Repeal PRWORA Project – Safeguard Employee Retirement Income Security
Excerpt: The “Repeal PRWORA Project” advocates for the repeal of Public Law 104-193, also known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) signed by US President Bill Clinton in 1996. The organizers argue that this law reintroduced varieties of slavery, including involuntary servitude and forced labor, by unfairly denying retirement income benefits to non-citizen taxpayers who cannot provide proof of lawful residency. Critics claim this law infringes on the constitutional rights of these workers, violating principles of equal treatment, protection, and justice under law. They demand for a strict adherence to the natural law principles abolishing any form of slavery.
THE REPEAL MOVEMENT – PROVIDE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY
WHERE IS PROTECTION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY RETIREMENT INCOME INSURANCE PLAN?
EXTEND ERISA PROTECTION TO SOCIAL SECURITY OLD AGE INSURANCE PLANS
EQUAL TREATMENT OF ALL US TAXPAYERS FOR ALL EMPLOYMENT RELATED BENEFITS
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO ALL US TAXPAYERS
ERISA PROTECTION MUST COVER INSURANCE BENEFIT PLANS OF THE US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
THE REPEAL – THE GREAT AWAKENING TO REVOKE SLAVERY IN MODERN ECONOMIC TIMES
On August 22, 1996, US President Bill Clinton (Democrat) signed into Law that reintroduced Slavery, Involuntary Servitude, Serfdom and Forced Labor in the pretext of making ‘A New Beginning’. Welfare Reform Act or Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) is unjust and unfair for it violates Constitutional Law that defends natural rights of all people living in United States. All US taxpayers must be treated as equals for receiving retirement income benefits for which they paid taxes.
GIVING VOICE TO A HIDDEN PROBLEM – DEFEND THE ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE OF SENIOR ALIEN TAXPAYERS
NATURAL LAW vs MAN MADE LAW – SLAVERY IS CONTEMPT OF NATURAL LAW
US CONGRESS SLAVE DRIVER – THE AMENDED SOCIAL SECURITY ACT FUNDAMENTALLY VIOLATES PRINCIPLES SHARED BY 43 WORDS OF THE 13th AMENDMENT.
My readers should not be surprised if I describe the US Congress as “Slave Driver.” The reason for my claim is based on PRWORA enacted by US Congress in 1996 that amended the US Social Security Act of 1935. This legal provision enacted by the Congress is incorporated as Section 202(y) of the Social Security Act. It mandates that no Retirement Income benefits shall be payable to registered alien (non-citizen) taxpayers in the United States without showing proof of lawful residency as determined by the Attorney General. In my view, such proof must not be demanded if the worker has paid all taxes and attained the full retirement age as determined by the law while laboring on the US soil.
Social Security Act, Section 202(y) violates the principle enshrined in those 43 words called the 13th Amendment. This 1996 amendment to the Social Security Act is fundamentally flawed for it is unconstitutional. It takes away property rights (earnings, wages and retirement income) of individuals who paid Federal, State, Local, Social Security and Medicare Taxes working in this country to attain the full retirement age.
The Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Abraham Lincoln (Republican) in September 1862 came into effect on January 01, 1863 freeing slaves in all territory still at War with the Union. These slaves were not citizens of the Land and had no political rights of their own. In Law, Servitude or Slavery refers to the burden imposed upon property of a person by a specified right another has in its use. Servitude involves labor in which the person who performs labor has no right to his earnings from labor.
The amended Social Security Act unconstitutionally gives power to the Social Security Administration to withhold property (wages, earnings, monthly retirement income benefits) of alien workers who are not convicted by any US Court of Law. In my analysis, Social Security Act of 1935 amended in 1996 does not uphold Constitution as the Supreme Law of this Land.
I ask my readers to make the distinction between Social Security Tax and Monthly Retirement Benefit. The first represents tax paid to government and the second represents earning or wage entitled to the retired person to provide income and security during old age.
EQUAL PROTECTIONS FOR WORK AND RETIREMENT TO ALL THE US TAXPAYERS
THE REPEAL MOVEMENT TO GIVE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS TO THE TAXPAYING US WORKERS.
The US Social Security Administration must either obtain criminal conviction or designate the US taxpayer as “SLAVE” to withhold payment of monthly retirement income benefit duly approved by the insurance plan.
Whole Dude - Whole Concept 