TIBET AWARENESS – POTALA PALACE, LHASA, TIBET

Posted on Updated on

TIBET AWARENESS – POTALA PALACE, LHASA, TIBET

TIBET AWARENESS - POTALA PALACE, LHASA, TIBET. SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE ACKNOWLEDGES THE DALAI LAMA AS THE RULER OF TIBET.
TIBET AWARENESS – POTALA PALACE, LHASA, TIBET. SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE ACKNOWLEDGES THE DALAI LAMA AS THE RULER OF TIBET.

At Special Frontier Force, I host ‘The Living Tibetan Spirits’ to promote ‘Tibet Awareness’. Special Frontier Force acknowledges The Dalai Lama as the Supreme, Independent, Sovereign Authority, and Ruler of Tibet.

Tibet Awareness, Potala Palace, Lhasa,  Symbol of Tibet's Sovereignty.
Tibet Awareness, Potala Palace, Lhasa, Symbol of Tibet’s Sovereignty.

The Great 5th Dalai Lama(1617 – 1682) founded the Ganden Phodrang Government of Tibet. Potala Palace was built-in Lhasa during the reign of the Great 5th Dalai Lama. The term ‘Sovereign’ is used to describe an entity that is above, superior to all others, Chief, greatest, Supreme in Power, Rank or Authority. Independence of Tibetan people is kept for much of its history as Tibet remained free of direct foreign control even while it came under foreign conquests by Mongol or Yunan Dynasty(1279 – 1368) and Qing, Ch’ing, or Manchu Dynasty(1644 – 1911). During the reign of the Great 13th Dalai Lama, Tibet declared full independence on February 13, 1913. Sovereign, Independent Tibet signed Mc Mahon Treaty in 1914 to come to an understanding about Tibet’s southern border with India. Tibet has not signed any treaty and has not concluded any agreement about border between Tibet and People’s Republic of China. The Seventeen-Point Plan or 17-Point Agreement that describe ‘measures for peaceful Liberation of Tibet’ do not compromise the power and authority of the Ganden Phodrang Government of Tibet to control Tibetan Affairs.

Potala Palace is built before the construction of The White House in Washington DC during presidency of George Washington. John Adams, the second President of the United States in 1797 was first to live there. Millions of tourists from Red China currently visit occupied Tibet and Potala Palace has become a place of tourist attraction for the 14th Dalai Lama lives in exile since March 1959. The geopolitical interests of all other independent, free, sovereign nations of this world are best served by defeat of Red China and eviction of Red China’s occupying forces from Tibet.

Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162, USA
SPECIALFRONTIERFORCE.ESTABLISHMENT22

image
The Spirits of Special Frontier ForceAt Special Frontier Force, I host ‘The Living Tibetan Spirits’ to promote Tibet Awareness.
View on www.facebook.com
  • nzherald.co.nz
  • The New Zealand Herald

adams2.png

CHRISTOPHER ADAMS

@chrisadamsNZ

The Business Herald’s markets and banking reporter.

LEGACY OF DALAI LAMA FADES IN NEW TIBET

5:00 AM Saturday Aug 22, 2015

Former leader runs an exile government, but at home China is in control and tourists roam the palace.

The Dalai Lama's Potala Palace is now an attraction for Chinese tourists and its former resident lives in exile in India. Photo / AP

The Dalai Lama’s Potala Palace is now an attraction for Chinese tourists and its former resident lives in exile in India. Photo / AP
It’s hard not to feel a sense of melancholy while passing through the Dalai Lama’s former quarters in Lhasa’s Potala Palace.

In one room visitors view the throne on which Tibet’s one-time ruler sat while addressing officials.
Further on – reached through a network of narrow passageways – is his bedroom, the first of the palace’s 1000 rooms to catch the winter sun.

But the 14th and current Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, no longer walks these corridors.
He fled south to India, where he established a government in exile, during the Tibetan uprising of 1959.

Nine years earlier, the army of the newly formed People’s Republic of China crossed the upper reaches of the Yangtze River and took control of Tibet.
The region was formally incorporated into the communist state in 1951.

Today, the 80-year-old Dalai Lama remains in his Indian exile and an army of a different kind – hordes of Chinese tourists – file daily through his old quarters.
Security guards in orange jumpsuits keep them in check, while red-robed monks stare at their smartphones or murmur prayers, seemingly oblivious to the crush of Chinese tourism surrounding them.

While access to Tibet is severely restricted for foreign journalists, the Herald was able to join an official media tour to Lhasa, the regional capital, this month.
It gave a controlled yet intriguing glimpse into life in a region that, like the rest of China, is forging ahead in the quest for development.

Chinese rule of Tibet rests on a platform of economic growth and substantial state subsidies provided to the indigenous population.
Hulking tower blocks are emerging from the barren earth on Lhasa’s western outskirts as investment pours in from the central government and wealthier, eastern provinces.

