFINITY BETWEEN TWO HUMAN INDIVIDUALS.
The cellular and the molecular basis of human identity and human individuality

Human Individuality and the Genome

Individuality and the Genome. A COLONY OF GENETICALLY IDENTICAL E. COLI IS ACTUALLY A MOB OF ‘INDIVIDUALS’.

UNDERSTANDING INDIVIDUALITY: 

Individuality and the Genome. Even among simple forms of life, like the common bacterium E. coli, genetics only partly determines what any one organism is like. E. coli expresses its individuality in many ways. All the bacilli above are genetically identical, but the shades show differences in the production of proteins that digest lactose.Credit…Dr. Michael Elowitz

Dr. Michael Elowitz, Physicist at California Institute of Technology has conducted experiments on colonies of genetically identical (Clones) E. coli bacteria under identical experimental conditions and has discovered that the clones behave in different ways which could be viewed as an expression of ‘individuality’.

Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality governs all Individual Living Things.

E. coli bacteria in billions populate our intestines. Typical E. coli bacillus has about 4,000 genes. Human cells have about 20,000 genes. The bacteria have fingerprints of their own and even when they share the exact same genome, they could still be identified as ‘individuals’.

Individuality and the Genome. Dr. Michael Elowitz and Dr. Long Cai are developing a platform through which cells can self-record their lineage and molecular event histories directly into their own DNA as they create new tissues, particularly in the brain. This research will help to address how individual cells in a developing embryo diversify into many distinct cell types, each playing its unique role in the organism.

The key to understanding E. coli’s fingerprints is to recognize that the bacteria are not simple machines. Unlike wires and transistors, E. coli’s molecules are floppy, twitchy and unpredictable. In an electronic device, like a computer or a radio, electrons stream in a steady flow through the machine’s circuits, but the molecules in E. coli jostle and wander. When E. coli begins using a gene to make a protein, it does not produce a smoothly increasing supply. It spurts out the proteins in fits and starts. One clone may produce half a dozen copies of a protein in an hour, while a clone right next to it produces none.

Michael Elowitz, a physicist at Caltech, put these bursts on display in an elegant experiment. He and his colleagues incited E. coli to produce its proteins for feeding on lactose. Dr. Elowitz and his colleagues added extra genes to the bacteria so that when they made lactose-digesting proteins, they also released light.

The bacteria, Dr. Elowitz found, did not produce a uniform glow. They flickered, sometimes brightly, sometimes dimly. And when Dr. Elowitz took a snapshot of the colony, it was not a uniform sea of light. Some microbes were dark at that moment while others shone at full strength.

At the very least, E. coli’s individuality should be a warning to those who would put human nature down to any sort of simple genetic determinism. Living things are more than just programs run by genetic software. Even in minuscule microbes, the same genes and the same genetic network can lead to different fates.

The bacteria have fingerprints of their own and even when they share the same genome, they could still be identified as individuals.

Individuality and the Genome. Man is constituted as a Biotic Community of socially interacting cells and microbes

Humans differ from one another in too many different ways and it is hard to count. The current human population of over six billion could be identified as the same number of individuals. Each human being has an unique genome of his own. There are millions of typographical differences between one genome and another human genome. Even identical twins are not truly identical at all as identical genes in our cells can behave differently. 

Living entities are not like simple machines. When we use a gene to make a protein, the gene may not produce a smoothly increasing supply of that protein. The gene tends to work in fits and starts and spurts out the protein. Identical genes can behave differently as the gene makes protein or remains silent depending upon the ‘Methyl’ groups that cap the DNA strands and function as ‘transducers’. These ‘Methyl’ groups sometimes fall off of DNA or become attached to new spots. Hence genetically identical individuals can have different physical identities in the natural world. The protein molecules that make up living entities, turn them into individuals. 

THE IRRELEVANCE OF EVOLUTION: 

Individuality and the Genome: CHARLES DARWIN’S ORIGIN OF SPECIES (1859) PROPOSES A MECHANISTIC, NONPURPOSIVE ACCOUNT OF EVOLUTION AS THE PRODUCT OF THE NATURAL SELECTION OF RANDOMLY PRODUCED GENETIC MUTATIONS.

In the natural world, all living entities exist as individuals and express their individuality. The Theory of Evolution proposes that a species can descend or arrive to become a new species by changing its genome in a gradual and incremental manner using a mechanism that is described as ‘ natural selection ‘. The mechanism of natural selection operates via a process of random and unguided mutations in the genetic code that changes the genome and eventually produces the ‘biodiversity’ that we witness in the natural world.

Individuality and the Genome. The phenomenon of Diversity must be studied beyond the realm of genes, genetic codes, and genomes. Cytoplasm and its organs must be studied to understand the physiological basis of Diversity

This Theory of Evolution has no relevance to the ultimate identity of each individual member of a given species. This identity is dictated by the interplay between the various components of each individual cell and its interactions with other cells. With the same genomes or different genomes, the living entities can only exist as individuals and they have no other choice. The evolutionary connections are not relevant to this identity. To understand the phenomenon of biodiversity, we will be forced to look at each individual member of each given species. 

THE LAW OF INDIVIDUALITY: 

Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality formulates the phenomenon of Human Individuality.

I propose that the Law of Individuality governs all the living entities and is manifested in various biological phenomena. The genes and the genetic code function in accordance with the Law of Individuality. I would describe Individuality as a Trade Mark. It is the characteristic of a biological entity. Genes and the genetic codes are the tools that an organism uses to express its Individuality. Each organism assembles its own kind of protein molecules to define its identity and to defend its existence in the natural world. 

Individuality and the Genome. The Law of Individuality formulates the phenomenon of Human Individuality.

WHOLE MENDELISM – #WholeMendelism VS DARWINISM

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  Vs  HUMAN EVOLUTION WHOLE MENDELISM  #WholeMendelism  Vs  DARWINISM:

The origin of Man, or the Beginning of Man as a new form of Life may have a basis that lies outside  operation of natural causes. Mendelism, ‘The Theory of Heredity’ formulated by Gregor Mendel provides insights to the problem of man’s origin. on the basis of Mendelism, it can be said that man did not descend from Primates and is not truly related to other members of Hominid Family. Man’s relationship with other zoological species has to be explained on the basis of reproductive history and inheritance of  biological traits. I coined the phrase “Whole Mendelism” #WholeMendelism to claim that man had arrived on planet Earth due to a special act of creation.  There are no natural conditions, no natural factors, no natural mechanisms, no natural processes and no natural causes to transform any of previously existing members of Hominid Family to establish the reality of anatomically modern man. To make  transition from an old species to a new species which is often called ‘EVOLUTION’ or ‘DARWINISM’, the breeding interactions of species involved must operate according to the Laws of Inheritance discovered by Gregor Johann Mendel, the Father of Genetics. In this article, I would like to describe the Laws of Inheritance and the problems that I encounter to verify Darwinism while using the Mendelian Principles of Heredity and Variation. For example, if evolutionary biologists or anthropologists claim that anatomically modern human species or its immediate ancestral species had reproduced with archaic hominids such as Neanderthals, the human genome has to include one complete ‘Haploid’ set of chromosomes normally occurring in the mature germ cell called egg or sperm  which means 22 chromosomes(Autosomes), and 1  X or Y chromosome(Sex chromosome) derived exclusively from Neanderthal genome. Secondly, human population must include a few members that can be clearly identified as Neanderthal.

THE ORIGIN AND EXTINCTION OF SPECIES:

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : AFTER  THE  ORIGIN  OF  LIFE  ON  EARTH  FOR  A  VERY,  VERY  LONG  TIME( ABOUT  3.5  BILLION  YEARS)  IT  COMPRISED  OF  SIMPLER  FORMS  OF  LIFE .  SUDDENLY,  ABOUT  600  MILLION  YEARS  AGO  NUMEROUS  MARINE  CREATURES  ARRIVED  TO  CAUSE  AN  "EXPLOSION  OF  LIFE."
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : AFTER THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ON EARTH FOR A VERY, VERY LONG TIME( ABOUT 3.5 BILLION YEARS) IT COMPRISED OF SIMPLER FORMS OF LIFE . SUDDENLY, ABOUT 600 MILLION YEARS AGO NUMEROUS MARINE CREATURES ARRIVED TO CAUSE AN “EXPLOSION OF LIFE.”

It will be interesting to note that a vast majority of species found on Earth have emerged suddenly and have disappeared suddenly. For example, Cambrian, first geologic Period in the Paleozoic Era witnessed  sudden emergence of a great variety of marine animals especially trilobites and brachiopods about 600 million years ago. This “Explosion of Life” is aptly named ‘Cambrian Explosion’. Similarly, towards the end of Cretaceous Period, third geologic Period of the Mesozoic Era and the beginning of Tertiary Period of the Cenozoic Era, about 65 million years ago, a global extinction event called K-T Event was responsible for eliminating approximately 80 percent of all species of animals. Dinosaurs which reached maximum development became extinct while new forms of life appeared with new hereditary traits.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :   THESE  DEEP  SEA  CREATURES  OF  ATLANTIC  OCEAN,  LAMELLIBRACHIA  LUYMESI,  TUBE  WORMS,  INVERTEBRATES  BELONG  TO  PHYLUM  ANNELIDA  LIVE  ON  THE  OCEAN  FLOOR  ALONG  HYDROCARBON  VENTS.  TUBE  WORMS  TAKE  170  TO  250  YEARS  TO  GROW  AND  HAVE  SURVIVED  AS  A  SPECIES  WITHOUT  CONCERN  FOR  CHANGING  TIMES.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THESE DEEP SEA CREATURES OF ATLANTIC OCEAN, LAMELLIBRACHIA LUYMESI, TUBE WORMS, INVERTEBRATES BELONG TO PHYLUM  ANNELIDA  LIVE  ON  THE  OCEAN  FLOOR  ALONG  HYDROCARBON VENTS. TUBE WORMS TAKE 170 TO 250 YEARS TO GROW AND HAVE SURVIVED AS A SPECIES WITHOUT CONCERN FOR CHANGING TIMES SINCE  PRECAMBRIAN  ERA .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  DARWINISM  CANNOT  ACCOUNT  FOR  SUDDEN  APPEARANCE  OF  A  VARIETY  OF  MARINE  LIFE  FORMS IN  AN  EVENT  CALLED 'CAMBRIAN  EXPLOSION'  ABOUT  570  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .  GEODUCK,  BIVALVE  CLAMS ARE  AMONG  THE  OLDEST  ANIMALS  IN  THE  WORLD  WITH  LIFESPANS  OF  ABOUT  146  TO  160  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : DARWINISM CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR SUDDEN APPEARANCE OF A VARIETY OF MARINE LIFE FORMS IN AN EVENT CALLED ‘CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION’ ABOUT 570 MILLION YEARS AGO . PANOPEA  GENEROSA, GEODUCK(NATIVE  AMERICAN CHINOOK  NAME), BIVALVE,  WORLD’S  LARGEST  BURROWING  SALT  WATER  CLAMS  FOUND  IN  THE  US  PUGET  SOUND  ARE AMONG THE OLDEST ANIMALS IN THE WORLD WITH LIFESPANS OF ABOUT 146 TO 160 YEARS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY  EXTINCTION  EVENT  ABOUT  65  MILLION  YEARS  AGO  WIPED  OUT  APPROXIMATELY  80  PERCENT  OF  ALL  SPECIES  OF  ANIMALS  INCLUDING  A  GREAT  VARIETY  OF  DINOSAURS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY EXTINCTION EVENT ABOUT 65 MILLION YEARS AGO WIPED OUT APPROXIMATELY 80 PERCENT OF ALL SPECIES OF ANIMALS INCLUDING A GREAT VARIETY OF DINOSAURS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  DARWINISM  CANNOT  EXPLAIN  EITHER  THE  EMERGENCE  OF  NEW  SPECIES  OR  EXTINCTION  OF  OLD  SPECIES.  NATURAL  FACTORS,  NATURAL  CONDITIONS,  NATURAL  MECHANISMS ,  AND  NATURAL  CAUSES  CANNOT  FULLY  ACCOUNT  FOR  EXTINCTION  OF  THE  LARGE-BODIED  ICE  AGE  MAMMALS  SUCH  AS  WOOLLY  RHINOCEROS,  WOOLY  MAMMOTHS, MASTODONS, AND  SABERTOOTH  CARNIVORES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : DARWINISM CANNOT EXPLAIN EITHER THE EMERGENCE OF NEW SPECIES OR EXTINCTION OF OLD SPECIES. NATURAL FACTORS, NATURAL CONDITIONS, NATURAL MECHANISMS , AND NATURAL CAUSES CANNOT FULLY ACCOUNT FOR EXTINCTION OF THE LARGE-BODIED ICE AGE MAMMALS SUCH AS WOOLLY RHINOCEROS, WOOLY MAMMOTHS, MASTODONS, AND SABERTOOTH CARNIVORES .

In Darwinism, new species arise when, among the varieties of an existing species, certain intermediate forms become extinct, and the other circumstances are such that the surviving varieties now become more sharply separated from one another in type, and are able to reproduce their kind, and , in the course of many generations of interbreeding, also tend to breed true. This ‘Theory of Evolution’ is not consistent with Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance and Variation. The Unit Character called ‘GENE’ conserves its identity during the process of reproduction which could be either ‘Inbreeding’, or ‘Interbreeding’. A species is always known by its reproductive history for the Unit Characters or Genes get propagated to the next generation during both inbreeding and interbreeding process.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  GREGOR  JOHANN  MENDEL(1822-1884),  THE  FATHER  OF  GENETICS .  AT  THE  AUGUSTINIAN  MONASTERY  IN  BRNO(1843-1868),  HE  CONDUCTED OVER 29,000 BREEDING  EXPERIMENTS  CHIEFLY  ON  GARDEN PEAS(PISUM  SATIVUM).

Gregor Johann Mendel(1822-1884), Austrian monk noted for his experimental work on Heredity. At the Augustinian monastery in Brno(1843-1868) he conducted experiments chiefly on Garden Peas(Pisum sativum) using a controlled pollination technique and a careful statistical analysis of his results. He produced the first accurate and scientific explanation of ‘Hybridization’. Some evolutionary geneticists and evolutionary anthropology scholars have shared opinions claiming that the ‘hybridization’ of unknown, ancestral Homo sapiens with other species of the genus Homo such as Neanderthals, and Denisova hominids may have resulted in  production of anatomically modern humans(Homo sapiens sapiens). Their views on blending of hereditary factors is not supported by Mendel’s classic experiments in Hybridization. According to Mendel, inheritance is particulate. Distinct genetic factors combine to produce a certain somatic result without losing their separate identities. They can therefore be reassorted and enter into new genetic combinations in the next generation. The hypothesis of  Hybridized Anatomically Modern(HAM) humans is fundamentally inconsistent with the Laws of Inheritance discovered by Mendel. If modern man is a product of Hybridization, the present, surviving human population would include a few surviving members of Neanderthals, Denisova, and other ancestral hominids who successfully reproduced with an unknown, ancestral Homo sapiens species which got transformed into ‘HAM’ humans.

THE LAW OF BIOGENESIS AND THE LAW OF NATURAL GENERATION :

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HUMAN  CHROMOSOMES  AND  HUMAN  IDENTITY .  MAN  REPRODUCES  AND  FURTHER  PROPAGATES  HIS  CHROMOSOMAL  INHERITANCE  ACCORDING  TO  THE  LAW  OF  BIOGENESIS  AND  THE  LAW  OF  NATURAL  GENERATION .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : DIPLOID  SET  OF  HUMAN CHROMOSOMES  AND  HUMAN  GENOTYPE  . MAN  REPRODUCES  AND  FURTHER PROPAGATES  HIS  CHROMOSOMAL  INHERITANCE  ACCORDING  TO  THE  LAW  OF BIOGENESIS  AND  THE  LAW  OF  NATURAL  GENERATION . HUMAN  OFFSPRING  WILL  ALWAYS  BE  OF  THE  SAME  SPECIES  AS  THE  PARENT  ORGANISM . THE  TERM  GENOME  DESCRIBES  THE  SET  OF  GENES  CHARACTERISTIC  OF  EACH  SPECIES .

The term ‘Generation’ means to produce offspring. The term ‘Propagation’ means to transmit hereditary characteristics by reproduction. The Law of Biogenesis states the Principle that living organisms originate only from other living organisms closely similar to themselves. It is  ‘The Law of Like Generating Like’. A species always breeds true to its own species. Its members always generate organisms which are classified as belonging to the same species, however much they vary among themselves as individuals within the group. The sub-groups, the races, or varieties of species are able to breed with one another, but diverse species cannot interbreed. By the Law of Natural Generation, offspring will always be of the same species as the parent organism. Hence, species is self-perpetuating and maintain  stability of all other groupings like the genera, phyla, and families which remain as fixed from generation to generation. In Plant and Animal Kingdom, a species distinguishes itself by its ability to maintain its stability from generation to generation. The Mendelian System of Heredity states that an inherited characteristic is determined by the combination of two hereditary units(now called genes), one from each of the parental reproductive cells or gametes(Sperm and Egg Cell). The term genome describes the complete haploid set of chromosomes of a sexually reproducing organism normally occurring in mature germ cell called egg or sperm. This number of chromosomes is characteristic of each species. Every human being arrives on planet Earth with an original, unique, distinctive, and one of its own kind of  genome that has never, ever existed in the past, and would never exist again in the future. Sexual reproduction is a creative process which involves a type of cell division called ‘MEIOSIS’ that results in production of Sperm or Egg Cell. Fertilization of egg cell by sperm always creates a new kind of genome while the number of chromosomes(Diploid set) that is the chief attribute of species is held constant.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  HUMAN  BIRTH  REQUIRES  THE  UNION  OF  TWO  HEREDITARY  UNITS,  ONE  FROM  EACH  OF  THE  PARENTAL  REPRODUCTIVE  CELLS  OR  GAMETES (SPERM  AND  EGG  CELL) .  MEIOSIS  OR  HAPLOID  DIVISION  IS  A  HIGHLY  CREATIVE  PROCESS  AS  IT  GENERATES  A UNIQUE ,  ORIGINAL,   DISTINCTIVE,  AND  ONE  OF  ITS  OWN  KIND  OF  GENOME, A  COMPLETE  HAPLOID  SET  OF  CHROMOSOMES  WHILE  THE  DIPLOID SET  OF  CHROMOSOMES AFTER FERTILIZATION  OR  CONCEPTION  IS  CONSTANT .

THE ORIGIN OR THE BEGINNING OF ANATOMICALLY MODERN HUMANS:

To explain the Origin of Man, The Beginning of Man on the basis of Darwinism, demands  presence of two, identical, rare, mutant individuals(a male, and a female) to produce offspring and to establish an entirely new, modern human population in all geographical regions of the Old World. About 10, 000 years ago, modern humans may have shared the planet with a few surviving members of Neanderthals and other hominid species. Techniques of DNA extraction and genomic sequencing have advanced and find application in the understanding of the genus Homo. The claims about Hybridization of archaic humans such as Neanderthals with Homo sapiens  finds support from DNA studies of the current,  members of human population as compared to DNA sequences extracted from Neanderthal fossils. But those shared genetic traits are not of major significance and do not account for the morphological appearance of either Neanderthal or modern man. At the same time, it may be noted that 30 – 35, 000 years ago, Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record. Similarly, Hominid Denisova, discovered in Altai Mountains, Southern Siberia lived 41, 000 years ago. Homo sapiens floresiensis(Flores Man) of Indonesia  suddenly disappeared 12, 000 years ago. Hominid Red Deer discovered in China lived 14.5 to 11.5 thousand years ago. To make a credible claim about interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, we need to demonstrate  presence of traits characteristic of Homo sapiens in the DNA extracted from Neanderthal fossil specimens. It will be correct to claim that from Holocene Epoch or Series, approximately for the last 10, 000 years, modern humans constitute the only surviving members of the Hominid Family found on planet Earth.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  MENDELIAN  SYSTEM  OF  HEREDITY  CAN  EASILY  ESTABLISH  THE  FACT  THAT  THIS  HUMAN  BABY  HAS  TWO ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMAN  PARENTS . EVERY  BABY   ARRIVES  WITH  ORIGINAL,  UNIQUE,  DISTINCTIVE,  AND  ONE  OF  ITS  OWN  KIND  OF   GENOME( A  COMPLETE  HAPLOID  SET  OF  CHROMOSOMES, OR  23 CHROMOSOMES  FROM  EACH  PARENT) THAT  NEVER  EXISTED  IN  THE  PAST  AND  WILL  NEVER  EXIST  AGAIN  IN  FUTURE  WHILE  ALL  HUMANS  ARE  BORN  WITH  A  DIPLOID  SET   THAT  HAS  46  CHROMOSOMES .

Charles Darwin uses the term species to signify “a set of individuals closely resembling each other” – a class of plants or animals having certain characteristics. The French naturalist George Louis Leclerc Comte de Buffon(1707-1788) in his monumental compendium on Natural History(Histoire Naturelle General et Particuliere, 44 Volumes, 1749-1804) described man as a zoological species. Buffon determined species not by their physical appearances but by their reproductive history. Two individual animals or plants are of the same species if they can produce fertile offspring. According to Buffon, a species is known only through the history of its propagation. Buffon opened the way to  development of Paleontology to discover lost species. The status of Anatomically Modern Humans as a distinct species is verified as human populations consist of members that are genetically similar, interbreeding or potentially interbreeding individuals that share the same collection of inherited characteristics, whose combination is unique to our species. Diverse species cannot interbreed. Organisms different in species cannot reproduce productively and if crossbred, like the horse and the ass, they produce a sterile hybrid like the mule. Hybrid is the term for the offspring of a cross between two different subspecies or species. In Genetics, hybrid is the term for the offspring of parents differing in any genetic characteristic.Interbreeding or Hybridization means to produce offspring by crossing two individuals of unlike genetic constitution. The offspring of different races, varieties, species, etc., are called ‘hybrids’. If Neanderthal is one of the parents of Anatomically Modern Humans, identity of the second Hominid parent has to be ascertained, and the characteristics of that parent are accounted for using Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance. The social and cultural behavior of anatomically modern man consistently displays a tendency that prefers and encourages ‘inbreeding’. The prevailing social and cultural norms of human society in general tend to oppose sexual behavior that may be identified as ‘interbreeding’. In selection of a mate for breeding, anatomically modern man prefers an individual who closely resembles the members of his/her own stock.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  A  SPECIES  IS  RECOGNIZED  BY  ITS  HISTORY  OF  PROPAGATION . MULE,  A   PRODUCT  OF  CROSSBREEDING , OR  HYBRIDIZATION  CANNOT FURTHER  REPRODUCE  PRODUCTIVELY  WITH  OTHER  MULES,  OR  WITH  HORSE , OR   ASS FOR  IT  IS  BORN  STERILE .  HYBRIDIZATION  WILL  NOT  HELP  TO  TRANSFORM  A  SPECIES  INTO  A  NEW  SPECIES  IF  ITS  PARENTS  BELONG  TO  DIFFERENT  SPECIES .

The concept of Hybridized Anatomically Modern(HAM) humans cannot be verified in  absence of any surviving members of Neanderthal, Denisova, or other Hominid population with whom modern man may have reproduced about 10, 000 years ago.

