RED CHINA – RED ALERT – MILITARY DOMINANCE

Red China’s military expansionism is a security threat for Red China is guilty of aggression. Red China made an unprovoked attack on Tibet in October 1950 and on India during October-November 1962. Red China is destructively hostile to her immediate neighbors. Red China uses her military power to threaten, to harm, to cause pain, to give misery, to bring misfortune, and to create trouble in the lives of her weak neighbors. Red China is ‘Evil-Hearted’, ‘Evil-Minded’, Evildoer. Red China is ‘The Evil One’ because of her malicious disposition. Red China’s military preparedness aims to project her power through offensive warfare and hence she poses an imminent danger to peace and security of all other nations.
Rudranarasimham Rebbapragada
Ann Arbor, MI 48104-4162, USA
SPECIAL FRONTIER FORCE.ESTABLISHMENT22
CHINA AIMS TO CHALLENGE U.S. AIR DOMINANCE: PENTAGON
BY DAVID ALEXANDER

© REUTERS/U.S. Navy/Handout A Chinese J-11 fighter jet is seen flying near a U.S. Navy P-8 Poseidon east of China’s Hainan Island
China is mounting a serious effort to challenge U.S. military superiority in air and space, forcing the Pentagon to seek new technologies and systems to stay ahead of its rapidly developing rival, Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work said on Monday.
The Pentagon’s chief operating officer, speaking to a group of military and civilian aerospace experts, said China was “quickly closing the technological gaps,” developing radar-evading aircraft, advanced reconnaissance planes, sophisticated missiles and top-notch electronic warfare equipment.
While hoping for a constructive relationship with China, the Pentagon “cannot overlook the competitive aspects of our relationship, especially in the realm of military capabilities, an area in which China continues to improve at a very impressive rate,” he said.
China’s state-run news agency Xinhua late on Monday cited Xu Qiliang, a vice chairman of the powerful Central Military Commission, as saying China must innovate even more.
“Our military’s equipment construction is shifting from catch-up research to independent innovations,” Xu said.
Work made his remarks to the inaugural conference of the China Aerospace Studies Initiative, a partnership of the U.S. Air Force and the RAND Corporation think tank. The initiative aims to boost U.S. research on China’s aerospace ambitions.
The conference came as hundreds of Chinese officials were in Washington for the three-day U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, wide-ranging talks that look at areas of mutual cooperation and address points of friction.
Asked about the timing of the military conference, Work said U.S. and Chinese leaders both see the bilateral relationship as one in which there are “measures of cooperation and measures of competition.”
“We’re hoping over time that the cooperative aspects outweigh competitive aspects,” Work added. “As the Department of Defense, we’re the hedge force. … We say, ‘Look, here are capabilities that we see that the Chinese are developing and it’s important for us to be able to counter those.”
Work, citing a Harvard study on rising powers confronting established powers, told the conference that interactions between the two often result in war. As a result, the Defense Department must “hedge against this international competition turning more heated.”
The United States has generally felt the best hedge is a strong nuclear and conventional deterrence capable of overmatching any rival, he added.
Work said the United States has relied on technological superiority for the past 25 years, but now “the margin of technological superiority upon which we have become so accustomed … is steadily eroding.”
To adjust, he said, the Pentagon is working to develop new technologies to maintain its edge and lower the cost of responding to attacks. Directed energy weapons, for example, might be able to shoot down missiles that cost a hundred times the price of a jolt of energy.
(Additional reporting by Ben Blanchard in BEIJING; Editing by Diane Craft and Alan Raybould)