The region’s economy grew by 12 per cent last year, well ahead of the 7.4 per cent national rate.
Access to the remote Himalayan region has been improved.

A high-altitude railway line linking Tibet to the rest of China opened in 2006 and carried 7.5 million passengers, more than twice the region’s population, in 2013.
And in 2011 China’s then Vice-President, Xi Jinping, cut the ribbon on a 38km, four-lane highway running from Lhasa to the city’s Gongkar airport. It’s a feat of engineering, with numerous tunnels beneath the jagged mountains on the route.

“The driving force of the Tibetan economy is basically the investment drive, rather than trading,” said Yang Tao, of Beijing’s China Tibetology Research Centre.
Despite the development, China’s control of Tibet remains a sensitive issue. Activists accuse Beijing of suppressing Tibetans’ cultural and religious freedoms amid a tide of Han Chinese migration into the region from other parts of the country.

Fatal anti-Chinese protests broke out in Tibet before the 2008 Beijing Olympics, and the Save Tibet organisation claims 142 Tibetans have self-immolated in China since 2009 in protest at Chinese rule of the region.

But China says its sovereignty over Tibet stretches back for centuries and the Tibetans were “liberated” from slavery and serfdom in 1951.
The extent of Han migration is evident in Lhasa, where Mandarin language dominates the signs above the shops, largely run by Han Chinese, that line the city’s bustling streets.

Tibetan script is required, by law, to also appear. But more often than not, it is secondary to much larger Mandarin characters.
The Chinese Government says the region’s population of more than three million remains more than 90 per cent Tibetan.

Today, the 80-year-old Dalai Lama remains in his Indian exile and an army of a different kind - hordes of Chinese tourists - file daily through his old quarters. Photo / AP

Today, the 80-year-old Dalai Lama remains in his Indian exile and an army of a different kind – hordes of Chinese tourists – file daily through his old quarters. Photo / AP Jigme Wangtso, an ethnic Tibetan and director of Tibet’s Government Information Office, said there was a misconception that the Government initiated Han migration to Tibet.

“It is normal and natural for people to migrate,” he said, adding that migration was a two-way street, as large numbers of Tibetans had migrated to Chinese provinces.
But international travel remains challenging for Tibetans who, according to Human Rights Watch, can face a five-year wait for passports.

Asked about the obvious presence of large numbers of migrants in Lhasa, Jigme suggested Tibetans were being confused with Han.
“Don’t judge all as being Han,” he said. “Am I Han or Tibetan? I don’t wear Tibetan costume.”

He said he saw no proof of a separatist movement existing in Tibet today.
He said most Tibetans did not have “any special attachment” to the exiled Dalai Lama and instead appreciated the improvements in living standards, in areas such as health and education, which China’s “preferential policies” had brought to Tibet.

“People are happy with the system,” he said. “He [the Dalai Lama] brought nothing for me.”
We do not see any obvious signs of discontent in Lhasa.

But on our first day in the city, we see a convoy of more than 40 trucks filled with paramilitary officers in full riot gear, accompanied by tanks and water cannon vehicles.
Our minders say the procession is “practice” for next month’s 50th anniversary of the Tibet Autonomous Region’s establishment.

In Lhasa’s Zhaxi community we are taken to the home of Tibetan local Communist Party chief Suolang Bazhu.
His living room wall is adorned with photographs of party leaders, past and present, alongside a mural of the Potala Palace.
Suolang, 72, says he has seen huge changes in Lhasa under Chinese rule.

“Ordinary people are usually very thankful for these changes because they lifted us from poverty,” he says. “We used to have nothing … but now we have everything.”
State subsidies to Tibet were increased after the 2008 unrest, and in 2010 exceeded 100 per cent of the region’s gross domestic product for the first time, according to Andrew Fischer, of the Institute for Social Sciences in The Hague.

A “comfortable housing” programme has reportedly given millions of rural Tibetans new homes.
Our group is taken to visit one relocation village, Dekyi, near Gongkar airport. It is part of the nationwide “New Socialist Countryside” project, which began in 2006.
It aims to help the country’s more than 600 million-strong rural population catch up, economically, with those living in China’s booming cities.

In Dekyi, we are ushered into the home of Dawa, a 55-year-old farmer (like many Tibetans he has only one name).
Dawa’s family was the first to move into the village, in early 2013 after their previous home was flooded.
He says he received a 115,000 yuan ($27,195) subsidy to help build his new house, plus another 20,000 yuan to construct a yak stable.

The rights group Free Tibet says Tibetans often suffer in new housing colonies and towns because they don’t have the skills to compete for jobs in a different environment.
There have also been accusations that many rural Tibetans have been forced to relocate.

But Dawa doesn’t have any complaints, or at least none that he will share with us.
He says it was his decision to make the move, which has enabled him to increase his agricultural production
“It would be impossible for me to have such a lifestyle without the subsidy of the Government,” he says.

NZ HERALD
© Copyright 2015, NZME. Publishing Limited

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s