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE :

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : IT  WILL  BE  IMPORTANT  TO  NOTE  THAT  ACQUIRED  CHARACTERISTICS  ARE  NOT  HEREDITARY  AND  THERE  IS  NO  INHERITANCE  OF  ACQUIRED  CHARACTERISTICS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : IT WILL BE IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT ACQUIRED CHARACTERISTICS ARE NOT HEREDITARY AND THERE IS NO INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERISTICS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  MENDEL  DEMONSTRATED  INHERITANCE  PATTERNS  THROUGH  BREEDING  EXPERIMENTATION. THE  IMAGE  SHOWS  SOME  OF  THE  HEREDITARY  TRAITS  OR  CHARACTERS  INVESTIGATED  BY  MENDEL  WHILE  EXPERIMENTING  ON  GARDEN  PEA  PLANTS  WITH  WHITE  OR  VIOLET  FLOWERS.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   FOR  UNIT  CHARACTERS  NAMED  R(DOMINANT),  r(RECESSIVE),  Y(DOMINANT),  AND   y(RECESSIVE),  THE  DIAGRAM  ILLUSTRATES  THE OPERATION  OF  MENDEL’S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  MENDELIAN  SYSTEM  OF  HEREDITY  STATES  THAN  AN  INHERITED  CHARACTERISTIC  IS  DETERMINED  BY  THE  COMBINATION  OF  TWO  HEREDITARY  UNITS( NOW  CALLED  GENES ),  ONE  FROM  EACH  OF  THE  PARENTAL  REPRODUCTIVE  CELLS  OR  GAMETES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  AS  PER  THE  MENDELIAN  SYSTEM  OF  HEREDITY ,  IF  MODERN  HUMANS  INTERBREED  WITH  NEANDERTHALS , IN  EACH  GENERATION  OF  OFFSPRING  PRODUCED ,  THREE  INDIVIDUALS  COULD  BE  MODERN  HUMANS ( DOMINANT  TRAIT )  AND  ONE  INDIVIDUAL WOULD  BE  NEANDERTHAL ( RECESSIVE  TRAIT ).  SUCH  INTERBREEDING  WOULD  IN  REALITY  SAVE  NEANDERTHAL  POPULATION  FROM  TOTAL  EXTINCTION .

Mendel demonstrated the inheritance patterns through breeding experimentations. He discovered in 1866 hereditary factors or “genes” whose existence he deduced without seeing them. Mendel’s statistical analysis of his data provided the mathematical basis for modern Genetics. There are four principles of hereditary phenomenon discovered and formulated by Mendel :

1. The Law of Independent Unit Characters which states that characters such as height, color, etc., are inherited separately as  Units,

2. The Law of Segregation which states that body cells and primordial germ cells contain pairs of such Unit Characters and that when gametes(Sperm or Egg Cell) are produced, each gamete receives only one member of each such pair,

3. The Law of Dominance which states that in every individual there is a pair of determining factors for each Unit Character, one from each parent, if these factors are different(heterozygous), one Character( the Dominant) appears in the organism, the other(  Recessive) being latent; the Recessive Character can appear in the organism only when the Dominant is absent; hence in all crossbred generations, Unit Characters are shown in varying combinations, each appearing in a definite proportion of the total number of offspring, and 

4. The Law of Independent Assortment which states that any one pair of Characters is inherited independently, not withstanding the simultaneous transmission of other traits. This Law is modified by the discovery of Linkage and Pleiotropy. Linkage describes the tendency of some genes to remain together and act as a Unit or Linkage Group. In Inheritance, the Linkage Group of genes are generally found in the same chromosome. Pleiotropy is the condition in which a single gene exerts simultaneous effects on more than one character in the offspring.

ABOUT GENETICS  AND THE CONSTANCY OF GENETIC CODE :

Genetics is an important aspect of many areas of Biology. Genetics helps in the study and identification of specific types of organisms; research in Molecular Genetics involves studies on chemical structure and functions of genes at molecular level; Cyto Genetics studies  location of genetic material in cells and the role of genes in cell division; Developmental Genetics studies the genetic function in embryological phenomena; Behavior Genetics studies the role of gene in regulating behavior; Population Genetics studies genetics in relation to the “evolutionary” process. Medical Genetics involves  application of genetic principles to the practice of Medicine such as the study of inheritance of diseases in families. Genetic factors cause many health disorders affecting man. Some human diseases are entirely genetic in origin and environmental factors play little if any part. This group of genetic disorders includes chromosomal abnormalities, and so-called “Unifactorial Disorders” which are due to single gene defects or Mendelian factors. There are over 3 thousand of such unifactorial disorders. The mode of inheritance of such disorders is straight forward and follows Mendelian Principles. Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance have their practical applications in Medical Genetics. However, the use of Mendel’s Principles in Population Genetics to verify The Theory of Evolution is highly controversial because of the speculative postulates about transformation of old species into a new species .  Several single-celled Blue-Green algae, plankton, microbes, viruses, protozoans, insects, crocodiles, turtles, sharks and other organisms are known to be existing upon Earth from billions to several millions of years. The unchanging  genetic code in all past and present members of these long-lived species permit the genes to have the same effects on their carriers from generation to generation. Because of  constancy of the genetic code, we can  identify  existence of individual species which maintain their species-specific traits as per Mendelian Principles. There are numerous kinds of longest living species on Earth and their identification is possible because of their genetic codes have essentially remained unchanged.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE .  BLUE-GREEN  ALGAE,  CYANOBACTERIA  MAINTAIN  THEIR  SPECIES-SPECIFIC  TRAITS  FOR  BILLIONS  OF  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE CONSTANCY OF THE GENETIC CODE . BLUE-GREEN ALGAE, CYANOBACTERIA MAINTAIN THEIR SPECIES-SPECIFIC TRAITS  SINCE  PRECAMBRIAN  TIME,  3,800  TO  700 MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  SPONGES  ARE  INVERTEBRATE  ANIMALS  OF  THE  PHYLUM  PORIFERA .  SPONGES  ARE  AMONG  THE  LONGEST  LIVING  ANIMAL  SPECIES  OF  EARTH .  THEY  APPEARED  IN  CAMBRIAN  PERIOD  ABOUT  570  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .  ANTARCTIC  SPONGE  CAN  LIVE  FOR  CENTURIES .  OLDEST  KNOWN  SPONGE  ESTIMATED  AGE  1, 550 YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : SPONGES ARE INVERTEBRATE ANIMALS OF THE PHYLUM PORIFERA . SPONGES ARE AMONG THE LONGEST LIVING ANIMAL SPECIES OF EARTH . THEY APPEARED IN CAMBRIAN PERIOD ABOUT 570 MILLION YEARS AGO . ANTARCTIC SPONGE CAN LIVE FOR CENTURIES . OLDEST KNOWN SPONGE ESTIMATED AGE 1, 550 YEARS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE  PERMIT  THE  GENES  TO  HAVE  THE  SAME  EFFECTS  ON  THEIR  CARRIERS  FROM  GENERATION  TO  GENERATION . AMERICAN  COCKROACH  IS  EXISTING  ON  EARTH  FOR  MILLIONS  OF  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE CONSTANCY OF THE GENETIC CODE PERMIT THE GENES TO HAVE THE SAME EFFECTS ON THEIR CARRIERS FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION . AMERICAN COCKROACH IS EXISTING ON EARTH BASICALLY  UNCHANGED  FOR  300   MILLION   YEARS . MOST  ABUNDANT  DURING  THE  CARBONIFEROUS  PERIOD  DURING  WHICH  A  VARIETY  OF  INSECTS  APPEARED .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  EVOLUTION  :  ARCTICA  ISLANDICA .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  ARCTICA  ISLANDICA .  OCEAN  QUAHOG  OR  CLAM  .  MOLLUSKS  ARE  ORGANISMS  WITH  SHELLS  DATE  BACK  TO  THE  CAMBRIAN  PERIOD,  500  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE  GIVES  THE  ABILITY  TO  IDENTIFY  THE  EXISTENCE  OF  INDIVIDUAL  SPECIES  WHICH  MAINTAIN  THEIR  SPECIES-SPECIFIC  TRAITS .  OVER  MILLIONS  OF  YEARS,  SHARKS  HAVE  MAINTAINED  THEIR  MORPHOLOGICAL  APPEARANCE .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE CONSTANCY OF THE GENETIC CODE GIVES THE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY THE EXISTENCE OF INDIVIDUAL SPECIES WHICH MAINTAIN THEIR SPECIES-SPECIFIC TRAITS . OVER 350  MILLION   YEARS,  SINCE  THE  END  OF  DEVONIAN  PERIOD  SHARKS HAVE MAINTAINED THEIR MORPHOLOGICAL APPEARANCE .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  SPHENODON  TUATARA  .  THIS  LIZARDLIKE  REPTILE  OF  NEW  ZEALAND  IS  KNOWN  AS  A  LIVING  FOSSIL .  THIS  SPECIES  IS  IN  EXISTENCE  FOR  ABOUT  200-225  MILLION  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : SPHENODON TUATARA . THIS LIZARDLIKE REPTILE OF NEW ZEALAND IS KNOWN AS A LIVING FOSSIL . THIS SPECIES IS IN EXISTENCE FOR ABOUT 200-225 MILLION YEARS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : BASED  UPON  THEIR  UNIQUE  GENETIC  CODES,  ORGANISMS  ARE  KNOWN  TO  BE  EXISTING  UPON  EARTH  FOR  SEVERAL  MILLIONS  OF  YEARS .  CROCODILES  LIVED  ALONG  WITH  DINOSAURS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : BASED UPON THEIR UNIQUE GENETIC CODES, ORGANISMS ARE KNOWN TO BE EXISTING UPON EARTH FOR SEVERAL MILLIONS OF YEARS . CROCODILES LIVED ALONG WITH DINOSAURS . ORIGINATED  DURING  THE  LATE  TRIASSIC  PERIOD  200  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  ORIGIN  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE  IS  UNKNOWN .  THE  VAST  MAJORITY  OF  ORGANISMS  BREED  WITH  OTHER  MEMBERS  OF  THEIR  OWN  SPECIES  PROPAGATING  THEIR  OWN  UNIQUE  GENETIC  CODES .  WE  KNOW  ABOUT  LONG-LIVED  ORGANISMS  LIKE  SEA  TURTLES  BECAUSE  OF  THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THEIR  GENETIC  CODES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE ORIGIN OF THE GENETIC CODE IS UNKNOWN . THE VAST MAJORITY OF ORGANISMS BREED WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF THEIR OWN SPECIES PROPAGATING THEIR OWN UNIQUE GENETIC CODES . WE KNOW ABOUT LONG-LIVED ORGANISMS LIKE SEA TURTLES BECAUSE OF THE CONSTANCY OF THEIR GENETIC CODES . TURTLES  ARE  IN  EXISTENCE  FROM  THE  TRIASSIC  PERIOD,  200  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  ALASKA  BOWHEAD  WHALE .  WHALES  ORIGINATED  IN  THE  EARLY  TERTIARY  OR  UPPER  CRETACEOUS  ABOUT  70  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : ALASKA BOWHEAD WHALE . WHALES ORIGINATED IN THE EARLY TERTIARY OR UPPER CRETACEOUS ABOUT 70 MILLION YEARS AGO.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  MONOTREMES .  DUCK-BILLED  PLATYPUS  ORNITHO  RHYNCHUS  ANATINUS  IS  A  SPECIES  SURVIVING  SINCE  AUSTRALIAN  PLEISTOCENE  ABOUT  2  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MONOTREMES . DUCK-BILLED PLATYPUS ORNITHO RHYNCHUS ANATINUS IS A SPECIES SURVIVING SINCE AUSTRALIAN PLEISTOCENE ABOUT 2 MILLION YEARS AGO.

While describing Genetics as the area of Biology concerned with the study of inheritance, the process by which certain characteristics or traits of organisms are handed down from parent to offspring, I would like to suggest that a creative mechanism, a creative process or a creative operation could be at work when Genetics accounts for variations in similar or related animals and plants. I would like to emphasize the fact of all organisms existing as Individuals with Individuality. In Nature, living things have no choice other than that of existence as Individuals with Individuality. Even a mob of genetically identical(“CLONES”) colony of bacteria of E. coli are experimentally proved to behave as Individuals with Individuality.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :
MENDEL’S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN EVOLUTION  : DOUBLE –  HELIX DEOXYRIBO NUCLEIC  ACID  OR  DNA  IS  FOUND  IN  CHROMOSOMES,  THE  STRUCTURES  FOUND  INSIDE   THE   NUCLEUS  OF  CELLS  OF  HIGHER  ORGANISMS.  THE  DNA  MOLECULE  ALWAYS  EXHIBITS  INDIVIDUALISTIC  VARIATION  IN   ITS   BEHAVIOR .

In higher organisms with cells that contain a Nucleus, the genetic material called DNA(deoxyribonucleic acid) is carried by structures known as Chromosomes in the Nucleus, and the cytoplasmic structures known as Mitochondria. The genetic material called RNA(ribonucleic acid) is found in the Nucleolus(present inside the Nucleus) and structures called Ribosomes found in the Cytoplasm.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  UNITS  OF  INHERITANCE  ARE  KNOWN  AS  GENES.  THE  GENES  ARE  FOUND  INSIDE  CHROMOSOMES  THAT  ARE  PRESENT  IN  THE  NUCLEUS  OF  CELLS  OF  HIGHER  ORGANISMS .  DNA  IS  FOUND IN  CHROMOSOMES,  MITOCHONDRIA,  AND  RIBOSOMES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION :  CELL  IS  THE   BASIC  BUILDING  BLOCK  OF  LIVING  THINGS . THE UNITS  OF  INHERITANCE  ARE KNOWN  AS GENES. THE GENES  ARE  FOUND  INSIDE  CHROMOSOMES THAT ARE PRESENT IN THE NUCLEUS OF CELLS OF HIGHER ORGANISMS . DNA,  IS FOUND IN CHROMOSOMES, MITOCHONDRIA, AND  RNA  IS  FOUND  IN THE NUCLEOLUS AND  RIBOSOMES .

The Ribosomes are the sites of protein synthesis present in the Cytoplasm. DNA interacts with ‘transfer RNA'(t-RNA), ‘Messenger RNA'(m-RNA), and Ribosomal RNA in the process of protein synthesis. The Chromosome is divided into Units called Genes. Each Gene is responsible for a particular trait  and hence Gene is the Unit of inheritance. The term ‘allele’ describes either of a pair of genes at the same position on both members of a pair of chromosomes and conveying traits that are inherited by Mendelian Laws.There could be small chemical differences in genes that are expressed as different versions of the same trait (‘alleles’). Each gene is responsible for the manufacture of a particular protein which is involved in  development of a trait associated with it. Each chromosome of each species of higher organisms has a definite number and arrangement of genes which govern the structure and functions of the cells.  It is important to note that, while genes are located inside the Nucleus of the cell, the actual protein synthesis occurs in structures called Ribosomes present in the Cytoplasm outside the Nucleus. While we appreciate the role of genes as Units of Inheritance, we should give equal importance to the Living Substance, the Living Material, or the Living Matter called Cytoplasm that is found inside the living cells, outside the Nucleus of the cell. There are basically three classes of Genes: 1. Structural genes which determine the sequences of amino acids that go to makeup proteins or the smaller chain of molecules known as polypeptides, 2. Coding genes which specify molecules that function in the processes involved in protein synthesis, and 3. Regulatory genes which are called Noncoding genes for they act solely as “Recognition” sites for enzymes and other proteins involved in controlling protein synthesis.

THE  GENETIC CODE AND THE ROLE OF MUTATIONS:    

 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :

MENDEL’S LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION   :  GENETIC  CODE  DESCRIBES  THE  RELATIONSHIP  BETWEEN  THE  COMPOSITION  OF  DNA  AND  THAT  OF  PROTEINS  PRODUCED  BY  GENES .

The Genetic Code describes the relationship between composition of DNA and that of proteins produced by genes. Genetic Code is the chemical equation by which hereditary information is translated from genes into proteins. Changes in the genetic code are called Mutations. Mutations can cause a change in protein synthesis. In higher organisms, when mutation involves the germ-line cells that eventually develop into sperm or egg cells, the mutation and its consequence of altered protein synthesis is inherited by offspring. A mutation can be minor and relatively insignificant, or it can cause serious deformity or metabolic deficiency in the organism. Most mutations tend to be harmful. Fortunately, a typical gene in higher organisms is segmented and the entire genetic information of a gene is not contained in a single, unbroken strand of DNA molecule. The value of having the genetic code in segments is to reduce the chances of mutations causing harmful changes in protein synthesis. Certain self-repair mechanisms also exist to deal with the damage done to DNA. Very often, the damaged DNA is repaired or the cell carrying the damaged DNA is killed and destroyed. For this reason, it is important to recognize the simple fact of DNA damage associated with mutations irrespective of its cause. The Theory of Evolution proposes that random, unguided, and apparently purposeless mutations lead to gradual changes in a species and eventually lead to its descent as a new species. As per the Theory of Evolution, mutations may bring about three kinds of changes; 1. Changes in the morphological appearance of an organism, 2. Changes in the skeletal and other anatomical structures of an organism, and 3. Changes in the behavior displayed by an organism.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  MUSCLE  TWITCH  IN  FROG  MUSCLE  EXPERIMENT .  MUTATIONS  CANNOT  ACCOUNT  FOR  GUIDED,  SEQUENTIAL,  AND  PURPOSEFUL  NATURE  OF  MUSCLE  CONTRACTIONS  WHICH  HAVE  SEVERAL  CREATIVE  APPLICATIONS  IN  THE  NATURAL  WORLD .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MUSCLE TWITCH IN FROG MUSCLE EXPERIMENT . MUTATIONS CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR GUIDED, SEQUENTIAL, AND PURPOSEFUL NATURE OF MUSCLE CONTRACTIONS WHICH HAVE SEVERAL CREATIVE APPLICATIONS IN THE NATURAL WORLD .

In higher organisms, the cells are differentiated to perform special functions. For example, muscle cells have ability of contraction. This physiological function of contraction is easily demonstrated by applying an electrical stimulus to muscle as done in Muscle Twitch in Frog Experiment. Animals have different abilities of locomotion; some crawl or creep, or slide on a surface, some swim, or move in water, some fly or glide in air, and others walk, run, climb, and swing in a variety of amazing manners. Whatever may be the mode of locomotion, all animal muscle cells display the same physiological function of contraction. While the physiology remains the same, the muscles of each animal species display individualistic functional characteristics. For mutations are random, unguided, and purposeless, they cannot account for guided, sequential and purposeful nature of muscle contractions which have several creative applications in the natural world.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :   CHIMPANZEE  AND  OTHER  APES HAVE  48  CHROMOSOMES  WHEREAS  MAN  HAS  ONLY  46  CHROMOSOMES .  CHROMOSOMES 2a  AND  2b  FOUND  IN  APES  IS  OF  PARTICULAR  INTEREST .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CHIMPANZEE AND OTHER APES HAVE 48 CHROMOSOMES WHEREAS MAN HAS ONLY 46 CHROMOSOMES . CHROMOSOMES 2 a AND 2 b FOUND IN APES ARE  OF PARTICULAR INTEREST .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THERE  IS  NO  NATURAL  MECHANISM  OF   SEXUAL  REPRODUCTION  THAT  CAN  FUSE  CHROMOSOME  2 a  AND  2 b  TO  ASSEMBLE   CHROMOSOME  #  2   FOUND  IN   MAN .  MENDEL'S   LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  WHAT  IS  GENETIC  DRIFT  ????   CAN  IT  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE  ARRIVAL  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS  ???   CAN  WE  EXPLAIN   MAN  AS  A  PRODUCT  OF  HYBRIDIZATION  AND  THE  PHENOMENON  CALLED  GENETIC  DRIFT  ????

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : WHAT IS GENETIC DRIFT ????  CAN  IT  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE ARRIVAL OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS ??? CAN  WE EXPLAIN  MAN  AS  A PRODUCT  OF  HYBRIDIZATION AND  THE PHENOMENON CALLED  GENETIC  DRIFT ????

In ‘Evolution’ the term ‘Genetic Drift is used to describe a random change in gene frequency within a small population, resulting in mutations which regardless of their adaptive value, become fixed within the group. Variations in diet, variations in physical activity, variations in reproductive behavior, and variations in external environmental conditions may contribute to minor variations in ‘allele’ frequencies without transforming an old species into a new species.

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  AND  THE  MISSING  LINK :

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : TAXONOMY  IS  A  BRANCH  OF  BIOLOGY  THAT  FORMULATES  THE  BASIS  FOR  SYSTEMATIC  CATEGORIZATION  OF  ORGANISMS  INTO  CATEGORIES  SUCH  AS  PHYLUM(OR DIVISION), CLASS,  ORDER,  FAMILY,  SUB-FAMILY,  GENUS,  AND  SPECIES .  WITHIN  THE  GENUS  HOMO  SAPIENS,  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  MAN  IS  UNIQUE,  AND  DISTINCT  FOR  HUMAN  NATURE  STANDS  BY  ITSELF .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : TAXONOMY IS A BRANCH OF BIOLOGY THAT FORMULATES THE BASIS FOR SYSTEMATIC CATEGORIZATION OF ORGANISMS INTO CATEGORIES SUCH AS PHYLUM(OR DIVISION), CLASS, ORDER, FAMILY, SUB-FAMILY, GENUS, AND SPECIES . WITHIN THE GENUS HOMO SAPIENS, ANATOMICALLY MODERN MAN IS UNIQUE, AND DISTINCT FOR HUMAN NATURE STANDS BY ITSELF .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : CHIMPANZEE  IS  NOT  THE  MISSING  LINK  BETWEEN  MAN  AND  ANIMAL .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CHIMPANZEE IS NOT THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN MAN AND ANIMAL .  CHIMPANZEES  ARE  NATIVE  TO  AFRICA .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  MOUNTAIN  GORILLA  IS  NOT  THE  MISSING  LINK  BETWEEN  MAN  AND  ANIMAL .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MOUNTAIN GORILLA IS NOT THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN MAN AND ANIMAL .  GORILLAS  ARE  NATIVE  TO  AFRICA .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  NO   EXTINCT  OR  LIVING  SPECIES  IS  ABLE  TO  BRIDGE  THE  GAP  BETWEEN  MODERN  MAN(HOMO  SAPIENS  SAPIENS)  AND  HIS  NEAREST  ALLIES  AMONG  HOMINID  FAMILY .  WHO  IS  THE  MISSING  LINK  BETWEEN  MAN  AND  ANIMALS  LIKE  CHIMPANZEE  AND  GORILLA ????

The above image reveals a fundamental problem  faced by Darwinism when it attempts to account for Human Evolution.  No extinct or living species is able to bridge the gap between modern man(Homo sapiens sapiens) and his nearest allies among Hominid Family and other Primates such as Chimpanzee and Gorilla.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  SOME  EVOLUTIONARY  GENTICISTS  CLAIM  THAT  MODERN  HUMANS HAVE  DESCENDED  BY  INTERBREEDING  AND  REPRODUCING  WITH  OTHER  SPECIES  OF  THE  GENUS  HOMO . INTERBREEDING  OR  INBREEDING  CANNOT  TRANSFORM  AN  OLD  SPECIES  INTO  A  NEW   SPECIES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THERE  IS  NO  NATURAL  MECHANISM,  NO  NATURAL  PROCESS,  NO  NATURAL  CONDITION,  OR  NATURAL  CAUSE  THAT  CAN  TRANSFORM  NEANDERTHAL  SPECIES  INTO  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS. ANATOMICAL  TRAITS  PECULIAR  TO  NEANDERTHALS  WILL  NOT  BE  WIPED  OUT  BY  SEXUAL  REPRODUCTION,  EITHER  INBREEDING  OR  INTERBREEDING .

MENDEL'S   LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  DENISOVA  HOMINIDS  DISCOVERED  IN  DENISOVA  CAVE ,  ALTAI  MOUNTAINS ,  SOUTHERN  SIBERIA,  RUSSIA .  DENISOVA  MORE  SIMILAR  TO  NEANDERTHALS  AS  COMPARED  TO  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS .  THEY   LIVED  41, 000 YEARS  AGO . CAN  ONLY  BREED  TRUE  TO  THEIR  OWN  SPECIES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  ARTISTIC  RENDITION  OF  DENISOVA  CHILD .  DNA  EXTRACTED  FROM  A  FRAGMENT  OF  PHALANX  OF  HAND  AND  A  MOLAR (TOOTH).  THIS  DENISOVA  GIRL IN  APPEARANCE  IS  MORE  SIMILAR  TO  NEANDERTHAL  THAN  TO  MODERN  HUMANS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  NEANDERTHALS  LIVED  FOR  ABOUT  300, 000  YEARS .  NEANDERTHAL  BELONGS  TO  MIDDLE  PALEOLITHIC  PERIOD  OF  OLD  STONE  AGE .  NEANDERTHAL  HAD  A  PRECISION  GRIP  SIMILAR  TO  THAT  OF  MODERN  HUMANS  BUT  DID  NOT  DISPLAY  WRITING  SKILLS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  NEANDERTHAL  HAD  POWER  GRIP  AND  PRECISION  GRIP  LIKE  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS .  BUT  HIS  ANATOMICAL  TRAITS  WERE  NOT  ENOUGH  FOR  HIM  TO  ADVANCE  INTO  MESOLITHIC  PERIOD  OF  OLD  STONE  AGE .  THIS  SPECIES  LIVED  FOR  A  LONG  TIME  WITHOUT  THE  POTENTIAL  TO  DEVELOP  WRITING  SKILLS .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   SAHELANTHROPUS  TCHADENSIS  NICKNAMED  “TOUMAI.”

NATURAL HISTORY OF HOMINID FAMILY :

Senckenberg Natural History Museum, Frankfurt, Germany prepared replicas of Hominid species using the fossils  discovered at different geographical locations. Sahelanthropus tchadensis lived 6.8 million years ago. It is one of the oldest Hominid specimens, found in 2003 in Djurab desert in Chad, Africa. 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  AUSTRALOPITHECUS  AFARENSIS, AFRICAN  HOMINID  LIVED  3.2  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Australopithecus afarensis discovered in Afar region of Ethiopia, Africa in 1975. This Hominid lived 3.2 million years ago.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMINID  AUSTRALOPITHECUS  AFRICANUS   LIVED  2.5  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

 Australopithecus africanus ,this Hominid replica nicknamed “Mrs Ples” lived 2.5 million years ago. Discovered in 1947, at Sterfontein, South Africa.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  PARANTHROPUS AETHIOPICUS  LIVED  2.5  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Paranthropus aethiopicus lived 2.5 million years ago. Discovered near Lake Turkana in Kenya, Africa, in 1985.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  PARANTHROPUS  BOISEI  LIVED  1.8  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Paranthropus boisei, nicknamed “Zinz” lived 1.8 million years ago. Discovered in 1959 in the Olduvai Gorge of Tanzania, Africa.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  RUDOLFENSIS  LIVED  ABOUT  1.8  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Homo Rudolfensis lived about 1.8 million years ago. Discovered in 1972 in Koobi Fora, Kenya, Africa.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  ERGASTER . LIVED  ABOUT  1.5  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.  NICKNAMED  “TURKANA  BOY.”

“TURKANA BOY” Homo ergaster lived about 1.5 million years ago. Initially thought to be an important “missing link” in Human Evolution.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  ERGASTER  IS  RELATED  TO  HOMO  ERECTUS  SPECIES  THAT  LIVED  IN  EASTERN  AND  SOUTHERN  AFRICA  FROM  ABOUT 1.89  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : HOMO ERGASTER IS RELATED TO HOMO ERECTUS SPECIES THAT LIVED IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA FROM ABOUT 1.89 MILLION YEARS AGO .

In Africa, Homo ergaster and Homo erectus are viewed as relatives and thought to be the ancestral forms of later Hominids such as Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo sapiens. But, African Homo erectus is not related to Asian species of Homo erectus like Java Man, and Peking Man.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : REPLICA  OF  HOMO  ERECTUS(AFRICA), ERECT  MAN,  VERTICAL  GAIT,  LIVED  ABOUT 1.8  TO  0.3  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : REPLICA OF HOMO ERECTUS(AFRICA), ERECT MAN, VERTICAL GAIT, LIVED ABOUT 1.8 TO 0.3 MILLION YEARS AGO .

Homo erectus of Africa had prominent brow ridges, projecting face, and a brain volume of about a litre as compared to modern man’s average brain volume of about 1,360 cubic centimetres. Some evolutionary biologists suggested that Homo erectus migrated to Asia, and Southern Europe.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO HEIDELBERGENSIS  ALSO  NAMED  HOMO  RHODESIENSIS  LIVED  ABOUT  500, 000  TO  350, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Homo heidelbergensis or Homo rhodesiensis. This replica is made from the fossils found in Sima de los Huesos, Spain in 1993. He lived about 500,000 to 350,000 years ago. Fossils also found in other places like Italy, France, and Greece. Homo sapiens may have appeared 300,000 years ago. Heidelbergensis could be the ancestor of Neanderthals which is often described as  a subspecies of Sapiens species.

Mendel's Laws-Human Evolution-Homo erectus
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE    VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  REPLICA   OF  HOMO  ERECTUS,  HOMINID  THAT  LIVED  1.5 MILLION  TO  300, 000  YEARS  AGO.

Homo erectus lived 1, 500, 000 to 300, 000 years ago. Homo erectus discovered in Republic of Georgia, China, and Indonesia lived until about 70,000 years ago.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  PILTDOWN  MAN  OF  SUSSEX,  ENGLAND.  HOMINID  SPECIES  OF  THE  PALEOLITHIC  PERIOD  OR  OLD  STONE  AGE .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : PITHECANTHROPUS  ERECTUS ,  HOMO  ERECTUS .  THE  REPLICA  OF   “JAVA  MAN.”

Pithecanthropus, “JAVA MAN” discovered in 1891 could be the first to use fire. He used stone tools and belongs to the Lower Pleistocene Period.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  RHODESIAN  MAN  HAD  A  BRAIN  LARGER  THAN  THAT  OF  MODERN  HUMANS.

It could be of interest to note that Rhodesian Man( Heidelberg Man – Germany) had a large, thick skull, a sloping forehead, a chinless jaw, a brain larger than that of modern  man. The height was about five feet(152 cm) or slightly over.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  ERECTUS  PEKINENSIS . SINANTHROPUS  OR  PEKING  MAN .

Sinanthropus, Homo erectus pekinensis, or PEKING MAN belonged to the Middle Pleistocene.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS  NEANDERTHALENSIS . THIS  REPLICA  IS  NICKNAMED “OLD MAN  OF  LA  CHAPELLE .”  HE  LIVED  56, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Homo sapiens neanderthalensis lived 56,000 years ago. The above is the replica nicknamed “OLD MAN OF LA CHAPELLE” found near La Chapelle aux-Saints in France in 1908.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS  FLORESIENSIS .  NICKNAMED  “HOBBIT. ”  LIVED  ABOUT  18, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Homo sapiens floresiensis, the FLORES MAN discovered in Liang Bua Cave, Flores, Indonesia in 2003. Lived about 18,000 years ago.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS FLORESIENSIS  –  FLORES  MAN  OF  INDONESIA  .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  FLORES  MAN  .  HOMO  SAPIENS  FLORESIENSIS. IT  COULD  BE  OF  INTEREST  TO  NOTE  THAT  FLORES  MAN  WAS ONLY  ABOUT  3  FEET  IN   HEIGHT. Initially thought to be a subspecies of Sapiens and now considered as a separate species. This Hominid species disappeared without any trace for unknown reasons.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS.  LIVED  BETWEEN  100,  000  TO  90,  000  YEARS  AGO  BUT  NOT  A  TRUE  REPRESENTATIVE  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMAN  SPECIES .

The above is a replica of Homo sapiens found in a cave in Israel in 1969. He lived between 100,000 to 90, 000 years ago. It is important to note that it is not representative of true, modern humans called Homo sapiens sapiens.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS  IDALTU . IDALTU  MAN   LIVED  ABOUT  160, 000  YEARS  AGO .  NOT  A  TRUE  REPRESENTATIVE  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMAN  SPECIES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : HOMO  SAPIENS  IDALTU  OR  “HERTO  MAN ”  DISCOVERED  IN  1997  AT  HERTO, ETHIOPIA ,  AFRICA  .

Homo sapiens idaltu lived about 160, 000 years ago in Pleistocene Period(Middle Paleolithic), in Ethiopia, Africa, may mark the origin of anatomically modern Homo sapiens, making  distinction between Homo erectus species and Homo sapiens species. They were at the threshold of modern anatomy but not fully modern humans.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   HOMO  SAPIENS  RED  DEER ,  SOUTHERN  CHINA   LIVED  11, 500  TO  14, 500  YEARS  AGO .

Homo sapiens Red Deer represents “Red Deer Cave” people who lived 11, 500 to 14, 500 years ago in Maludong, Yunnan Province, Southern China. Red Deer Man had high domed braincase, small eyebrow ridges, lower jaw ended in a prominent chin, with a body less muscular than those of earlier Hominids.

THE  ORIGIN  OF  MAN –  MONOGENISM  VS  POLYGENISM :

The term “RACE” is used to describe any of the different varieties or populations of human beings distinguished by physical traits such as hair, eyes, skin color, shape of body, head, facial features, and blood groups. These characteristics are transmitted by heredity but they are highly variable; not every member of a race will exhibit all distinguishing traits. It is apparent to claim that races arose in response to inbreeding. Across  majority of human cultures prevalent in Old World, inbreeding is the established cultural norm. In his ‘Systema Naturae'(1735) Carolus Linnaeus, Swedish botanist, gave a very precise description of man placing him among the Mammals in the order of Primates along the apes and the bat. Linnaeus presented a summary of the diverse varieties of human species. He described varieties such as The Asian, The African, and The European. Linnaeus created a system of classification that depended only on external characteristics to place objects into a rational set of categories. 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HUMAN  VARIETIES  OR  RACES  AROSE  IN  RESPONSE  TO  INBREEDING . CAROLUS  LINNAEUS  DESCRIBED  HUMAN  VARIETIES  SUCH  AS  THE  ASIAN,  THE  AFRICAN,  AND  THE  EUROPEAN .

The French naturalist George Louis Leclerc comte de Buffon in his monumental compendium on Natural History(Histoire Naturelle general et particuliere, 44 volumes, 1749-1804) described man as a zoological species. Buffon determined species not by their physical appearances but by their reproductive history. He held the view that a species is known only through the history of its propagation. Buffon claimed that it is absurd to use the same principles for classifying living and nonliving things. Most important, apes and other animals lack the ability to speak. Buffon saw the rise of human intelligence as a product of development of an articulated language. For animals may lack the ability to attach meaning to their articulated sounds, human language can be used as a basis to define human species and its varieties. Monogenism is the theory that all human beings are descended from a single pair of ancestors. Polygenism is the theory that each race of people has descended from distinct, ultimate ancestors and hence asserts that races are created separately. If anatomically modern humans are products of interbreeding between different Hominid Family members, it would be difficult to suggest that hybridized humans stopped interbreeding and preferred inbreeding to establish the races or varieties that can be observed today. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach(1752-1840), Father of Physical Anthropology known for his work ‘De Generis Humani Varietate Nativa(1775-76), did his research in measurement of craniums. He divided mankind into five great families – Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, and Ethiopian. Physical anthropologists initially described three primary divisions of people, 1. Caucasoid, 2. Mongoloid, and 3. Negroid. Thomas Huxley in his paper titled “On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind” (1870) described racial varieties such as 1. Bushmen, 2. Africoid, 3. Negritoes, 4. Melanochroi, 5. Australoids, 6. Xanthochroi, 7. Polynesians, 8. Mongoloids A, B, & C, and 9. Esquimaux. Today, some anthropologists entirely reject the concept of “RACE.” The apparent variations among members of human population have to be explained using Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance which alone can account for breeding behavioral patterns. 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  ORIGIN  AND  THE  EXTINCTION  OF DIFFERENT  MEMBERS  OF  HOMINID  SPECIES  CANNOT  BE  ACCOUNTED  ON  THE  BASIS  OF  NATURAL  CAUSES,  NATURAL  MECHANISMS ,  OR  NATURAL  CONDITIONS  THAT  INFLUENCE  LIFE  AND  DEATH  OF  LIVING  ORGANISMS .MENDEL'S  LAWS

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE :  JOHANN FRIEDRICH BLUMENBACH(1752-1840), FATHER OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY DIVIDED MANKIND INTO FIVE GREAT FAMILIES  – CAUCASIAN, MONGOLIAN, MALAYAN, AND ETHIOPIAN .

CHARLES DARWIN – DARWINISM –  THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES(1859):

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  CHARLES  DARWIN(1809-1892) .  HIS  IMPORTANT  CONTRIBUTIONS  INCLUDE  THE  ORIGIN  OF  SPECIES(1859),  AND  THE  DESCENT  OF  MAN(1871).

Charles Darwin claimed that new species originate in the course of time. In his view, one species is transformed into another as a product of ‘Natural Selection’ of randomly produced genetic mutations. He formulated an opinion about the factors or circumstances under which some forms of life cease to have the status of species or become extinct. Darwin states, “The Origin of Species, like their extinction, is entirely a natural process which requires no factors other than those at work everyday in the life, death, and breeding of plants and animals.” To make  transition from an old species to a new species, certain intermediate forms become extinct combined with the survival of one or more of the extreme varieties. Darwin further attests, “If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed, but the very process of natural selection constantly tends as has been so often remarked to exterminate the parent forms and the intermediate links.” As per Darwin’s analysis, anatomically modern human species may have to be viewed as a variety of one of the Hominid species that simply survived while this ancestral species and all other Hominid species perished towards the end of Pleistocene(Ice Age).

Darwin’s theory of ‘The Origin of Species’ depends on causes that can be divided into two sets of factors:

1. Mechanism of Survival that includes causes or factors which determine the extinction or survival of organisms, and with their survival, their opportunities for mating and reproduction, and 

2. Mechanism of Heredity that includes causes or factors which determine transmission of characteristics from one generation to another and  variation of offspring from their ancestors and from each other.

In Darwin’s estimate, the factors of ‘Natural Selection’ operate on genetic variations that cause a range of differences within a group. At the same time it may be noted that the variations generated in the breeding process are never enough to change the basic criteria applied in  identification of any given species. For  perpetuation of group characteristics in organisms which manage to survive and reproduce,  inheritance of ancestral traits is of utmost importance. Darwin’s view on blending of hereditary factors is not supported by Mendel’s classic experiments in Hybridization. According to Mendel, inheritance is particulate. Distinct genetic factors combine to produce a certain somatic result without losing their separate identities. They can therefore be reassorted and enter into new genetic combinations in the next generation. If anatomically modern human species appeared suddenly due to abrupt mutations in a single generation of as yet unknown Hominid species, it will not validate Darwin’s view that new forms of life arise gradually as the result of a continuous accumulation of slight and imperceptible variations. According to Darwin, environment acts as a selective agency and it acts upon variations produced entirely by causes operating in the breeding process. During the period of the Great Ice Age, Pleistocene Series or Epoch, 1.8 million to 10, 000 years ago, 28 percent of Earth’s land area was covered by ice. Continental glaciers covered much of N. North America and NW Europe. Holocene Epoch or Series that began 10, 000 years ago witnessed a dramatic change in land area that is covered by ice. Now, about 10 percent of land area is covered by ice and continental glaciers are restricted to Antarctica and Greenland. In other words, areas of Earth’s surface have become more hospitable for all kinds of Hominid population. There was no geographical catastrophe and there was no environmental change of cataclysmic proportion with serious consequences for the survival of any variety of Hominid species. To adapt to changed environment was easy, food supply became abundant and there is nothing to suggest that Hominid Family members were preying upon one another in a bitter struggle of existence. 

COMPARATIVE ANATOMY  WILL  DEMOLISH  DARWINISM :

According to Geologic Time Chart which records the physical nature and history of planet Earth, we are living in the Cenozoic Era the beginning of which was marked by the K-T extinction. Most of the major and minor extinction events were the result of causes that are not natural to Earth or terrestrial factors. The exposure of living things to consequences such as collisions with asteroids, comets, or exposure to ionizing radiation  do not belong to a category of circumstances that can be called ‘natural’. I would prefer to use the term ‘supernatural’ to describe extinction events initiated by extraterrestrial factors. The origin, the beginning, appearance of anatomically modern man during Holocene Epoch or Series has no natural cause. No natural condition, no natural factor, no natural mechanism, no natural process and no natural event can alter the shape and size of man’s cranium. Inbreeding, or interbreeding do not change genes, the Units of Inheritance. The sudden, and abrupt change in man’s form and morphological appearance is not due to imperceptible changes and genetic variations that accumulated over a prolonged period of time. If skeletal structures undergo a change due to mutations caused by external factors like climate, physical activity, diet, and opportunities for breeding or reproductive behavior, the skeletal structures of all members of the diverse Hominid Family living at that time have to register a change that affects the germ cells and gets propagated to their offspring as stated by Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance. If a natural condition, a natural factor, or a natural cause can account for a mutation in anatomically modern human, I would like to examine the evidence for its operation in other members of Hominid Family such as Neanderthal who lived at the same time.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  LIVING  FORMS  EMERGED  AND  DIVERSIFIED  IN  SUDDEN  SPURTS  AND  WERE  ELIMINATED  ABRUPTLY  IN  MAJOR  AND  MINOR  EXTINCTION  EVENTS  DURING  GEOLOGIC  PERIOD .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THERE  IS  NO  NATURAL  PROCESS  OF  SEXUAL  REPRODUCTION  EITHER  INBREEDING  OR  INTERBREEDING  THAT  CAN  TRANSFORM  ANATOMICAL  TRAITS  OF  NEANDERTHAL  INTO  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  CRO-MAGNON  SKULL  .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN EVOLUTION : CRO-MAGNON SKULL .  CRO-MAGNON  MAN  IS  NOT  CONSIDERED  AS  A  SEPARATE  SPECIES  OR  SUBSPECIES  . LIVED  40, 000  TO  35, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Cro-Magnon Man lived 40, 000 to 35, 000 years ago. He was discovered in southwestern France in 1868. His height was about 6 feet(180 Cms), had high forehead, short and wide face, developed prominent chin, and large brain. His brain capacity of 1600 cubic centimetres is larger than the average 1,360 cubic centimetres for anatomically modern human species.  He belonged to upper paleolithic culture of Old Stone Age whereas anatomically modern human species had established its presence in the Mesolithic Period or Middle Stone Age at the end of the last glacial era about 10, 000 years ago. Anatomically modern human species developed a culture that included gradual domestication of plants and animals, formation of settled communities, use of the bow, development of delicate stone ‘Microliths’, and pottery.

THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN SPECIES – THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN LANGUAGE:

In my view, Human Speech(spoken and written) is the criteria by which the difference between anatomically modern man and other members of Hominid Family is made. Human Language is one of the principal characteristics of the specifically human world. Language is the peculiar possession of human beings. While Neanderthal, and Cro-Magnon Man share certain anatomical and physiological traits possessed by the zoological species identified as human beings, they were not true representatives of Homo sapiens sapiens. In the use of ‘Precision Grip’, both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon Man fall short of the status called ‘human’. Paleolithic art, paintings, and drawings are not the same as human writing.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  CRO-MAGNON  MAN  AND  PRECISION  GRIP .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CRO-MAGNON MAN AND PRECISION GRIP . PALEOLITHIC  ART  IS  NOT  EQUIVALENT  TO  HUMAN  ARTISTIC  EXPRESSION .  DRAWINGS  AND  PAINTINGS  ARE  NOT  THE  SAME  AS  HUMAN  WRITING .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  THE  ANATOMICAL  STRUCTURES  INVOLVED  IN  PRECISION  GRIP .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES INVOLVED IN PRECISION GRIP .  HOMINIDS  LIKE  NEANDERTHAL  HAD  ANATOMICAL  STRUCTURES  THAT  GIVE  FUNCTIONAL  ABILITIES  CALLED 1. PRESSURE  GRIP,  AND  2.  PRECISION  GRIP .  NEUROMUSCULAR  COORDINATION  BETWEEN  BRAIN  AND  FINGERS  CONTRIBUTES  TO  A  CREATIVE  ABILITY  CALLED  WRITING .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION .  PALEOLITHIC  ART  .  CAVE  PAINTINGS  IN  N  SPAIN  AND  SW  FRANCE  . c. 14,000- c. 13,500 B.C.  LASCAUX  CAVE  PAINTINGS  -  THE  AURIGNACIO - PERIGORDIAN  PERIOD .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION . PALEOLITHIC ART . CAVE PAINTINGS IN N SPAIN AND SW FRANCE . c. 14,000- c. 13,500 B.C. LASCAUX CAVE PAINTINGS – THE AURIGNACIO – PERIGORDIAN PERIOD .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  PALEOLITHIC  ART .  MURALS  AT  ROUFFIGNAC,  NIAUX,  AND  CAVE  PAINTINGS  OF  ALTAMIRA ,  SPAIN . c. 14,000 -c. 9500 B.C. THE  SOLUTREO - MAGDALENIAN  PERIOD  .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : PALEOLITHIC ART . MURALS AT ROUFFIGNAC, NIAUX, AND CAVE PAINTINGS OF ALTAMIRA , SPAIN . c. 14,000 – c. 9500 B.C. THE SOLUTREO – MAGDALENIAN PERIOD .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  KUNDA  TOOLS ,  MICROLITHS, c. 10,000 -c.8000 B.C. MESOLITHIC  PERIOD  OR  MIDDLE  STONE  AGE .  THE  BEGINNING  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  MAN .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : KUNDA TOOLS , MICROLITHS, c. 10,000 -c.8000 B.C. MESOLITHIC PERIOD OR MIDDLE STONE AGE . THE BEGINNING OF ANATOMICALLY MODERN MAN . HUMANS  ARE  KNOWN  BY  THEIR  CULTURE .

The reproductive history of modern man does not support Darwinism and its assumptions about breeding . To identify and to recognize man as a zoological species, the yardstick has to be defined as morphological appearances are inadequate. I coined the phrase ‘Whole Linguistics’ to use Human Language as the chief characteristic of human species. Whole Linguistics involves three entities, namely 1. A Language User, 2. A Language Interpreter and 3. A Language Creator. It introduces a concept about the Creative Beginning of Man and his Language.

HUMAN IDENTITY, INDIVIDUALITY, AND THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX:

All said and done, man has no choice about the nature of his physical existence in natural world. Each man without any choice exists as an Individual with Individuality. Man deploys protein molecules called antigens to identify ‘self’ and ‘non-self’. The antigens causing the immune response that results in  rejection of a tissue allograft are known as ‘Major Histocompatibility Antigens'(HLA). In man, the Major Histocompatibility Complex(MHC) is the HLA cluster on Chromosome 6. As MHC antigens were originally described on human Leukocytes(White Blood Cells), they are still referred to as Human leukocyte Antigens(HLA). The role of MHC is not limited to transplantation rejection as the proteins encoded in this region are involved in many aspects of immunological recognition and immunity  response. The HLA antigens are remarkable for the extensive degree of genetic polymorphism which makes  variability between individuals very great . Even among members of human population, most unrelated persons possess different HLA . This antigenic specificity established at molecular level is the evidence for a creative process, a creative mechanism, and a creative principle which determines the Subjective and Objective Physical Reality of Man’s Status in Nature.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HUMAN  LEUKOCYTE  ANTIGEN .  MAN  DEPLOYS  UNIQUE  PROTEIN  MOLECULES  TO  IDENTIFY  SELF  AND  NON-SELF .  HUMAN  EXISTENCE  AND  HUMAN  IDENTITY  IS  DEFINED  BY  MOLECULES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : HUMAN LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN . MAN DEPLOYS UNIQUE PROTEIN MOLECULES TO IDENTIFY SELF AND NON-SELF . HUMAN EXISTENCE AND HUMAN IDENTITY IS DEFINED BY MOLECULES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  MAN  IS  ABLE  TO  EXIST  IN  NATURE  FOR  HE  IS  ABLE  TO  DEFEND  HIS  EXISTENCE  BY  DEPLOYING  MOLECULES  THAT  CAN  MAKE  THE  RECOGNITION  AND  DISTINCTION  BETWEEN  SELF  AND  NON-SELF.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MAN IS ABLE TO EXIST IN NATURE FOR HE IS ABLE TO DEFEND HIS EXISTENCE BY DEPLOYING MOLECULES THAT CAN MAKE THE RECOGNITION AND DISTINCTION BETWEEN SELF AND NON-SELF.

THE PROOF OF PUDDING IS IN THE EATING :

Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle introduced  notion of Form, Nature, or Essence. Plants and animals are derived from seeds that already contain within them the Form, Nature, or Essence of the species from which they were derived and into which they would subsequently develop. To exist as a thing of a given kind, there could be an innate tendency to strive to develop into a perfect example of itself to fulfill its nature and to realize its full potential. In a purposive or teological view of the natural world, each natural thing by its intrinsic nature strives to realize its own ideal Form or Essence. Darwinism proposes a view that explains  development of a natural thing in a “mechanistic” and nonpurposive manner. If a new form of life is a product of unguided, random, and purposeless genetic mutations, it will be hard to explain and account for its Form, Nature, and Essence.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  GREGOR  MENDEL  CONDUCTED  EXPERIMENTS  ON  GARDEN  PEA(PISUM  SATIVUM)  PLANTS  TO  DISCOVER  THE   NATURAL  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  AND  VARIATION  .  I  DISCOVER   THE  ‘MAGIC  OF  CREATION’  BY   SIMPLY   TASTING   A  FEW   SWEET   PEAS  .

All living things define their existence using about 20 Amino Acids. Protein Synthesis involves unique and creative ways of arranging these amino acids into chains called polypeptides. Protein Synthesis is a creative process for the product created by one species has ability to impart unique sensory experience in an unrelated species.  Man can distinguish plant and animal proteins by using his organs of sense perception. The creative aspect of protein synthesis is in the taste, smell, flavor, color, texture, and palatability of plant and animal proteins. Man further improves palatability of proteins he consumes by refining his culinary skills.To refute the concept called ‘DARWINISM’, the Proof or Verification is in Eating Sweet Garden Peas and recognizing them from their color, taste, smell, flavor, texture, and palatability. Plants and animals do not use sensory functions like vision, olfaction, and taste in protein synthesis. The sensory experience of man is possible for living things exist with an innate tendency to express their Form, Nature, and Essence. I am asking my readers to contemplate upon supernatural circumstances that may define Form, Nature, and Essence of living things that are not explained by a study of their genes and genetic code.

Related Articles:

1SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – MAN IS A SPIRITUAL BEING

2. SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE HUMAN SPECIES

3. SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN SPECIES

 

 

#WHOLEMENDELISM – MENDELISM VS DARWINISM

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  Vs  HUMAN EVOLUTION WHOLE MENDELISM  #WholeMendelism  Vs  DARWINISM:

The origin of Man, or the Beginning of Man as a new form of Life may have a basis that lies outside  operation of natural causes. Mendelism, ‘The Theory of Heredity’ formulated by Gregor Mendel provides insights to the problem of man’s origin. on the basis of Mendelism, it can be said that man did not descend from Primates and is not truly related to other members of Hominid Family. Man’s relationship with other zoological species has to be explained on the basis of reproductive history and inheritance of  biological traits. I coined the phrase “Whole Mendelism” #WholeMendelism to claim that man had arrived on planet Earth due to a special act of creation.  There are no natural conditions, no natural factors, no natural mechanisms, no natural processes and no natural causes to transform any of previously existing members of Hominid Family to establish the reality of anatomically modern man. To make  transition from an old species to a new species which is often called ‘EVOLUTION’ or ‘DARWINISM’, the breeding interactions of species involved must operate according to the Laws of Inheritance discovered by Gregor Johann Mendel, the Father of Genetics. In this article, I would like to describe the Laws of Inheritance and the problems that I encounter to verify Darwinism while using the Mendelian Principles of Heredity and Variation. For example, if evolutionary biologists or anthropologists claim that anatomically modern human species or its immediate ancestral species had reproduced with archaic hominids such as Neanderthals, the human genome has to include one complete ‘Haploid’ set of chromosomes normally occurring in the mature germ cell called egg or sperm  which means 22 chromosomes(Autosomes), and 1  X or Y chromosome(Sex chromosome) derived exclusively from Neanderthal genome. Secondly, human population must include a few members that can be clearly identified as Neanderthal.

THE ORIGIN AND EXTINCTION OF SPECIES:

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : AFTER  THE  ORIGIN  OF  LIFE  ON  EARTH  FOR  A  VERY,  VERY  LONG  TIME( ABOUT  3.5  BILLION  YEARS)  IT  COMPRISED  OF  SIMPLER  FORMS  OF  LIFE .  SUDDENLY,  ABOUT  600  MILLION  YEARS  AGO  NUMEROUS  MARINE  CREATURES  ARRIVED  TO  CAUSE  AN  "EXPLOSION  OF  LIFE."
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : AFTER THE ORIGIN OF LIFE ON EARTH FOR A VERY, VERY LONG TIME( ABOUT 3.5 BILLION YEARS) IT COMPRISED OF SIMPLER FORMS OF LIFE . SUDDENLY, ABOUT 600 MILLION YEARS AGO NUMEROUS MARINE CREATURES ARRIVED TO CAUSE AN “EXPLOSION OF LIFE.”

It will be interesting to note that a vast majority of species found on Earth have emerged suddenly and have disappeared suddenly. For example, Cambrian, first geologic Period in the Paleozoic Era witnessed  sudden emergence of a great variety of marine animals especially trilobites and brachiopods about 600 million years ago. This “Explosion of Life” is aptly named ‘Cambrian Explosion’. Similarly, towards the end of Cretaceous Period, third geologic Period of the Mesozoic Era and the beginning of Tertiary Period of the Cenozoic Era, about 65 million years ago, a global extinction event called K-T Event was responsible for eliminating approximately 80 percent of all species of animals. Dinosaurs which reached maximum development became extinct while new forms of life appeared with new hereditary traits.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :   THESE  DEEP  SEA  CREATURES  OF  ATLANTIC  OCEAN,  LAMELLIBRACHIA  LUYMESI,  TUBE  WORMS,  INVERTEBRATES  BELONG  TO  PHYLUM  ANNELIDA  LIVE  ON  THE  OCEAN  FLOOR  ALONG  HYDROCARBON  VENTS.  TUBE  WORMS  TAKE  170  TO  250  YEARS  TO  GROW  AND  HAVE  SURVIVED  AS  A  SPECIES  WITHOUT  CONCERN  FOR  CHANGING  TIMES.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THESE DEEP SEA CREATURES OF ATLANTIC OCEAN, LAMELLIBRACHIA LUYMESI, TUBE WORMS, INVERTEBRATES BELONG TO PHYLUM  ANNELIDA  LIVE  ON  THE  OCEAN  FLOOR  ALONG  HYDROCARBON VENTS. TUBE WORMS TAKE 170 TO 250 YEARS TO GROW AND HAVE SURVIVED AS A SPECIES WITHOUT CONCERN FOR CHANGING TIMES SINCE  PRECAMBRIAN  ERA .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  DARWINISM  CANNOT  ACCOUNT  FOR  SUDDEN  APPEARANCE  OF  A  VARIETY  OF  MARINE  LIFE  FORMS IN  AN  EVENT  CALLED 'CAMBRIAN  EXPLOSION'  ABOUT  570  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .  GEODUCK,  BIVALVE  CLAMS ARE  AMONG  THE  OLDEST  ANIMALS  IN  THE  WORLD  WITH  LIFESPANS  OF  ABOUT  146  TO  160  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : DARWINISM CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR SUDDEN APPEARANCE OF A VARIETY OF MARINE LIFE FORMS IN AN EVENT CALLED ‘CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION’ ABOUT 570 MILLION YEARS AGO . PANOPEA  GENEROSA, GEODUCK(NATIVE  AMERICAN CHINOOK  NAME), BIVALVE,  WORLD’S  LARGEST  BURROWING  SALT  WATER  CLAMS  FOUND  IN  THE  US  PUGET  SOUND  ARE AMONG THE OLDEST ANIMALS IN THE WORLD WITH LIFESPANS OF ABOUT 146 TO 160 YEARS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY  EXTINCTION  EVENT  ABOUT  65  MILLION  YEARS  AGO  WIPED  OUT  APPROXIMATELY  80  PERCENT  OF  ALL  SPECIES  OF  ANIMALS  INCLUDING  A  GREAT  VARIETY  OF  DINOSAURS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY EXTINCTION EVENT ABOUT 65 MILLION YEARS AGO WIPED OUT APPROXIMATELY 80 PERCENT OF ALL SPECIES OF ANIMALS INCLUDING A GREAT VARIETY OF DINOSAURS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  DARWINISM  CANNOT  EXPLAIN  EITHER  THE  EMERGENCE  OF  NEW  SPECIES  OR  EXTINCTION  OF  OLD  SPECIES.  NATURAL  FACTORS,  NATURAL  CONDITIONS,  NATURAL  MECHANISMS ,  AND  NATURAL  CAUSES  CANNOT  FULLY  ACCOUNT  FOR  EXTINCTION  OF  THE  LARGE-BODIED  ICE  AGE  MAMMALS  SUCH  AS  WOOLLY  RHINOCEROS,  WOOLY  MAMMOTHS, MASTODONS, AND  SABERTOOTH  CARNIVORES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : DARWINISM CANNOT EXPLAIN EITHER THE EMERGENCE OF NEW SPECIES OR EXTINCTION OF OLD SPECIES. NATURAL FACTORS, NATURAL CONDITIONS, NATURAL MECHANISMS , AND NATURAL CAUSES CANNOT FULLY ACCOUNT FOR EXTINCTION OF THE LARGE-BODIED ICE AGE MAMMALS SUCH AS WOOLLY RHINOCEROS, WOOLY MAMMOTHS, MASTODONS, AND SABERTOOTH CARNIVORES .

In Darwinism, new species arise when, among the varieties of an existing species, certain intermediate forms become extinct, and the other circumstances are such that the surviving varieties now become more sharply separated from one another in type, and are able to reproduce their kind, and , in the course of many generations of interbreeding, also tend to breed true. This ‘Theory of Evolution’ is not consistent with Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance and Variation. The Unit Character called ‘GENE’ conserves its identity during the process of reproduction which could be either ‘Inbreeding’, or ‘Interbreeding’. A species is always known by its reproductive history for the Unit Characters or Genes get propagated to the next generation during both inbreeding and interbreeding process.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  GREGOR  JOHANN  MENDEL(1822-1884),  THE  FATHER  OF  GENETICS .  AT  THE  AUGUSTINIAN  MONASTERY  IN  BRNO(1843-1868),  HE  CONDUCTED OVER 29,000 BREEDING  EXPERIMENTS  CHIEFLY  ON  GARDEN PEAS(PISUM  SATIVUM).

Gregor Johann Mendel(1822-1884), Austrian monk noted for his experimental work on Heredity. At the Augustinian monastery in Brno(1843-1868) he conducted experiments chiefly on Garden Peas(Pisum sativum) using a controlled pollination technique and a careful statistical analysis of his results. He produced the first accurate and scientific explanation of ‘Hybridization’. Some evolutionary geneticists and evolutionary anthropology scholars have shared opinions claiming that the ‘hybridization’ of unknown, ancestral Homo sapiens with other species of the genus Homo such as Neanderthals, and Denisova hominids may have resulted in  production of anatomically modern humans(Homo sapiens sapiens). Their views on blending of hereditary factors is not supported by Mendel’s classic experiments in Hybridization. According to Mendel, inheritance is particulate. Distinct genetic factors combine to produce a certain somatic result without losing their separate identities. They can therefore be reassorted and enter into new genetic combinations in the next generation. The hypothesis of  Hybridized Anatomically Modern(HAM) humans is fundamentally inconsistent with the Laws of Inheritance discovered by Mendel. If modern man is a product of Hybridization, the present, surviving human population would include a few surviving members of Neanderthals, Denisova, and other ancestral hominids who successfully reproduced with an unknown, ancestral Homo sapiens species which got transformed into ‘HAM’ humans.

THE LAW OF BIOGENESIS AND THE LAW OF NATURAL GENERATION :

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HUMAN  CHROMOSOMES  AND  HUMAN  IDENTITY .  MAN  REPRODUCES  AND  FURTHER  PROPAGATES  HIS  CHROMOSOMAL  INHERITANCE  ACCORDING  TO  THE  LAW  OF  BIOGENESIS  AND  THE  LAW  OF  NATURAL  GENERATION .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : DIPLOID  SET  OF  HUMAN CHROMOSOMES  AND  HUMAN  GENOTYPE  . MAN  REPRODUCES  AND  FURTHER PROPAGATES  HIS  CHROMOSOMAL  INHERITANCE  ACCORDING  TO  THE  LAW  OF BIOGENESIS  AND  THE  LAW  OF  NATURAL  GENERATION . HUMAN  OFFSPRING  WILL  ALWAYS  BE  OF  THE  SAME  SPECIES  AS  THE  PARENT  ORGANISM . THE  TERM  GENOME  DESCRIBES  THE  SET  OF  GENES  CHARACTERISTIC  OF  EACH  SPECIES .

The term ‘Generation’ means to produce offspring. The term ‘Propagation’ means to transmit hereditary characteristics by reproduction. The Law of Biogenesis states the Principle that living organisms originate only from other living organisms closely similar to themselves. It is  ‘The Law of Like Generating Like’. A species always breeds true to its own species. Its members always generate organisms which are classified as belonging to the same species, however much they vary among themselves as individuals within the group. The sub-groups, the races, or varieties of species are able to breed with one another, but diverse species cannot interbreed. By the Law of Natural Generation, offspring will always be of the same species as the parent organism. Hence, species is self-perpetuating and maintain  stability of all other groupings like the genera, phyla, and families which remain as fixed from generation to generation. In Plant and Animal Kingdom, a species distinguishes itself by its ability to maintain its stability from generation to generation. The Mendelian System of Heredity states that an inherited characteristic is determined by the combination of two hereditary units(now called genes), one from each of the parental reproductive cells or gametes(Sperm and Egg Cell). The term genome describes the complete haploid set of chromosomes of a sexually reproducing organism normally occurring in mature germ cell called egg or sperm. This number of chromosomes is characteristic of each species. Every human being arrives on planet Earth with an original, unique, distinctive, and one of its own kind of  genome that has never, ever existed in the past, and would never exist again in the future. Sexual reproduction is a creative process which involves a type of cell division called ‘MEIOSIS’ that results in production of Sperm or Egg Cell. Fertilization of egg cell by sperm always creates a new kind of genome while the number of chromosomes(Diploid set) that is the chief attribute of species is held constant.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  HUMAN  BIRTH  REQUIRES  THE  UNION  OF  TWO  HEREDITARY  UNITS,  ONE  FROM  EACH  OF  THE  PARENTAL  REPRODUCTIVE  CELLS  OR  GAMETES (SPERM  AND  EGG  CELL) .  MEIOSIS  OR  HAPLOID  DIVISION  IS  A  HIGHLY  CREATIVE  PROCESS  AS  IT  GENERATES  A UNIQUE ,  ORIGINAL,   DISTINCTIVE,  AND  ONE  OF  ITS  OWN  KIND  OF  GENOME, A  COMPLETE  HAPLOID  SET  OF  CHROMOSOMES  WHILE  THE  DIPLOID SET  OF  CHROMOSOMES AFTER FERTILIZATION  OR  CONCEPTION  IS  CONSTANT .

THE ORIGIN OR THE BEGINNING OF ANATOMICALLY MODERN HUMANS:

To explain the Origin of Man, The Beginning of Man on the basis of Darwinism, demands  presence of two, identical, rare, mutant individuals(a male, and a female) to produce offspring and to establish an entirely new, modern human population in all geographical regions of the Old World. About 10, 000 years ago, modern humans may have shared the planet with a few surviving members of Neanderthals and other hominid species. Techniques of DNA extraction and genomic sequencing have advanced and find application in the understanding of the genus Homo. The claims about Hybridization of archaic humans such as Neanderthals with Homo sapiens  finds support from DNA studies of the current,  members of human population as compared to DNA sequences extracted from Neanderthal fossils. But those shared genetic traits are not of major significance and do not account for the morphological appearance of either Neanderthal or modern man. At the same time, it may be noted that 30 – 35, 000 years ago, Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record. Similarly, Hominid Denisova, discovered in Altai Mountains, Southern Siberia lived 41, 000 years ago. Homo sapiens floresiensis(Flores Man) of Indonesia  suddenly disappeared 12, 000 years ago. Hominid Red Deer discovered in China lived 14.5 to 11.5 thousand years ago. To make a credible claim about interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, we need to demonstrate  presence of traits characteristic of Homo sapiens in the DNA extracted from Neanderthal fossil specimens. It will be correct to claim that from Holocene Epoch or Series, approximately for the last 10, 000 years, modern humans constitute the only surviving members of the Hominid Family found on planet Earth.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  MENDELIAN  SYSTEM  OF  HEREDITY  CAN  EASILY  ESTABLISH  THE  FACT  THAT  THIS  HUMAN  BABY  HAS  TWO ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMAN  PARENTS . EVERY  BABY   ARRIVES  WITH  ORIGINAL,  UNIQUE,  DISTINCTIVE,  AND  ONE  OF  ITS  OWN  KIND  OF   GENOME( A  COMPLETE  HAPLOID  SET  OF  CHROMOSOMES, OR  23 CHROMOSOMES  FROM  EACH  PARENT) THAT  NEVER  EXISTED  IN  THE  PAST  AND  WILL  NEVER  EXIST  AGAIN  IN  FUTURE  WHILE  ALL  HUMANS  ARE  BORN  WITH  A  DIPLOID  SET   THAT  HAS  46  CHROMOSOMES .

Charles Darwin uses the term species to signify “a set of individuals closely resembling each other” – a class of plants or animals having certain characteristics. The French naturalist George Louis Leclerc Comte de Buffon(1707-1788) in his monumental compendium on Natural History(Histoire Naturelle General et Particuliere, 44 Volumes, 1749-1804) described man as a zoological species. Buffon determined species not by their physical appearances but by their reproductive history. Two individual animals or plants are of the same species if they can produce fertile offspring. According to Buffon, a species is known only through the history of its propagation. Buffon opened the way to  development of Paleontology to discover lost species. The status of Anatomically Modern Humans as a distinct species is verified as human populations consist of members that are genetically similar, interbreeding or potentially interbreeding individuals that share the same collection of inherited characteristics, whose combination is unique to our species. Diverse species cannot interbreed. Organisms different in species cannot reproduce productively and if crossbred, like the horse and the ass, they produce a sterile hybrid like the mule. Hybrid is the term for the offspring of a cross between two different subspecies or species. In Genetics, hybrid is the term for the offspring of parents differing in any genetic characteristic.Interbreeding or Hybridization means to produce offspring by crossing two individuals of unlike genetic constitution. The offspring of different races, varieties, species, etc., are called ‘hybrids’. If Neanderthal is one of the parents of Anatomically Modern Humans, identity of the second Hominid parent has to be ascertained, and the characteristics of that parent are accounted for using Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance. The social and cultural behavior of anatomically modern man consistently displays a tendency that prefers and encourages ‘inbreeding’. The prevailing social and cultural norms of human society in general tend to oppose sexual behavior that may be identified as ‘interbreeding’. In selection of a mate for breeding, anatomically modern man prefers an individual who closely resembles the members of his/her own stock.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  A  SPECIES  IS  RECOGNIZED  BY  ITS  HISTORY  OF  PROPAGATION . MULE,  A   PRODUCT  OF  CROSSBREEDING , OR  HYBRIDIZATION  CANNOT FURTHER  REPRODUCE  PRODUCTIVELY  WITH  OTHER  MULES,  OR  WITH  HORSE , OR   ASS FOR  IT  IS  BORN  STERILE .  HYBRIDIZATION  WILL  NOT  HELP  TO  TRANSFORM  A  SPECIES  INTO  A  NEW  SPECIES  IF  ITS  PARENTS  BELONG  TO  DIFFERENT  SPECIES .

The concept of Hybridized Anatomically Modern(HAM) humans cannot be verified in  absence of any surviving members of Neanderthal, Denisova, or other Hominid population with whom modern man may have reproduced about 10, 000 years ago.

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE :

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : IT  WILL  BE  IMPORTANT  TO  NOTE  THAT  ACQUIRED  CHARACTERISTICS  ARE  NOT  HEREDITARY  AND  THERE  IS  NO  INHERITANCE  OF  ACQUIRED  CHARACTERISTICS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : IT WILL BE IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT ACQUIRED CHARACTERISTICS ARE NOT HEREDITARY AND THERE IS NO INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERISTICS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  MENDEL  DEMONSTRATED  INHERITANCE  PATTERNS  THROUGH  BREEDING  EXPERIMENTATION. THE  IMAGE  SHOWS  SOME  OF  THE  HEREDITARY  TRAITS  OR  CHARACTERS  INVESTIGATED  BY  MENDEL  WHILE  EXPERIMENTING  ON  GARDEN  PEA  PLANTS  WITH  WHITE  OR  VIOLET  FLOWERS.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   FOR  UNIT  CHARACTERS  NAMED  R(DOMINANT),  r(RECESSIVE),  Y(DOMINANT),  AND   y(RECESSIVE),  THE  DIAGRAM  ILLUSTRATES  THE OPERATION  OF  MENDEL’S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  MENDELIAN  SYSTEM  OF  HEREDITY  STATES  THAN  AN  INHERITED  CHARACTERISTIC  IS  DETERMINED  BY  THE  COMBINATION  OF  TWO  HEREDITARY  UNITS( NOW  CALLED  GENES ),  ONE  FROM  EACH  OF  THE  PARENTAL  REPRODUCTIVE  CELLS  OR  GAMETES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  AS  PER  THE  MENDELIAN  SYSTEM  OF  HEREDITY ,  IF  MODERN  HUMANS  INTERBREED  WITH  NEANDERTHALS , IN  EACH  GENERATION  OF  OFFSPRING  PRODUCED ,  THREE  INDIVIDUALS  COULD  BE  MODERN  HUMANS ( DOMINANT  TRAIT )  AND  ONE  INDIVIDUAL WOULD  BE  NEANDERTHAL ( RECESSIVE  TRAIT ).  SUCH  INTERBREEDING  WOULD  IN  REALITY  SAVE  NEANDERTHAL  POPULATION  FROM  TOTAL  EXTINCTION .

Mendel demonstrated the inheritance patterns through breeding experimentations. He discovered in 1866 hereditary factors or “genes” whose existence he deduced without seeing them. Mendel’s statistical analysis of his data provided the mathematical basis for modern Genetics. There are four principles of hereditary phenomenon discovered and formulated by Mendel :

1. The Law of Independent Unit Characters which states that characters such as height, color, etc., are inherited separately as  Units,

2. The Law of Segregation which states that body cells and primordial germ cells contain pairs of such Unit Characters and that when gametes(Sperm or Egg Cell) are produced, each gamete receives only one member of each such pair,

3. The Law of Dominance which states that in every individual there is a pair of determining factors for each Unit Character, one from each parent, if these factors are different(heterozygous), one Character( the Dominant) appears in the organism, the other(  Recessive) being latent; the Recessive Character can appear in the organism only when the Dominant is absent; hence in all crossbred generations, Unit Characters are shown in varying combinations, each appearing in a definite proportion of the total number of offspring, and 

4. The Law of Independent Assortment which states that any one pair of Characters is inherited independently, not withstanding the simultaneous transmission of other traits. This Law is modified by the discovery of Linkage and Pleiotropy. Linkage describes the tendency of some genes to remain together and act as a Unit or Linkage Group. In Inheritance, the Linkage Group of genes are generally found in the same chromosome. Pleiotropy is the condition in which a single gene exerts simultaneous effects on more than one character in the offspring.

ABOUT GENETICS  AND THE CONSTANCY OF GENETIC CODE :

Genetics is an important aspect of many areas of Biology. Genetics helps in the study and identification of specific types of organisms; research in Molecular Genetics involves studies on chemical structure and functions of genes at molecular level; Cyto Genetics studies  location of genetic material in cells and the role of genes in cell division; Developmental Genetics studies the genetic function in embryological phenomena; Behavior Genetics studies the role of gene in regulating behavior; Population Genetics studies genetics in relation to the “evolutionary” process. Medical Genetics involves  application of genetic principles to the practice of Medicine such as the study of inheritance of diseases in families. Genetic factors cause many health disorders affecting man. Some human diseases are entirely genetic in origin and environmental factors play little if any part. This group of genetic disorders includes chromosomal abnormalities, and so-called “Unifactorial Disorders” which are due to single gene defects or Mendelian factors. There are over 3 thousand of such unifactorial disorders. The mode of inheritance of such disorders is straight forward and follows Mendelian Principles. Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance have their practical applications in Medical Genetics. However, the use of Mendel’s Principles in Population Genetics to verify The Theory of Evolution is highly controversial because of the speculative postulates about transformation of old species into a new species .  Several single-celled Blue-Green algae, plankton, microbes, viruses, protozoans, insects, crocodiles, turtles, sharks and other organisms are known to be existing upon Earth from billions to several millions of years. The unchanging  genetic code in all past and present members of these long-lived species permit the genes to have the same effects on their carriers from generation to generation. Because of  constancy of the genetic code, we can  identify  existence of individual species which maintain their species-specific traits as per Mendelian Principles. There are numerous kinds of longest living species on Earth and their identification is possible because of their genetic codes have essentially remained unchanged.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE .  BLUE-GREEN  ALGAE,  CYANOBACTERIA  MAINTAIN  THEIR  SPECIES-SPECIFIC  TRAITS  FOR  BILLIONS  OF  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE CONSTANCY OF THE GENETIC CODE . BLUE-GREEN ALGAE, CYANOBACTERIA MAINTAIN THEIR SPECIES-SPECIFIC TRAITS  SINCE  PRECAMBRIAN  TIME,  3,800  TO  700 MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  SPONGES  ARE  INVERTEBRATE  ANIMALS  OF  THE  PHYLUM  PORIFERA .  SPONGES  ARE  AMONG  THE  LONGEST  LIVING  ANIMAL  SPECIES  OF  EARTH .  THEY  APPEARED  IN  CAMBRIAN  PERIOD  ABOUT  570  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .  ANTARCTIC  SPONGE  CAN  LIVE  FOR  CENTURIES .  OLDEST  KNOWN  SPONGE  ESTIMATED  AGE  1, 550 YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : SPONGES ARE INVERTEBRATE ANIMALS OF THE PHYLUM PORIFERA . SPONGES ARE AMONG THE LONGEST LIVING ANIMAL SPECIES OF EARTH . THEY APPEARED IN CAMBRIAN PERIOD ABOUT 570 MILLION YEARS AGO . ANTARCTIC SPONGE CAN LIVE FOR CENTURIES . OLDEST KNOWN SPONGE ESTIMATED AGE 1, 550 YEARS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE  PERMIT  THE  GENES  TO  HAVE  THE  SAME  EFFECTS  ON  THEIR  CARRIERS  FROM  GENERATION  TO  GENERATION . AMERICAN  COCKROACH  IS  EXISTING  ON  EARTH  FOR  MILLIONS  OF  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE CONSTANCY OF THE GENETIC CODE PERMIT THE GENES TO HAVE THE SAME EFFECTS ON THEIR CARRIERS FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION . AMERICAN COCKROACH IS EXISTING ON EARTH BASICALLY  UNCHANGED  FOR  300   MILLION   YEARS . MOST  ABUNDANT  DURING  THE  CARBONIFEROUS  PERIOD  DURING  WHICH  A  VARIETY  OF  INSECTS  APPEARED .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  EVOLUTION  :  ARCTICA  ISLANDICA .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  ARCTICA  ISLANDICA .  OCEAN  QUAHOG  OR  CLAM  .  MOLLUSKS  ARE  ORGANISMS  WITH  SHELLS  DATE  BACK  TO  THE  CAMBRIAN  PERIOD,  500  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE  GIVES  THE  ABILITY  TO  IDENTIFY  THE  EXISTENCE  OF  INDIVIDUAL  SPECIES  WHICH  MAINTAIN  THEIR  SPECIES-SPECIFIC  TRAITS .  OVER  MILLIONS  OF  YEARS,  SHARKS  HAVE  MAINTAINED  THEIR  MORPHOLOGICAL  APPEARANCE .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE CONSTANCY OF THE GENETIC CODE GIVES THE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY THE EXISTENCE OF INDIVIDUAL SPECIES WHICH MAINTAIN THEIR SPECIES-SPECIFIC TRAITS . OVER 350  MILLION   YEARS,  SINCE  THE  END  OF  DEVONIAN  PERIOD  SHARKS HAVE MAINTAINED THEIR MORPHOLOGICAL APPEARANCE .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  SPHENODON  TUATARA  .  THIS  LIZARDLIKE  REPTILE  OF  NEW  ZEALAND  IS  KNOWN  AS  A  LIVING  FOSSIL .  THIS  SPECIES  IS  IN  EXISTENCE  FOR  ABOUT  200-225  MILLION  YEARS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : SPHENODON TUATARA . THIS LIZARDLIKE REPTILE OF NEW ZEALAND IS KNOWN AS A LIVING FOSSIL . THIS SPECIES IS IN EXISTENCE FOR ABOUT 200-225 MILLION YEARS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : BASED  UPON  THEIR  UNIQUE  GENETIC  CODES,  ORGANISMS  ARE  KNOWN  TO  BE  EXISTING  UPON  EARTH  FOR  SEVERAL  MILLIONS  OF  YEARS .  CROCODILES  LIVED  ALONG  WITH  DINOSAURS .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : BASED UPON THEIR UNIQUE GENETIC CODES, ORGANISMS ARE KNOWN TO BE EXISTING UPON EARTH FOR SEVERAL MILLIONS OF YEARS . CROCODILES LIVED ALONG WITH DINOSAURS . ORIGINATED  DURING  THE  LATE  TRIASSIC  PERIOD  200  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  ORIGIN  OF  THE  GENETIC  CODE  IS  UNKNOWN .  THE  VAST  MAJORITY  OF  ORGANISMS  BREED  WITH  OTHER  MEMBERS  OF  THEIR  OWN  SPECIES  PROPAGATING  THEIR  OWN  UNIQUE  GENETIC  CODES .  WE  KNOW  ABOUT  LONG-LIVED  ORGANISMS  LIKE  SEA  TURTLES  BECAUSE  OF  THE  CONSTANCY  OF  THEIR  GENETIC  CODES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE ORIGIN OF THE GENETIC CODE IS UNKNOWN . THE VAST MAJORITY OF ORGANISMS BREED WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF THEIR OWN SPECIES PROPAGATING THEIR OWN UNIQUE GENETIC CODES . WE KNOW ABOUT LONG-LIVED ORGANISMS LIKE SEA TURTLES BECAUSE OF THE CONSTANCY OF THEIR GENETIC CODES . TURTLES  ARE  IN  EXISTENCE  FROM  THE  TRIASSIC  PERIOD,  200  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  ALASKA  BOWHEAD  WHALE .  WHALES  ORIGINATED  IN  THE  EARLY  TERTIARY  OR  UPPER  CRETACEOUS  ABOUT  70  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : ALASKA BOWHEAD WHALE . WHALES ORIGINATED IN THE EARLY TERTIARY OR UPPER CRETACEOUS ABOUT 70 MILLION YEARS AGO.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  MONOTREMES .  DUCK-BILLED  PLATYPUS  ORNITHO  RHYNCHUS  ANATINUS  IS  A  SPECIES  SURVIVING  SINCE  AUSTRALIAN  PLEISTOCENE  ABOUT  2  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MONOTREMES . DUCK-BILLED PLATYPUS ORNITHO RHYNCHUS ANATINUS IS A SPECIES SURVIVING SINCE AUSTRALIAN PLEISTOCENE ABOUT 2 MILLION YEARS AGO.

While describing Genetics as the area of Biology concerned with the study of inheritance, the process by which certain characteristics or traits of organisms are handed down from parent to offspring, I would like to suggest that a creative mechanism, a creative process or a creative operation could be at work when Genetics accounts for variations in similar or related animals and plants. I would like to emphasize the fact of all organisms existing as Individuals with Individuality. In Nature, living things have no choice other than that of existence as Individuals with Individuality. Even a mob of genetically identical(“CLONES”) colony of bacteria of E. coli are experimentally proved to behave as Individuals with Individuality.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :
MENDEL’S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN EVOLUTION  : DOUBLE –  HELIX DEOXYRIBO NUCLEIC  ACID  OR  DNA  IS  FOUND  IN  CHROMOSOMES,  THE  STRUCTURES  FOUND  INSIDE   THE   NUCLEUS  OF  CELLS  OF  HIGHER  ORGANISMS.  THE  DNA  MOLECULE  ALWAYS  EXHIBITS  INDIVIDUALISTIC  VARIATION  IN   ITS   BEHAVIOR .

In higher organisms with cells that contain a Nucleus, the genetic material called DNA(deoxyribonucleic acid) is carried by structures known as Chromosomes in the Nucleus, and the cytoplasmic structures known as Mitochondria. The genetic material called RNA(ribonucleic acid) is found in the Nucleolus(present inside the Nucleus) and structures called Ribosomes found in the Cytoplasm.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  UNITS  OF  INHERITANCE  ARE  KNOWN  AS  GENES.  THE  GENES  ARE  FOUND  INSIDE  CHROMOSOMES  THAT  ARE  PRESENT  IN  THE  NUCLEUS  OF  CELLS  OF  HIGHER  ORGANISMS .  DNA  IS  FOUND IN  CHROMOSOMES,  MITOCHONDRIA,  AND  RIBOSOMES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION :  CELL  IS  THE   BASIC  BUILDING  BLOCK  OF  LIVING  THINGS . THE UNITS  OF  INHERITANCE  ARE KNOWN  AS GENES. THE GENES  ARE  FOUND  INSIDE  CHROMOSOMES THAT ARE PRESENT IN THE NUCLEUS OF CELLS OF HIGHER ORGANISMS . DNA,  IS FOUND IN CHROMOSOMES, MITOCHONDRIA, AND  RNA  IS  FOUND  IN THE NUCLEOLUS AND  RIBOSOMES .

The Ribosomes are the sites of protein synthesis present in the Cytoplasm. DNA interacts with ‘transfer RNA'(t-RNA), ‘Messenger RNA'(m-RNA), and Ribosomal RNA in the process of protein synthesis. The Chromosome is divided into Units called Genes. Each Gene is responsible for a particular trait  and hence Gene is the Unit of inheritance. The term ‘allele’ describes either of a pair of genes at the same position on both members of a pair of chromosomes and conveying traits that are inherited by Mendelian Laws.There could be small chemical differences in genes that are expressed as different versions of the same trait (‘alleles’). Each gene is responsible for the manufacture of a particular protein which is involved in  development of a trait associated with it. Each chromosome of each species of higher organisms has a definite number and arrangement of genes which govern the structure and functions of the cells.  It is important to note that, while genes are located inside the Nucleus of the cell, the actual protein synthesis occurs in structures called Ribosomes present in the Cytoplasm outside the Nucleus. While we appreciate the role of genes as Units of Inheritance, we should give equal importance to the Living Substance, the Living Material, or the Living Matter called Cytoplasm that is found inside the living cells, outside the Nucleus of the cell. There are basically three classes of Genes: 1. Structural genes which determine the sequences of amino acids that go to makeup proteins or the smaller chain of molecules known as polypeptides, 2. Coding genes which specify molecules that function in the processes involved in protein synthesis, and 3. Regulatory genes which are called Noncoding genes for they act solely as “Recognition” sites for enzymes and other proteins involved in controlling protein synthesis.

THE  GENETIC CODE AND THE ROLE OF MUTATIONS:    

 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :

MENDEL’S LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION   :  GENETIC  CODE  DESCRIBES  THE  RELATIONSHIP  BETWEEN  THE  COMPOSITION  OF  DNA  AND  THAT  OF  PROTEINS  PRODUCED  BY  GENES .

The Genetic Code describes the relationship between composition of DNA and that of proteins produced by genes. Genetic Code is the chemical equation by which hereditary information is translated from genes into proteins. Changes in the genetic code are called Mutations. Mutations can cause a change in protein synthesis. In higher organisms, when mutation involves the germ-line cells that eventually develop into sperm or egg cells, the mutation and its consequence of altered protein synthesis is inherited by offspring. A mutation can be minor and relatively insignificant, or it can cause serious deformity or metabolic deficiency in the organism. Most mutations tend to be harmful. Fortunately, a typical gene in higher organisms is segmented and the entire genetic information of a gene is not contained in a single, unbroken strand of DNA molecule. The value of having the genetic code in segments is to reduce the chances of mutations causing harmful changes in protein synthesis. Certain self-repair mechanisms also exist to deal with the damage done to DNA. Very often, the damaged DNA is repaired or the cell carrying the damaged DNA is killed and destroyed. For this reason, it is important to recognize the simple fact of DNA damage associated with mutations irrespective of its cause. The Theory of Evolution proposes that random, unguided, and apparently purposeless mutations lead to gradual changes in a species and eventually lead to its descent as a new species. As per the Theory of Evolution, mutations may bring about three kinds of changes; 1. Changes in the morphological appearance of an organism, 2. Changes in the skeletal and other anatomical structures of an organism, and 3. Changes in the behavior displayed by an organism.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  MUSCLE  TWITCH  IN  FROG  MUSCLE  EXPERIMENT .  MUTATIONS  CANNOT  ACCOUNT  FOR  GUIDED,  SEQUENTIAL,  AND  PURPOSEFUL  NATURE  OF  MUSCLE  CONTRACTIONS  WHICH  HAVE  SEVERAL  CREATIVE  APPLICATIONS  IN  THE  NATURAL  WORLD .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MUSCLE TWITCH IN FROG MUSCLE EXPERIMENT . MUTATIONS CANNOT ACCOUNT FOR GUIDED, SEQUENTIAL, AND PURPOSEFUL NATURE OF MUSCLE CONTRACTIONS WHICH HAVE SEVERAL CREATIVE APPLICATIONS IN THE NATURAL WORLD .

In higher organisms, the cells are differentiated to perform special functions. For example, muscle cells have ability of contraction. This physiological function of contraction is easily demonstrated by applying an electrical stimulus to muscle as done in Muscle Twitch in Frog Experiment. Animals have different abilities of locomotion; some crawl or creep, or slide on a surface, some swim, or move in water, some fly or glide in air, and others walk, run, climb, and swing in a variety of amazing manners. Whatever may be the mode of locomotion, all animal muscle cells display the same physiological function of contraction. While the physiology remains the same, the muscles of each animal species display individualistic functional characteristics. For mutations are random, unguided, and purposeless, they cannot account for guided, sequential and purposeful nature of muscle contractions which have several creative applications in the natural world.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :   CHIMPANZEE  AND  OTHER  APES HAVE  48  CHROMOSOMES  WHEREAS  MAN  HAS  ONLY  46  CHROMOSOMES .  CHROMOSOMES 2a  AND  2b  FOUND  IN  APES  IS  OF  PARTICULAR  INTEREST .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CHIMPANZEE AND OTHER APES HAVE 48 CHROMOSOMES WHEREAS MAN HAS ONLY 46 CHROMOSOMES . CHROMOSOMES 2 a AND 2 b FOUND IN APES ARE  OF PARTICULAR INTEREST .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THERE  IS  NO  NATURAL  MECHANISM  OF   SEXUAL  REPRODUCTION  THAT  CAN  FUSE  CHROMOSOME  2 a  AND  2 b  TO  ASSEMBLE   CHROMOSOME  #  2   FOUND  IN   MAN .  MENDEL'S   LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  WHAT  IS  GENETIC  DRIFT  ????   CAN  IT  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE  ARRIVAL  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS  ???   CAN  WE  EXPLAIN   MAN  AS  A  PRODUCT  OF  HYBRIDIZATION  AND  THE  PHENOMENON  CALLED  GENETIC  DRIFT  ????

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : WHAT IS GENETIC DRIFT ????  CAN  IT  ACCOUNT  FOR  THE ARRIVAL OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS ??? CAN  WE EXPLAIN  MAN  AS  A PRODUCT  OF  HYBRIDIZATION AND  THE PHENOMENON CALLED  GENETIC  DRIFT ????

In ‘Evolution’ the term ‘Genetic Drift is used to describe a random change in gene frequency within a small population, resulting in mutations which regardless of their adaptive value, become fixed within the group. Variations in diet, variations in physical activity, variations in reproductive behavior, and variations in external environmental conditions may contribute to minor variations in ‘allele’ frequencies without transforming an old species into a new species.

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  AND  THE  MISSING  LINK :

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : TAXONOMY  IS  A  BRANCH  OF  BIOLOGY  THAT  FORMULATES  THE  BASIS  FOR  SYSTEMATIC  CATEGORIZATION  OF  ORGANISMS  INTO  CATEGORIES  SUCH  AS  PHYLUM(OR DIVISION), CLASS,  ORDER,  FAMILY,  SUB-FAMILY,  GENUS,  AND  SPECIES .  WITHIN  THE  GENUS  HOMO  SAPIENS,  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  MAN  IS  UNIQUE,  AND  DISTINCT  FOR  HUMAN  NATURE  STANDS  BY  ITSELF .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : TAXONOMY IS A BRANCH OF BIOLOGY THAT FORMULATES THE BASIS FOR SYSTEMATIC CATEGORIZATION OF ORGANISMS INTO CATEGORIES SUCH AS PHYLUM(OR DIVISION), CLASS, ORDER, FAMILY, SUB-FAMILY, GENUS, AND SPECIES . WITHIN THE GENUS HOMO SAPIENS, ANATOMICALLY MODERN MAN IS UNIQUE, AND DISTINCT FOR HUMAN NATURE STANDS BY ITSELF .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : CHIMPANZEE  IS  NOT  THE  MISSING  LINK  BETWEEN  MAN  AND  ANIMAL .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CHIMPANZEE IS NOT THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN MAN AND ANIMAL .  CHIMPANZEES  ARE  NATIVE  TO  AFRICA .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  MOUNTAIN  GORILLA  IS  NOT  THE  MISSING  LINK  BETWEEN  MAN  AND  ANIMAL .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MOUNTAIN GORILLA IS NOT THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN MAN AND ANIMAL .  GORILLAS  ARE  NATIVE  TO  AFRICA .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  NO   EXTINCT  OR  LIVING  SPECIES  IS  ABLE  TO  BRIDGE  THE  GAP  BETWEEN  MODERN  MAN(HOMO  SAPIENS  SAPIENS)  AND  HIS  NEAREST  ALLIES  AMONG  HOMINID  FAMILY .  WHO  IS  THE  MISSING  LINK  BETWEEN  MAN  AND  ANIMALS  LIKE  CHIMPANZEE  AND  GORILLA ????

The above image reveals a fundamental problem  faced by Darwinism when it attempts to account for Human Evolution.  No extinct or living species is able to bridge the gap between modern man(Homo sapiens sapiens) and his nearest allies among Hominid Family and other Primates such as Chimpanzee and Gorilla.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  SOME  EVOLUTIONARY  GENTICISTS  CLAIM  THAT  MODERN  HUMANS HAVE  DESCENDED  BY  INTERBREEDING  AND  REPRODUCING  WITH  OTHER  SPECIES  OF  THE  GENUS  HOMO . INTERBREEDING  OR  INBREEDING  CANNOT  TRANSFORM  AN  OLD  SPECIES  INTO  A  NEW   SPECIES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THERE  IS  NO  NATURAL  MECHANISM,  NO  NATURAL  PROCESS,  NO  NATURAL  CONDITION,  OR  NATURAL  CAUSE  THAT  CAN  TRANSFORM  NEANDERTHAL  SPECIES  INTO  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS. ANATOMICAL  TRAITS  PECULIAR  TO  NEANDERTHALS  WILL  NOT  BE  WIPED  OUT  BY  SEXUAL  REPRODUCTION,  EITHER  INBREEDING  OR  INTERBREEDING .

MENDEL'S   LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  DENISOVA  HOMINIDS  DISCOVERED  IN  DENISOVA  CAVE ,  ALTAI  MOUNTAINS ,  SOUTHERN  SIBERIA,  RUSSIA .  DENISOVA  MORE  SIMILAR  TO  NEANDERTHALS  AS  COMPARED  TO  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS .  THEY   LIVED  41, 000 YEARS  AGO . CAN  ONLY  BREED  TRUE  TO  THEIR  OWN  SPECIES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  ARTISTIC  RENDITION  OF  DENISOVA  CHILD .  DNA  EXTRACTED  FROM  A  FRAGMENT  OF  PHALANX  OF  HAND  AND  A  MOLAR (TOOTH).  THIS  DENISOVA  GIRL IN  APPEARANCE  IS  MORE  SIMILAR  TO  NEANDERTHAL  THAN  TO  MODERN  HUMANS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  NEANDERTHALS  LIVED  FOR  ABOUT  300, 000  YEARS .  NEANDERTHAL  BELONGS  TO  MIDDLE  PALEOLITHIC  PERIOD  OF  OLD  STONE  AGE .  NEANDERTHAL  HAD  A  PRECISION  GRIP  SIMILAR  TO  THAT  OF  MODERN  HUMANS  BUT  DID  NOT  DISPLAY  WRITING  SKILLS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  NEANDERTHAL  HAD  POWER  GRIP  AND  PRECISION  GRIP  LIKE  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS .  BUT  HIS  ANATOMICAL  TRAITS  WERE  NOT  ENOUGH  FOR  HIM  TO  ADVANCE  INTO  MESOLITHIC  PERIOD  OF  OLD  STONE  AGE .  THIS  SPECIES  LIVED  FOR  A  LONG  TIME  WITHOUT  THE  POTENTIAL  TO  DEVELOP  WRITING  SKILLS .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   SAHELANTHROPUS  TCHADENSIS  NICKNAMED  “TOUMAI.”

NATURAL HISTORY OF HOMINID FAMILY :

Senckenberg Natural History Museum, Frankfurt, Germany prepared replicas of Hominid species using the fossils  discovered at different geographical locations. Sahelanthropus tchadensis lived 6.8 million years ago. It is one of the oldest Hominid specimens, found in 2003 in Djurab desert in Chad, Africa. 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  AUSTRALOPITHECUS  AFARENSIS, AFRICAN  HOMINID  LIVED  3.2  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Australopithecus afarensis discovered in Afar region of Ethiopia, Africa in 1975. This Hominid lived 3.2 million years ago.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMINID  AUSTRALOPITHECUS  AFRICANUS   LIVED  2.5  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

 Australopithecus africanus ,this Hominid replica nicknamed “Mrs Ples” lived 2.5 million years ago. Discovered in 1947, at Sterfontein, South Africa.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  PARANTHROPUS AETHIOPICUS  LIVED  2.5  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Paranthropus aethiopicus lived 2.5 million years ago. Discovered near Lake Turkana in Kenya, Africa, in 1985.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  PARANTHROPUS  BOISEI  LIVED  1.8  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Paranthropus boisei, nicknamed “Zinz” lived 1.8 million years ago. Discovered in 1959 in the Olduvai Gorge of Tanzania, Africa.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  RUDOLFENSIS  LIVED  ABOUT  1.8  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .

Homo Rudolfensis lived about 1.8 million years ago. Discovered in 1972 in Koobi Fora, Kenya, Africa.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  ERGASTER . LIVED  ABOUT  1.5  MILLION  YEARS  AGO.  NICKNAMED  “TURKANA  BOY.”

“TURKANA BOY” Homo ergaster lived about 1.5 million years ago. Initially thought to be an important “missing link” in Human Evolution.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  ERGASTER  IS  RELATED  TO  HOMO  ERECTUS  SPECIES  THAT  LIVED  IN  EASTERN  AND  SOUTHERN  AFRICA  FROM  ABOUT 1.89  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : HOMO ERGASTER IS RELATED TO HOMO ERECTUS SPECIES THAT LIVED IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA FROM ABOUT 1.89 MILLION YEARS AGO .

In Africa, Homo ergaster and Homo erectus are viewed as relatives and thought to be the ancestral forms of later Hominids such as Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo sapiens. But, African Homo erectus is not related to Asian species of Homo erectus like Java Man, and Peking Man.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION : REPLICA  OF  HOMO  ERECTUS(AFRICA), ERECT  MAN,  VERTICAL  GAIT,  LIVED  ABOUT 1.8  TO  0.3  MILLION  YEARS  AGO .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : REPLICA OF HOMO ERECTUS(AFRICA), ERECT MAN, VERTICAL GAIT, LIVED ABOUT 1.8 TO 0.3 MILLION YEARS AGO .

Homo erectus of Africa had prominent brow ridges, projecting face, and a brain volume of about a litre as compared to modern man’s average brain volume of about 1,360 cubic centimetres. Some evolutionary biologists suggested that Homo erectus migrated to Asia, and Southern Europe.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO HEIDELBERGENSIS  ALSO  NAMED  HOMO  RHODESIENSIS  LIVED  ABOUT  500, 000  TO  350, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Homo heidelbergensis or Homo rhodesiensis. This replica is made from the fossils found in Sima de los Huesos, Spain in 1993. He lived about 500,000 to 350,000 years ago. Fossils also found in other places like Italy, France, and Greece. Homo sapiens may have appeared 300,000 years ago. Heidelbergensis could be the ancestor of Neanderthals which is often described as  a subspecies of Sapiens species.

Mendel's Laws-Human Evolution-Homo erectus
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE    VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  REPLICA   OF  HOMO  ERECTUS,  HOMINID  THAT  LIVED  1.5 MILLION  TO  300, 000  YEARS  AGO.

Homo erectus lived 1, 500, 000 to 300, 000 years ago. Homo erectus discovered in Republic of Georgia, China, and Indonesia lived until about 70,000 years ago.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  PILTDOWN  MAN  OF  SUSSEX,  ENGLAND.  HOMINID  SPECIES  OF  THE  PALEOLITHIC  PERIOD  OR  OLD  STONE  AGE .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : PITHECANTHROPUS  ERECTUS ,  HOMO  ERECTUS .  THE  REPLICA  OF   “JAVA  MAN.”

Pithecanthropus, “JAVA MAN” discovered in 1891 could be the first to use fire. He used stone tools and belongs to the Lower Pleistocene Period.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  RHODESIAN  MAN  HAD  A  BRAIN  LARGER  THAN  THAT  OF  MODERN  HUMANS.

It could be of interest to note that Rhodesian Man( Heidelberg Man – Germany) had a large, thick skull, a sloping forehead, a chinless jaw, a brain larger than that of modern  man. The height was about five feet(152 cm) or slightly over.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  ERECTUS  PEKINENSIS . SINANTHROPUS  OR  PEKING  MAN .

Sinanthropus, Homo erectus pekinensis, or PEKING MAN belonged to the Middle Pleistocene.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS  NEANDERTHALENSIS . THIS  REPLICA  IS  NICKNAMED “OLD MAN  OF  LA  CHAPELLE .”  HE  LIVED  56, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Homo sapiens neanderthalensis lived 56,000 years ago. The above is the replica nicknamed “OLD MAN OF LA CHAPELLE” found near La Chapelle aux-Saints in France in 1908.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS  FLORESIENSIS .  NICKNAMED  “HOBBIT. ”  LIVED  ABOUT  18, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Homo sapiens floresiensis, the FLORES MAN discovered in Liang Bua Cave, Flores, Indonesia in 2003. Lived about 18,000 years ago.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS FLORESIENSIS  –  FLORES  MAN  OF  INDONESIA  .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  FLORES  MAN  .  HOMO  SAPIENS  FLORESIENSIS. IT  COULD  BE  OF  INTEREST  TO  NOTE  THAT  FLORES  MAN  WAS ONLY  ABOUT  3  FEET  IN   HEIGHT. Initially thought to be a subspecies of Sapiens and now considered as a separate species. This Hominid species disappeared without any trace for unknown reasons.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS.  LIVED  BETWEEN  100,  000  TO  90,  000  YEARS  AGO  BUT  NOT  A  TRUE  REPRESENTATIVE  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMAN  SPECIES .

The above is a replica of Homo sapiens found in a cave in Israel in 1969. He lived between 100,000 to 90, 000 years ago. It is important to note that it is not representative of true, modern humans called Homo sapiens sapiens.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HOMO  SAPIENS  IDALTU . IDALTU  MAN   LIVED  ABOUT  160, 000  YEARS  AGO .  NOT  A  TRUE  REPRESENTATIVE  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMAN  SPECIES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  : HOMO  SAPIENS  IDALTU  OR  “HERTO  MAN ”  DISCOVERED  IN  1997  AT  HERTO, ETHIOPIA ,  AFRICA  .

Homo sapiens idaltu lived about 160, 000 years ago in Pleistocene Period(Middle Paleolithic), in Ethiopia, Africa, may mark the origin of anatomically modern Homo sapiens, making  distinction between Homo erectus species and Homo sapiens species. They were at the threshold of modern anatomy but not fully modern humans.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :   HOMO  SAPIENS  RED  DEER ,  SOUTHERN  CHINA   LIVED  11, 500  TO  14, 500  YEARS  AGO .

Homo sapiens Red Deer represents “Red Deer Cave” people who lived 11, 500 to 14, 500 years ago in Maludong, Yunnan Province, Southern China. Red Deer Man had high domed braincase, small eyebrow ridges, lower jaw ended in a prominent chin, with a body less muscular than those of earlier Hominids.

THE  ORIGIN  OF  MAN –  MONOGENISM  VS  POLYGENISM :

The term “RACE” is used to describe any of the different varieties or populations of human beings distinguished by physical traits such as hair, eyes, skin color, shape of body, head, facial features, and blood groups. These characteristics are transmitted by heredity but they are highly variable; not every member of a race will exhibit all distinguishing traits. It is apparent to claim that races arose in response to inbreeding. Across  majority of human cultures prevalent in Old World, inbreeding is the established cultural norm. In his ‘Systema Naturae'(1735) Carolus Linnaeus, Swedish botanist, gave a very precise description of man placing him among the Mammals in the order of Primates along the apes and the bat. Linnaeus presented a summary of the diverse varieties of human species. He described varieties such as The Asian, The African, and The European. Linnaeus created a system of classification that depended only on external characteristics to place objects into a rational set of categories. 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HUMAN  VARIETIES  OR  RACES  AROSE  IN  RESPONSE  TO  INBREEDING . CAROLUS  LINNAEUS  DESCRIBED  HUMAN  VARIETIES  SUCH  AS  THE  ASIAN,  THE  AFRICAN,  AND  THE  EUROPEAN .

The French naturalist George Louis Leclerc comte de Buffon in his monumental compendium on Natural History(Histoire Naturelle general et particuliere, 44 volumes, 1749-1804) described man as a zoological species. Buffon determined species not by their physical appearances but by their reproductive history. He held the view that a species is known only through the history of its propagation. Buffon claimed that it is absurd to use the same principles for classifying living and nonliving things. Most important, apes and other animals lack the ability to speak. Buffon saw the rise of human intelligence as a product of development of an articulated language. For animals may lack the ability to attach meaning to their articulated sounds, human language can be used as a basis to define human species and its varieties. Monogenism is the theory that all human beings are descended from a single pair of ancestors. Polygenism is the theory that each race of people has descended from distinct, ultimate ancestors and hence asserts that races are created separately. If anatomically modern humans are products of interbreeding between different Hominid Family members, it would be difficult to suggest that hybridized humans stopped interbreeding and preferred inbreeding to establish the races or varieties that can be observed today. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach(1752-1840), Father of Physical Anthropology known for his work ‘De Generis Humani Varietate Nativa(1775-76), did his research in measurement of craniums. He divided mankind into five great families – Caucasian, Mongolian, Malayan, and Ethiopian. Physical anthropologists initially described three primary divisions of people, 1. Caucasoid, 2. Mongoloid, and 3. Negroid. Thomas Huxley in his paper titled “On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind” (1870) described racial varieties such as 1. Bushmen, 2. Africoid, 3. Negritoes, 4. Melanochroi, 5. Australoids, 6. Xanthochroi, 7. Polynesians, 8. Mongoloids A, B, & C, and 9. Esquimaux. Today, some anthropologists entirely reject the concept of “RACE.” The apparent variations among members of human population have to be explained using Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance which alone can account for breeding behavioral patterns. 

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THE  ORIGIN  AND  THE  EXTINCTION  OF DIFFERENT  MEMBERS  OF  HOMINID  SPECIES  CANNOT  BE  ACCOUNTED  ON  THE  BASIS  OF  NATURAL  CAUSES,  NATURAL  MECHANISMS ,  OR  NATURAL  CONDITIONS  THAT  INFLUENCE  LIFE  AND  DEATH  OF  LIVING  ORGANISMS .MENDEL'S  LAWS

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :

MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE :  JOHANN FRIEDRICH BLUMENBACH(1752-1840), FATHER OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY DIVIDED MANKIND INTO FIVE GREAT FAMILIES  – CAUCASIAN, MONGOLIAN, MALAYAN, AND ETHIOPIAN .

CHARLES DARWIN – DARWINISM –  THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES(1859):

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  CHARLES  DARWIN(1809-1892) .  HIS  IMPORTANT  CONTRIBUTIONS  INCLUDE  THE  ORIGIN  OF  SPECIES(1859),  AND  THE  DESCENT  OF  MAN(1871).

Charles Darwin claimed that new species originate in the course of time. In his view, one species is transformed into another as a product of ‘Natural Selection’ of randomly produced genetic mutations. He formulated an opinion about the factors or circumstances under which some forms of life cease to have the status of species or become extinct. Darwin states, “The Origin of Species, like their extinction, is entirely a natural process which requires no factors other than those at work everyday in the life, death, and breeding of plants and animals.” To make  transition from an old species to a new species, certain intermediate forms become extinct combined with the survival of one or more of the extreme varieties. Darwin further attests, “If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking closely together all the species of the same group, must assuredly have existed, but the very process of natural selection constantly tends as has been so often remarked to exterminate the parent forms and the intermediate links.” As per Darwin’s analysis, anatomically modern human species may have to be viewed as a variety of one of the Hominid species that simply survived while this ancestral species and all other Hominid species perished towards the end of Pleistocene(Ice Age).

Darwin’s theory of ‘The Origin of Species’ depends on causes that can be divided into two sets of factors:

1. Mechanism of Survival that includes causes or factors which determine the extinction or survival of organisms, and with their survival, their opportunities for mating and reproduction, and 

2. Mechanism of Heredity that includes causes or factors which determine transmission of characteristics from one generation to another and  variation of offspring from their ancestors and from each other.

In Darwin’s estimate, the factors of ‘Natural Selection’ operate on genetic variations that cause a range of differences within a group. At the same time it may be noted that the variations generated in the breeding process are never enough to change the basic criteria applied in  identification of any given species. For  perpetuation of group characteristics in organisms which manage to survive and reproduce,  inheritance of ancestral traits is of utmost importance. Darwin’s view on blending of hereditary factors is not supported by Mendel’s classic experiments in Hybridization. According to Mendel, inheritance is particulate. Distinct genetic factors combine to produce a certain somatic result without losing their separate identities. They can therefore be reassorted and enter into new genetic combinations in the next generation. If anatomically modern human species appeared suddenly due to abrupt mutations in a single generation of as yet unknown Hominid species, it will not validate Darwin’s view that new forms of life arise gradually as the result of a continuous accumulation of slight and imperceptible variations. According to Darwin, environment acts as a selective agency and it acts upon variations produced entirely by causes operating in the breeding process. During the period of the Great Ice Age, Pleistocene Series or Epoch, 1.8 million to 10, 000 years ago, 28 percent of Earth’s land area was covered by ice. Continental glaciers covered much of N. North America and NW Europe. Holocene Epoch or Series that began 10, 000 years ago witnessed a dramatic change in land area that is covered by ice. Now, about 10 percent of land area is covered by ice and continental glaciers are restricted to Antarctica and Greenland. In other words, areas of Earth’s surface have become more hospitable for all kinds of Hominid population. There was no geographical catastrophe and there was no environmental change of cataclysmic proportion with serious consequences for the survival of any variety of Hominid species. To adapt to changed environment was easy, food supply became abundant and there is nothing to suggest that Hominid Family members were preying upon one another in a bitter struggle of existence. 

COMPARATIVE ANATOMY  WILL  DEMOLISH  DARWINISM :

According to Geologic Time Chart which records the physical nature and history of planet Earth, we are living in the Cenozoic Era the beginning of which was marked by the K-T extinction. Most of the major and minor extinction events were the result of causes that are not natural to Earth or terrestrial factors. The exposure of living things to consequences such as collisions with asteroids, comets, or exposure to ionizing radiation  do not belong to a category of circumstances that can be called ‘natural’. I would prefer to use the term ‘supernatural’ to describe extinction events initiated by extraterrestrial factors. The origin, the beginning, appearance of anatomically modern man during Holocene Epoch or Series has no natural cause. No natural condition, no natural factor, no natural mechanism, no natural process and no natural event can alter the shape and size of man’s cranium. Inbreeding, or interbreeding do not change genes, the Units of Inheritance. The sudden, and abrupt change in man’s form and morphological appearance is not due to imperceptible changes and genetic variations that accumulated over a prolonged period of time. If skeletal structures undergo a change due to mutations caused by external factors like climate, physical activity, diet, and opportunities for breeding or reproductive behavior, the skeletal structures of all members of the diverse Hominid Family living at that time have to register a change that affects the germ cells and gets propagated to their offspring as stated by Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance. If a natural condition, a natural factor, or a natural cause can account for a mutation in anatomically modern human, I would like to examine the evidence for its operation in other members of Hominid Family such as Neanderthal who lived at the same time.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  LIVING  FORMS  EMERGED  AND  DIVERSIFIED  IN  SUDDEN  SPURTS  AND  WERE  ELIMINATED  ABRUPTLY  IN  MAJOR  AND  MINOR  EXTINCTION  EVENTS  DURING  GEOLOGIC  PERIOD .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  THERE  IS  NO  NATURAL  PROCESS  OF  SEXUAL  REPRODUCTION  EITHER  INBREEDING  OR  INTERBREEDING  THAT  CAN  TRANSFORM  ANATOMICAL  TRAITS  OF  NEANDERTHAL  INTO  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  HUMANS .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  CRO-MAGNON  SKULL  .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN EVOLUTION : CRO-MAGNON SKULL .  CRO-MAGNON  MAN  IS  NOT  CONSIDERED  AS  A  SEPARATE  SPECIES  OR  SUBSPECIES  . LIVED  40, 000  TO  35, 000  YEARS  AGO .

Cro-Magnon Man lived 40, 000 to 35, 000 years ago. He was discovered in southwestern France in 1868. His height was about 6 feet(180 Cms), had high forehead, short and wide face, developed prominent chin, and large brain. His brain capacity of 1600 cubic centimetres is larger than the average 1,360 cubic centimetres for anatomically modern human species.  He belonged to upper paleolithic culture of Old Stone Age whereas anatomically modern human species had established its presence in the Mesolithic Period or Middle Stone Age at the end of the last glacial era about 10, 000 years ago. Anatomically modern human species developed a culture that included gradual domestication of plants and animals, formation of settled communities, use of the bow, development of delicate stone ‘Microliths’, and pottery.

THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN SPECIES – THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN LANGUAGE:

In my view, Human Speech(spoken and written) is the criteria by which the difference between anatomically modern man and other members of Hominid Family is made. Human Language is one of the principal characteristics of the specifically human world. Language is the peculiar possession of human beings. While Neanderthal, and Cro-Magnon Man share certain anatomical and physiological traits possessed by the zoological species identified as human beings, they were not true representatives of Homo sapiens sapiens. In the use of ‘Precision Grip’, both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon Man fall short of the status called ‘human’. Paleolithic art, paintings, and drawings are not the same as human writing.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  CRO-MAGNON  MAN  AND  PRECISION  GRIP .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : CRO-MAGNON MAN AND PRECISION GRIP . PALEOLITHIC  ART  IS  NOT  EQUIVALENT  TO  HUMAN  ARTISTIC  EXPRESSION .  DRAWINGS  AND  PAINTINGS  ARE  NOT  THE  SAME  AS  HUMAN  WRITING .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  THE  ANATOMICAL  STRUCTURES  INVOLVED  IN  PRECISION  GRIP .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : THE ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES INVOLVED IN PRECISION GRIP .  HOMINIDS  LIKE  NEANDERTHAL  HAD  ANATOMICAL  STRUCTURES  THAT  GIVE  FUNCTIONAL  ABILITIES  CALLED 1. PRESSURE  GRIP,  AND  2.  PRECISION  GRIP .  NEUROMUSCULAR  COORDINATION  BETWEEN  BRAIN  AND  FINGERS  CONTRIBUTES  TO  A  CREATIVE  ABILITY  CALLED  WRITING .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION .  PALEOLITHIC  ART  .  CAVE  PAINTINGS  IN  N  SPAIN  AND  SW  FRANCE  . c. 14,000- c. 13,500 B.C.  LASCAUX  CAVE  PAINTINGS  -  THE  AURIGNACIO - PERIGORDIAN  PERIOD .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION . PALEOLITHIC ART . CAVE PAINTINGS IN N SPAIN AND SW FRANCE . c. 14,000- c. 13,500 B.C. LASCAUX CAVE PAINTINGS – THE AURIGNACIO – PERIGORDIAN PERIOD .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  PALEOLITHIC  ART .  MURALS  AT  ROUFFIGNAC,  NIAUX,  AND  CAVE  PAINTINGS  OF  ALTAMIRA ,  SPAIN . c. 14,000 -c. 9500 B.C. THE  SOLUTREO - MAGDALENIAN  PERIOD  .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : PALEOLITHIC ART . MURALS AT ROUFFIGNAC, NIAUX, AND CAVE PAINTINGS OF ALTAMIRA , SPAIN . c. 14,000 – c. 9500 B.C. THE SOLUTREO – MAGDALENIAN PERIOD .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  KUNDA  TOOLS ,  MICROLITHS, c. 10,000 -c.8000 B.C. MESOLITHIC  PERIOD  OR  MIDDLE  STONE  AGE .  THE  BEGINNING  OF  ANATOMICALLY  MODERN  MAN .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : KUNDA TOOLS , MICROLITHS, c. 10,000 -c.8000 B.C. MESOLITHIC PERIOD OR MIDDLE STONE AGE . THE BEGINNING OF ANATOMICALLY MODERN MAN . HUMANS  ARE  KNOWN  BY  THEIR  CULTURE .

The reproductive history of modern man does not support Darwinism and its assumptions about breeding . To identify and to recognize man as a zoological species, the yardstick has to be defined as morphological appearances are inadequate. I coined the phrase ‘Whole Linguistics’ to use Human Language as the chief characteristic of human species. Whole Linguistics involves three entities, namely 1. A Language User, 2. A Language Interpreter and 3. A Language Creator. It introduces a concept about the Creative Beginning of Man and his Language.

HUMAN IDENTITY, INDIVIDUALITY, AND THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX:

All said and done, man has no choice about the nature of his physical existence in natural world. Each man without any choice exists as an Individual with Individuality. Man deploys protein molecules called antigens to identify ‘self’ and ‘non-self’. The antigens causing the immune response that results in  rejection of a tissue allograft are known as ‘Major Histocompatibility Antigens'(HLA). In man, the Major Histocompatibility Complex(MHC) is the HLA cluster on Chromosome 6. As MHC antigens were originally described on human Leukocytes(White Blood Cells), they are still referred to as Human leukocyte Antigens(HLA). The role of MHC is not limited to transplantation rejection as the proteins encoded in this region are involved in many aspects of immunological recognition and immunity  response. The HLA antigens are remarkable for the extensive degree of genetic polymorphism which makes  variability between individuals very great . Even among members of human population, most unrelated persons possess different HLA . This antigenic specificity established at molecular level is the evidence for a creative process, a creative mechanism, and a creative principle which determines the Subjective and Objective Physical Reality of Man’s Status in Nature.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  HUMAN  LEUKOCYTE  ANTIGEN .  MAN  DEPLOYS  UNIQUE  PROTEIN  MOLECULES  TO  IDENTIFY  SELF  AND  NON-SELF .  HUMAN  EXISTENCE  AND  HUMAN  IDENTITY  IS  DEFINED  BY  MOLECULES .
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : HUMAN LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN . MAN DEPLOYS UNIQUE PROTEIN MOLECULES TO IDENTIFY SELF AND NON-SELF . HUMAN EXISTENCE AND HUMAN IDENTITY IS DEFINED BY MOLECULES .

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION :  MAN  IS  ABLE  TO  EXIST  IN  NATURE  FOR  HE  IS  ABLE  TO  DEFEND  HIS  EXISTENCE  BY  DEPLOYING  MOLECULES  THAT  CAN  MAKE  THE  RECOGNITION  AND  DISTINCTION  BETWEEN  SELF  AND  NON-SELF.
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE VS HUMAN EVOLUTION : MAN IS ABLE TO EXIST IN NATURE FOR HE IS ABLE TO DEFEND HIS EXISTENCE BY DEPLOYING MOLECULES THAT CAN MAKE THE RECOGNITION AND DISTINCTION BETWEEN SELF AND NON-SELF.

THE PROOF OF PUDDING IS IN THE EATING :

Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle introduced  notion of Form, Nature, or Essence. Plants and animals are derived from seeds that already contain within them the Form, Nature, or Essence of the species from which they were derived and into which they would subsequently develop. To exist as a thing of a given kind, there could be an innate tendency to strive to develop into a perfect example of itself to fulfill its nature and to realize its full potential. In a purposive or teological view of the natural world, each natural thing by its intrinsic nature strives to realize its own ideal Form or Essence. Darwinism proposes a view that explains  development of a natural thing in a “mechanistic” and nonpurposive manner. If a new form of life is a product of unguided, random, and purposeless genetic mutations, it will be hard to explain and account for its Form, Nature, and Essence.

MENDEL'S  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  :
MENDEL’S LAWS OF INHERITANCE   VS  HUMAN  EVOLUTION  :  GREGOR  MENDEL  CONDUCTED  EXPERIMENTS  ON  GARDEN  PEA(PISUM  SATIVUM)  PLANTS  TO  DISCOVER  THE   NATURAL  LAWS  OF  INHERITANCE  AND  VARIATION  .  I  DISCOVER   THE  ‘MAGIC  OF  CREATION’  BY   SIMPLY   TASTING   A  FEW   SWEET   PEAS  .

All living things define their existence using about 20 Amino Acids. Protein Synthesis involves unique and creative ways of arranging these amino acids into chains called polypeptides. Protein Synthesis is a creative process for the product created by one species has ability to impart unique sensory experience in an unrelated species.  Man can distinguish plant and animal proteins by using his organs of sense perception. The creative aspect of protein synthesis is in the taste, smell, flavor, color, texture, and palatability of plant and animal proteins. Man further improves palatability of proteins he consumes by refining his culinary skills.To refute the concept called ‘DARWINISM’, the Proof or Verification is in Eating Sweet Garden Peas and recognizing them from their color, taste, smell, flavor, texture, and palatability. Plants and animals do not use sensory functions like vision, olfaction, and taste in protein synthesis. The sensory experience of man is possible for living things exist with an innate tendency to express their Form, Nature, and Essence. I am asking my readers to contemplate upon supernatural circumstances that may define Form, Nature, and Essence of living things that are not explained by a study of their genes and genetic code.

Related Articles:

1SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – MAN IS A SPIRITUAL BEING

2. SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE HUMAN SPECIES

3. SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN SPECIES

 

 

WHOLE SPIRITUALITY – THE ART OF KNOWING

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING :

When I write about Man as a Spiritual Being, the concern is not about glorifying people as saints. The issue is about man’s true or real nature. My theory of Spirituality is about “The Art of Knowing” that can provide tools to all people to know themselves in an objective manner. This is a simple challenge that can be accomplished without forcing people to attend Church or any other place of worship. The Art of Knowing does not involve what most people tend to recognize as spiritual practices such as Prayer, Meditation, Yoga, or Mysticism. The Art of Knowing simply involves training people to know what they know about others or about themselves. It must be noted that Life is essentially a state, a condition, or an act of knowing.

WHOLE INTUITION  VS  WHOLE MYSTICISM :

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - THE ART OF KNOWING : HENRI BERGSON(1859 - 1941), FRENCH PHILOSOPHER, WAS AWARDED THE 1927 NOBEL PRIZE IN LITERATURE. HE DESCRIBED INTUITION AS THE HIGHEST FORM OF KNOWING.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : HENRI BERGSON(1859 – 1941), FRENCH PHILOSOPHER, WAS AWARDED THE 1927 NOBEL PRIZE IN LITERATURE .  HE DESCRIBED INTUITION AS THE HIGHEST FORM OF KNOWING.

Henri Bergson, French philosopher, Professor at the College de France, was awarded the 1927 Nobel Prize in Literature. His famous works include Time and Free Will(1889) and The Creative Mind(1934). Bergson’s dualistic philosophy holds that the world contains two opposing tendencies, the life force and the resistance of matter against that life force. The individual knows matter through intellect but through intuition perceives the life force and the reality of time, which is not a unit of measurement but duration in terms of life experience. Bergson considered intuition to be the highest state of human knowing and  held that mysticism is the perfection of intuition. Bergson emphasized the value of intuition in scientific thinking and argued that reality is beyond rational understanding. He formulated a Theory of Knowledge in which intuition plays a central role. He contended that the expansive and creative thrust of Life explained by Darwinian mechanism. Bergson claimed that ‘Evolution’ is creative and is not based upon mechanistic principles. For similar reasons, I shared my arguments to oppose Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. I formulated my theory of ‘The Law of Creation and Individuality’ for all known living things primarily exist as Individuals with Individuality and they have no choice other than that of existing as Individuals. In this article, I would like to recognize knowing as a basic cognitive function and this biological characteristic can be attributed to a popular term called ‘Spirit’ or ‘Soul’. In this context, I would like to interpret Bergson’s views about Knowing, Intuition, Mysticism, and the Reality of Time.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE -  THE ART OF KNOWING : HOW DO PLANTS KNOW WHAT THEY KNOW ???  PLANTS KNOW ABOUT LIGHT, THE LENGTH OF DAY, AND THE DURATION OF DARKNESS CALLED NIGHT. THERE IS NO "INTELLECT" INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS OF KNOWING. THE ABILITY OF KNOWING LIGHT OR PHOTORECEPTION IS EXPLAINED BY PHOTOCHEMISTRY.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : HOW DO PLANTS KNOW WHAT THEY KNOW ??? PLANTS KNOW ABOUT LIGHT, THE LENGTH OF DAY, AND THE DURATION OF DARKNESS CALLED NIGHT. THERE IS NO “INTELLECT” INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS OF KNOWING. THE ABILITY OF KNOWING LIGHT OR PHOTORECEPTION IS EXPLAINED BY PHOTOCHEMISTRY.

Intuition provides immediate understanding and it describes the ability to perceive or know things without conscious reasoning. Intuition is about direct knowing or learning of something without using the faculties of mind such as Intellect. The doctrine of Intuitionism claims that things and principles are truly apprehended by Intuition. The doctrine called Ethics describes that fundamental moral principles or the rightness of acts is apprehended by Intuition. In Biology, I would like to use the term Intuition to things apprehended by ‘Innate Knowledge’, the Knowledge that is inherent and not acquired, the Knowledge that is implanted in the Substance or Material called Living Matter. Plants know Light not because of intellectual ability but on account of an innate ability or intuitive power.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - THE ART OF KNOWING : AT A FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL, LIFE AND LIVING IS ABOUT KNOWING MATTER AS SELF OR NON-SELF. THIS IDENTIFICATION OF MATTER INVOLVES THE ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE MOLECULES OF MATTER . TO LEARN THE ART OF KNOWING, MAN HAS TO KNOW ABOUT THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR EXISTENCE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : AT A FUNDAMENTAL LEVEL, LIFE AND LIVING IS ABOUT KNOWING MATTER AS SELF OR NON-SELF. THIS IDENTIFICATION OF MATTER INVOLVES THE ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE MOLECULES OF MATTER . TO LEARN THE ART OF KNOWING, MAN HAS TO KNOW ABOUT THE MOLECULAR BASIS FOR EXISTENCE .

To learn the Art of Knowing, man has to know that the physiological basis for existence is dependent upon Innate Knowledge with which the human organism recognizes matter( such as molecules of Oxygen, or energy-yielding molecules of food substances) and further exploits matter and energy to support and maintain its living functions. To the same extent, the human organism defends its own existence by recognizing the molecules as Self or Non-Self. The immune defense mechanisms that the human body uses to recognize viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and other foreign antigens involve the recognition of molecules.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - THE ART OF KNOWING : WHAT IS THE MYSTERY OF LIFE ??? CAN MYSTICISM HELP TO KNOW THE HIDDEN TRUTHS ABOUT LIFE ??? WHAT IS THE MYSTICAL INFLUENCE OF TIME THAT DRIVES THE AGING PHENOMENON ???
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : WHAT IS THE MYSTERY OF LIFE ??? CAN MYSTICISM HELP TO KNOW THE HIDDEN TRUTHS ABOUT LIFE ??? WHAT IS THE MYSTICAL INFLUENCE OF TIME THAT DRIVES THE AGING PHENOMENON ???

What is the Mystery of Life ??? Can Mysticism help to know the hidden truths about Life ???  Mysticism is the doctrine about knowing reality through intense contemplation and other secret practices that involve mental concentration. Mysticism is found in several religions of the world. The criteria and conditions for mystical experience vary depending on the cultural traditions, but there are three common attributes of Mysticism : 1. The experience is immediate and overwhelming, divorced from the common experience of reality, 2. The experience or the knowledge imparted by it is self-authenticating, without need of further evidence or justification, and 3. The experience is ineffable, its essence incapable of being expressed or understood outside the experience itself. The focus of Mysticism is not about the physical reality called existence but it is about a direct and immediate experience of the sacred, or the knowledge derived from such an experience. Mysticism is about the practices of those who are initiated into the mysteries, the practice of putting oneself into direct relation with God, the Absolute or any Unifying Principle of Life.  Mystics believe that it is possible to achieve communion with God through their mystic practices. There are two general tendencies in the practice of Mysticism; 1. To regard God as outside the ‘Soul’ which rises to God by successive stages, and 2. To regard God as dwelling within the ‘Soul’ to be found by delving deeper into one’s own reality. Mysticism is extended to Magic, Occultism, and the Esoteric. Magic may involve the use of charms, spells, and rituals in seeking or pretending to cause or control events or govern certain natural and supernatural forces. Occultism is about hidden, concealed, and secret information that could be beyond human understanding. The Esoteric is about confidential, private, or withheld information that is intended for or understood by only a chosen few and as such the knowledge or information is beyond the understanding of most people. The rituals of Mysticism include meditation, prayer, and a variety of ascetic disciplines. If Mysticism is about Knowing the Secrets of Life, it does not demand the learning of Human Anatomy or Human Physiology, or any of the principles of Biology.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - THE ART OF KNOWING : HOW DOES THE HUMAN ORGANISM KNOWS ABOUT ITS OWN LIFETIME ??? THE AGING PHENOMENON IS RELATED TO MAN'S PERCEPTION OF TIME. HOW IS TIME CONTROLLING OR OPERATING LIFE EXPERIENCE ???
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : HOW DOES THE HUMAN ORGANISM KNOWS ABOUT ITS OWN LIFETIME ??? THE AGING PHENOMENON IS RELATED TO MAN’S PERCEPTION OF TIME. HOW IS TIME CONTROLLING OR OPERATING LIFE EXPERIENCE ???

 Bergson claimed that the Reality of Time is not a Unit of Measurement but duration in terms of life experience. How does the human organism knows about its own lifetime??? The human organism experiences the Aging Phenomenon which is related to man’s perception of Time. How is Time controlling or operating life experience ???  The physical reality called existence is controlled, is operated, or is directly influenced by events in man’s external environment, and the most important change in the environment is the alternating periods of light and darkness called Day and Night.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - THE ART OF KNOWING : THE HUMAN ORGANISM RUNS ITS LIVING FUNCTIONS AS IF OPERATED BY A PRECISE TIMEKEEPING DEVICE OR BIOLOGICAL CLOCK. MAN'S EXPERIENCE OF TIME IS RELATED TO SUN'S APPARENT MOTIONS IN THE SKY. MAN KNOWS THE REALITY OF TIME BECAUSE OF AN ILLUSION THAT CAUSES DAY AND NIGHT GIVING MAN THE PERCEPTION OF SUN'S APPARENT MOTION WHILE CONCEALING THE REALITY OF SUN'S MOTION IN THE MILKY WAY GALAXY.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : THE HUMAN ORGANISM RUNS ITS LIVING FUNCTIONS AS IF OPERATED BY A PRECISE TIMEKEEPING DEVICE OR BIOLOGICAL CLOCK. MAN’S EXPERIENCE OF TIME IS RELATED TO SUN’S APPARENT MOTIONS IN THE SKY. MAN KNOWS THE REALITY OF TIME BECAUSE OF AN ILLUSION THAT CAUSES DAY AND NIGHT GIVING MAN THE PERCEPTION OF SUN’S APPARENT MOTION WHILE CONCEALING THE REALITY OF SUN’S MOTION IN THE MILKY WAY GALAXY.

Bergson may have used the term life force to describe the vital, animating Principle called Spirit or Soul. In my view, Soul is an animating Principle for it is fundamentally related to the functional ability called Knowing. Soul is a vital Principle for it is fundamentally related to the functional ability called Nutrition, the power of a living organism to exploit matter found in its external environment. The functional attributes of Soul are related to Knowledge that is inherent or Innate and not acquired as learned experience. Soul describes man’s intuitive ability to know the fact of his own existence in a given environment and to maintain that existence while experiencing the aging process under the external influence called Time.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - THE ART OF KNOWING : BLAISE PASCAL(1623 - 1662), FRENCH SCIENTIST AND RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHER CLAIMED THAT MAN IS INFINITELY REMOVED FROM COMPREHENDING THE EXTREMES ; THE END OF THINGS AND THEIR BEGINNINGS ARE HIDDEN.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : BLAISE PASCAL(1623 – 1662), FRENCH SCIENTIST AND RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHER CLAIMED THAT MAN IS INFINITELY REMOVED FROM COMPREHENDING THE EXTREMES ; THE END OF THINGS AND THEIR BEGINNINGS ARE HIDDEN .

While writing about The Art of Knowing, I would like to remind my readers that certain things could be hidden from the human perception and man has no ability to know things even if he knows the reality of those things. Blaise Pascal, the French scientist who founded the modern Theory of Probability had claimed : “Man is a nothing in comparison with the Infinite, an All in comparison with the Nothing, a mean between Nothing and Everything. Since he is infinitely removed from comprehending the extremes, the end of things and their beginnings are hopelessly hidden from him in an impenetrable secret; he is equally incapable of seeing the Nothing from which he was made, and the Infinite in which he swallowed up.”

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - THE ART OF KNOWING : WHICH HAS COME FIRST ??? THE CHICK OR THE EGG ??? SPIRITUALITY IS NOT ABOUT KNOWING THE BEGINNING OR THE ENDING OF THINGS. IT IS ABOUT THINGS THAT EXIST IN THE PRESENT.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – THE ART OF KNOWING : WHICH HAS COME FIRST ??? THE CHICK OR THE EGG ??? SPIRITUALITY IS NOT ABOUT KNOWING THE BEGINNING OR THE ENDING OF THINGS. IT IS ABOUT THINGS THAT EXIST IN THE PRESENT.

Which came first, the Chick or the Egg ??? Spirituality Science is not about knowing the Beginning or the Ending of things. Spirituality is about things that exist in the ‘Present’. The Physical Reality of Man’s Subjective and Objective experience of his lifetime is a functional attribute of Soul or Spirit which gives Man the cognitive ability called Knowing . If Devotion is used as a scientific method of Inquiry, ‘The Art of Knowing’ is about Knowing Man as a Spiritual Being.

Related Articles:

SPIRITUALISM – SELF AND THE KNOWING-SELF

WHAT IS LIFE ? LIFE IS KNOWLEDGE IN ACTION

WHOLE SPIRITUALITY – WHOLE ILLUMINATION

 

 

WHOLE SPIRITUALITY- AHAM BRAHMASMI

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY:

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : THIS ARTICLE IS DEDICATED TO THIS INDIAN LADY WHO SYMBOLIZES THE PRINCIPLE OF UNITY THAT APPEARS AS THE VERBAL SOUND OR SHABDA CALLED "ASMI" WHICH MEANS  ALWAYS PRESENT, OR EVER-EXISTING.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : THIS ARTICLE IS DEDICATED TO THIS INDIAN LADY WHO SYMBOLIZES THE PRINCIPLE OF UNITY THAT APPEARS AS THE VERBAL SOUND OR “SHABDA”CALLED “ASMI” WHICH MEANS ALWAYS PRESENT, OR EVER-EXISTING.

This article is dedicated to this Indian Lady who symbolizes the Principle of Unity that appears as the verbal Sound or “SHABDA” called “ASMI” which means always present or ever-existing.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : ON THIS MOST AUSPICIOUS DAY, DECEMBER 05, 2014, INDIANS ARE CELEBRATING THE FESTIVAL OF "KARTHIGAI DEEPAM" . "KARTHIKAI DEEPAM" OR 'KARTIKA DEEPAM'. SHOULD MAN SEARCH INWARDS OR SEARCH OUTWARDS TO FIND GOD??? I CAN SEARCH IF MY EXISTENCE IS SUPPORTED. FOR MY EXISTENCE, I DEPEND UPON THE ABILITY OF PLANTS CALLED PHOTORECEPTION.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : ON THIS MOST AUSPICIOUS DAY, DECEMBER 05, 2014, INDIANS ARE CELEBRATING THE FESTIVAL OF “KARTHIGAI DEEPAM” . “KARTHIKAI DEEPAM” OR ‘KARTIKA DEEPAM’. SHOULD MAN SEARCH INWARDS OR SEARCH OUTWARDS TO FIND GOD??? I CAN SEARCH IF MY EXISTENCE IS SUPPORTED. FOR MY EXISTENCE, I DEPEND UPON THE ABILITY OF PLANTS CALLED PHOTORECEPTION.

Should man search inwards or search outwards to find God??? I can search, if and only if my existence is supported. For my existence, I depend upon the ability of plants called Photoreception. If God is Light, the Light that sustains Life is not about the human ability of sensory perception called Vision.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE THOUGHTS OF VARIOUS INDIAN THINKERS HAVE TO BE CAREFULLY INTERPRETED. EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS IS NOT EXACTLY THE SAME OR IDENTICAL TO BRAHMAN. IT WILL BE CORRECT TO INTERPRET THE ABOVE STATEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF UNITY BETWEEN ORDERS LIKE GOD, ENERGY, MATTER, AND LIVING THINGS. THIS UNITY OR EIKYATA IS THE FUNDAMENTAL BASIS FOR EXISTENCE AND IS CALLED "ASMI" TO DESCRIBE BRAHMAN AS THE 'CAUSE' OF EXISTENCE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE THOUGHTS OF VARIOUS INDIAN THINKERS HAVE TO BE CAREFULLY INTERPRETED. EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS IS NOT EXACTLY THE SAME OR IDENTICAL TO BRAHMAN. IT WILL BE CORRECT TO INTERPRET THE ABOVE STATEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF UNITY BETWEEN ORDERS LIKE GOD, ENERGY, MATTER, AND LIVING THINGS. THIS UNITY OR EIKYATA IS THE FUNDAMENTAL BASIS FOR EXISTENCE AND IS CALLED “ASMI” TO DESCRIBE BRAHMAN AS THE ‘CAUSE’ OF EXISTENCE.

I am asking my readers, specially those who study Indian Schools of Thought, to recognize the need for careful interpretation of the insights provided by Indian thinkers. The concern is not about duality and differentiation. The problem is not that of establishing the exact  Identity between God and orders like Matter, Energy, Time, Space, Man, and Living Entities. The concern is about the fact of existence. Everything that exists is not exactly the same or identical to Brahman. It may be correct to state that everything finds its existence because of Unity or “EIKYATA”, the fundamental basis for existence and this Unity becomes the verbal Sound known as “ASMI” which describes BRAHMAN as the Cause of all that exists.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : IN THIS PRESENTATION I WOULD LIKE TO STRESS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE VERBAL SOUND CALLED "ASMI" THAT DESCRIBES THE UNITY BETWEEN GOD AND MAN. HENCE THE ISSUE IS NOT THAT OF IDENTITY  OR DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN MAN AND GOD.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : IN THIS PRESENTATION I WOULD LIKE TO STRESS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE VERBAL SOUND CALLED “ASMI” THAT DESCRIBES THE UNITY BETWEEN GOD AND MAN. HENCE THE ISSUE IS NOT THAT OF IDENTITY OR DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN MAN AND GOD.

It is indeed true that man’s existence on planet Earth could be short-lived, ephemeral, transitory, and may even last only one day. Man is an organism with a brief life cycle. But, the Physical Reality of this existence demands the Unity described by the verbal Sound called “ASMI” which means ‘always present’, or ‘ever-existing’. The Physical Dimension of human life and human existence cannot be rejected as unreal and it is not an illusion for there are always both Subjective and Objective criteria to verify and to validate the physical form and physical appearance that is associated with existence. Man’s true or real Essence called Self or ATMAN cannot manifest itself in the physical world without Unity between the mortal nature of man’s conditioned  existence and the eternal nature of Brahman which is always present, or ever-existing.

SPIRITUALITY SELF - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE SPIRIT, SOUL, OR ATMAN HAS TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE VITAL, ANIMATING PRINCIPLE THAT IS PRIMARILY INVOLVED IN ESTABLISHING MAN'S PHYSICAL EXISTENCE IN THE WORLD AND THE ISSUE IS NOT ABOUT ITS EXISTENCE WHEN SEPARATED FROM HUMAN BODY.
SPIRITUALITY SELF – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE SPIRIT, SOUL, OR ATMAN HAS TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE VITAL, ANIMATING PRINCIPLE THAT IS PRIMARILY INVOLVED IN ESTABLISHING MAN’S PHYSICAL EXISTENCE IN THE WORLD AND THE ISSUE IS NOT ABOUT ITS EXISTENCE WHEN SEPARATED FROM HUMAN BODY.

I use the word Spirit, Soul, or ATMAN to describe the Vital, Animating Principle that is involved in establishing man’s physical existence in the world. The issue is not about Soul or ATMAN’s existence when separated from its human body. The human form, the human appearance, and the human existence at any given age or condition is always dependent upon the Unity between Body and Soul.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE EXISTENCE OF SELF OR ATMAN REPRESENTS THE CONDITION CALLED "ASMI" THE VERBAL SOUND FOR UNITY BETWEEN BRAHMAN, ATMAN, AND MAN.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE EXISTENCE OF SELF OR ATMAN REPRESENTS THE CONDITION CALLED “ASMI” THE VERBAL SOUND FOR UNITY BETWEEN BRAHMAN, ATMAN, AND MAN.

It should not be of any surprise to note that ATMAN could be Unborn, Eternal, Everlasting, Immortal, and Imperishable. Those are the fundamental attributes of all Physical Matter that exists in this Universe. Matter is made up of Chemical Elements and the Fundamental Laws of Conservation state that Matter is neither created, nor destroyed.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF UNITY AND UNIFYING PRINCIPLE, WE NEED NOT IGNORE THE BEAUTIFUL REALITY THAT MANIFESTS ITSELF IN NUMEROUS, COUNTLESS FORMS AND SHAPES.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF UNITY AND UNIFYING PRINCIPLE, WE NEED NOT IGNORE THE BEAUTIFUL REALITY THAT MANIFESTS ITSELF IN NUMEROUS, COUNTLESS FORMS AND SHAPES. THERE ARE NO IDENTICAL LIVING THINGS. EVERY LIVING THING, EVERY MEMBER OF ALL KNOWN LIVING SPECIES SIMPLY EXIST AS INDIVIDUALS WITH INDIVIDUALITY AND THERE IS NO SECOND ONE OR A COPY, A TRUE REPLICA  OF THE ORIGINAL FORM.

To understand the concept of Unity and the Unifying Principle, we need not ignore the beautiful Reality that manifests itself in numerous, countless forms and shapes. There are no identical living things. Every living thing, every member of all known living species simply exist as Individuals with Individuality. The Statement about The Atman, “The One Without Second” is a mere reflection of the Reality that Science can experimentally verify. To know about Life, we have to know about each individual, living thing.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : GOD IS DESCRIBED AS THE CREATOR, THE ARTIST, THE DESIGNER, AND THE ARCHITECT OF THE UNIVERSE. EVERY CREATED OBJECT EXISTS AS AN ORIGINAL, UNIQUE, DISTINCT, AND ONE OF ITS OWN KIND OF OBJECT. AND YET THIS DIFFERENTIATION IS DEPENDENT UPON A MATERIAL SUBSTANCE AND NATURE THAT IS SHARED BY ALL CREATED OBJECTS.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : GOD IS DESCRIBED AS THE CREATOR, THE ARTIST, THE DESIGNER, AND THE ARCHITECT OF THE UNIVERSE. EVERY CREATED OBJECT EXISTS AS AN ORIGINAL, UNIQUE, DISTINCT, AND ONE OF ITS OWN KIND OF OBJECT. AND YET THIS DIFFERENTIATION IS DEPENDENT UPON A MATERIAL SUBSTANCE AND NATURE THAT IS SHARED BY ALL CREATED OBJECTS.

Brahman or God is variously described as the Creator, the Artist, the Designer, and the Architect of the Universe. Every created object exists as an original, unique, distinct, and one of its own kind of object. For the Architect uses Imagination to draw a Plan or Design, there is Unity while there is Diversity, Variation, and Differentiation of various parts that come together in Harmony to give the Whole Experience.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE MORTALITY OF ALL LIVING THINGS RELATES TO THEIR INDIVIDUALISTIC IDENTITIES. DEATH INVOLVES THE SPECIFIC FORM AND ITS APPEARANCE AND NOT THE SUBSTANCE AND THE CHEMICAL ELEMENTS THAT CONSTITUTE PHYSICAL MATTER.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE MORTALITY OF ALL LIVING THINGS RELATES TO THEIR INDIVIDUALISTIC IDENTITIES. DEATH INVOLVES THE SPECIFIC FORM AND ITS APPEARANCE AND NOT THE SUBSTANCE AND THE CHEMICAL ELEMENTS THAT CONSTITUTE PHYSICAL MATTER.

The discussion about Life and Death need not involve the separation of human body into separate or distinct parts like the Body, and Soul. At no time, the Body exists without its operating Principle called Soul, or ATMAN. The phenomenon of Death involves the physical form and appearance and not that of the Substance and the Chemical Elements that constitute the Living Things.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO SPEAK OF ABSOLUTE, TOTAL IDENTITY BETWEEN GOD AND MAN FOR LORD KRISHNA IN THIS STATEMENT CLAIMS THAT HE IS THE CAUSE OF ALL THINGS, AND ALL THINGS EXIST IN HIM, WHILE HE NEED NOT DWELL IN THEM, OR CAN BE DETACHED FROM THEM.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO SPEAK OF ABSOLUTE, TOTAL IDENTITY BETWEEN GOD AND MAN FOR LORD KRISHNA IN THIS STATEMENT CLAIMS THAT HE IS THE CAUSE OF ALL THINGS, AND ALL THINGS EXIST IN HIM, WHILE HE NEED NOT DWELL IN THEM, OR CAN BE DETACHED FROM THEM.

Man’s mortal or conditioned existence demands the operation of Unity or Unifying Principle that allows man and other living entities to exist in relationship with God. At the same time, Lord Krishna in the above image(The Bhagavad Gita, Chapter IX, Verse #4) clarifies that God’s Existence is Unconditioned and God does not depend upon man and other living entities to maintain or sustain His own eternal, everlasting Existence.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY :
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : I WOULD BE VERY CAREFUL TO INTERPRET THE ABOVE STATEMENT AS MAN HAS NO ABILITY TO SEPARATE THE LIVING ENTITY FROM ITS LIVING PRINCIPLE.. THE UNION OF BODY AND SOUL IS NOT ACCOMPLISHED BY MAN’S MENTAL OR PHYSICAL ACTIONS AND MAN EXISTS WITH NO CONTROL OR ABILITY TO RULE OR GOVERN HIS OWN EXISTENCE AT ANY GIVEN INSTANT.

Indian tradition such as the above image of a statement from Kathoponishad(KATHA+UPANISHAD) may suggest the separation of human body from its indwelling Soul, Atman, or PURUSHA, I would ask my readers to be very careful to make an interpretation after recognizing the simple fact that man has no ability to separate the living entity from its Living Principle. Man may kill himself, man can kill other men and other forms of Life. But, the Union of Body and its Soul or ATMAN, or PURUSHA is not accomplished by man’s mental, or physical actions. Man exists with no Control, or ability to Rule or Govern his own existence at any given instant.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY :
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : MAN IS NOT THE CAUSE OF HIS OWN EXISTENCE. MAN MAY DESCRIBE HIS EXISTENCE AS THAT OF UNITY BETWEEN MAN AND PURUSHA, THE ETERNAL, COSMIC PERSON. MAN’S LIFE AND EXISTENCE HAS SEVERAL DIMENSIONS AND THE PRINCIPLE OF UNITY OR UNIFYING PRINCIPLE REPRESENTS THAT SINGLE, HARMONIOUS EFFECT THAT BRINGS STRUCTURAL, AND FUNCTIONAL UNITY BETWEEN VARIOUS INTERACTING PARTS.

Indian Tradition often describes the Identity between the Self, ATMAN, and PURUSHA, the Eternal Cosmic Person. For I recognize that man is not the Cause or Originating Seed of his own existence, man must carefully describe his existence as that of Unity between man, and PURUSHA, the eternal Cosmic Person. Man is the result of the harmonious effect that brings Structural, and Functional Unity between various interacting parts such as the trillions of individual, independent, living cells that constitute the human organism.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - AHAM BRAHMASMI - UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE COMPLEXITY OF BRAHMAN, THE PURUSHA, OR THE COSMIC PERSON CAN BE UNDERSTOOD BY VIEWING THIS IMAGE OF "VIRAT PURUSHA" IN WHICH EVERY ENERGY, FORCE, OR POWER IS DEPICTED WITH A DISTINCT PHYSICAL APPEARANCE AND FORM. MAN'S OWN PHYSICAL FORM AND APPEARANCE IS SIMPLY ONE AMONG THE NUMEROUS MANIFESTATIONS.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – AHAM BRAHMASMI – UNITY VS IDENTITY : THE COMPLEXITY OF BRAHMAN, THE PURUSHA, OR THE COSMIC PERSON CAN BE UNDERSTOOD BY VIEWING THIS IMAGE OF “VIRAT PURUSHA” IN WHICH EVERY ENERGY, FORCE, OR POWER IS DEPICTED WITH A DISTINCT PHYSICAL APPEARANCE AND FORM. MAN’S OWN PHYSICAL FORM AND APPEARANCE IS SIMPLY ONE AMONG THE NUMEROUS MANIFESTATIONS.

The Complexity of BRAHMAN, THE PURUSHA, OR THE COSMIC PERSON can be understood by viewing the above image of “VIRAT PURUSHA” in which every Energy, Force, or Power is depicted with a distinct physical appearance and form. Man’s own physical form and appearance is derived from this Universal Form and it simply represents one aspect among the numerous manifestations. Hence I submit that the “MAHAVAKYA” or the Great Statement that appears in the Brihadarnyaka Upanishad, “AHAM BRAHMASMI” should be interpreted with a pinch of Salt and in Reality, man may speak of his Unity and not of Identity with “VIRAT PURUSHA.”

Related Articles:

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE AND EXISTENCE

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE, IDENTITY, UNITY, AND EXISTENCE

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – LIGHT OF LIGHTS

 

WHOLE SPIRITUALITY – WHOLE UNITY

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE:

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE: THERE IS NO ESSENCE, NO IDENTITY, AND NO EXISTENCE OF MAN IF THERE IS NO UNITY BETWEEN THE THREE FUNDAMENTAL ORDERS CALLED 1. GOD, 2. SOUL, AND 3. MATTER. THE WORD "ASMI" STANDS FOR UNITY OR "EIKYATA."
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : THERE IS NO ESSENCE, THERE IS NO IDENTITY, AND THERE IS NO EXISTENCE OF MAN IF THERE IS NO UNITY BETWEEN THE THREE FUNDAMENTAL ORDERS CALLED 1. GOD, 2. SOUL, AND 3. MATTER. THE WORD “ASMI” STANDS FOR UNITY OR “EIKYATA.” FOR UNITY ALONE IS EVERLASTING AND IS ALWAYS PRESENT.

There is no ‘Essence’, there is no ‘Identity’, and there is no ‘Existence’ of man if there is no ‘Unity’ between the three fundamental orders called 1. God, 2. Soul, and 3. Matter. The Sanskrit word “ASMI” stands for ‘Unity’ or “EIKYATA” of the three fundamental orders. I want to invite my readers to join me in a discussion to interpret the terms Essence, Identity, Unity, and Existence that appear in the Indian Holy Scriptures and are variously interpreted by the major Indian Schools of Thought known as ‘Advaita'(Unqualified Non-Dualism), ‘Visistadvaita'(Qualified Non-Dualism), and ‘Dvaita'(Dualism).

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : ADI SHANKARA(c.788 - c.820?), EXPONENT OF ADVAITA OR NON-DUALISM AND THE THEORY OF MAYA OR ILLUSION.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : ADI SHANKARA(c.788 – c.820?), EXPONENT OF ADVAITA OR NON-DUALISM AND THE THEORY OF MAYA OR ILLUSION.

Adi Shankara held that the Divine Soul or Paramatma, and the individual soul or Jeevatma are identical or the same. He did not account for the existence of his human body. He was satisfied by claiming that his human body does not describe his true or real identity or essence. In his view, the material world including the appearance of man is deceptive for it is the product of Illusion.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : RAMANUJA(c.1017 - c.1137), EXPONENT OF QUALIFIED NON-DUALISM OR VISISTADVAITA. HE STATED HIS GOAL OF ACHIEVING SOUL'S UNION WITH A PERSONAL GOD THROUGH THE PRACTICE OF BHAKTI OR DEVOTION.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : RAMANUJA(c.1017 – c.1137), EXPONENT OF QUALIFIED NON-DUALISM OR VISISTADVAITA. HE STATED HIS GOAL OF ACHIEVING SOUL’S UNION WITH A PERSONAL GOD THROUGH THE PRACTICE OF BHAKTI OR DEVOTION.

Ramanuja held the view that God is modified by the orders of Matter and Soul. He stated that the Soul is modified by the body for the body has no separate existence from its Soul. Similarly, the Soul modifies God for it has no separate existence apart from God. His aim was to achieve Soul’s Union with a Personal God. He had not accounted for the existence of the living human being whose Body, and Soul have no separate existence without maintaining Unity with God.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE :  MADHVA(c. 1199 - c.1278), EXPONENT OF DVAITA OR DUALISM. HE REJECTED THE THEORY OF MAYA OR ILLUSION. HE CLAIMED THAT THERE IS A BASIC DIFFERENCE IN KIND BETWEEN GOD AND INDIVIDUAL SOULS. BUT, THE FACT OF DIFFERENCE OR DISTINCTION BETWEEN SOUL AND GOD WILL NOT ACCOUNT FOR MAN'S EXISTENCE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : MADHVA(c. 1199 – c.1278), EXPONENT OF DVAITA OR DUALISM. HE REJECTED THE THEORY OF MAYA OR ILLUSION. HE CLAIMED THAT THERE IS A BASIC DIFFERENCE IN KIND BETWEEN GOD AND INDIVIDUAL SOULS. BUT, THE FACT OF DIFFERENCE OR DISTINCTION BETWEEN SOUL AND GOD WILL NOT ACCOUNT FOR MAN’S EXISTENCE.

Madhva maintained that the simple fact that things are transient and ever changing does not mean that they are not real. He rejected Shankara’s Theory of Maya or Illusion but, at the same time he may have failed to acknowledge that the phenomenon of Illusion could be an important basis for the reality of man’s existence on the surface of a very fast spinning object like Earth. Man’s existence demands a blissful state of ignorance of the realities of motion of planet Earth while he synchronizes his existence taking the cues from Sun’s apparent motions across the sky that generate the experience of Sunrise and Sunset.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : AITAREYA UPANISHAD SUGGESTS THAT GOD IS THE CAUSE OF ALL KINDS OF EXISTENCE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : AITAREYA UPANISHAD SUGGESTS THAT GOD IS THE CAUSE OF ALL KINDS OF EXISTENCE.

Aitareya Upanishad claims that Consciousness is God or Brahman and it states that all existence is supported by Consciousness. To that extent, Consciousness can be defined as the awareness of the fact of one’s own Existence. In my view, the ‘Essence’ and ‘Identity’ of a thing can be described if, and only if the thing had a past ‘Existence’, or is existing in the present, or has the potential ability to exist in the future. Essence and Identity are predetermined by the requirement called ‘Existence’.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : THE TERM SOUL OR ATMAN HAS TO BE INTERPRETED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REALITY OF MAN'S EXISTENCE THAT NEEDS A BODY THAT IS DIFFERENTIATED, HAS A FORM AND APPEARANCE THAT HELPS MAN TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PERSON AS "I AM."
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : THE TERM SOUL OR ATMAN HAS TO BE INTERPRETED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REALITY OF MAN’S EXISTENCE THAT NEEDS A BODY THAT IS DIFFERENTIATED, HAS A FORM AND APPEARANCE THAT HELPS MAN TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PERSON AS “I AM.”

If the universe is accounted by three distinct or separate orders such as God(“BRAHMAN”), Soul(“ATMAN”), and Matter, man represents the single, harmonious effect called ‘Unity’ or “ASMI.” The terms such as Soul or “ATMAN”, or “JEEVATMA” may have to be used to explain the fact of ‘Unity’ and the manifestation called ‘Existence’ by which the thing called “I” gets its name, and form, becomes differentiated and can be recognized as “I AM.” I want to categorically claim that it will be of no help or use if terms such as Soul, Atman, and Jeevatma are narrowly defined to simply describe the Essence or Identity of man. I would like to direct this discussion towards the importance of ‘Unity’ or of the term “ASMI” which means always present, and ever existing. Thus ‘Existence’ becomes the defining feature or chief attribute of all things and without the fact or reality called ‘Existence’, no truth can be known, and things have no Identity or Essence.

MY IDENTITY – MY CONNECTION – REBBAPRAGADA – KASTURI – SARVEPALLI – CONNECTION:

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE: MY IDENTITY AND MY CONNECTION. I CALL MYSELF AS 'REBBAPRAGADA', BUT MY MOTHER BELONGS TO THE 'KASTURI' FAMILY. THIS IS A PICTURE OF KASTURI BROTHERS. FROM LEFT TO RIGHT, 1. DR. KASTURI NARAYANA MURTHY, M.D.(MY MATERNAL GRANDFATHER), 2. KASTURI. SESHAGIRI RAO( MARRIED TO MRS. RUKMINI, DAUGHTER OF DR. SARVEPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN), 3. KASTURI NARASIMHA RAO, 4. KASTURI KRISHNA RAO, 5. KASTURI SOMESHWARA RAO, 6. KASTURI RAMACHANDRA RAO, AND 7. KASTURI SIVAPRASADA RAO(FAR RIGHT).
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : MY IDENTITY AND MY CONNECTION. I CALL MYSELF AS ‘REBBAPRAGADA’, BUT MY MOTHER BELONGS TO THE ‘KASTURI’ FAMILY. THIS IS A PICTURE OF KASTURI BROTHERS. FROM LEFT TO RIGHT, 1. DR. KASTURI NARAYANA MURTHY, M.D.(MY MATERNAL GRANDFATHER), 2. KASTURI. SESHAGIRI RAO( MARRIED TO MRS. RUKMINI, DAUGHTER OF DR. SARVEPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN), 3. KASTURI NARASIMHA RAO, 4. KASTURI RAMACHANDRA RAO, 5. KASTURI SOMESHWARA RAO, 6. KASTURI KRISHNA RAO, AND 7. KASTURI SIVAPRASADA RAO(FAR RIGHT).

I am able to recognize and describe the ‘Identity’ of my maternal grandfather and his brothers for man always comes into existence with an original form, and gets a name for it can be clearly differentiated from all other men. My maternal grandfather’s younger brother was married to Mrs. Rukmini, daughter of Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan. This ‘Connection’ with Sarvepalli family is important for several reasons. Most of my readers of this blog post in India can easily identify the person who existed as Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan. He served as India’s first Vice President for two consecutive terms from 1952 to 1962, and served as India’s second President from  May 13, 1962 to May 13, 1967. Apart from being a statesman, Dr. Radhakrishnan is recognized as an Indian philosopher and had published 56 books. His most popular books are Indian Philosophy, two-volumes and The Principal Upanishads(1953).

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE: I RECOGNIZE THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON AND DESCRIBE HIM AS DR. SARVEPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN FOR MAN ALWAYS EXISTS WITH A DIFFERENTIATED FORM THAT IS GIVEN A PROPER NAME. THIS INDIAN PHILOSOPHER HAD INTERPRETED INDIAN SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN SEVERAL BOOKS THAT HE HAD AUTHORED. IN MY OPINION, HE DID NOT EMPHASIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF UNITY AND EXISTENCE IN HIS ANALYSIS OF THE MEANING OF GOD(BRAHMAN) AND SOUL(ATMAN OR JEEVATMA).
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : I RECOGNIZE THE IDENTITY OF THIS PERSON AND DESCRIBE HIM AS DR. SARVEPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN FOR MAN ALWAYS EXISTS WITH A DIFFERENTIATED FORM THAT IS GIVEN A PROPER NAME. THIS INDIAN PHILOSOPHER HAD INTERPRETED INDIAN SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN SEVERAL BOOKS THAT HE HAD AUTHORED. IN MY OPINION, HE DID NOT EMPHASIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF UNITY AND EXISTENCE IN HIS ANALYSIS OF THE MEANING OF GOD(BRAHMAN) AND SOUL(ATMAN OR JEEVATMA).

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE: DR SARVEPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN'S MOST POPULAR BOOK, INDIAN PHILOSOPHY MAY NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE MEANING OF MAN AS A SUBSTANCE AND FAILS TO DESCRIBE THE BASIS FOR MAN'S PHYSICAL REALITY IN THIS WORLD.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : DR SARVEPALLI RADHAKRISHNAN’S MOST POPULAR BOOK, INDIAN PHILOSOPHY MAY NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE MEANING OF MAN AS A SUBSTANCE AND FAILS TO DESCRIBE THE BASIS FOR MAN’S PHYSICAL REALITY IN THIS WORLD.

Man must understand what it is to be a Substance and what it is to Exist. The Indian traditional thoughts about man tend to divide man into two categories; 1. The Sentient Soul or the Conscious Being, and 2. The Insentient or the Physical Being that is unreal, constantly changing, perishable, and leads a mortal, transient, or evanescent existence.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : IN INDIAN TRADITION, IT IS OFTEN CLAIMED THAT THE HUMAN BODY IS PERISHABLE. THIS REQUIRES CLARIFICATION. CHEMICAL ELEMENTS ARE NOT PERISHABLE. IT IS THE FORM, AND APPEARANCE THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE NATURAL LAWS OF AGING AND DEATH.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : IN INDIAN TRADITION, IT IS OFTEN CLAIMED THAT THE HUMAN BODY IS PERISHABLE. THIS REQUIRES CLARIFICATION. CHEMICAL ELEMENTS ARE NOT PERISHABLE. IT IS THE FORM, AND APPEARANCE THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE NATURAL LAWS OF AGING AND DEATH.

The above statement that claims that the universe consists of a combination of the perishable and imperishable may need further clarification. It cannot be entirely true for the Chemical Elements that constitute Physical Matter cannot be destroyed or they are imperishable. Indian tradition describes man as “DEHA”, the physical body which is often compared to an empty vessel or house which is distinct, and separate from an entity called “DEHE”, or “DEHINAH”, the indweller, the embodied being, the tenant who occupies a place of dwelling or residence. The indweller of the physical human body is identified as Soul, Atman, or Jeevatma. This separation of Body/Mind, and its Soul into unrelated, or independent entities poses huge problems if I have to account for the physical reality of man’s Subjective and Objective Existence in the present world, the world that exists today as a self-evident truth.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : MAN'S EXISTENCE BEGINS WITH THE ACT CALLED CONCEPTION, THE UNION OF ORIGINATING PRINCIPLE OR SEED WITH EGG CELL. LORD KRISHNA CLAIMED THAT HE IS THE ORIGINATING SEED OF ALL TYPES OF EXISTENCE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : MAN’S EXISTENCE BEGINS WITH THE ACT CALLED CONCEPTION, THE UNION OF ORIGINATING PRINCIPLE OR SEED WITH EGG CELL. LORD KRISHNA CLAIMED THAT HE IS THE ORIGINATING SEED OF ALL TYPES OF EXISTENCE.

Man’s existence in the world begins with the act called ‘Conception’, the Union of the originating Principle or Seed with Egg Cell. In the Divine Song of The Bhagavad Gita, Chapter X, verse #39, Lord Krishna claims that He is the Originating Seed of all types of Existence and hence it must be understood that the fact of Existence requires an Original Cause, an Original Purpose, and an Originating Seed or Principle.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : MAN'S PHYSICAL EXISTENCE DEMANDS THE OPERATION OF AN ORIGINAL CAUSE, ORIGINAL PURPOSE, AND AN ORIGINATING SEED OR ORIGINATING PRINCIPLE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : MAN’S PHYSICAL EXISTENCE DEMANDS THE OPERATION OF AN ORIGINAL CAUSE, ORIGINAL PURPOSE, AND AN ORIGINATING SEED OR ORIGINATING PRINCIPLE.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : INDIAN HOLY SCRIPTURE "YAJUR VEDA" EXPLAINS THE CONNECTION BETWEEN EXISTENCE AND GOD(BRAHMAN).
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : INDIAN HOLY SCRIPTURE “YAJUR VEDA” EXPLAINS THE CONNECTION BETWEEN EXISTENCE AND GOD(BRAHMAN).

If God is viewed as the fosterer of the People, and if God is explained as the Originating Seed that accounts for man’s existence, God, and man’s physical body cannot be separated into separate parts.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : GOD(BRAHMAN) IS DEFINED AS THE FIRST CAUSE AND MAN'S EXISTENCE BECOMES THE SINGLE, HARMONIOUS EFFECT OF THAT ORIGINAL CAUSE THAT BRINGS UNITY BETWEEN THE THREE ORDERS CALLED GOD, SOUL, AND MATTER.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : GOD(BRAHMAN) IS DEFINED AS THE FIRST CAUSE AND MAN’S EXISTENCE BECOMES THE SINGLE, HARMONIOUS EFFECT OF THAT ORIGINAL CAUSE THAT BRINGS UNITY BETWEEN THE THREE ORDERS CALLED GOD, SOUL, AND MATTER.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : THE CAUSE, THE ORIGIN, THE ESSENCE, THE IDENTITY OF MAN HAVE A SINGLE PURPOSE FOR THERE IS ALWAYS UNITY IN THE BODY OF GOD WHO IS THE CONTROLLER.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : THE CAUSE, THE ORIGIN, THE ESSENCE, THE IDENTITY OF MAN HAVE A SINGLE PURPOSE FOR THERE IS ALWAYS UNITY IN THE BODY OF GOD WHO IS THE CONTROLLER.

For God(Brahman) is defined as the ‘First Cause’, man’s physical existence can be accounted as the single, harmonious “Effect” of that Original Cause that brings Unity between the three orders called God, Soul, and Matter.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : THIS FERTILIZED HUMAN OVUM OR EGG CELL BEGINS THE LIFE JOURNEY OF MAN. FROM THE BEGINNING, THERE IS UNITY BETWEEN, BODY, MIND, SOUL, AND GOD.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : THIS FERTILIZED HUMAN OVUM OR EGG CELL BEGINS THE LIFE JOURNEY OF MAN. FROM THE BEGINNING, THERE IS UNITY BETWEEN, BODY, MIND, SOUL, AND GOD.

Man’s physical existence begins with the stage called ‘ZYGOTE’, the fertilized human ovum or Egg Cell. This single cell grows, multiplies, and fully differentiates to develop all the tissues, organs, and organ systems that are parts of the human body. The human body is the “Effect” of an Originating Seed, and cannot be considered as an empty vessel or an empty dwelling that is apart from its resident or indweller.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : THE SINGLE FERTILIZED EGG CELL RAPIDLY DIVIDES AND DEVELOPS INTO AN EMBRYO THAT IMPLANTS ITSELF TO FURTHER SECURE ITS OWN EXISTENCE. THE EMBRYO IS CONSCIOUS OF THE FACT OR REALITY OF ITS OWN EXISTENCE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : THE SINGLE FERTILIZED EGG CELL RAPIDLY DIVIDES AND DEVELOPS INTO AN EMBRYO THAT IMPLANTS ITSELF INTO THE TISSUES OF MOTHER’S WOMB TO FURTHER SECURE ITS OWN EXISTENCE. THE EMBRYO IS CONSCIOUS OF THE FACT OR REALITY OF ITS OWN EXISTENCE.

The Single, Fertilized Egg Cell is conscious of its own existence and the developing Embryo on its sixth day of existence implants itself into the tissues of Mother’s womb to secure its own further existence.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE : THE NEWBORN BABY ALWAYS ARRIVES INTO THE WORLD WITH AN ORIGINAL, UNIQUE, DISTINCT, AND ONE OF ITS OWN KIND OF GENOME THAT HAS NEVER EXISTED IN THE PAST AND WILL NEVER EXIST AGAIN IN THE FUTURE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : THE NEWBORN BABY ALWAYS ARRIVES INTO THE WORLD WITH AN ORIGINAL, UNIQUE, DISTINCT, AND ONE OF ITS OWN KIND OF GENOME THAT HAS NEVER EXISTED IN THE PAST AND WILL NEVER EXIST AGAIN IN THE FUTURE.

The Newborn Baby always arrives into the world with an original, unique, distinct, and one of its own kind of genome that has never existed in the past, and will never exist again in the future. Every man who is born can only exist as an Individual with Individuality. Every man can be identified as a specific individual. The Law of Generation and Propagation is based on the principle of Creation that always causes the production of original objects that cannot be further duplicated. For man’s form, and appearance is always associated with differentiation, man’s identity can be easily described by attaching a proper name.

SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE - ESSENCE - IDENTITY - UNITY - EXISTENCE :  MAN'S EXISTENCE IS GOVERNED BY THE ETERNAL LAW OF AGING. MAN EXISTS WHILE HE PASSES THROUGH VARIOUS STAGES SUCH AS BOYHOOD, YOUTH, ADULTHOOD, AND OLDAGE THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGES IN FORM AND APPEARANCE.
SPIRITUALITY SCIENCE – ESSENCE – IDENTITY – UNITY – EXISTENCE : MAN’S EXISTENCE IS GOVERNED BY THE ETERNAL LAW OF AGING. MAN EXISTS WHILE HE PASSES THROUGH VARIOUS STAGES SUCH AS BOYHOOD, YOUTH, ADULTHOOD, AND OLD AGE THAT IS ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGES IN FORM AND APPEARANCE.

The word ‘Essence'(Latin. Essentia) describes that something which makes an entity what it is; intrinsic, fundamental nature, the most important quality of something to constitute its essential being. Essence is used to describe the inward nature of anything that is important to know its manifestations that can be physically observed. The word ‘Spirit’ or ‘Soul’ are often used to describe the ‘true’ or unchanging principle of man for man’s physical identity is not constant. The term ‘Identity'(Latin. idem) means the same(Sanskrit. idam). The Latin word identitas is related to Latin. essentitas and hence Identity and Essence are always related and they help to know the thing or entity that they describe.  Identity is about the condition or fact of being the same, or exactly alike, sameness or oneness. In modern times, identity is about the condition or fact of being a specific person or thing. Whereas the term ‘Individuality’ describes the sum of characteristics or qualities that set one person or thing apart from others. Individuality is the condition of the Individual who exists as a single, separate, or particular thing. For man, his Individuality sets him apart from all other men. The term ‘Existence'(Latin. existere, or exsistere) is about the act of existing, the state, or the fact, or the reality of actual being. Existence demands that the thing or entity must come forth, stand forth, to manifest, living, or being alive. The term ‘Unity’ implies the state of being united to make something complete in itself, the quality or fact of being a totality or ‘Whole’. Unity is used to signify a Complex, the product of a Union of related parts, or an arrangement of parts that will produce a single, harmonious effect. Unity is thus concerned about the ‘Effect’ it generates while a thing could be made up of diverse elements or individuals. For human body is constituted by trillions of Individual, and Independent Living Units called Cells, the ‘Effect’ called ‘Unity’ is of fundamental importance to know man’s ‘Essence’, or ‘Identity’ that is manifested by his ‘Existence.

Related Articles:

1. Spiritualism – The New Advaita Theory of Non-Dualism 

2. Spiritualism – Visistadvaita – Modified Non-Dualism

3. Spiritualism and Fundamental Dualism

 4. Spiritualism – The Unity of Man in Body Mind and Soul